Q assembling sample set from existing smaller sets
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Cosine
unread,
Jul 5, 2021, 1:42:35 PM7/5/21
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Hi:
How do we properly assemble a dataset for testing the performance of a new method of screening by a set of small datasets?
To have enough power, we need to have a dataset that is large enough. This might not be possible in practice. Some papers resolve this issue by combining a set of similar but small datasets.
The critical problem here is: what are the rules to make sure the dataset combined is appropriate? Are there books that illustrate this type of problem?
David Duffy
unread,
Jul 5, 2021, 11:30:14 PM7/5/21
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
This is not just statistical, but domain specific (excluding one dataset
is based on common-sensical tests of study quality, but also a
knowledge of the underlying science of the test). Check out
http://prisma-statement.org/
Rich Ulrich
unread,
Jul 7, 2021, 11:52:09 AM7/7/21
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Thanks for the reference.
"Welcome to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) website!"
I haven't spent much time reading, but that looks like an
excellent resource.
--
Rich Ulrich
David Duffy
unread,
Jul 7, 2021, 7:37:20 PM7/7/21
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> "Welcome to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
> and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) website!"
The Cochrane Consortium is the other such go-to resource. I just noticed they
have a textbook on how to do "Cochrane Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy",