info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
So you think it is a thermal effect ...
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Doctor Who
Jan 12, 2023, 1:40:30 PM1/12/23
to
We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
Dean Markley
Jan 12, 2023, 2:20:44 PM1/12/23
to
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 1:40:30 PM UTC-5, Doctor Who wrote:
> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
A branch of physics that deals with the effects arising from the interactions of electric currents with magnets, with other currents, or with themselves.
> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
Huh, that was easy.
Doctor Who
Jan 12, 2023, 2:30:43 PM1/12/23
to
Snidely
Jan 13, 2023, 6:17:00 AM1/13/23
to
Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still
constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
speed.
Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
relativistic form?
/dps
--
You could try being nicer and politer
> instead, and see how that works out.
-- Katy Jennison
> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still
constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
speed.
Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
relativistic form?
/dps
--
You could try being nicer and politer
> instead, and see how that works out.
-- Katy Jennison
Doctor Who
Jan 13, 2023, 8:37:26 AM1/13/23
to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 03:16:53 -0800, Snidely <snide...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
>> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
>
>An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
>But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still
>constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
>relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
>power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
>original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
>speed.
>
>Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
>acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
>relativistic form?
>
>/dps
washing donkey's head is a waste of time with soap and water.
wrote:
>Doctor Who scribbled something on Thursday the 1/12/2023:
>> We ask you to prove that you know electrodynamics.
>
>An electric or magnetic field generates a force on a charged particle.
>But charged particles still have mass, and their acceleration is still
>constrained by that mass. Which has been well studied at highly
>relativistic speeds (and the magnets at CERN are very big and use a lot
>power to move a smattering of particles). Each upgrade since the
>original cyclotron has required more power for smaller increases in
>speed.
>
>Is there something else in electrodynamics that you think allows
>acceleration where F=ma doesn't apply, in either its Newtonian or
>relativistic form?
>
>/dps
Doctor Who
Jan 15, 2023, 8:37:35 AM1/15/23
to
whata troll
0 new messages