Hi all,
numpy.distutils
to use scikit-build
because of the deprecation of distutils
(the package
contains 2 Fortran extension modules wrapped with f2py
).
To get to know the system I’ve started with a minimal example that
I've put together from reading the numpy/f2py and scikit-build
documentation. I have been getting compile failures on Windows (on
Linux and macOS everything works, I can build and install the
module).
I have posted this on SO and on the Fortran discourse group but have not had any replies despite quite a number of reads. Perhaps anyone here can help out? Links to the other posts:
Minimal example (I attach the zipped full source tree of the
package for reference if needed):
hi.f
SUBROUTINE HELLO()
PRINT*,"Hello from fortran"
END
hi.pyf
! -*- f90 -*-
! Note: the context of this file is case sensitive.
python module hi ! in
interface ! in :hi
subroutine hello ! in :hi:hi.f
end subroutine hello
end interface
end python module hi
! This file was auto-generated with f2py (version:1.23.2).
! See:
! https://web.archive.org/web/20140822061353/http://cens.ioc.ee/projects/f2py2e
During compilation with python setup.py build
the
build fails. In tracking it down I saw that ninja/cmake expands
the full path of the source files and this is where it fails. To
ensure that it is not a problem with the skbuild
build system I verified that the failure can be reproduced on the
command line using f2py
on its own as follows - copy
the Fortran files above to the same folder and then run in a
command prompt:
(skbuild) Z:\Documents\Python\skbuild_test\simple\hello\shout>f2py.exe -m hi -c hi.pyf hi.f
(works and generates the .pyd
and .dll
files)
However, specifying the full path, fails:
(skbuild) Z:\Documents\Python\skbuild_test\simple\hello\shout>f2py.exe -m hi -c Z:/Documents/Python/skbuild_test/simple/hello/shout/hi.pyf Z:/Documents/Python/skbuild_test/simple/hello/shout/hi.f
running build
running config_cc
INFO: unifing config_cc, config, build_clib, build_ext, build commands --compiler options
running config_fc
INFO: unifing config_fc, config, build_clib, build_ext, build commands --fcompiler options
running build_src
INFO: build_src
INFO: building extension "hi" sources
creating C:
creating C:Users
creating C:Users\jr
creating C:Users\jr\AppData
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents\Python
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents\Python\skbuild_test
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents\Python\skbuild_test\simple
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents\Python\skbuild_test\simple\hello
creating C:Users\jr\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpdbudw6jh\src.win-amd64-3.10\Documents\Python\skbuild_test\simple\hello\shout
INFO: f2py options: []
INFO: f2py: Z:/Documents/Python/skbuild_test/simple/hello/shout/hi.pyf
error: [WinError 123] The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect: 'C:C:\\Users\\jr\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\tmpdbudw6jh\\src.win-amd64-3.10\\Documents\\Python\\skbuild_test\\simple\\hello\\shout'
The problem seems to be with the creating C:Users
part leading to the
malformed filename in the last line.
Specifying only the filename for hi.pyf
but the
full path for hi.f
does work
strangely enough, but as soon as the full path for hi.pyf
is specified it fails. As mentioned, on Linux and macOS all works
fine.
NOTE:
I could of course skip the .pyf
file and then it
works. However, the Fortran code I’m wrapping is F77 and needs to
be redistributed in unmodified form due to licensing conditions,
so I do need a custom .pyf
file to integrate it into
my Python module.
System
I realize this may not be directly related to skbuild, since the
error can be reproduced on the command line using only f2py, but
perhaps someone here has seen anything similar? I honestly have no
idea what is going on here.
Thanks,
Johann