Recently in another newsgroup (physics.foundations), someone (no
natural scientist, presumably a mathematician) wrote that the esoteric
books from Gurdjeff were based on "objective methods" and such books
would be better to investigate consciousness than by scientific
psychology which would be only "so called" scientific. Obviously, this
mathematician does not know the meaning of "objectivity" in natural
science. Who can help him (Charles Francis alias Oh No)? What is
objectivity? What is science?
see: Physics of Consciousness (# 64)):
http://groups.google.de/group/sci.physics.foundations/browse_thread/thread/ef7282132c914f0e/d5556a7edb10eda3?hl=de&q=%22Physics+of+consciousness%22&lnk=nl&
Bye, Lothar Arendes
http://freenet-homepage.de/LotharArendes/index2.htm
'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`''`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
sci.psychology.research is a moderated newsgroup.
Before submitting an article, please read the guidelines which are posted
here bimonthly or the charter on the web at http://psychcentral.com/spr/
Submissions are acknowledged automatically.