Seeking participants for a panel on strategic interventions for sustainable consumption

689 views
Skip to first unread message

michael....@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 3:00:01 AMJun 19
to sco...@googlegroups.com

Dear Colleagues,

 

Apologies for intruding into your Inbox, and for cross-postings. 

 

RIFS, the Research Institute for Sustainability, based in Potsdam, is hosting a conference from 3 - 5 December 2025 on “Tough Conversations in Tough Times.”  One strand of the meetings will focus on consumption, especially on notions of sustainable consumption, sufficiency, and consumption corridors as they connect to issues of social justice and environmental degradation.  Public conversation about how much is enough, the limitations of green growth, and the links between happiness, security and limits has always been difficult, though perhaps never so much as now, during this current moment of political upheaval and economic instability.  How might scholars, practitioners, and advocates of sustainable consumption and linked concepts productively navigate these challenging times, in support of human and non-human flourishing?

 

The conference will feature roundtables, panels, and informal conversations on several “tough conversations,” including a panel on “strategic springboards for consumption corridors,” which I am organizing.   I’ve attached a description of the panel to this email and reprint it below.  I’m on the hunt for potential participants.  If this is something that interests you, or if you know of someone who might be interested, please drop me a note off-list. 

 

Much appreciated, and many thanks,

Michael

 

Michael F MANIATES 

 

Forthcoming: The Living-Green Myth: The Promise and Limits of Lifestyle Environmentalism, Polity Press, 2025

Now available open access:  Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life Within Sustainable Limits, Routledge, 2021

 

Yale-NUS College, Singapore | Professor of Social Sciences, Environmental Studies | 

Inaugural Head of Environmental Studies (2013 – 2022, 2024) | Distinguished Teaching Award - 2021 | 

Convener, gep-ed (Environmental Studies Section, International Studies Association) | 

 

Web: http://michaelmaniates.com |

Senior Visiting Professor of Environmental Studies, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH, 2011 – 2013 |

Professor of Environmental Science and Political Science, Allegheny College, Meadville, PA, 1993 – 2013 |

BS (University of California), MA, PhD (Energy and Resources, University of California) |

 

Most people are eagerly groping for some medium, some way in

which they can bridge the gap between their morals and their practices.
--Saul Alinsk
y

 

 

For the RIFS Conference “Tough Conversations in Tough Times”

3 - 5 December 2025

Michael Maniates     michael....@gmail.com

 

Strategic Springboards for Consumption Corridors

 

Consumption corridors, which Fuchs et al. (2021) describe as “a space between minimum consumption standards that provide every individual with the ability to live a good life, and maximum consumption standards that keep individuals from consuming in quantities or ways that hurt others’ chances to do the same,” are a necessary and contentious component of any path to a better future.  Necessary because of the social, ethical, and ecological violence arising from deeply asymmetrical and continuously expanding levels of consumption.  And contentious because of resistance by vested interests that benefit from an economic logic of expansion and appropriation, supported by powerful narratives about the imperatives of growth and the efficacy of technological innovation.

 

Efforts to overcome political and social opposition to consumption corridors will need to be strategically incremental, focusing on places and ways in which small wins and shrewd policy sequencing (e.g. Meckling et al. 2017) create positive feedback loops of expanding political support and policy implementation, echoing Levin et al.’s 2012 model of “applied forward reasoning.”  No preliminary reconnaissance of these possible “places and ways” – where elements of consumption corridors are already supported, accepted, or pursued – yet exists in the scientific literature.  This panel is conceived as a first step toward remedying this deficiency. 

 

Consumption corridors as currently theorized do not yet exist.  But their precursors do, in the form of existing or emerging norms, participatory governance practices, specific consumption-focused policies and practices, larger institutional forms, and the like.  Identifying these precursors, understanding their evolution and operation, and strategizing about appropriate interventions (research, advocacy, organizing, storytelling, etc.) to escalate their salience and power could produce potent springboards for robust corridors while dodging unnecessary political struggle.

 

Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Di Giulio, A., Maniates, M., Lorek, S., & Graf, A. (2021). Consumption corridors: Living a good life within sustainable limits.  Routledge

 

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy sciences45(2), 123-152.

 

Meckling, J., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy2(12), 918-922.

 

RIFS - StrategicSpringboards.pdf

Philip Vergragt

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 9:41:23 AMJun 19
to michael....@gmail.com, sco...@googlegroups.com

Dear Michael,

Thank you for organizing this event. I very much like the idea of “strategic interventions”.

With all due respect, I think that the vision of “consumption corridors” is not comprehensive enough. I think that for instance the concept of “Doughnut Economy”, which also encompasses the notion of upper and lower boundaries, is not only a much more appealing metaphor, but also better acknowledges the contextual issues like the economic system, power relationships, the dominant culture of growth, competition and consumerism, the existing infrastructure, etc. I would suggest including other metaphors and approaches in this workshop.

I wish you all the best,

Philip

--
* Subscribe to this mailing list: scorai+s...@googlegroups.com
* SCORAI website: https://scorai.net
* Subscribe to the SCORAI newsletter: https://scorai.net/join
* Submit an item to the next newsletter: newsl...@scorai.net
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SCORAI" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scorai+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scorai/01e101dbe0e7%24bf6758d0%243e360a70%24%40gmail.com.

Heyman, Josiah M

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 12:24:15 PMJun 19
to pver...@outlook.com, michael....@gmail.com, sco...@googlegroups.com

Just curious: who has discussed this idea of a doughnut economy, either literally (that word) or generally the concept?

Many thanks,

Joe

 

From: sco...@googlegroups.com <sco...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Philip Vergragt <pver...@outlook.com>
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2025 at 7:41
AM
To: michael....@gmail.com <michael....@gmail.com>, sco...@googlegroups.com <sco...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [SCORAI] Seeking participants for a panel on strategic interventions for sustainable consumption

EXTERNAL EMAIL: This e-mail is from a sender outside of the UTEP system. Please forward suspicious emails by using the report button in Outlook or emailing secu...@utep.edu

Rees, William E.

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 12:32:51 PMJun 19
to pver...@outlook.com, michael....@gmail.com, sco...@googlegroups.com, jmhe...@utep.edu

Kate Raworth is the Guru of doughnut economics.  https://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/ 



aka

William E Rees, PhD, FRSC

Professor Emeritus

UBC Faculty of Applied Science


"The ecologically necessary is politically infeasible, but the politically feasible is ecologically ineffective, when not catastrophic."


From: sco...@googlegroups.com <sco...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Heyman, Josiah M <jmhe...@utep.edu>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:24:08 AM
To: pver...@outlook.com; michael....@gmail.com; sco...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SCORAI] Seeking participants for a panel on strategic interventions for sustainable consumption
 
[CAUTION: Non-UBC Email]

Ilan Kelman

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 12:42:51 PMJun 19
to sco...@googlegroups.com
"Doughnut economics" is typically attributed to Raworth from a 2012 Oxfam paper https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en_5.pdf

It appeared in a 2010 book https://www.javygalindo.com/the-power-of-thinking-differently which seems to be in the context of referring literally to selling doughnuts. If anyone has any earlier mentions, they would be of interest.

The current rendition has a strong basis in the problematic "planetary boundaries" framework, with critiques from many others summarised in:


Joe Zammit-Lucia

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 2:44:50 PMJun 19
to Ilan Kelman, sco...@googlegroups.com
Dear Ilan,

Thanks for the useful links. 

I would add a couple more things. 

Raworth talks about Doughnut Economics. Yet this is not about economics, it’s about politics. She has developed a framework that takes an explicit political position - that we should care about planetary boundaries etc. yet it is labeled ‘economics’ which in my view (and in my view deliberately) gives an incorrect impression that this is somehow a technical issue rather than a political one. It’s a common approach to try to put contentious issues beyond discussion by pretending they are purely technocratic. 

A further issue is that this is a typical collective action problem (or predicament as we have heard on this list). Everybody and nobody has responsibility for planetary boundaries. No individual citizen, business or anyone else has control of planetary boundaries. It’s not something people can identify with in their everyday lives. 

Climate change too is a collective action issue but there we have a very simple metric - carbon emissions - around which negotiation can take place. Very different from the endless complexity of planetary boundaries. 

All that to say that I suggest that the planetary boundaries approach will be difficult to impossible to convert into tangible action. 

Best

Joe


Dr Joe Zammit-Lucia


Follow my regular 'Random Thoughts' newsletter here



Richard Rosen

unread,
Jun 19, 2025, 4:26:10 PMJun 19
to jo...@me.com, Ilan Kelman, sco...@googlegroups.com
I still don't understand what people mean by sustainable consumption when the issue of consuming metals and minerals arises. Mining anything is always not sustainable, by definition. All metals and minerals would have to be produced from recycled items. Is this possible as the population grows? --- Rich Rosen

Vadovics Edina

unread,
Jun 20, 2025, 4:59:40 AMJun 20
to richard...@gmail.com, jo...@me.com, Ilan Kelman, sco...@googlegroups.com

Dear Joe, dear all,

 

You may be interested to check the website of DEAL, or Doughnut Economics Action Lab, which is exactly about converting theory into tangible action. They are supporting communities, businesses, municipalities, etc. in their efforts to operationalise „the doughnut”, so to say, and provide a forum for exchanging relevant experience.

Visit https://doughnuteconomics.org/about-doughnut-economics and I also recommend subscribing to their newsletter.

 

Also, there was a large European research project in which researchers calculated the doughnut for many countries (not just European).

You can check at https://goodlife.leeds.ac.uk/national-snapshots/countries/.

 

Furthermore, there are various ongoing or completed research efforts to see how e.g. various sustainability initiatives are doing in terms of (selected) doughnut indicators, what could be done to improve them, etc.

 

So, I’d say there is a lot of ongoing effort to put the doughnut into practice, use it to create strategies, action programmes, inform policy, etc.

 

Best wishes,

Edina

 

 

Edina Vadovics

research director

GreenDependent Institute

Hungary, 2100 Gödöllő, Éva u. 4.

email: ed...@greendependent.org

www.intezet.greendependent.org

image001.jpg

Jean Boucher

unread,
Jun 20, 2025, 11:38:05 AMJun 20
to ed...@greendependent.org, richard...@gmail.com, jo...@me.com, Ilan Kelman, sco...@googlegroups.com
I'm happy to get some commiseration here: I'm trying to travel from Wash, DC, to Boston at the end of the month. I can take the train in 7 hrs for $333, I can take the 8.5 hr bus for $217, or I can take a 2 hr flight for $70 - this system is neither setup nor was it designed to be sustainable - though I'll probably take the train - these limited systemic options are very painful to me - Jean

Ilan Kelman

unread,
Jun 20, 2025, 11:45:57 AMJun 20
to SCORAI Group
Are any assumptions being made regarding the environmental life cycle cost of different transportation modes?
A few examples https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1013350 and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102285 with more such analyses welcome. Journeys to/from the stations/airports also ought to be accounted for, as well as luggage weights.

Best wishes for deciding and travelling,

Ilan


Jean Boucher

unread,
Jun 21, 2025, 6:03:50 PMJun 21
to Richard Rosen, SCORAI Group
Hi Richard,
      Thanks for helping me refine my language. After thinking things over, I believe I do mean the entire system, or at least the entire human economic system. I need to live in a world where the environment is valued, and this value is reflected in prices. This would apply to everything from flights and cars to dropping bombs, and any other goods and services we consume. I think that alone would be a significant help. Of course, we'd still have inequalities to address, but we've long needed to fix those issues anyway.

As John Lennon said, "You may call me a dreamer, but I'm not the only one." Hopefully, more people will join us in the dream.

Jean

 


On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:52 AM Richard Rosen <richard...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, the system can only be sustainable once renewable energy is used to fly airplanes. The whole system is not the problem, just the source of energy for the airplanes.  --- Rich Rosen
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages