For the Record (Post 2B- Pt.1)!!!!!!
Nomen Nescio
Post 2B. Part 1 LET'S HAVE THESE on the permanent record for "Taylor Jimenez,
of Newport Beach, CA." actually apparently the world's most
disgusting and hated spammer, Stanford "Spamford" Wallace:
Return-Path:
<rema...@dizum.com>
From:
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups:
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject:
Re: Taylor Jimenez == Spamford Wallace
References:
<43988329b8c2ab24...@dizum.com>
X-No-Archive:
yes
Message-ID:
<6b07c5d3389948c8...@dizum.com>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 04:30:20 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
rema...@dizum.com
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:118145
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:30:36 GMT
There is no other explanation. With all the domain names out there to
choose or to buy, why would you buy a domain name from a known spammer??
You wouldn't. You choose your own domain name first. Think about it.
All evidence links "Taylor Jimenez" to Stanford Wallace.
He IS Stanford Wallace -- in age, nature, and behavior. So, given
all these facts, one must conclude "Taylor Jimenez" does not exist.
He is an alias. "Taylor" is Spamford Wallace (fat ass, lying spammer).
(Like Wallace Taylor apparently took up quite an anti-spamming campaign.
But we have seen that Taylor -- just toooo much like Wallace --
is a hypocrite. "Taylor" is on 70 Usenet abuse spam reports; and
Wallace has returned to his cash cow of money via spam. And, both are
flagrant materialists.)
He is fooling no one. It is the criminal Stanford Wallace!!!
Return-Path:
<an...@xganon.com>
Date:
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:22:40 -0600
From:
xganon <nob...@xganon.com>
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject:
Taylor has been at work for Years!!
X-No-Archive:
yes
Message-ID:
<e431e6a91f036cfb...@xganon.com>
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:118132
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 02:17:57 GMT
How long has Taylor Been doing his "work" on Usenet and the Internet?
INFO-ADA Digest - 28 May 1997 to 29 May 1997 - Special issue
Re: Chassidic Faggot Grady Booch exposed at http://WWW.NETSCUM.NET/boochg0.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: INFO-ADA Digest - 28 May 1997 to 29 May 1997 - Special issue
Subject: Re: Chassidic Faggot Grady Booch exposed at http://WWW.NETSCUM.NET/boochg0.html
From: Tim Gowen <t...@JUGLANS.DEMON.CO.UK.ANTI-SPAM>
From: Tim Gowen <t...@JUGLANS.DEMON.CO.UK.ANTI-SPAM>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <1997052519...@fat.doobie.com>, Huge Cajones Remailer
<nob...@huge.cajones.com> writes
<Libellous Crap Snipped>
Grady Booch is considered to be one of the top guys in his field, and
you are probably considered to be among the lower life-forms.
Go back to the playroom.
Tim
"I'm smitten... I'm in deep smitt."
Tim Gowen - http://www.uea.ac.uk/~u9435026
t...@juglans.demon.co.uk
REMOVE 'anti-spam' FROM ADDRESS TO E-MAIL ME
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 18:23:34 -0700
Return-Path:
<m...@remailer.havenco.com>
From:
Anonymous User <anon...@remailer.havenco.com>
Newsgroups:
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
Subject:
Definitive Proof: Taylor Jimenez == Spamford Wallace?
X-No-Archive:
yes
Message-ID:
<a5abf27829cd6cf2...@remailer.havenco.com>
X-Loop:
mail...@freedom.gmsociety.com
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Host:
205.157.138.7
X-Complaints-To:
ab...@verio.net
X-Trace:
dfw-read.news.verio.net 1014435044 205.157.138.7 (Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:30:44 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:30:44 GMT
Xref:
wnmasters2 sci.psychology.psychotherapy:118144
X-Received-Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 03:30:26 GMT
NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
--------------------------------------------------------
I got a picture from one of "Taylor's" own web sites of him on
a snowmobile. I got a picture of Stanford Wallace from an interview
on a web page. Guess what? They look exactly alike!!!!
This post is about:
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace Taylor Netscum Jimenez Stanford Wallace
Joseph P. Arco
> Post 2B is coming in two parts.
You fell apart some time ago. Why not make it three?
> Sorry if this comes twice!!!!!
Not a chance.
...Joe
--
TXLTLQWCPDHKZHWCZQREKRUS
A. Melon
Joseph P. Arco
> Path:
>
> news.mv.net!newsfeed4.cidera.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!dca6-feed2.news.digex.net!jfk3-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
>
> From:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
> Comments:
> This message did not originate from the Sender
> address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer
> software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
> administrator at <ab...@dizum.com>.
> Newsgroups:
> sci.psychology.psychotherapy
> Subject:
> Psychologists are PSYCHOS
> X-No-Archive:
> yes
> Message-ID:
> <8e82b870c83d43d8...@dizum.com>
> Date:
> Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:50:23 +0100 (CET)
> Mail-To-News-Contact:
> ab...@dizum.com
> Organization:
> mail...@dizum.com
> Lines:
> 17
> Xref:
> news.mv.net sci.psychology.psychotherapy:121368
>
>
>
>
> Psychologists are PSYCHOS. This newsgroup proves it. Why don't
> all you psychologists try to get honest jobs where you actually do
> have to know something and actually do have to do something? Dare you.
> You couldn't. You are soft and stupid from living off of fraud and
> the insurance "gravy train." You have no abilities that can be
> demonstrated convincingly or shown. I think you have pea brains and
> could not learn anything hard or do anything that took any real
> professional skills. And, you are too damned mean to be preachers.
> A white castle worker is typically better than you. He may even
> be smarter.
>
> I say you are worthless and parasites on society. You are
> psycho frauds. You should all kill yourselves and do society and your
> families a favor. It would be about the only honorable thing you could
> do if I am right about you. There is no reason whatsoever to believe
> I am not right.
I suspect you're incorrect as always. Projecting again?
...Joe
--
DDZQKHAMEALMLGADLVJY
Anonymous User
Joseph P. Arco
> Path:
>
> news.mv.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
>
> Date:
> Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:11:04 +0100
> Posted-Date:
> Thu, 28 Feb 2002 23:11:04 +0100
> From:
> Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
> Comments:
> This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed
> automatically by anonymizing
> remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
> administrator at
> <cripto...@ecn.org>.
> Newsgroups:
> sci.psychology.psychotherapy
> Subject:
> Who are the *real* kooks and trolls
> X-No-Archive:
> yes
> Message-ID:
> <6be317d60f544626...@ecn.org>
> Mail-To-News-Contact:
> ab...@dizum.com
> Organization:
> mail...@dizum.com
> Lines:
> 34
> Xref:
> news.mv.net sci.psychology.psychotherapy:121485
>
>
>
>
> "Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
> news:a5md8h$4cd$4...@astroconsulting.databasix.com...
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:12:35 -0400, "Norman L. DeForest"
> > <af...@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >[posted and emailed]
> > >
> > >On 26 Feb 2002, Alexander Alexandrov wrote:
> > >
> > >*This* newsgroup seems to be overrun with trolls and net-kooks. I'm
> only
> > >here because I heard that one such net-kook had claimed that I was
> Sanford
> > >Wallace.
> >
> > This newsgroup has been a mess ever since Brad Jesness showed up years
> ago.
> > Any real discussions take place in
> sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated.
> > It has gone so well over there it drove Brad to spamming newbies with
> his
> > dumb sppFAQ because he can't ruin there as he has done here....
> >
> If this is so, why wouldn't professional psychologists, Dan Rogers, Joe
> Arco,
> Mark Morin, John Price, Kali, et al. leave spp?
> They are the *real* kooks and trolls of this newsgroup.