Catching Pam Weintraub lying on Lymenet Europe (and DCF's penis-biter)
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Mort Zuckerman
Oct 16, 2008, 6:26:19 AM10/16/08
to scilyme2
To: emcsw...@nasw.org, zerh...@od.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com,
illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com,
jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: Catching Pam Weintraub lying on Lymenet Europe (and DCF's
penis-biter)
Date: Oct 16, 2008 6:24 AM
Here is your proof that Pam Weintraub is a LIAR:
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1952&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=10
Oh, and I would like to point out that the pervert talk is
Durland Fish's and Crazy Eddie McSweegan's:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
that indeed, James Phillips is a sex-perv (sex is his
only topic), and that DCF's Annette Anderson is a
little-boy penis-biter and penis-pincher since that's
what the boys told me and the medical records confirm it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PENISBITERDOCS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
I clearly have Lyme borreliosis and congenitally
infected children. That has ZERO to do with "Kathleen
Dickson should become a slut in order to cure the
world of Lyme Disease, alcoholism and everything else"
- the world according to James Phillips.
http://www.actionlyme.org/DIANE_EHRLICHIOSIS.htm
Should I set up a brothel to cure my daughter Diane of
Lyme *AND* Ehrlichiosis, too???
This sex-o-pervo talk and behavior is the trademark
of DCF and DMHAS, and the whole world knows it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
I simply re-demonstrate what is *documented* as Corrupticut's
excuse for "medicine" and "care."
-------------------------
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1952&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=10
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby kmdickson on Tue 7 Oct 2008 22:54
kmdickson wrote:
cloverdale7 wrote:You can't possibly believe that I copied
your confusing,
misleading website in work on which I was staking my professional
reputation, can
you? If I put forth what YOU put forth I would never work in
journalism again. I
am not going to say anymore --my statement is above, and its truth
should be apparent
to anyone who carefully reads my work and all the notes and references
and THEN
compares it to your work on your website. I am done here --stop
harassing me, stop
libeling me, stop following me around the web. Pam Weintraub, CURE
UNKNOWN
Pam, you are a liar and you know it.
These are not the sorts of things you
were saying to me when I was explaining
to you about Dearborn, and how that
was a fraud.
Have you no conscience, girl?
Are you really that cheap, and that much
of a low-life?
You sure had me fooled.
Hats off to your exquisite deception.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
Here is proof you are a liar:
I did not follow you here, you followed me
here. Did I not post here about this matter
first?
LOL
Kathleen
kmdickson
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu 2 Oct 2008 14:43
* E-mail
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby kmdickson on Wed 8 Oct 2008 0:02
http://www.actionlyme.org
The bad guys (IDSA/ALDF) actually can't believe they effed up as badly
as they
did with LYMErix or OspA (Pam3Cys) vaccination. Their current hysteria
(and "guidelines")
is meant to be a cover-up of their lies about Lyme and LYMErix.
They're just
pretending they don't know Lyme is an immune suppression/opportunistic
infection
disease like AIDS, and that LYMErix vaccination produces the same
outcome.
Read all the reports and related reports:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... rm=Pam3Cys[All+Fields]
None of this stuff is in Pam Weintraub's book, "Cure Unknown," by
the way, because I hadn't published it by the time her book went to
print. The
Pat Smith kooky lymediseaseassociation.org AND the IDSociety.org are
hysterical
over this at the present time, because it is huge and is the crux of
the indictment.
All of the lies about Lyme are about Pam3Cys or OspA. The Lyme crooks
were going
to make OspA-hypersensitivity the "disease," and they did that at
Dearborn.
No one in Lyme land has to worry about whether they'll be rich and
famous whistleblowers
or even if they'll be facing jail for homicide, since there's no USDOJ
and
the country will collapse into chaos very soon. The reason for the
chastisement
is the likes of what happened with Lyme - the lack of charity and
honesty. The United
States will well-deserve what it gets, as a people. (I think it's
funny because
I have witnessed so many vain, arrogant pin-heads running around lying
their faces
off and blowing their own horns, when they knew nothing, did nothing,
and deserved
no admiration.)
I have not read Pam Weintraub's book, but I know for certain this is
not in
it because I had not published it yet ("receiver operating
characteristic"
is not a criterion in validating a method). This is from the Dearborn
booklet, the
Dressler/Steere report, where Steere tries to falsely claim that a
high concentration
of antibodies make the diagnosis more valid:
See CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm for an expansion of exactly what Allen
Steere did in
Europe that is deliberate research fraud and compare to the FDA's
rules for
the validation of an analytical method. You can see that there is no
such thing
as saying that "to detect the highest concentration of an analyte
makes it
more valid" or "receiver operating characteristic." In real science,
we strive to detect the lowest quantities of anything, reliably.
What Allen Steere did in Europe with the bogus "high passage" strains
and this craziness about "receiver operating characteristic" is the
crux
of the crime- creating the false CDC Dearborn diagnostic standard
which only detects
late Lyme arthritis in a knee (high antibody concentration, as I
explained to the
US Attorney, in 2003).
FDA RULES ► http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/4252fnl.htm
Specificity and Sensitivity are separate criteria and not to be
crossed like this.
This is the bogus "elephant rule" where Steere et al claim that no
elephants
can be diagnosed as elephants unless they weigh 7 tons or more. We
sure would not
want Steere in any biodefense work, or half the nation would be dead
from a swine
flu pandemic, and Steere would say, "Hey, maybe it's an outbreak of a
disease.
I think I will call it the Sneezing Disease."
FALSE CLAIMS ACT ► http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_re ...
m00921.htm
All the people who make false claims - not just the Lyme crooks - who
do not publicly
repent and make restitution, are going to hell. It is a capital sin to
bear false
witness. And this includes frauds of omission, or only telling part of
the story.
It is especially bad when one lies under oath, especially if the
perjurer is a critic
of no merit.
"The executioners did not allow him to rest long, but bade him rise
and place
himself on the cross that they might nail him to it. Then seizing his
right arm
they dragged it to the hole prepared for the nail, and having tied it
tightly down
with a cord, one of them knelt upon his sacred chest, a second held
his hand flat,
and a third taking a long thick nail, pressed it on the open palm of
that adorable
hand, which had ever been open to bestow blessings and favours on the
ungrateful
Jews, and with a great iron hammer drove it through the flesh, and far
into the
wood of the cross. Our Lord uttered one deep but suppressed groan, and
his blood
gushed forth and sprinkled the arms of the archers. I counted the
blows of the hammer,
but my extreme grief made me forget their number. The nails were very
large, the
heads about the size of a crown piece, and the thickness that of a
man’s thumb,
while the points came through at the back of the cross. The Blessed
Virgin stood
motionless; from time to time you might distinguish her plaintive
moans; she appeared
as if almost fainting from grief, and Magdalen was quite beside
herself. When the
executioners had nailed the right hand of our Lord, they perceived
that his left
hand did not reach the hole they had bored to receive the nail,
therefore they tied
ropes to his left arm, and having steadied their feet against the
cross, pulled
the left hand violently until it reached the place prepared for it.
This dreadful
process caused our Lord indescribable agony, his breast heaved, and
his legs were
quite contracted. They again knelt upon him, tied down his arms, and
drove the second
nail into his left hand; his blood flowed afresh, and his feeble
groans were once
more heard between the blows of the hammer, but nothing could move the
hard-hearted
executioners to the slightest pity. The arms of Jesus, thus
unnaturally stretched
out, no longer covered the arms of the cross, which were sloped; there
was a wide
space between them and his armpits. Each additional torture and insult
inflicted
on our Lord caused a fresh pang in the heart of his Blessed Mother;
she became white
as a corpse, but as the Pharisees endeavoured to increase her pain by
insulting
words and gestures, the disciples led her to a group of pious women
who were standing
a little farther off....
http://www.jesus-passion.com/THE_PASSIO ... %20XXXVIII
This is the savagery one can expect in return for giving people the
truth. I recommend
that everyone should read the whole thing, because the people who
crucified him
were jealous that Christ might steal their thunder.
kmdickson
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu 2 Oct 2008 14:43
* E-mail
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby admin on Wed 8 Oct 2008 2:16
Second warning issued to kmdickson for violating the forum rules.
(flaming / abusing)
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed 25 Jul 2007 21:06
* E-mail
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby Freethinker on Thu 9 Oct 2008 14:27
September 09, 2008
This missive is directed to Pam Weintraub so there will be no
mistaking.
(If you did not pass reading comprehension, please have someone
interpret for you.)
Pam,
In no way did i ever say your book was bad, in fact i have not yet
finished with
it to lend my humble opinion. I merely happen to believe Kathleen
Dicksons’ story
about what happened with Pat Smith and yourself. I make no claim of
being a "professional",
ever anywhere. But i do have a right to my own opinions.
Why so defensive, if you are not trying to cover up the fact you did
not cite Kathleen
in your beloved book, Cure Unknown? You already agreed you took the
data, “but it
was so jumbled up, you had to re-do all the research yourself.” Well,
then why did
you take the data in the first place if not to get what you could from
it? You gleaned
months and months of research from Kathleen, she spoon fed you at your
own home
the data for the FDA LYMErix meeting. Did you testify at the FDA? It
is to my understanding;
NO you sat next to her. So if her data was so jumbled up, how on earth
could the
FDA even listen to all the adverse effects and her data?
I see your choice of words explaining the event in footnote #315 comes
straight
from the law books. Yes, you researched and wrote the report that you
gave Pat,
but i believe, after you took the data, Kathleen’s work that Pat gave
you. Then
you researched what she already had and then had your high fluetin’
attorneys put
their ok on it, just to be safe the data was ok.
I am entitled to my opinion and you yours. I have not slandered or
libeled you in
anyway. This is merely MY opinion, and i am exercising my first
amendment rights,
while i still have them. In no way is this an attack on you
personally. I am simply
stating some facts I believe are true.
I do not appreciate the fact you wrote a Lyme activist friend of mine
and told him,
he better tame me down, before the issue is sent to a higher level.
Like he has
some kind of control over what i say. Just exactly what does this
mean? What higher
level would that be? You did not even come to the source yourself, as
my phone number
and address is all over the Illinois site and on my story. Instead,
you chose to
go through someone else to get me a message just like we were in high
school. I
take what you said as a threat.
I guess i too, would be upset if i did what you did, and then would
have to explain
it to all your manicured lawn buddies and Wall Street journal pals
once it was brought
out into the light.
I do not care if anyone likes me; i am not in this for the Miss
Congeniality contest.
I am in this to bring the truth out into the light. Say what you will
about me.
The LDA’s very own Tincup made an open post about Camp A and Camp B.
Most “new sick”
infected freeked out people read that scenario. At the very end of her
long clarification
of what Camp A and Camp B should be she states, “Bottom line…If Camp A
were right,
there wouldn’t be a Camp B.”
I would like to amend the Camp scenario and make the statement: IF
CAMP A AND B
were right, we would not need a CAMP C. Camp A nor Camp B will speak
about the crux
of the issue, yet all the entities knows that it is “SCIENTIFIC
FRAUD.” All the
labs that were “invited” to the Second National Serological Lyme
Disease Conference
in Dearborn Michigan, 1994 reported that the % of being positive was
very low when
using the Steere method of detecting Lyme. Yet, the FDA let the Steere
method reign.
The CDC even says it is underdetected X10. Well, just why is that? Not
too hard
to figure that one out.
I am so tired of entities using Kathleen Dickson for personal and
business gain,
I saw some recent events and I felt I had to speak out.
I am a pretty good judge of people that is how I got this far in life.
I do not
take my choices lightly and it took many moons for me to be certain.
Before i made
my decision to belong to an independent or Camp C, (which stands for
“Change” btw)
i listened a very long time to both sides of this Lyme coin. I did not
like the
tactics the LDA used, and the more i heard stories from people they
have wronged
along the way, the more i leaned to belong to something different.
You totally disrespected Kathleen by no citations and you expect no
recourse. Did
you not think this might be exposed someday? Could that why you told
Kathleen to
wipe all the data off of the actio...@google.groups (now the
spinlyme group) just
in case the “bad guys” come after you both? Then no one would see the
endless hours
Kathleen taught you, is what i concluded, and that is my honest humble
opinion.
There were, hundreds of people who saw what happened on that
newsgroup.
By not citing Kathleen and re-writing Lyme history is just plain
wrong.
Pam, I am truly sorry you have been LDA’d, but please……please don’t
take it out
on the messenger.
Just my humble opinion,
Dottie L. Heffron a/k/a “Freethinker”
Independent Lyme Activist
http://www.illinoislyme.com
p.s. I’ll let you know what i thought of your book when i am finished.
Data Over Dogma
Evidence Over Egos
Patients Over Politics
--E.J. Masters 2005 Philly Conference
----Scientist/Discoverer/Good Guy
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com,
illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com,
jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: Catching Pam Weintraub lying on Lymenet Europe (and DCF's
penis-biter)
Date: Oct 16, 2008 6:24 AM
Here is your proof that Pam Weintraub is a LIAR:
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1952&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=10
Oh, and I would like to point out that the pervert talk is
Durland Fish's and Crazy Eddie McSweegan's:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
that indeed, James Phillips is a sex-perv (sex is his
only topic), and that DCF's Annette Anderson is a
little-boy penis-biter and penis-pincher since that's
what the boys told me and the medical records confirm it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PENISBITERDOCS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
I clearly have Lyme borreliosis and congenitally
infected children. That has ZERO to do with "Kathleen
Dickson should become a slut in order to cure the
world of Lyme Disease, alcoholism and everything else"
- the world according to James Phillips.
http://www.actionlyme.org/DIANE_EHRLICHIOSIS.htm
Should I set up a brothel to cure my daughter Diane of
Lyme *AND* Ehrlichiosis, too???
This sex-o-pervo talk and behavior is the trademark
of DCF and DMHAS, and the whole world knows it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
I simply re-demonstrate what is *documented* as Corrupticut's
excuse for "medicine" and "care."
-------------------------
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1952&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=10
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby kmdickson on Tue 7 Oct 2008 22:54
kmdickson wrote:
cloverdale7 wrote:You can't possibly believe that I copied
your confusing,
misleading website in work on which I was staking my professional
reputation, can
you? If I put forth what YOU put forth I would never work in
journalism again. I
am not going to say anymore --my statement is above, and its truth
should be apparent
to anyone who carefully reads my work and all the notes and references
and THEN
compares it to your work on your website. I am done here --stop
harassing me, stop
libeling me, stop following me around the web. Pam Weintraub, CURE
UNKNOWN
Pam, you are a liar and you know it.
These are not the sorts of things you
were saying to me when I was explaining
to you about Dearborn, and how that
was a fraud.
Have you no conscience, girl?
Are you really that cheap, and that much
of a low-life?
You sure had me fooled.
Hats off to your exquisite deception.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
Here is proof you are a liar:
I did not follow you here, you followed me
here. Did I not post here about this matter
first?
LOL
Kathleen
kmdickson
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu 2 Oct 2008 14:43
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby kmdickson on Wed 8 Oct 2008 0:02
http://www.actionlyme.org
The bad guys (IDSA/ALDF) actually can't believe they effed up as badly
as they
did with LYMErix or OspA (Pam3Cys) vaccination. Their current hysteria
(and "guidelines")
is meant to be a cover-up of their lies about Lyme and LYMErix.
They're just
pretending they don't know Lyme is an immune suppression/opportunistic
infection
disease like AIDS, and that LYMErix vaccination produces the same
outcome.
Read all the reports and related reports:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... rm=Pam3Cys[All+Fields]
None of this stuff is in Pam Weintraub's book, "Cure Unknown," by
the way, because I hadn't published it by the time her book went to
print. The
Pat Smith kooky lymediseaseassociation.org AND the IDSociety.org are
hysterical
over this at the present time, because it is huge and is the crux of
the indictment.
All of the lies about Lyme are about Pam3Cys or OspA. The Lyme crooks
were going
to make OspA-hypersensitivity the "disease," and they did that at
Dearborn.
No one in Lyme land has to worry about whether they'll be rich and
famous whistleblowers
or even if they'll be facing jail for homicide, since there's no USDOJ
and
the country will collapse into chaos very soon. The reason for the
chastisement
is the likes of what happened with Lyme - the lack of charity and
honesty. The United
States will well-deserve what it gets, as a people. (I think it's
funny because
I have witnessed so many vain, arrogant pin-heads running around lying
their faces
off and blowing their own horns, when they knew nothing, did nothing,
and deserved
no admiration.)
I have not read Pam Weintraub's book, but I know for certain this is
not in
it because I had not published it yet ("receiver operating
characteristic"
is not a criterion in validating a method). This is from the Dearborn
booklet, the
Dressler/Steere report, where Steere tries to falsely claim that a
high concentration
of antibodies make the diagnosis more valid:
See CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm for an expansion of exactly what Allen
Steere did in
Europe that is deliberate research fraud and compare to the FDA's
rules for
the validation of an analytical method. You can see that there is no
such thing
as saying that "to detect the highest concentration of an analyte
makes it
more valid" or "receiver operating characteristic." In real science,
we strive to detect the lowest quantities of anything, reliably.
What Allen Steere did in Europe with the bogus "high passage" strains
and this craziness about "receiver operating characteristic" is the
crux
of the crime- creating the false CDC Dearborn diagnostic standard
which only detects
late Lyme arthritis in a knee (high antibody concentration, as I
explained to the
US Attorney, in 2003).
FDA RULES ► http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/4252fnl.htm
Specificity and Sensitivity are separate criteria and not to be
crossed like this.
This is the bogus "elephant rule" where Steere et al claim that no
elephants
can be diagnosed as elephants unless they weigh 7 tons or more. We
sure would not
want Steere in any biodefense work, or half the nation would be dead
from a swine
flu pandemic, and Steere would say, "Hey, maybe it's an outbreak of a
disease.
I think I will call it the Sneezing Disease."
FALSE CLAIMS ACT ► http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_re ...
m00921.htm
All the people who make false claims - not just the Lyme crooks - who
do not publicly
repent and make restitution, are going to hell. It is a capital sin to
bear false
witness. And this includes frauds of omission, or only telling part of
the story.
It is especially bad when one lies under oath, especially if the
perjurer is a critic
of no merit.
"The executioners did not allow him to rest long, but bade him rise
and place
himself on the cross that they might nail him to it. Then seizing his
right arm
they dragged it to the hole prepared for the nail, and having tied it
tightly down
with a cord, one of them knelt upon his sacred chest, a second held
his hand flat,
and a third taking a long thick nail, pressed it on the open palm of
that adorable
hand, which had ever been open to bestow blessings and favours on the
ungrateful
Jews, and with a great iron hammer drove it through the flesh, and far
into the
wood of the cross. Our Lord uttered one deep but suppressed groan, and
his blood
gushed forth and sprinkled the arms of the archers. I counted the
blows of the hammer,
but my extreme grief made me forget their number. The nails were very
large, the
heads about the size of a crown piece, and the thickness that of a
man’s thumb,
while the points came through at the back of the cross. The Blessed
Virgin stood
motionless; from time to time you might distinguish her plaintive
moans; she appeared
as if almost fainting from grief, and Magdalen was quite beside
herself. When the
executioners had nailed the right hand of our Lord, they perceived
that his left
hand did not reach the hole they had bored to receive the nail,
therefore they tied
ropes to his left arm, and having steadied their feet against the
cross, pulled
the left hand violently until it reached the place prepared for it.
This dreadful
process caused our Lord indescribable agony, his breast heaved, and
his legs were
quite contracted. They again knelt upon him, tied down his arms, and
drove the second
nail into his left hand; his blood flowed afresh, and his feeble
groans were once
more heard between the blows of the hammer, but nothing could move the
hard-hearted
executioners to the slightest pity. The arms of Jesus, thus
unnaturally stretched
out, no longer covered the arms of the cross, which were sloped; there
was a wide
space between them and his armpits. Each additional torture and insult
inflicted
on our Lord caused a fresh pang in the heart of his Blessed Mother;
she became white
as a corpse, but as the Pharisees endeavoured to increase her pain by
insulting
words and gestures, the disciples led her to a group of pious women
who were standing
a little farther off....
http://www.jesus-passion.com/THE_PASSIO ... %20XXXVIII
This is the savagery one can expect in return for giving people the
truth. I recommend
that everyone should read the whole thing, because the people who
crucified him
were jealous that Christ might steal their thunder.
kmdickson
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu 2 Oct 2008 14:43
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby admin on Wed 8 Oct 2008 2:16
Second warning issued to kmdickson for violating the forum rules.
(flaming / abusing)
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed 25 Jul 2007 21:06
Top
Re: e-Petitions to reveal Conflicts of Interest- 1999
Postby Freethinker on Thu 9 Oct 2008 14:27
September 09, 2008
This missive is directed to Pam Weintraub so there will be no
mistaking.
(If you did not pass reading comprehension, please have someone
interpret for you.)
Pam,
In no way did i ever say your book was bad, in fact i have not yet
finished with
it to lend my humble opinion. I merely happen to believe Kathleen
Dicksons’ story
about what happened with Pat Smith and yourself. I make no claim of
being a "professional",
ever anywhere. But i do have a right to my own opinions.
Why so defensive, if you are not trying to cover up the fact you did
not cite Kathleen
in your beloved book, Cure Unknown? You already agreed you took the
data, “but it
was so jumbled up, you had to re-do all the research yourself.” Well,
then why did
you take the data in the first place if not to get what you could from
it? You gleaned
months and months of research from Kathleen, she spoon fed you at your
own home
the data for the FDA LYMErix meeting. Did you testify at the FDA? It
is to my understanding;
NO you sat next to her. So if her data was so jumbled up, how on earth
could the
FDA even listen to all the adverse effects and her data?
I see your choice of words explaining the event in footnote #315 comes
straight
from the law books. Yes, you researched and wrote the report that you
gave Pat,
but i believe, after you took the data, Kathleen’s work that Pat gave
you. Then
you researched what she already had and then had your high fluetin’
attorneys put
their ok on it, just to be safe the data was ok.
I am entitled to my opinion and you yours. I have not slandered or
libeled you in
anyway. This is merely MY opinion, and i am exercising my first
amendment rights,
while i still have them. In no way is this an attack on you
personally. I am simply
stating some facts I believe are true.
I do not appreciate the fact you wrote a Lyme activist friend of mine
and told him,
he better tame me down, before the issue is sent to a higher level.
Like he has
some kind of control over what i say. Just exactly what does this
mean? What higher
level would that be? You did not even come to the source yourself, as
my phone number
and address is all over the Illinois site and on my story. Instead,
you chose to
go through someone else to get me a message just like we were in high
school. I
take what you said as a threat.
I guess i too, would be upset if i did what you did, and then would
have to explain
it to all your manicured lawn buddies and Wall Street journal pals
once it was brought
out into the light.
I do not care if anyone likes me; i am not in this for the Miss
Congeniality contest.
I am in this to bring the truth out into the light. Say what you will
about me.
The LDA’s very own Tincup made an open post about Camp A and Camp B.
Most “new sick”
infected freeked out people read that scenario. At the very end of her
long clarification
of what Camp A and Camp B should be she states, “Bottom line…If Camp A
were right,
there wouldn’t be a Camp B.”
I would like to amend the Camp scenario and make the statement: IF
CAMP A AND B
were right, we would not need a CAMP C. Camp A nor Camp B will speak
about the crux
of the issue, yet all the entities knows that it is “SCIENTIFIC
FRAUD.” All the
labs that were “invited” to the Second National Serological Lyme
Disease Conference
in Dearborn Michigan, 1994 reported that the % of being positive was
very low when
using the Steere method of detecting Lyme. Yet, the FDA let the Steere
method reign.
The CDC even says it is underdetected X10. Well, just why is that? Not
too hard
to figure that one out.
I am so tired of entities using Kathleen Dickson for personal and
business gain,
I saw some recent events and I felt I had to speak out.
I am a pretty good judge of people that is how I got this far in life.
I do not
take my choices lightly and it took many moons for me to be certain.
Before i made
my decision to belong to an independent or Camp C, (which stands for
“Change” btw)
i listened a very long time to both sides of this Lyme coin. I did not
like the
tactics the LDA used, and the more i heard stories from people they
have wronged
along the way, the more i leaned to belong to something different.
You totally disrespected Kathleen by no citations and you expect no
recourse. Did
you not think this might be exposed someday? Could that why you told
Kathleen to
wipe all the data off of the actio...@google.groups (now the
spinlyme group) just
in case the “bad guys” come after you both? Then no one would see the
endless hours
Kathleen taught you, is what i concluded, and that is my honest humble
opinion.
There were, hundreds of people who saw what happened on that
newsgroup.
By not citing Kathleen and re-writing Lyme history is just plain
wrong.
Pam, I am truly sorry you have been LDA’d, but please……please don’t
take it out
on the messenger.
Just my humble opinion,
Dottie L. Heffron a/k/a “Freethinker”
Independent Lyme Activist
http://www.illinoislyme.com
p.s. I’ll let you know what i thought of your book when i am finished.
Data Over Dogma
Evidence Over Egos
Patients Over Politics
--E.J. Masters 2005 Philly Conference
----Scientist/Discoverer/Good Guy
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages