[SciPy-User] [SciPy-user] problem with documentation for `jn` and `jv` Bessel functions

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Dr. Phillip M. Feldman

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 9:33:33 PM12/14/09
to scipy...@scipy.org

The documentation for `jv` and `jn` in
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/special.html#module-scipy.special
needs some fixing. I believe that `jn` evaluates the Bessel function of the
first kind for integer order n at complex z, and that `jv` evaluates the
Bessel function of the first kind for real order v at complex z. (I tried
to edit the page in question, but although I can log in, I'm unable to
actually edit anything).
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/problem-with-documentation-for-%60jn%60-and-%60jv%60-Bessel-functions-tp26787354p26787354.html
Sent from the Scipy-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
SciPy...@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user

Robert Kern

unread,
Dec 14, 2009, 9:36:41 PM12/14/09
to SciPy Users List
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 20:33, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman
<pfel...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> The documentation for `jv` and `jn` in
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/special.html#module-scipy.special
> needs some fixing. I believe that `jn` evaluates the Bessel function of the
> first kind for integer order n at complex z, and that `jv` evaluates the
> Bessel function of the first kind for real order v at complex z.  (I tried
> to edit the page in question, but although I can log in, I'm unable to
> actually edit anything).

jn() is currently just an alias to jv(). The jn() implementation was
found to be buggy for certain combinations of inputs and the floating
point algorithm for jv() wasn't too bad performancewise over an
integer algorithm.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages