Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Wikipedia is all wrong about pseudofossils
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Wretch Fossil
Feb 5, 2012, 4:16:23 AM2/5/12
to
Wikipedia lists the following objects as pseudofossils:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudofossil Those objects are in fact
fossils. For example, the first object was identified as manganese
dendrites. In fact it is fossil assembly of neurons and tracts of
nerve fibers, which are marked in http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=22&f=1472476662&p=103
The second object was identified as concretion with calcite-filled
septarian cracks. The object is in fact a fossil of blood vessel
branches, marked in
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=22&f=1472476661&p=104
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudofossil Those objects are in fact
fossils. For example, the first object was identified as manganese
dendrites. In fact it is fossil assembly of neurons and tracts of
nerve fibers, which are marked in http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=22&f=1472476662&p=103
The second object was identified as concretion with calcite-filled
septarian cracks. The object is in fact a fossil of blood vessel
branches, marked in
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=22&f=1472476661&p=104
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
0 new messages