To:
zerh...@od.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com,
kshe...@calea.org,
fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org,
let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
len...@courant.com,
michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us,
executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com,
news...@nytimes.com,
the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com,
me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com,
ubi...@courant.com,
ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com,
jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com,
hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us,
da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc:
fra...@ucia.gov,
dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com,
hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com,
tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com,
thomas...@usdoj.gov,
amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov
Subject: [SpinLyme] For Jane Brody and the other creeps at the
NYTimes...
Date: Jul 15, 2008 10:08 AM
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12819085
See?
It's not that complicated. This is why Lyme is the New Great
Imitator.
The immune suppression from shed Osps that cause tolerization to other
Osps (fungal antigens like from mycoplasma) causes all those great
new
imitator outcomes, meaning,
Lyme is not an inflammatory disease and does not test like Allen
Steere later
said it did, when he falsified the disease for Big Insurance (knee
diseases
do not need ceftriaxone).
And here's how to diagnose Lyme:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=423723&blobtype=pdf
By Western Blotting, if there is band 41, look in their mouths and
see
if their teeth are rotting out of their heads, or look somewhere else
and see if they have syphilis... says Allen Steere.
Anyone could have done this research, especially the likes of
Jane Brody, since we gave the info to the NYT about 200,000 times.
True or false? Was it at least 200,000 times?
The reason for the Times backing off now is UnderOurSkin, and less
Pam's book. The timing of the release of the movie and the clips
was superb. The clips where Euegene Shapiro is lying his face off
came out in late April, near the biggest first showing of the
movie, April 26, 2008 in NYC. The following Monday, Blumenthal's
office was utterly livid over their lies (especially about congenital
Lyme), and the next day IDSA caved.
It was because of Eugene Shapiro's lies about congenital Lyme, that
was more than anyone could stand, even IDSA.
Lawrence Altman, Jane Brody's co-worker, is a CDC officer.
Perhaps I should add Altman's mugshot to the list of people we
want kidnapped and tortured on my homepage.
This bullshit from the NYT is most dishonest and it kinda makes me
furious. Go to their homepage today (SCIENCE TUESDAY). The story
is not listed among the top three, despite Lyme being the biggest
epidemic there is, once you add in all the people with all those
other New Great Imitator diseases who only have band 41- made
SPECIFIC by Yale, and patented in 1993:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CENTRAL_LYME_RICO_PATENTS.htm
I remind that the Times did not report the Bushie illegal
wiretapping before the Nov 2004 elections. They withheld
that information for a year and *now* look at the mess we're in.
Those are quite a few significant disasters that the Times,
had they been honest, could have averted. What else are
they holding back on??
Brody must be pretty old, because we were forced to read
Science Tuesday way, way back a hundred years ago in my college
journalism class for scientists.
They all clearly need to be replaced.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
------------------------------------