1. You can design a powersat as a collection of independant modules, each
containing a reflector, power converter, and a microwave transmitter. The
transmitters on the units are coordinated by a redundant central control
system into a large phased-array transmitter. Advantages of such a
powersat : you use a lot of small, cheap components instead of a few
big, expensive ones; you can start small and expand it easily; you
can take portions down for service without shutting down everything;
and it is very robust ( loosing subunits doesn't cost you the whole thing ).
If you think about it, this makes it a survivable weapon also.
2. The USA did not ( hasn't yet ? ) conquered England because North America
is rich in natural resources and England is ( generally ) poor in them.
The same CAN NOT be said of space.
3. A space-based installation is only vulnerable to attack by a weapon if :
a. It allows the groundhogs to build it.
b. It allows the groundhogs a launch facility for it.
c. It allows it to survive the LONG trip from Earth.
You can do A or B by blackmail or pre-emptive strike, and C using
existing machine-cannon or air-to-air technology. Given all this,
if you come up with a list of attacks that space colonies are
"very vulnerable" to, I'll come up with cheap, easy countermeasures.
( Countermeasure 1 : " You build a launch pad, we fry New York " ).
4. If the inside of the colonie rotates and the outside doesn't,
then put all the weapons on the outside and don't let any of them
get blasted off ( see 3, above ). If the whole thing rotates do
the same but get better targetting systems. Really BIG weapons mount
inside along the axis of rotation, with a targetting mirror at the end.
5. in re the difference between tanks and cadillacs, more to the
point is the difference between pillboxes and underground parking
garages ( pillboxes are cheaper the garages, actually ).
6. If I win the war, I will MAKE YOU send me ANYTHING I WANT
( only to low orbit, I'll take it from there, but YOU DO THE
HARD PART ), and I WON'T PAY FOR IT, and IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT
I WILL FRY YOU because I CAN HIT YOU BUT YOU CAN"T HIT ME.
Beyond that, you can govern yourselves. This is called GUNBOAT
DIPLOMACY. Yes, goverments do act ( have acted ) this childishly.
7. A thriving, expanding space culture doesn't hold any fear for
me. Rather, a desparate, struggling, just-getting-started culture
is the real threat. They NEED to get things cheap/free.
8. If people are going to adapt to low gravity in only a few generation,
the ONLY way it will happen ( genetically ) is if you refuse to allow
people who aren't well adapted to breed. Period. There is no other
form of adaptation possible ( unless your going to splice genes yourself,
but beleive me, that isn't a cheap thing with people. It's not
even cheap with E. Coli ). And what about bone-mass loss ?
9. If one of the MAJOR causes of war is scarce resources, then Space
Colonies will have a lot of cause for war. The list of important
resources that ARE NOT AT ALL AVAILABLE ( much less "scarce" ) in
space runs like a CRC Handbook. And if an ambitous politician can
exploit these multitudinous shortages ...
I think everyone on the net would appreciate if entries to it
were well thought out, not just knee-jerk reactions. I am trying
( I'll admit I may not be suceeding ) to adher to this rule.
Dennis O'Connor
--------
Name a handful, please. Bear in mind that "in space" includes asteroids
(both nickel-iron and carbonaceous-chondrite), comet nuclei, and the
smaller moons of the outer planets.
--
Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
{allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry