Insurance companies, under trial, will claim the CDC committed the Lyme fraud.

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org

Subject: Insurance companies, under trial, will claim the CDC
committed the Lyme fraud.

Date: Apr 3, 2009 10:20 AM

ARTICLE BELOW ABOUT PBS BEING HIJACKED BY
BIG INSURANCE
====================================================

Insurance companies, under trial, will claim in
their defense that the CDC committed the Lyme fraud,
and that they, therefore, are not guilty of defrauding
Uncle Sam by causing people to be disabled from
bogus diagnostics (and being supported by Social
Security and Medicare).

The bogus diagnostics come from Allen Steere,
virtually alone, in Germany. (Allen Steere is
a CDC officer, which is exactly like career
military intelligence service.)
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP_B.htm

^^^That was ALLEN STEERE ALONE IN GERMANY with a
student, Frank Dressler. CDC hasn't explained
to us why Allen Steere had to go to Germany to
come up with this standard. Even the NIH isn't
asking them.

We got "Lyme is a knee" from Germany, meanwhile
Germany sent us "Lyme is Multiple Sclerosis" and
he - Roland Martin - ended up with his own department
at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARTIN_NINDS_MS_CHRONIC_LYME.htm


Meanwhile, the AMA says not a word about this
unusual phenomenon of NINDS saying Lyme causes
Multiple Sclerosis, which is clearly not a
knee-disease.



Since no one can sue the CDC (so we are told),
*individuals* who work for the CDC can be prosecuted
or sued, since that's what the RICO laws say.

At that point, a discussion of what happened at
Dearborn will ensue. Arthur Weinstein, the person
who apparently approved the Dearborn standard
despite no one agreeing, will then tell us who
demanded that he pretend to approve of this
crazy diagnostic standard:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CONNOLLY_FISH_WEINSTEIN.htm
^^^Look at the Weinstein "chromatography" graphic.

Then look at a real chromatogram:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=chromatogram&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2

And detectors:
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&sa=1&q=chromatography+detectors&btnG=Search+Images

You can see that no one in real life chemistry
uses a polaroid and then says "Only that stock of
anthrax which weighs 200 tons may be diagnosed as
a bioweapon."


Here is Weinstein's Validation of the 200 Tons
Theory of Detection:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053960?ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

OBJECTIVE. To determine the usefulness of quantitative band-intensity
analysis of Western blots for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis.
METHODS. IgG Western blots for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi were
performed on sera from 39 patients with Lyme arthritis, 30 patients
with syphilis, 50 patients with connective tissue diseases, and 10
healthy individuals. Band positions and band intensities were
calculated using a computerized image analysis system. RESULTS. Lyme
arthritis patients had more bands and higher-intensity bands than did
non-Lyme patients. The presence of at least 2 bands of moderate to
high intensity (> 40 optical units) or at least 5 bands of lower
intensity (> 20 optical units) was over 90% sensitive and 100%
specific for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. A 60-kd band was present
in all Lyme arthritis patients. The presence of an 83-, 39-, 21-, or
18-kd band was highly specific for Lyme arthritis. CONCLUSION. Band
intensity analysis increases the *** objectivity *** and accuracy of
Western blot interpretation for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis.


- - -

As you can see, there is no such criterion
"objectivity" and the world better hope it
isn't a real one if they have cancer screening
or the like:
http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/4252fnl.htm


Weinstein *OWNS* this crime, and the insurance
companies will win that argument.

How does that fit into the following argument
by insurance companies that they need to exist?

Well, they hardly argued with the Lyme crooks
when the crooks said Lyme was a non-treatable,
knee-only disease, so, BigInsurance can't claim
they do science and regulation better than
the "government." In other words, insurance
companies can't claim that private industry
does anything better than the "government" in
either this healthcare instance or in Defense.

Both are equally criminal and retarded.

It's a stale mate.


Is there a third option?

I don't know. Psychiatry comes up with all
sorts of negative, debased explanations for why
other people behave the way they do based on their
own personal debasement, but virtue or personal
integrity is not something they recognize or promote.

There is no list of Psychiatric "Orders."

There is no inverse of the DSM-IV.

Virtue or Integrity is not even in their vocabulary.
These aren't not words psychiatrists ever use, yet
these same characters pretend to have the capacity to
condemn others, permanently.


So, how could America even describe what third
entity for oversight of government/medicine could
exist?


As I recall, I saw no March on Washington by the
AMA over torture.


KMDickson


====================================================

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/03-7
Published on Friday, April 3, 2009 by CommonDreams.org
Something is Rotten at PBS

by Russell Mokhiber

Last year, former Washington Post reporter T.R. Reid made a great
documentary for the PBS show Frontline titled Sick Around the World.

Reid traveled to five countries that deliver health care for all - UK,
Japan, Switzerland, Germany, Taiwan - to learn about how they do it.

Reid found that the one thing these five countries had in common -
none allowed for-profit health insurance companies to sell basic
medical coverage.

Frontline then said to Reid - okay, we want you to go around the
United States and make a companion documentary titled Sick Around
America.

So, Reid traveled around America, interviewing patients, doctors, and
health insurance executives.

The documentary that resulted - Sick Around America - aired Monday
night on PBS.

But even though Reid did the reporting for the film, he was cut out of
the film when it aired this week.

And the film didn't present Reid's bottom line for health care reform
- don't let health insurance companies profit from selling basic
health insurance.

They can sell for-profit insurance for extras - breast enlargements,
botox, hair transplants.

But not for the basic health needs of the American people.

Instead, the film that aired Monday pushed the view that Americans be
required to purchase health insurance from for-profit companies.

And the film had a deceptive segment that totally got wrong the lesson
of Reid's previous documentary - Sick Around the World.

During that segment, about halfway through Sick Around America, the
moderator introduces Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health
Insurance Plans, the lead health insurance lobby in the United States.

Moderator: Other developed countries guarantee coverage for everyone.
We asked Karen Ignagni why it can't work here. Karen Ignagni: Well, it
would work if we did what other countries do, which is have a mandate
that everybody participate. And if everybody is in, it's quite
reasonable to ask our industry to do guarantee issue, to get everybody
in. So, the answer to your question is we can, and the public here
will have to agree to do what the public in other countries have done,
which is a consensus that everybody should be in. Moderator: That's
what other developed countries do. They make insurers cover everyone,
and they make all citizens buy insurance. And the poor are subsidized.

But the hard reality, as presented by Reid in Sick Around the World,
is quite different than Ignagni and the moderator claim.

Other countries do not require citizens buy health insurance from for-
profit health insurance companies - the kind that Karen Ignagni
represents.

In some countries like Germany and Japan, citizens are required to buy
health insurance, but from non-profit, heavily regulated insurance
companies.

And other countries, like the UK and Canada, don't require citizens to
buy insurance. Instead, citizens are covered as a birthright - by a
single government payer in Canada, or by a national health system in
the UK.

The producers of the Frontline piece had a point of view - they wanted
to keep the for-profit health insurance companies in the game.

TR Reid wants them out.

"We spent months shooting that film," Reid explains. "I was the
correspondent. We did our last interview on January 6. The producers
went to Boston and made the documentary. About late February I saw it
for the first time. And I told them I disagreed with it. They listened
to me, but they didn't want to change it."

Reid has a book coming out this summer titled The Healing of America:
A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper and Fairer Health Care (Penguin
Press, August 2009.)

"I said to them - mandating for-profit insurance is not the lesson
from other countries in the world," Reid said. "I said I'm not going
to be in a film that contradicts my previous film and my book. They
said - I had to be in the film because I was under contract. I
insisted that I couldn't be. And we parted ways."

"Doctors, hospitals, nurses, labs can all be for-profit," Reid said.
"But the payment system has to be non-profit. All the other countries
have agreed on that. We are the only one that allows health insurance
companies to make a profit. You can't allow a profit to be made on the
basic package of health insurance."

"I don't think they deliberately got it wrong, but they got it wrong,"
Reid said.

Reid said that he now wants to make other documentaries, but not for
Frontline.

"Frontline will never touch me a again - they are done with me," Reid
said.

Reid says that "it's perfectly reasonable for people to disagree about
health policy."

"We disagreed, and we parted ways," Reid says.

It might be perfectly reasonable for people to disagree about health
policy.

But it's not perfectly reasonable to mislead the American people on
national television in the middle of a health care crises when
Congress is shaping legislation that will mean life or death for the
for-profit health insurance industry.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate
Crime Reporter. He is also founder of singlepayeraction.org.



"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci