Thanks,
JDH
_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
SciPy...@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
I would also like to know, I haven't seen any python GARCH so far.
I started to translate http://www.kevinsheppard.com/wiki/MFE_Toolbox
(BSD license) into python, but it is slow going and I'm running out of
Christmas break. The plan is to have a tested literal translation and
then to numpify/scipify it.
ETA: half a year.
Josef
Wow, that would be fantastic, but I don't envy you :-) That looks
like quite a task.
This would be a great google summer of code project if you can get it
far enough along that a dedicated student or two could finish, polish,
document and test.
Maybe faster for at least a rough pass, if you get some help with the
time series stuff ;)
> Wow, that would be fantastic, but I don't envy you :-) That looks
> like quite a task.
I'll also be helping out with this most likely in the coming months,
as it looks like I'll be doing time series specific coursework.
>
> This would be a great google summer of code project if you can get it
> far enough along that a dedicated student or two could finish, polish,
> document and test.
>
Very much agree with this. There are more than few projects that
could be good for interested students as far as stats and statistical
modelling go.
I know this has come up already, but do we have a wiki page for
proposed GSoC 2010 projects? Better sooner than later probably.
-Skipper
Checking the license again for the MFE toolbox, it seems I was
mistaken that MFE is BSD licensed. The previous version, UCSD Garch
has BSD style license http://www.kevinsheppard.com/wiki/License but
not MFE.
So I might have to drop MFE and switch to UCSD Garch, which has many
functions very similar but not as clean as the MFE version.
5 days of fun partially down the drain, oh well.
Josef
Maybe he would make an expressed exception? And come to think of it,
is this enough for inclusion under BSD-style? Though I understand the
basics and the spirit behind the more popular licenses, a lot of the
licensing stuff is beyond me wrt what it actually means, practically
speaking. I definitely err on the side of caution though, and I've
had pretty good luck getting expressed permission or licenses changed
at least for the stuff I've wanted to use for statsmodels. Easier to
write an email than start over...
+ 1, I would be interested in contributing to the porting effort in
that case that the author will agree to a BSD-style license.
That license (for UCSD Garch) has an advertising clause; it's not GPL
compatible.
-- Nathaniel