"bringyagrogalong" <
sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:bab96c80-c2e0-42e7...@f30g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> Oy rool <the.germans.won.the.battle@moscow> waffled:
>> bringyagrogalong wrote:
>> > "CONCOCTEDCONSENSUS" lied:
>> >>
>> >> Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
>> >> Change, reluctantly admitted that there has been no global warming so
>> >> far in the 21st century.
>>
>> > cite!
>>
>> > Simply saying something doesn't make it so.
>>
>> > You have to back your shit up.
>>
>> Even better:
>
> Not asking for better.
>
> I want that idiot CONCOCTEDCONSENSUS to back his claim up.
>
> If he can't, it will be yet another example of the AGW-deniers
> resorting to lies and distortions to back up their discredited claims.
>
Just Another Small Step In Concocting The Fake AGW Consensus
29 Nov 2011
In 2005, Roger Pielke Jr co-wrote a peer-reviewed paper warning against
linking man-made warming to hurricane impacts:
To summarize, claims of linkages between global warming and hurricane
impacts are premature for three reasons. First, no connection has been
established between greenhouse gas emissions and the observed behavior of
hurricanes . . . Second, the peer-reviewed literature reflects that a
scientific consensus exists that any future changes in hurricane intensities
will likely be small in the context of observed variability . . . And third,
under the assumptions of the IPCC, expected future damages to society of its
projected changes in the behavior of hurricanes are dwarfed by the influence
of its own projections of growing wealth and population . . . While future
research or experience may yet overturn these conclusions, the state of the
peer-reviewed knowledge today is such that there are good reasons to expect
that any conclusive connection between global warming and hurricanes or
their impacts will not be made in the near term.
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/resource-1766-2005.36.pdf
"The team" concluded this was heresy.
Pielke writes:
Kevin Trenberth, a "scientist" at NCAR here in Boulder and the person (along
with Phil Jones) in charge of the 2007 IPCC AR4 chapter that reviewed
extreme events including hurricanes, said this in the Boulder Daily Camera
about our article:
I think the role of the changing climate is greatly underestimated by Roger
Pielke Jr. I think he should withdraw this article. This is a shameful
article.
And Professor Phil Jones - yes, him again, demonstrating how few people it
takes to scare the world on warming - agreed that here was one more paper
that wouldn't even be referred to in the IPCC's 2007 report:
Jones to Trenberth on 22 June 2005:
Kevin,
I'll read the Pielke et al piece for BAMS that came over the skeptic email
today. Presumably we'll get forced to refer to it [in the 2007 IPCC report].
Trenberth replies:
Don't see why we should refer to the Pielke piece. It is [n]ot yet
published. It is very political and an opinion.
Jones soon comes around, despite noting its peer-reviewed status:
Kevin,
Read the article on the new patio at home with a glass of wine. I thoroughly
agree that we don't need to refer to it. Wrote that on it last night. It is
very political. Several sentences and references shouldn't be there. I don't
know who was supposed to have reviewed it - maybe Linda [Mearns] will know,
as she used to or still does have something to do with BAMS. The inference
in the email (from whence it came) is that it has been accepted !
Cheers
Phil
The gatekeeping of the IPCC process is abundantly clear, and the shadowy
suggestion that they can find out who the reviewers are from another
colleague is a bit unsettling as well.
This is how the "consensus" was manufactured by "peer review".
It is a scandal, and the consequences have been enormous and costly.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2011/11/foia2011-on-shameful-paper.html
Warmest Regards
B0nnz0
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."
Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
"A major problem has been the co-option of climate science by politics,
ambition, greed, and what seems to be a hereditary human need for a
righteous cause."
"What better cause than "saving" the planet, especially if one can get
ample, secure funding at the same time?"
William Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, Princeton
University.
"The claim is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8ºK in
about 150 years, which, if true, means to me that the temperature has been
amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely
improved in this 'warming' period,".
Nobel Laureate Dr. Ivar Giaever:
"If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip
now due to mankind. The planet has a natural thermostat"
Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, Professor of Meteorology MIT,
Former IPCC Lead Author
"A core problem is that science has given way to ideology. The scientific
method has been dispensed with, or abused, to serve the myth of man-made
global warming."
"The World Turned Upside Down", Melanie Phillips
"Computer models are built in an almost backwards fashion: The goal is to
show evidence of AGW, and the "scientists" go to work to produce such a
result. When even these models fail to show what advocates want, the data
and interpretations are "fudged" to bring about the desired result"
"The World Turned Upside Down", Melanie Phillips
"Ocean acidification looks suspiciously like a back-up plan by the
environmental pressure groups in case the climate fails to warm: another try
at condemning fossil fuels!"
http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/threat-ocean-acidification-greatly-exaggerated
Before attacking hypothetical problems, let us first solve the real problems
that threaten humanity. One single water pump at an equivalent cost of a
couple of solar panels can indeed spare hundreds of Sahel women the daily
journey to the spring and spare many infections and lives.
Martin De Vlieghere, philosopher
"All it takes to find oneself called a 'denier' is to seek a sense of
proportion about environmental problems"
Mark Lynas, The God Species