Re: [External] Re: The Nature of Reality

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Vasavada, Kashyap V

unread,
Dec 26, 2024, 5:37:31 PM12/26/24
to Biological-Phys...@googlegroups.com, scientific-basis...@googlegroups.com
Hi Yeshua and others,
I am slowly improving and walking around the house with a walker! To me 6 years for commercial fusion sounds too much optimistic. This means that you have to include the cost of building the lab equipment which will produce fusion, although I am little bit surprised that so many companies are investing in these. The most efficient work (california) in which individual fusion produced 1.5 times the energy input per small number of reactions has been in laser initiated  fusion. But tokamak (magnetic confinement)type has a factor much less than 1.5. Of course Every attempt must be made to reduce the initial cost. So let us see what happens!
 Best
Kashyap



From: 'Yeshua Ben David' via Biological Physics and Meaning <Biological-Phys...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2024 8:03 PM
To: Biological Physics and Meaning <biological-phys...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [External] Re: The Nature of Reality
 
This message was sent from a non-IU address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.

This Firm Says It’s 6 Years Away From Making Energy From Fusionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9Ne3LjjrIQ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Biological Physics and Meaning" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Biological-Physics-an...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Biological-Physics-and-Meaning/4c06cf2d-bdd8-4a97-ae75-01d5d080d210n%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages