For the Record (Post 2B- Pt.2)
Anonymous
Post 2B-- Pt. 2. LET'S HAVE THESE on the permanent record for "Taylor Jimenez,
of Newport Beach, CA." actually apparently the world's most
disgusting and hated spammer, Stanford "Spamford" Wallace:
Return-Path:
<mixm...@helferlein.net>
From:
Anonymous Coredump <mixm...@remailer.segfault.net>
http://remailer.segfault.net/mixmaster/
Newsgroups:
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject:
Sure thing, I'd buy a spammers domain!!!?????
X-No-Archive:
yes
Message-ID:
<ffeb913cab1d29cd...@remailer.segfault.net>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 04:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:118148
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:46:22 GMT
NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
--------------------------------------------------------
Of all the ways to get a domain name, what would be the least likely
way a person would do it? (They have always been cheap however you
get one.) Well, I'll tell you: To go out and by the
domain name of a notorious spammer. That would be the least likely.
(I might continue to use a particular domain name if I were a
notorious spammer.)
From:
Anonymous <nob...@noisebox.remailer.org>
Newsgroups:
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject:
Psychologist Linked to Notorious Criminal?
Date:
23 Feb 2002 16:20:34 GMT
Organization:
Noisebox Anonymous Posting Service
Lines:
20
Message-ID:
<25edf85be2f14403...@noisebox.remailer.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
dhcp-80c-0052.unm.edu
To:
mail...@dizum.com, mail...@freedom.gmsociety.org, mail...@anon.lcs.mit.edu
X-No-Archive:
yes
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:118164
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:30:30 GMT
I've been reading here a while. Let me see if I have this straight.
Some psychologist reportedly has sent her own personal snail mail
correspondence to the notorious Stanford ("Spamford") Wallace to
do person defamation and malice against one of there enemies? That is
what I have figured out putting the last few days posts together.
Reading the posts of the last few days leads one to this conclusion.
I'll bet Brad has not been able to get "Taylor Jimenez" to tell
him his attorney's name. That is because "Taylor Jimenez" is
an alias. BUT WAIT. For the psychologist to send "Taylor" the
personal correspondence, wouldn't she have to know she was dealing
with Spamford Wallace? I think so.
Brad should just be saying ONE THING to his opponents (which include
unethical psychologists): "Show ME the MONEY!!!!"
I bet "Taylor" has some MONEY!!!!!!!! Right, Spamford???
baaahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
This post is about:
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Iceman
Ok pea brain, have one last look before it all disappears:
Eaton Vance Annuity
EquiVest Annuity
EquiVest TSA
Exxon Mobil
Merck
WalMart
Xcel Engery
Look familiar??
Also looks like someone else has a spelling problem.