Updates to the economic criteria spreadsheet

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 1:30:50 PM8/19/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Hello, economic criteria team.  I've returned to the office and various crises and am catching up, but Eric is coping with serious family health issues and must de-emphasize the national sustainable ag standard work for now.  

Attached is a version of the economic criteria table that attempts to address Jesse's comments from July, the latest I've seen.  

In preparation for the quarterly Standards Committee call, which I understand is this coming Thursday, could you please send me any edits or progress you have made by COB Monday, 8/22? I will compile what I receive into one document as far as possible and redistribute it to you on Tuesday or early Wednesday.  

Please let me know if you would like to represent the Econ subcommittee on the SC call, especially if you are a member of the Standards Committee.  Otherwise I will try to be available to present our table and update the SC on our status.  Best,

Don

   
_________________________________
Don Hodge  |  Agriculture Program
Region 9  |  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
75 Hawthorne Street  (CED-1)  |  San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 972-3240  |  hodg...@epa.gov
table_criteria development_Econ_110819.xlsx

jesse.s...@mchsi.com

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 1:35:26 PM8/19/11
to scs001economic criteria
Thank you for stepping in Don- I've been wondering where things stood and will have my edits to you by Monday.

Jesse
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sustainable Ag Standard Economic Sustainability Criteria Development Subcommittee" group.
To post to this group, send email to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_cr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scs001economic_criteria?hl=en.


--


Jennifer Trucks

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 1:53:51 PM8/19/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com

Next Monday August 29th. Thanks all. Jennifer

Jennifer Trucks

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 1:56:11 PM8/19/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com

Please have your edits, rows or comments into Don by  (I meant) Monday August 22nd.  Thanks Jennifer

 


Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 12:35 PM
To: scs001economic criteria

Beginning Farmers

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 7:27:52 AM8/20/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for this Don.

I think it looks pretty good. My only question/suggestion at this point is whether value-added products are assumed to be included in 'count of marketing practices' or 'count of distinct products'. Might it be worthwhile to separate this out, or do you think it's accounted for within the current structure? I haven't been participating as actively as others because my dissertation has had to take priority for the time being, so I'm willing to defer to subcommittee consensus on this issue if it has been established.

Thanks again,
Taylor
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sustainable Ag Standard Economic Sustainability Criteria Development Subcommittee" group.
To post to this group, send email to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_cr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scs001economic_criteria?hl=en.



--
Taylor Reid
Doctoral Candidate in Community Food & Agriculture, Michigan State University
Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance
Founder & Administrator BeginningFarmers.org
 


Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 10:54:11 AM8/20/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Hi, Taylor et al.,

I intended "count of distinct products" to capture value-added products
(jam from fruit, cheese from milk, etc.); examples for "count of
marketing practices" would be farm stand, CSA, farmers' market, local
aggregator/food hub, packer/distributor, large corporate buyer (or some
value-free label), etc. Does that clarify?

What's the dissertation on? All the best with that.

Don




Re: Updates to the economic criteria spreadsheet


Beginning Farmers
to:
scs001economic_criteria
08/20/2011 04:27
AM




Sent by:
scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Please respond to scs001economic_criteria


Thanks for this Don.

Thanks again,
Taylor

Don

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_criteria
+unsub...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/scs001economic_criteria?hl=en.

--
Taylor Reid
Doctoral Candidate in Community Food & Agriculture, Michigan State
University
Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance
Founder & Administrator BeginningFarmers.org

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Sustainable Ag Standard Economic Sustainability Criteria
Development Subcommittee" group.
To post to this group, send email to
scs001econo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_criteria
+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

jesse.s...@mchsi.com

unread,
Aug 22, 2011, 11:48:47 PM8/22/11
to scs001economic criteria
Hi Don-

I reviewed the spreadsheet and have no further changes to recommend. I think you captured the discussion we had during the last call and that the points I had concerns about have been addressed.

Thanks for your work.

Jesse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hodge Don" <Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov>
To: "scs001economic criteria" <scs001econo...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 12:30:50 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central

Subject: Updates to the economic criteria spreadsheet

Hello, economic criteria team. I've returned to the office and various crises and am catching up, but Eric is coping with serious family health issues and must de-emphasize the national sustainable ag standard work for now.

Attached is a version of the economic criteria table that attempts to address Jesse's comments from July, the latest I've seen.

In preparation for the quarterly Standards Committee call, which I understand is this coming Thursday, could you please send me any edits or progress you have made by COB Monday, 8/22 ? I will compile what I receive into one document as far as possible and redistribute it to you on Tuesday or early Wednesday.

Please let me know if you would like to represent the Econ subcommittee on the SC call, especially if you are a member of the Standards Committee. Otherwise I will try to be available to present our table and update the SC on our status. Best,

Don


_________________________________
Don Hodge | Agriculture Program
Region 9 | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
75 Hawthorne Street (CED-1) | San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 972-3240 | hodg...@epa.gov

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sustainable Ag Standard Economic Sustainability Criteria Development Subcommittee" group.
To post to this group, send email to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_cr...@googlegroups.com.

Ryan Rivard

unread,
Aug 23, 2011, 4:44:21 PM8/23/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Hey Don...all, 

Sorry I have not gotten back sooner.  Some things again that I think would be important are: land lease terms to be longer than at least 3 years but maybe in the 4-5yr range, this provides incentives for the farm tenant to share the interest in the farming and reassure the farmer that they will benefit from longer term sustainability development to land, if for instance they transition to organic which takes 3 years. 

Maybe also in the investment lease terms we could provide easier avenues for the farm tenants to purchase the land at the end of the term if the farm is going to be sold to some other party to ensure that the farm stays sustainable, like offering a right-of-first-refsual to farm tenants. 

Lastly, although there should be some agreed farming practices included in the lease, this may be more difficult to implement a sustainability threshold practice per se.  So some options could be the use of non-gmo seeds which cannot germinate after one rotation and thus are not sustainable, and maybe limited uses of pesticide/herbicide, but maybe provide incentives to the farmers for cost sharing to implement such practices so that the farmer isn't bearing the entire cost/risk, etc.

Additionally, there is an individual that may have some interesting input on topics/criteria such as ecosystem service market participation.  His name is  Jay Truty and he is the president of Ecosystem Capital, LLC, which focuses on exactly this... I will be contacting him this week for some further info.

Thanks all.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scs001economic_cr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scs001economic_criteria?hl=en.




--
Ryan Rivard
Iroquois Valley Farms, LLC




_________________________
IMPORTANT: This e-mail message is not intended to be binding or relied upon and, without limitation on the foregoing, shall not create, waive or modify any right, obligation or liability, or be construed to contain or be an electronic signature, to constitute a notice, approval, waiver or election, or to form, modify, amend or terminate any contract. The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended only for the named addressee(s). This message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it.
Thank you.


Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov

unread,
Aug 24, 2011, 11:08:52 AM8/24/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Ryan, Taylor, et al.,

I inserted a row 33 into the spreadsheet to capture the ownership succession criterion and I specified the recommended minimum lease term in row 30.  I tried to capture capture your third point in row 35 on good agricultural practices.   I also edited the indicator descriptions in rows 17 and 19 to address Taylor's comment.  

I hope that will do for the Thursday meeting.  I expect we'll have further opportunities to discuss and revise.  Thanks for taking the time to review and comment.  Regards,

Don


_________________________________


  Don Hodge  |  Agriculture Program
  Region 9  |  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  75 Hawthorne Street  (AIR-6)  |  San Francisco, CA 94105
  (415) 972-3240  |  hodg...@epa.gov
table_criteria development_Econ_110823.xlsx

jesse.s...@mchsi.com

unread,
Aug 24, 2011, 11:12:33 AM8/24/11
to scs001economic criteria
Thank you for your work Don! Really appreciate it.


Jesse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hodge Don" <Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov>
To: "scs001economic criteria" <scs001econo...@googlegroups.com>

Ryan Rivard

unread,
Aug 24, 2011, 11:51:27 AM8/24/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Don.

Ryan Rivard

unread,
Aug 24, 2011, 4:28:11 PM8/24/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
So is the meeting tomorrow at noon?

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:08 AM, <Hodg...@epamail.epa.gov> wrote:

Jennifer Trucks

unread,
Aug 24, 2011, 4:31:22 PM8/24/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
11-1pm Central

Ryan Rivard

unread,
Aug 25, 2011, 12:15:58 PM8/25/11
to scs001econo...@googlegroups.com
Hello Jennifer,

Was there a previous link sent out for the online meeting today?  I cannot seem to find one.

Thanks
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages