Lyme vaccines impossible under this proposal

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org

Subject: Lyme vaccines impossible under this proposal

Date: May 12, 2009 3:19 AM

PROPOSAL BELOW
------------------------------

I doubt they'll admit they knew all
along LYMErix was not a vaccine. They'd
have to admit the CDC's current diagnostic
standard is also a hoax, and therefore a crime.

Have you seen how many times these clowns
played the coward card?

How about the non-stalking of Allen Steere at
Albany Lobby Day?
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_FAIRY_UNSTALKED.htm

If we were stalking Steere, why were we at the FDA
meeting, complaining about Steere's Dearborn being
a hoax?
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm


How about the Yalie accusations against myself for
filing a RICO complaint against Yale:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PENISBITERDOCS.htm
"Unabomber Chemist" and "dangerously intelligent?"

Huh?

How about the stalking and harassment of Karen Forschner
for having revealed that it doesn't take 48 hours after
tick attachment to transfer Lyme?
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm

That's what started the McSweegan vs Forschner lawsuits:
http://www.actionlyme.org/McSweegan_Relentless.htm

Here Gary Wormser reported that 2/9 people
who were treated for tick attachments still
had spirochetal DNA/RNA in their bite zone:
http://www.actionlyme.org/HOW_RICO_WILL_BE_CHARGED.htm

(It's at the bottom of the page).

How can they run another vaccine trial when they
haven't even admitted what's in CDC officer
Alan Barbour's patents about Lyme being a Relapsing
Fever organism?
http://www.actionlyme.org/CENTRAL_LYME_RICO_PATENTS.htm

Barbour's Vsp and Vmp patents *alone* say there can
never be a vaccine against Lyme.

There's no vaccine for Relapsing Fever and there's
no vaccine against Sleeping Sickness for the same
reasons, says Alan Barbour:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10998374?ordinalpos=9&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

They knew this all along. The idea of vaccines
was the essence of the plan, ENTIRELY, to name
this new local Plum Island one, "Lyme Disease"
instead of Lyme Relapsing Fever.

Besides admitting that the Dearborn conference
was a hoax, and that the testing is a hoax,
they'd have to admit what OspA is - Pam3Cys - and
that they did not report on efficacies of previous
lipoprotein vaccines, which was easily discoverable:
http://www.actionlyme.org/FUNGAL_VACCINES.htm

The tuberculosis vaccines.

Same with what Luc Montanier, the Nobel Prize
winner for the discovery of the HIV (Pam3Cys)
virus now following up on this immune-suppression
research, first reported - indirectly - by Paul
Duray to IDSA in 1989:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm


No, I don't see it happening. Not with the
Blumenthal lawsuit and now most chronic Lyme
victims know the whole thing was a hoax, not
to mention all the foreign nations who are
following this:
http://www.actionlyme.org/NATIONS_TO_ACTIONLYME.htm

http://www.lymecryme.com/rich_text_18.html

They're as humiliated as they can be.


Have you see the Fauci apology?
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/359/9/888

They have to rethink the whole idea of vaccines
because they don't know all the mechanisms of
immunity. They're only now starting to recognize
the role of Epstein-Barr infected B cells in
Multiple Sclerosis... Only now, I mean, since
I announced the synthesis of discoveries associated
with the 1989 and 1992 Paul Duray reports to
IDSA about how the lymphocytes of chronic Lyme
victims look like Epstein-Barr transformed cells.
http://www.actionlyme.org/Duray.htm


Go ahead and look it up on MedLine.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=(%22b-lymphocytes%22[MeSH+Terms]+OR+%22b-lymphocytes%22[All+Fields]+OR+%22b+cells%22[All+Fields])+AND+(%22multiple+sclerosis%22[MeSH+Terms]+OR+(%22multiple%22[All+Fields]+AND+%22sclerosis%22[All+Fields])+OR+%22multiple+sclerosis%22[All+Fields])

How novel!!! it is to have overlooked Epstein-Barr
transformed B cells and their role in Multiple Sclerosis!!!

Yeah. Thanks, Yale.

We heard about it 20 years ago, but we had
to have a "Lyme vaccine" and suffer all the
crazy bullshit related to that Kaiser-and-Patents
Profiteering ALDF.com agenda.


Not happenin soon, Boyfriend. Probably not at
all given all the other calamities that could
have been prevented had anyone looked at what
Bushie said he was gonna do to us and the world
in the October 2000 Gore debates:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/6940a8d9e0024621/8591b95e0ece47f7?q=Bush%2FGore+ENERGY+&rnum=1#8591b95e0ece47f7
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_frm/thread/e4359868117b8d81/e066f6566802741e?q=lehrer+bush+gore+bombs+bursting+in+air&rnum=1#e066f6566802741e


Kathleen

---------------------------------------

Sent: Fri, 8 May 2009 9:46 am
Subject: [LymeInfo] [sci] Human Lyme disease vaccines: past and future
concerns



Human Lyme disease vaccines: past and future concerns

Future Microbiology
May 2009, Vol. 4, No. 4, Pages 457-469.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fmb.09.17

Dean T Nardelli‌, Erik L Munson‌, Steven M Callister‌ & Ronald F
Schell

The development of a vaccine for Lyme disease was intensely pursued in
the 1990s. However, citing a lack of demand, the first human Lyme
disease vaccine was withdrawn from the market less than 5 years after
its approval. The public's concerns about the vaccine’s safety also
likely contributed to the withdrawal of the vaccine.

Nearly a decade later, no vaccine for human Lyme disease exists. The
expansion of Lyme disease's endemic range, as well as the difficulty
of
diagnosing infection and the disease's steady increase in incidence in
the fac e of proven preventative measures, make the pursuit of a Lyme
disease vaccine a worthwhile endeavor. Many believe that the negative
public perception of the Lyme disease vaccine will have tarnished any
future endeavors towards its development.

Importantly, many of the drawbacks of the Lyme disease vaccine were
apparent or foreseeable prior to its approval. These pitfalls must be
confronted before the construction of a new, effective and safe human
Lyme disease vaccine.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fmb.09.17

"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci