The Peter Hood[lum] we KNOW, an Abuser
TruthBeTold
Peter Hood is a well-known and proven 'net abuser. Moreover, he is an
abusive person, generally. He bullies people repeatedly who do not
"conform" to his views. He is presently trying to bully GeneDoug.
Below I provide some objective evidece that Peter is indeed a 'net
abuser and completely inappropriate thug. (Leslie Packer is similar.)
I am quoting someone named "psycpers" from another group hereon:
Subject: Peter Hood, Libelous Net Abuser
Peter Hood, sophisticate?? NO !!! (In fact, he is likely
bumbli...@hotmail.com, given his history of using aliases and his
malicious activity; also the language in the "bumblingbrad" posts is
often distinctly U.K. English (e.g. use of the word "bum" for buttocks).
Anyhow, look at the company Peter Hood, 'net spammer and 'net abuser,
keeps (see Peter in the post quoted below about 7 from the bottom -- and
this does not even consider the fact that he uses several true
aliases): (Note: There is more idicating Peter's aliases and his
character below the following quoted post. He along with psychologist
Leslie Packer are the major 'net abusers who drive people whose ideas
they don't like off the internet "sci." newsgroups. They both ALSO have
been regular contributors with malicious posts in alt.usenet.kooks and
were major posters in alt.brad.jesness.die.die.die -- a newsgoup formed
by another psychologist, John Price)
Quoting a post of another below (post is w/r to spamming and likely
usenet abuse):
Subject: Usenet Posting Summary (Thu, 01 Jan 1998 16:04:29 CST)
From: Joe Greco [snip]
Date: 1998/01/01
[snip]
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
This is an experimental report at this time. -JG199711180154
==============================================================================
This data has been gathered by Joe Greco and sol.net Network Services
as part of an ongoing project to monitor Usenet trends and abuse.
There are currently two items scanned:
1) "From:" header
2) "NNTP-Posting-Host:" header, if present
All articles sharing the same header (i.e. all articles with a
"From:" header of "jgr...@ns.sol.net") are counted together, with
a summary of the number of posts, bytes posted, and BI. Only
articles that have a BI of 20 or greater are summarized.
Please remember that BI is a general formula to measure the
number of groups posted to in a manner which favors crossposting....
[snip]
543 23.000 23 1481008 butt...@aol.com
544 23.000 23 16968 THR...@prodigy.com (Brian D.
Howells)
545 23.000 23 235438 joi...@bi-girl.com
546 23.000 23 51528 sc...@zorch.sf-bay.org (Scott Hazen
Mueller)
547 23.000 23 157239 Toma...@girl-girlsex.com
548 23.000 23 319076 "Steve Cochran"
<scoc...@chattanooga.net>
549 22.869 12 39509 mi...@sonic.net (M is for Malapert)
550 22.696 14 69215 gra...@daveney.matra.com.au (Graham
Daveney)
551 22.564 10 19022 rf...@netcom.com (Richard Foy)
552 22.517 13 1612539 SKULL/LosS<sk...@spamkill.4u>
553 22.517 13 653197 "EvilCub23" <Evil...@aol.com>
554 22.473 17 27297 l...@put.com (Louis Epstein)
555 22.450 6 129631 b...@fo.com
556 22.414 22 39967 \\The Best Jobs//
<jayb...@thebestjobs.com>
557 22.414 22 17032 STC <stc...@mail.earthlink.net>
558 22.361 10 1293787 Ge...@pics.net
559 22.117 16 40248 johan...@aimnet.com (Big Oh)
560 22.045 9 498174 sup...@abpebarc.com
561 22.000 22 15210 dmb...@aol.com (DMBlarr)
562 22.000 22 1846063 Mistress <Mist...@dvnexus.net>
563 22.000 22 11944 nhlg...@aol.com (Nhlgames)
564 22.000 22 1541709 east...@mindspring.com (Gondorf)
565 22.000 22 36810 "SHEDGIRL" <nif...@dircon.co.uk>
566 22.000 22 17415 TO JENNIFER (Private)
567 22.000 22 2664131 ecos...@concentric.net
568 22.000 22 124424 Mar...@girl-girlsex.com
569 22.000 22 281142 h...@sassygirl.com
570 22.000 22 229132 mu...@bi-girl.com
571 22.000 22 15902 WebXXXpert
572 22.000 22 40321 Alex Shakhajlo
<Alex.Sh...@f701.n461.z2.fidonet.org>
573 22.000 22 28597 ".adrienne."
<mo...@byebyespam.slim.demon.co.uk>
574 22.000 22 27601 "Elvis J.R." <fel...@goodnet.com>
575 22.000 22 1747076 "Hammett" <Ham...@library.jp>
576 22.000 22 5697595 oksc...@happy.holydays
577 22.000 22 4069284 Race...@ix.netcom.com
578 22.000 22 3272512 LDD <blue...@earthlink.net>
579 22.000 22 43960 dhus...@bbs.sjtu.edu.cn
(«ÎŚ*ĄÚ»=-MOUSE)
580 22.000 22 43914 Kat...@SCAT.com
581 22.000 22 44395 Mich...@GrossPics.com
582 22.000 22 11606 windo...@aol.com (Windowss95)
583 22.000 22 29091 bam11...@aol.com (BAM1106016)
584 22.000 22 1377145 Stanl...@Binford.org
585 22.000 22 430892 M...@girl-girlsex.com
586 22.000 22 267336 bev...@bi-girl.com
587 22.000 22 398532 wa...@bisexual-girl.com
588 22.000 22 9599724 PigB...@please.dont.email.me (Pig
Bodine)
589 22.000 22 144661 "Majik" <ma...@mindspring.com>
590 22.000 22 4293261 spam.p...@hotmail.com (wave boy)
591 22.000 22 8593361 Pig...@world.of.pooh (Tone Deaf)
592 21.975 18 257515 Peter <Pe...@wharton.demon.co.uk+>
593 21.842 15 23350 Alex Buell
<alex....@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
594 21.828 20 34132 "Nick Darlington"
<ne...@nickd.demon.co.uk>
595 21.657 20 30297 tau...@nospam.demon.co.uk (Mike
Fleming)
596 21.633 6 202904 Christopher
<Youn...@YoungHung.Com>
597 21.560 20 39365 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
<spam...@library.lspace.org>
598 21.463 18 30798 Courageous <jkra...@san.rr.com>
[snip]
(end quote of this first post)
Note: IN fact, this post above only deals with the frequent use and
cross-posting by one of Peter Hood's e-mail addresses
(Pe...@wharton.demon.co.uk+), one distinct from even the
Pe...@wharton.demon.co.uk address (because of "+" added).
------
Now more:
All this (above) is true in spite of the fact that Peter uses numerous
TRUE aliases himself, while *falsely* accusing others of using aliases
(when they just use different screen names, with the same well-know
e-mail addresses and typically sign their posts !!). Peter also knowing
makes unfounded and false and malicious accusations repeatedly, until he
drives his "enemies" ("enemies" of status quo psychotherapy) out of
"sci." newsgroups. Leslie Packer's behavior is quite similar. Both
have repeatedly attempted character assassination based on unfounded
(and false) accusations. More evidence about Peter, a recent contibutor
HERE in Clinical-Psychologists (quoting Peter himself):
At 06:09 PM 3/24/98 +0000, Peter <[alias address snipped]> wrote:
>
>Apologies for the length of this response, but please bear with me and
>be amused as I lay out my sock puppets, one of whom is buried deep and
>known to only a few in auk and spp. -+>;->
>
>In article [address snipped],
>Bratley L. Jesness [snipped again] writes
>>More KOOK points for Peter Hood:
>>
>>Remember how Peter Hood has ranted and raved about others using "aliases",
>>when in fact these people just used different screen names WITH their same
>>old FAMILAR ADDRESSES ??!! (and only very rarely did they change e-mail
>>addressses, as they changed ISP services). Well now this **KOOK**, who
>>has saved 41 megs of one person's posts for malicious reasons, HIMSELF
>>uses an "alias", BUT in the REAL sense and REAL meaning of the word !!!
>>The twit, to wit: [the rest of Brad's post snipped]
[Peter then continues his post writing:]
> Too woo?
><item not snipped, see end of post>
>
>I hereby nominate Bradley L. Jesness for the HL and S award, March 1998,
>and submit my evidence from the middle of this post onward.
>
>Who will kindly second my nomination please?
[snip]
>Bratley and Timmie have allowed themselves to fall HL & S for some of
>those sock puppets I've used and publicly declared to have used. I
>forget some of them, but they include:
>
>Adolf Reinach <Rei...@ar.demon.co.uk>
>Alexander Pfaender <Al...@ap.demon.co.uk>
>Arthur Wellesley <Art...@Wellesley.demon.co.uk>
>Carl Stumpf <Pe...@stumpf.demon.co.uk>
>Carl Stumpf <Ca...@stumpf.demon.co.uk>
>Christian Freiherr von Ehrenfels <Chri...@cve.demon.co.uk>
>Dietrich von Hildebrand <Pe...@hildebrand.demon.co.uk>
>Duke Nukem <Du...@duke.a-bomb.com>
>Edmund Husserl <Edm...@Brentano.demon.co.uk>
>For...@justice.com
>Georg Lukacs <Ge...@lukacs.demon.co.uk>
>Josef Popper-Lynkeus <cho-...@jpl.demon.co.uk>
>Karl Kraus <Ka...@kraus.demon.co.uk>
>Leopold von Sacher-Masoch <bon...@lvsm.demon.co.uk>
>Lipot Szondi <Li...@szondi.demon.co.uk>
>Maurice Merleau-Ponty <Pe...@mmp.demon.co.uk>
>Michael Collins <m...@HQ.demon.co.eire>
>Moritz Geiger <Pe...@geiger.demon.co.uk>
>Myles na Gopaleen <Myles@O'Brien.demon.co.uk>
>Nicolai Hartmann <Nich...@nichart.demon.co.uk>
>Peter <Pe...@wharton.demon.co.uk+>
>Roman Ingarden <Pe...@ingarden.demon.co.uk>
>Sandor Ferenczi <San...@ferenczi.demon.co.uk>
>Sludge <Di...@sludge.veruka.com>
>Squeaky <Squ...@curiosity.trollnet.us>
>The Reverend James Dallaway <Ja...@dallaway.demon.co.uk>
>Theodor Hertzka <the...@hertzka.demon.co.uk>
>Theodor Gomperz <The...@tg.demon.co.uk>
>
>As I say, I have two other *accounts*, one of which is well known to
>both spp and auk posters. Here is your clue-stick for the day; I am a
>Follower Of The Clawed Albino, and post from AOL UK, and I reeled you
>in, HL & S. 0 ;->
>So, indeed, if interested persons look for this Follower Of The Clawed
>Albino, of AOL UK, they will find her to be a most confused and unhappy
>bunny. Indeed, her husband actually wanted to *hit* Bratley, the poor
>dear. ;->
>
>[She didn't respond to that /ghastly/ sexual oriented post in spp tho'
>as it just wasn't her scene, and besides, she's married. ;-> ]
>
>Bardley, did it take you almost twelve months to realise that I spoke
>the truth? You silly little kook! You among two others fell head-first
>into my use of appropriately named puppets. Squeaky responded to
>squeaking kooks, and so on.
>
[snip]
>--
>Peter
>
[snip]
SCN User
Who cares about all this crap? Is this forum about identifying
assholes and stringing together paranoid fabrics of names and dates
documenting conspiracies and persecution? Or is it dedicated to the
spread of knowledge, inane gossip, and flaming people as it should be?
Lin
Gene Douglas
I wouldn't waste time on this joker. He's a habitual troller who's unhappy
because Brad isn't here, and is looking for someone else to play with.
SCN User wrote in message ...
:
:Who cares about all this crap? Is this forum about identifying
John Clark
TruthBeTold schrieb:
> Peter Hood is a well-known and proven 'net abuser. Moreover, he is an
> abusive person, generally. He bullies people repeatedly who do not
> "conform" to his views. He is presently trying to bully GeneDoug.
> Below I provide some objective evidece that Peter is indeed a 'net
> abuser and completely inappropriate thug. (Leslie Packer is similar.)
Not true. Once Peter figured out that John Price and John Clark are two
separate persons there have been no more 'problems' from Peter.
On the other hand Gene Douglas spares himself almost never to play
credential proctologist, as well as bullying anyone who has a different
view on how 'truth' in a science based activity is defined. If he likes
religious systems, then let him be truthful enough to say so.
May a thousand Kali devotees dance on your pin head.
Erich von Tappiken
In article <6kuaik$25b6$1...@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>, Gene Douglas
<gene...@prodigy.net> writes
>I wouldn't waste time on this joker. He's a habitual troller
You learned a new word, but didn't learn the meaning? Did I hear you say
IKYABWAI?
>who's unhappy
>because Brad isn't here,
He's in my kill-file. I guess you didn't read Message-ID: <vbLvJEA5OHR1E
w...@wharton.demon.co.uk>, or are in need of a toupee with brains.
>and is looking for someone else to play with.
Read the messages whose IDs I posted. Look in the mirror. Consult
Message-ID: <libel-ya02408000...@news.concentric.net>. I
reckon you fit all but <perhaps> one of the criteria there.
>SCN User wrote in message ...
> :
> :Who cares about all this crap? Is this forum about identifying
> :assholes and stringing together paranoid fabrics of names and dates
> :documenting conspiracies and persecution? Or is it dedicated to the
> :spread of knowledge, inane gossip, and flaming people as it should be?
> :Lin
--
Erich von Tappiken
<That's Peter being ironic again, lamer>