>>> WHY so many SECRETS about the SRB-5 and 1-X tests???? >>>
gaetanomarano
NASA and ATK haven't released yet the (TRUE and FULL) data of the
SRB-5 and Ares 1-X tests they've gathered months/weeks ago!!!!
--
WHY so many SECRETS about the SRB-5 and 1-X tests????
--
Me
Fool, it is less than 10 days ago. It takes time to analyze flight
data. Shuttle flights take months. Also, what do you expect to see
from the static test. There was no data released from the last shuttle
SRB test. You are not going to see it. NASA is not hiding
anything. There are no secrets. Just a spammer and loser trying to
make a name for himself.
gaetanomarano, you and your website are the joke of the space
program. No one who matters, takes you seriously. You are a legend
in your own mind. The only reason your site gets visited is because
people are looking for a laugh. Links to your site get emailed around
and usually the accompanying words are "look at what the dork says now"
gaetanomarano
> Fool, it is less than 10 days ago.
the main data are well known seconds after the tests and they can
release them... if they want... but probably they prefer to hide some
bad data...
> There are no secrets.
true, there are no secrets and everything is revealed quickly... but
only when the results are good...
> people are looking for a laugh.
happy to be the "David Letterman" of the space blogging... :-)
however, HOW you at LockMart will launch the Orion if the Ares-1 can't
fly?
or... maybe... you hope that NASA will fail to sell your Delta IV
Heavy... ?
it could be a good business for LM, but the max payload of the DIVH is
6-7 tons LESS than necessary to carry the lunar Orion
.
Me
1. > the main data are well known seconds after the tests and they
can
> release them... if they want... but probably they prefer to hide some
> bad data...
>
2. > true, there are no secrets and everything is revealed quickly...
but
> only when the results are good...
>
3. > happy to be the "David Letterman" of the space blogging... :-)
>
4. > however, HOW you at LockMart will launch the Orion if the Ares-1
can't
> fly?
>
5. it could be a good business for LM, but the max payload of the
DIVH is
> 6-7 tons LESS than necessary to carry the lunar Orion
More clueless posts from a fool
1. Have you ever done any launch vehicle telemetry reduction? No,
actually you haven't done anything in the field of spaceflight, so you
know nothing. The data is not "known" immediately. The data does not
come off the vehicle in a publishable format. It has to be gathered,
reduced, analyzed before it is published.
2. wrong again. It takes a few weeks to work with the data. Delta
II's first report on a flight isn't for 30 days.
3. He isn't as funny as you, but you are more annoying.
4. Again, I am not a LockMart employee. But there are many ways
Orion can fly.
5. Wrong again. No, D-IVH with RS-68A's can fly it.
gaetanomarano why do you continue spam your crap.
You are not an engineer, you do not work for any aerospace company,
you have no technical background. All these are evident in your
posts. You don't know basic engineering concepts. Your designs are
unworkable. You don't know how things work mechanically. You don't
know the proper equations to analyze yours and others designs , Your
calculations are even wrong, You keep spamming and you wonder why
nobody is listening to you. Nobody takes you seriously.
You are treated like the lunatic in a padded cell, you make noise but
nothing makes sense. You are the crazy man on the street corner that
yells at all the cars and everyone ignores. .You are an annoyance,
and you clog the space blogs with your spam and crap.
gaetanomarano
> Delta II's first report on a flight isn't for 30 days.
we not even know the BASIC data of the 1-X flight and the SRB-5 test
was accomplished 60 days ago
> Again, I am not a LockMart employee.
sorry, but I believe you're a LM guy
> D-IVH with RS-68A's can fly it.
the CURRENT version can lift 24 tons from lift-off to LEO
the Orion is only 21.5 tons in LEO but, with the LAS, BPC, fairing and
overweight, it's over 32 tons today, so, the CURRENT version of the
DIVH can't leave the pad with a full Orion atop it
when other and more powerful versions will be released and tested, I
can change my opinion
> You are not an engineer, you do not work for any aerospace company,
> you have no technical background. All these are evident in your
> posts. You don't know basic engineering concepts. Your designs are
> unworkable. You don't know how things work mechanically. You don't
> know the proper equations to analyze yours and others designs , Your
> calculations are even wrong, You keep spamming and you wonder why
> nobody is listening to you. Nobody takes you seriously.
> You are treated like the lunatic in a padded cell, you make noise but
> nothing makes sense. You are the crazy man on the street corner that
> yells at all the cars and everyone ignores. .You are an annoyance,
> and you clog the space blogs with your spam and crap.
don't be angry... :-) ...stay calm... :-) ... take care of your
coronary arteries... :-)
.
gaetanomarano
...the LUNAR Orion is only 21.5 tons in LEO but, with the LAS, BPC,
fairing and
overweight, it's over 32 tons AT LIFT-OFF today...
.
gaetanomarano
...the LUNAR Orion is only 21.5 tons in LEO but, with the LAS, BPC,
fairing and
overweight, it's over 32 tons AT LIFT-OFF today...
.
Damon Hill
2eda17...@v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
> On 7 Nov, 16:50, Me <charliexmur...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Delta II's first report on a flight isn't for 30 days.
>
> we not even know the BASIC data of the 1-X flight and the SRB-5 test
> was accomplished 60 days ago
>
>> Again, I am not a �LockMart employee.
>
> sorry, but I believe you're a LM guy
Oh, me, ME! I"M a LM guy, on their payroll and all that.
I wish...
But yeah, you're a ranting looney with no grasp of reality,
so I'll just go back to ignoring your delusions. There's no
money in refuting nitwits.
--Damon
Me
1. > we not even know the BASIC data of the 1-X flight and the SRB-5
test
> was accomplished 60 days ago
>
2. > sorry, but I believe you're a LM guy
>
3. > > D-IVH with RS-68A's can fly it.
>
> the CURRENT version can lift 24 tons from lift-off to LEO
>
> the Orion is only 21.5 tons in LEO but, with the LAS, BPC, fairing and
> overweight, it's over 32 tons today, so, the CURRENT version of the
> DIVH can't leave the pad with a full Orion atop it
>
> when other and more powerful versions will be released and tested, I
> can change my opinion
1. Have you seen the data from the last Shuttle SRB test in Dec 2008?
http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=879
No, because it isn't published and put on the internet, because there
is no need for it to be. You have no need for it.
2. Again, what you believe isn't reality. Just because I am on an LM
network, doesn't mean I work for them. LM provides computer and
network support to NASA. I am not an LM employee nor am I a
subcontractor to LM.
3. Your "opinion" doesn't enter the picture *. It is a fact. The
DIVH can fly the lunar Orion.
The next D-IVH launch will have the RS-68A, which means the CURRENT
version has the RS-68A.
* Your opinion is worthless. It carries no weight. Your posts and
blogs show that you have no education or experience to base an opinion
of spaceflight matters. You have no concept of physics and
engineering processes and are wrong in your conclusions. What you
believe doesn't matter. Opinion doesn't matter in engineering. Your
concepts won't or can't work. Mostly, your calculations to prove your
ideas are wrong because they aren't based on engineering formulas.
Jonathan
"Me" <charlie...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bdaed8c8-c5ad-45a8...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 9:25 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@gaetanomarano.it> wrote:
> --
> NASA and ATK haven't released yet the (TRUE and FULL) data of the
> SRB-5 and Ares 1-X tests they've gathered months/weeks ago!!!!
> --
> > WHY so many SECRETS about the SRB-5 and 1-X tests????
> --
> Fool, it is less than 10 days ago. It takes time to analyze flight
> data.
So when NASA announces ....just hours....after the flight that
the flight, and I quote "performed as expected" and was
"successful" then they would be making those conclusions
without having done any analysis of the flight data at all?
Right? You can't have it both ways.
Thank you for confirming my source of criticism, that those
announcements were highly premature.
If not outright misinformation, to put it politely.
Me
> "Me" <charliexmur...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
No, not true. The vehicle's altitude and velocity is measured at
burnout and that can be compared to predicted and give a ROM of
success. Also recovery of the stage is a measure of success. The
detailed assessment is what takes time.