> > Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/ Guth Venus
>
> Something I read in some science type journal online a while back was
> talking about the physical limits of the actual mirror or lens glass of
> optical telescopes, where if the Universe is beyond a certain size, the
> image of a ultra distant object, say a galaxy, would be tinier than even
> the atoms making up the mirror/lens, and thus couldn't be imaged.
> I THINK I'm remembering that article accurately, but it's been long ago.
> How this limit applies to radio telescopes, I don't know, but light and
> radio waves are both electromagnetic radiation.
> 4HEAD
That's a good point, as to whatever the minimum mirror resolution
might actually be another limiting factor. However, cosmic gravity
lens distortions can greatly morph or magnify whatever is extremely
far beyond.
According to the latest interpretations of our supposedly forever
expanding universe, the expansion rate is roughly 74.3 km/sec/3e6 ly,
or 2.477e-2 m/sec/ly.
In other words, anything past 12.1e9 ly from us is going to become
invisible to us, because we’re moving faster than ‘c’ away from it,
and those distant photons will never again reach us unless something
slows down or sort of drags its feet.
However, with perhaps at least 5e55 kg and possibly 5e56 kg worth of
cosmic mass (including its dark/clear aether), there should be
sufficient gravity to have slowed and even as having reversed this
rate of expansion, unless there’s an ongoing flow to contend with.