Cathy,
No! Formal description is not same. In physics, entanglement is described by a two particle wave function
H(1)*V(2) + V(1) *H (2) where H and V are polarization states of a single photon and 1 and 2 are two photons. This means that if an observation reveals H or V state of 1st particle (no matter where , how far), the 2nd particle has to be either in V or H state respectively. The 2nd particle has no random choice unlike the first particle. I do not see any resemblance between this and your state
|mind>* |P up> + | no mind> * | P down>
In your case no mind state is already inanimate physical state. So there is overlap between it and P down state whereas the first mind according to you is nonphysical. In physics case both H and V are strictly physical measurable states.
Best
kashyap
-----Original Message-----
From:
biological-phys...@googlegroups.com <
biological-phys...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Cathy Reason
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 1:17 PM
To:
Biological-Phys...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [SBoC-F] Death as Disentanglement
From: "Vasavada, Kashyap V"
Cc: "Biological Physics and Meaning"
<
Biological-Phys...@googlegroups.com>
> These are your words. " Entanglement is just a property of a
> particular
mathematical formalism. It can be applied wherever it works."
> As I said your kind of entanglement does not correspond to anything in
physics.
This is not correct. I have no idea how you arrive at this conclusion, since the formal description is the same in both cases.
Cathy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Biological Physics and Meaning" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
Biological-Physics-an...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Biological-Physics-and-Meaning/CAGPzamWepA%3D8Kh%2BfMjpL4%3DJRw_SCvMBYVx5Adei%2B0E9VHhvK3w%40mail.gmail.com.