Attn: Brad Jesness - Your Express Delivery package has been delivered to Taylor Jimenez.
PostMASTER
Tracking number, ED939329463US
Well Brad, you have until midnight to deny and come up with new lies
about how I didn't accept your package since the USPS won't update the
delivery status until then.
However, you will have a hard time hiding from the pictures I took of
the package you sent me. Sorry, I don't have a scanner handy so you
will have to settle for digital photo's from my Canon D20.
Lets start with the Express Delivery envelope,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope.JPG
And from a different angle just to make sure everyone can see your name
and mine,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope2.JPG
Then there was the envelope inside the package,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/envelope.JPG
And now your letter,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
Oh and Brad, it is *RENOWN LAWYER*, not "reknown" lawyer. So be sure to
tell your "reknown lawyer" that you have been lying about who I am and
make sure he knows what you have been saying about Joe Jared.
But then again, go ahead and pretend I never got your package and waste
your money. Once he finds out what you have been doing to Joe Jared, he
will not want anything to do with a loser like you.
Now where is my $1000?
TwistyCreek
Just Taylor
>"Taylor", did they make you sign for the package????
Yes Brad, I signed for the package as it was certified.
You should know that Brad, you sent the Express Delivery certified and
said there was no way I would be able to get your package if I wasn't
Taylor Jimenez.
So what lie are you going to tell now, Brad?
Am I somehow now associated with the USPS, seeing as how I must be
associated with GoDaddy because you can't netkkkop any of my domains?
And where is that "reknown lawyer" of yours?
--
Taylor
Anonymous
Did you sign YOUR name on the green card, "Taylor"???
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
anon
There is no "Taylor Jimenez" to sign, so this is all one can conclude
PostMASTER <IOwnBra...@wilhelp.com> wrote in
news:43bd2497.104198812@bradje
sness.com:
>
Just Taylor
<Bigapple...@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
>But, but, but ....
>
>
>Did you sign YOUR name on the green card, "Taylor"???
Yes Brad, I signed *MY* name to the certified green card. Not Joe
Jared, not Sanford Wallace.
In a few days you will receive a nice little X-Mas gift from me, signed
Taylor Jimenez.
Sucks to be you and all your lies, huh?
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>The postoffice failed to get "Taylor Jimenez" to sign.
>
>There is no "Taylor Jimenez" to sign, so this is all one can conclude
This is the best you can do, huh Brad? Lie about how the post office
didn't get me to sign?
Why would they fail to do so? It is their job, Brad. And why would
they release a package to me if I'm not Taylor Jimenez?
All of a sudden your *Certified Mail* is no longer valid because you
can't lie about how I'm Joe Jared anymore, huh Brad?
Merry Christmas. This couldn't have turned out any better!
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>The postoffice failed to get "Taylor Jimenez" to sign.
>
>There is no "Taylor Jimenez" to sign, so this is all one can conclude
I expected more from you, Brad. I figured you would have claimed I
worked for the post office or something.
Maybe you are just tired from the major smack-down I delivered today,
but you are just not putting any effort into this.
You first claimed I couldn't get the certified mail you sent me, then I
proved you once again the liar.
Now all you can do is just lie about how I didn't sign it. And no doubt
you will only claim I never did and never produce a scan of the
certified mailing card you receive.
You are as predictable as a bowel movement after eating chili with
broccoli, Brad.
--
Taylor
Imperial_Leader
In article with msg ID: <43ab6dea....@bradjesness.com>, Just
Taylor, tay...@wilhelp.com took the time to etch the following into
Usenet History:
Do I hear "SPANK"??
Oh, BTW, can you make your little pet monkey do other tricks? TIA.
Just Taylor
<Imperia...@attilaKhan.com> wrote:
Right now my dancing monkey is performing "hide like a coward" dance.
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>But, but, but ...
>
>"Taylor", did they make you sign for the package????
>
http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm?from=home&page=0035trackandconfirm
Tracking number, ED939329463US
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 1:04 pm on December 19, 2005 in GROVER BEACH,
CA 93483. The item was signed for by T JIMINEZ.
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered, December 19, 2005, 1:04 pm, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Notice Left, December 16, 2005, 11:00 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Arrival at Unit, December 16, 2005, 10:59 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93433
Enroute, December 16, 2005, 12:09 am, GOLETA, CA 93199
Enroute, December 15, 2005, 6:51 am, LOS ANGELES, CA 90009
Enroute, December 14, 2005, 4:41 pm, SAINT PAUL, MN 55111
Acceptance, December 14, 2005, 10:59 am, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
So much for the lie about me not signing for the package you sent to me,
huh Brad?
SPNAK!
--
Taylor
Brad
Hash: SHA1
Is it supposed to surprise anyone that a criminal-type stalking,
lying, forging, harassing, defaming psychopath would have a true
alias or be working with another psycho allowing the use of his
domain?
Whether "Taylor Jimenez" is a false name and true alias or the
front person of another stalker or one of the CABAL stalkers himself
does NOT affect the true account of the situation at (<-- all
are possibilities):
http://bradjesness.home.att.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ6hBh75mfd8AI17qEQLerwCgzJe737QbeV+BIES6xuk62JVpKmIAoPDI
NIwvrxh09MB/zyzde38lMH0o
=aHbn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Brad
Hash: SHA1
That is the way a true alias is: A criminal-type psychopath will
actually ***_USE_*** a true alias.
All the evidence (A LOT OF GOOD EVIDENCE) is that "Taylor Jimenez"
is a TRUE ALIAS FOR
Joe Jared. Otherwise, why would he not collect the $1000 ???
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ6hKJL5mfd8AI17qEQIkgwCdHBJAFxBUkQ4ElmRaZV+MyB3KS4wAoJKQ
3rk234h84x7KBqJKj32FXZ+J
=d1g3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Necco
"Brad" <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:43A841...@concentric.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is it supposed to surprise anyone that a criminal-type stalking,
> lying, forging, harassing, defaming psychopath would have a true
> alias or be working with another psycho allowing the use of his
> domain?
>
> Whether "Taylor Jimenez" is a false name and true alias or the
> front person of another stalker or one of the CABAL stalkers himself
> does NOT affect the true account of the situation at (<-- all
> are possibilities):
Annual brad jesness kookrant time, isn't it?
You're just pissed off becaluse Taylor has just given you a world class
spnacking! You, being a moron, walked right into it.
You said that some reknowned attorney was going to advise you and
go after Taylor. Yesterday. Where is it, moron?
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahha!
Here's the real facts about you, little weenie. Want your daughter to
read them?
The newest, updated sites are:
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/one.html
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/archive.html (AKA www.bradjesness.com)
and then there are the dependable:
http://www.spamblocked.com/bj_faq/
http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/bj_faq/
http://www.the-foxhole.org/bjfaq/
http://www.thesbl.com/bradlee
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/brad/
http://www.seige-perilous.org/bwad/
http://www.morningmist.org/kooks/bj/
Here is some fantastic information about your web site. First, the fun, an
accurate representation of what expers in psychology say about your web
sites:
http://www.netdisaster.com/go.php?mode=cow&url=http://cyberper.cnc.net/
And of course, the proof that you phoned Jared in spite of your claims that
you did not:
http://www.oretek.com/jesness/20050825-tmobile.pdf
There are several mentions of the wonderful kook awards you have earned,
such as the Looney Maroon, Kook of the Month, Kook of the Year, Busted
Urinal, George Armstrong Custer, and many more!
Enjoy, bradley. Your own posts prove you to be a lying jerk.
Do you have any kids to watch your kookiness?
Nomen Necco
Hammer of Thor, May 2005
Necco
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> That is the way a true alias is: A criminal-type psychopath will
> actually ***_USE_*** a true alias.
And commit a federal crime, right? Then file charges, moron. Tell
the postal inspectors that they were defrauded! Go for it, kook!!
And read this: The newest, updated sites are:
Just Taylor
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Is it supposed to surprise anyone that a criminal-type stalking,
>lying, forging, harassing, defaming psychopath would have a true
>alias or be working with another psycho allowing the use of his
>domain?
Yet my domains are all functional and yours have been taking away from
you, Brad.
Looks like the only criminal-type stalking, lying, forging, harassing
and defaming psychopath here is you.
After all, it was you who said I wasn't Taylor Jimenez and couldn't
receive certified mail. Now you just dismiss it because you can't lie
your way out of this one.
>Whether "Taylor Jimenez" is a false name and true alias or the
>front person of another stalker or one of the CABAL stalkers himself
>does NOT affect the true account of the situation at (<-- all
>are possibilities):
Poor Brad Jesness, caught in another big lie about how I am Joe Jared
and now has to think up a new lie to tell everyone.
So much for that "forensic research" thing you got going for yourself,
huh Brad?
<snicker>
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>That is the way a true alias is: A criminal-type psychopath will
>actually ***_USE_*** a true alias.
Give it up, Brad. You lose. You said I couldn't get your certified
mail and now that I have proven that you have nothing but lies, all of a
sudden your certified mail means nothing.
Just because you are a weasel with nothing but lies doesn't mean the
USPS, with all their red-tape and regulations are.
You should have stuck to your original Sanford Wallace lies, at least
then people would have thought you actually believed your own lies.
>All the evidence (A LOT OF GOOD EVIDENCE) is that "Taylor Jimenez"
>is a TRUE ALIAS FOR
>Joe Jared. Otherwise, why would he not collect the $1000 ???
Actually it was you who proved beyond a doubt now Brad that you are a
liar. You sent certified mail to me and it was delivered to me. You
can continue to tell lies about how I'm Joe Jared but that would be
pretty pathetic even for you considering how there is now proof that
certified mail you sent me was delivered and signed for by me.
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>
>"Brad" <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>news:43A84B...@concentric.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> That is the way a true alias is: A criminal-type psychopath will
>> actually ***_USE_*** a true alias.
>
>And commit a federal crime, right? Then file charges, moron. Tell
>the postal inspectors that they were defrauded! Go for it, kook!!
Oh say tune, soon Brad will be ranting about how he is personally
working with the USPS and anytime now they will be knocking on my door.
Just when you think Brad might actually own up to his lies he goes the
extra mile to prove just how much of a coward he really is.
--
Taylor
xxxdarb
BEEN AT THIS CRAP. Look:
From:
"Dan Rogers" <dlrog...@frontiernet.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: As Long as There are Brad Supporters
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 1998 16:17:14 -0600
Organization:
Dan Rogers
Lines:
13
Message-ID:
<71vsi4$2mu...@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References:
<199811060459.FAA29...@replay.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
as5200-1-12.ftd.ia.frontiernet.net
X-Complaints-To:
a...@frontiernet.net
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2110.0
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Xref:
news alt.usenet.kooks:114494
Anonymous wrote in message <199811060459.FAA29...@replay.com>...
>As long as there are Brad supporters, Peter Hood will keep pissing his
>pants and letting Leslie Packer wring them out on his head.
Hi, there, squeegee lips.
You are such a lame wart!
------------------
From:
"Dan Rogers" <dlrog...@frontiernet.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: As Long as There are Brad Supporters
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 1998 16:19:12 -0600
Organization:
Dan Rogers
Lines:
11
Message-ID:
<71vslo$3dt...@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References:
<199811061715.SAA18...@replay.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
as5200-1-12.ftd.ia.frontiernet.net
X-Complaints-To:
a...@frontiernet.net
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2110.0
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Xref:
news alt.usenet.kooks:114495
Anonymous wrote in message <199811061715.SAA18...@replay.com>...
>As Long as There are Brad Supporters, Leslie will pick her nose and eat
>it.
This from Tim, who thinks a cow's nose is a buffet table.
------------------
From:
"Dan Rogers" <dlrog...@frontiernet.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: As Long as There are Brad Supporters
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 1998 16:20:28 -0600
Organization:
Dan Rogers
Lines:
17
Message-ID:
<71vso4$32o...@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References:
<199811060459.FAA29...@replay.com> <36433241.2865...
@news.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
as5200-1-12.ftd.ia.frontiernet.net
X-Complaints-To:
a...@frontiernet.net
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2110.0
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Xref:
news alt.usenet.kooks:114496
Taylor Netscum wrote in message
>Brad supporters? Who would that be? Tim "Skidmark" Brown? We know
>Skidmark has a big "Defenders of Tim Brown" webring. I checked and
>Skidmark was one, his sockpuppet was two and though they don't know it,
>Dejanews was three. I can see why we Peter Hoods have to worry.
Excellent point. Besides, from what the futted one said, he doesn't need
any sort of supporter.
Nothing to hold it up, either!
From:
"Dan Rogers" <dlrog...@frontiernet.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: Bradnee show lameness above and beyond....
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 1998 21:34:40 -0600
Organization:
Dan Rogers
Lines:
18
Message-ID:
<720f59$h0...@node17.cwnet.frontiernet.net>
References:
<199811052114.WAA21...@replay.com> <364c621b.106715...
@news.erols.com> <fJt02.646$i63.2042...@ptah.visi.com> <71u05h$7r...
@news.interlog.com>
<36437A06.5EEB0...@vlsi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
as5200-2-42.ftd.ia.frontiernet.net
X-Complaints-To:
a...@frontiernet.net
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2110.0
X-MimeOLE:
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Xref:
news alt.usenet.kooks:114565
Peter Hood #12 wrote ...
>Unless they put on sheepskins. You (ewe? we? I? tinph) may
>have something there. A kook in sheep's clothing. We should
>introduce them to Palmjob.
Aw, Peter, now you've done it!!
You mentioned sheepskins to brad-the-fut and timbobbed. Any mention
of sheep or their derivatives gets them all excited.
They'll become downright nutty now, like a bunch of kooks! Why'd you
go an do that?
"Necco" <ne...@lifeslices.com> wrote in
news:vaYpf.1658$OU3....@news01.roc.ny:
[snip of insanity]
xxxdarb
Hi, there, squeegee lips.
>
[snip]
xxxdarb
For more about the creepy EX-psychologist, Dan Rogers of
Ft. Dodge, Iowa, see:
http://cyberper.cnc.net/dan_rogers.htm
Just Taylor
Brad Jesness lost six domains in less than three weeks, including,
http://www.danrogers-unethical-psychologist.info
Yahoo took the domain above away from Brad Jesness over his fraudulent
activities.
The fact that Brad Jesness has to use the sock "xxxdarb" and hide behind
anonymous remailers tells a lot about this person.
The most important of all is that he can not be believed.
Brad Jesness is jealous of those who actually did something with their
lives like Dr. Rogers and don't turn to Usenet so they can scam people
with their psychology lies.
--
Taylor
Brad
Hash: SHA1
"Taylor Jimenez" just got lucky. I called the Postmaster
in Grover Beach, CA. and he said that NO ID WAS ASKED FOR
BEFORE the letter was signed for. In short, "Taylor" could
have signed "Daffy Duck" and received the letter.
This is not the way it is supposed to be with Certified Mail
and the post office person admitted an error.
I was told that if REGISTERED MAIL was sent, an ID would have
to be produced and seen. At least then "Taylor Jimenez" (a man
using an admitted alias) would have to produce some fake ID
that looked real.
The Postmaster in Grover Beach recommend I have my people send
REGISTERED MAIL, so no worker at the post office will fail to
ask for ID (as happened this last time).
Thus, I am having a legal representative of me, Brad Jesness,
send REGISTERED MAIL TO "Taylor's" PO Box 699 to see if the
psychopath will still be able or willing to pick up the letter
WHEN ID IS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR.
AT THIS POINT, OFFICIALLY ACCORDING TO THE POSTMASTER AT
Grover Beach, CA, "Taylor Jimenez" has done nothing to prove
his identity
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ6iEa75mfd8AI17qEQI8HACg2R62JyPFI39B7MSfV83osBMQu64AoK3n
Lh0hv9nWbh4akVT9RucKagES
=ECty
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Just Taylor
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Thus, I am having a legal representative of me, Brad Jesness,
>send REGISTERED MAIL TO "Taylor's" PO Box 699 to see if the
>psychopath will still be able or willing to pick up the letter
>WHEN ID IS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR.
When you a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California sent
certified mail Brad, only then will I accept anything further from you.
I have told you time and time again I want no contact from you unless it
is from a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California.
I am not going to waste my time on this matter. You better make sure
your lawyer can legally practice in the state of California because I
will not accept anything further from you until you do.
I have already wasted my time going to the PO on a busy day to accept
the certified mail you already sent, Brad. You got your one and only
chance to send me mail and no more will be accepted by you or any
fictitious, wannabe "legal representative you create."
And just so you know Brad, I will not take down the Brad Jesness FAQ or
Brad Jesness Usenet Archive even if you find a lawyer to send me
certified mail.
--
Taylor
xxxdarb
OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
"Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
some ID to back your alias.
--
Proof Rich Tiejens is a punk, kicked off a decent service for TOS
violations: http://tinyurl.com/9mmgy and http://tinyurl.com/7zfzc to see
some of the evidence. AND: What's wrong with Joe Jared?
aka "Taylor Jimenez"?: http://tinyurl.com/84db9 More on these
moron pricks: http://tinyurl.com/a7h88 & http://tinyurl.com/6ukk4
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
>OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
>"Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
>ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
>check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
>UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
>some ID to back your alias.
All I have said Brad is that I will not accept any more mail from you or
any loser you claim is your "legal representative." You wasted my time
on Monday the 19th and its not my fault that you are a coward who can't
admit you are lying.
But what a shock you have already gave up on having your "reknown
lawyer" send mail to me, Brad. I guess he is not what you claim he is.
So fine, you keep on ranting about how I am Joe Jared and I will keep
documenting what you do at www.bradjesness.com.
Sounds fair to me.
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
>OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
>"Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
>ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
>check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
>UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
>some ID to back your alias.
All I have said Brad is that I will not accept any more mail from you or
any loser you claim is your "legal representative." You wasted my time
on Monday the 19th and its not my fault that you are a coward who can't
admit you are lying.
But what a shock you have already gave up on having your "reknown
lawyer" send mail to me, Brad. I guess he is not what you claim he is.
So fine, you keep on ranting about how I am Joe Jared and I will keep
documenting what you do at www.bradjesness.com.
Sounds fair to me.
The only way you are going to get what you want now Brad is to do is
100% by the book. No more going out of my way to humor you when you
don't even have the guts to admit you have been lying.
--
Taylor
xxxdarb
"Taylor" is so thoughtless of others (or so it appears). HE COULD
HELP Joe Jared (supposedly) but he does not. WHAT A LAUGH!!!!
YOU BLUFF was SOooooooooo EASY to disprove. You have proven NOTHING
WHATSOEVER ABOUT YOUR IDENTITY. Brad has stated he contacted the
people at the Grover Beach post office and they asked only for
a signature and NO ID. NO ONE HAS YET SEEN ***ANY*** EVIDENCE
OF WHO YOU ARE YET. Thus, there exists to this day: NO EVIDENCE
THAT YOU ARE A "Taylor Jimenez" **AND** not a shred of evidence
that you are NOT Joe J (though over 35 strong pieces of evidence
that you ARE).
TOO BAD, Brad J would gladly write Joe J the $1000 check
if Joe Jared COULD SIMPLY PROVE HE WAS NOT THE PERSON POSTING AS
"Taylor Jimenez" and NOT the 'owner' of the wilhelp.com site.
BUT I GUESS YOU ARE "SELFISH" "Taylor" and do not want Joe Jared to
have some money he so badly needs and begs for **** OR *****:
indeed you ARE Joe J -- as over thirty-five strong pieces of
evidence indicate beyond a reasonable doubt.
I BET ON THE SECOND POSSIBILITY.
Tell you what, "Taylor" -- you collect the REGISTERED MAIL AND PROVIDE
ANY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE YOU ARE "Taylor Jimenez" and Brad will send YOU
$100
xxxdarb <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in
news:Xns9732ABACFC7...@213.155.197.138:
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>Hey "Taylor":
>
>"Taylor" is so thoughtless of others (or so it appears). HE COULD
>HELP Joe Jared (supposedly) but he does not. WHAT A LAUGH!!!!
Why does Joe Jared need my help, Brad?
>YOU BLUFF was SOooooooooo EASY to disprove. You have proven NOTHING
>WHATSOEVER ABOUT YOUR IDENTITY. Brad has stated he contacted the
>people at the Grover Beach post office and they asked only for
>a signature and NO ID. NO ONE HAS YET SEEN ***ANY*** EVIDENCE
>OF WHO YOU ARE YET. Thus, there exists to this day: NO EVIDENCE
>THAT YOU ARE A "Taylor Jimenez" **AND** not a shred of evidence
>that you are NOT Joe J (though over 35 strong pieces of evidence
>that you ARE).
Well then, Brad why are you now backing out of having your "reknown
lawyer" send the registered mail? Could it be you don't really have
one?
Looks to me that once again you have been caught in a lie. When can I
expect mail from your "reknown lawyer", Brad?
>TOO BAD, Brad J would gladly write Joe J the $1000 check
>if Joe Jared COULD SIMPLY PROVE HE WAS NOT THE PERSON POSTING AS
>"Taylor Jimenez" and NOT the 'owner' of the wilhelp.com site.
Brad, you have already won the $1000 after exposing yourself as a liar.
You sent me certified mail and I accepted it. Congratulations.
Are you going to use that $1000 to pay your "reknown lawyer" to send me
mail, Brad?
>BUT I GUESS YOU ARE "SELFISH" "Taylor" and do not want Joe Jared to
>have some money he so badly needs and begs for **** OR *****:
>indeed you ARE Joe J -- as over thirty-five strong pieces of
>evidence indicate beyond a reasonable doubt.
You mean the anonymous pieces of turds you claim as evidence, Brad? If
I'm Joe Jared, why are you sending certified mail to Taylor Jimenez in
Grover Beach and not Joe Jared in Orange, CA?
>I BET ON THE SECOND POSSIBILITY.
>
>Tell you what, "Taylor" -- you collect the REGISTERED MAIL AND PROVIDE
>ANY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE YOU ARE "Taylor Jimenez" and Brad will send YOU
>$100
I told you Brad I will not waste any more time on you when it comes to
your phone calls, e-mail requests for me to e-mail you or mail you send.
There is only *ONE* way for you to get what you want and that will be by
you having your "reknown lawyer" that I verify is real and licensed to
practice in California send mail.
Everything is a waste of my time because I already accepted mail from
you and don't care what you have to say, Brad.
>xxxdarb <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in
>news:Xns9732ABACFC7...@213.155.197.138:
>
>> So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
>> OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
>> "Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
>> ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
>> check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
>> UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
>> some ID to back your alias.
>>
>>
--
Taylor
xxxdarb
been verified that "Taylor Jimenez" ONLY PRETENDED TO have done
something to prove his identity, when IN FACT HE DID NOTHING TO
PROVE THIS. FACT. EVIDENCE AGAINST Joe Jared. NO EVIDENCE FOR HIM.
Joe Jared ZERO, Joe Jared IS "Taylor Jimenez" *** 35 ***!!!
xxxdarb <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in
news:Xns9732ABACFC7...@213.155.197.138:
> So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>Tell you what, "Taylor" -- you collect the REGISTERED MAIL AND PROVIDE
>ANY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE YOU ARE "Taylor Jimenez" and Brad will send YOU
>$100
Why the change from your Concentric account to some cowardly anonymous
remailer, Brad?
And why are you now asking that I accept registered mail from you? What
happened to your "reknown lawyer" you spoke with on the 12/19/05? Can't
he do the job for you, Brad?
I don't want or need your money or anything you have to offer, Brad. I
will continue to host and maintain both the Brad Jesness FAQ and Usenet
Archive regardless of what you do or say.
Haven't you figured that out by now, Brad? No matter who you abuse and
harass, no matter what names you call me while hiding behind some
anonymous remailer and no matter how much mail you personally send, I
will not take either down.
They are both here to stay and as long as you keep providing content for
them, I will continue to add it to your FAQ and Usenet Archive.
Case closed, huh Brad? Sure, you win. What a winner you are!
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>No evidence is no evidence. ALL US SCIENTISTS KNOWN THAT. It has
>been verified that "Taylor Jimenez" ONLY PRETENDED TO have done
>something to prove his identity, when IN FACT HE DID NOTHING TO
>PROVE THIS. FACT. EVIDENCE AGAINST Joe Jared. NO EVIDENCE FOR HIM.
http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm?from=home&page=0035trackandconfirm
Tracking number, ED939329463US
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 1:04 pm on December 19, 2005 in GROVER BEACH,
CA 93483. The item was signed for by T JIMINEZ.
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered, December 19, 2005, 1:04 pm, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Notice Left, December 16, 2005, 11:00 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Arrival at Unit, December 16, 2005, 10:59 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93433
Enroute, December 16, 2005, 12:09 am, GOLETA, CA 93199
Enroute, December 15, 2005, 6:51 am, LOS ANGELES, CA 90009
Enroute, December 14, 2005, 4:41 pm, SAINT PAUL, MN 55111
Acceptance, December 14, 2005, 10:59 am, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
Lets start with the Express Delivery envelope,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope.JPG
And from a different angle just to make sure everyone can see your name
and mine,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope2.JPG
Then there was the envelope inside the package,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/envelope.JPG
And now your letter,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
- - -
So when will your "reknown lawyer" be sending mail for you, Brad?
--
Taylor
xxxdarb
PROVE. I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish YET MORE
EVIDENCE THAT "Taylor Jimenez" is Joe Jared. There is already
plenty of evidence.
IF "Taylor Jimenez" wants to continue to do NOTHING TO PROVE HIS
identity,
fine. NO ONE GIVES A DAMN. But, as empirical scientists, people like
Brad will not let you pretend you have proven ANYTHING by signing
something
where there was NO ID CHECK. OBVIOUSLY THAT MEANS NOTHING.
Brad is respected in the science world and is a great empiricist. HE
WILL NOT BELIEVE ANY OF THE NONSENSE from "Taylor Jimenez" with
absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IN EXISTENCE THAT THAT IS YOUR NAME.
ON THE OTHER HAND: REST ASSURED: The failure to collect any email where
YOU DO HAVE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY
shall be used against you. Dumb ASS!!!!
Just Taylor <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in
news:43f08f36...@bradjesness.com:
> lt.psychology.personality
> Subject: Re: CASE CLOSED: Only decent evidence, SHOWS "Taylor Jimenez"
> IS Joe Jared Followup-To:
xxxdarb
AND: Any unwillingness to do anything to prove
YOUR IDENTITY AT THE ADDRESS YOU PROVIDE WILL MOST CERTAINLY have
consequences FOR YOU AND YOUR PALS ONLY. Are you too stupid to
know that?
Brad will be happy to see the certified mail come back.
Can't wait, in fact. I am sure he wish he had sent it overnight.
Just Taylor <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in
news:43f49219...@bradjesness.com:
>
[snip]
Just Taylor
wrote:
>On 2005-12-20, xxxdarb <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>> So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
>> OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
>> "Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
>> ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
>> check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
>> UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
>> some ID to back your alias.
>
>Then why didn't you send registered mail, Brad?
According to Brad his "legal representative" was going to do so. But
that could be anyone. That could be Moronis. But as soon as I brought
up his "reknown lawyer" he had a hissy fit over how I will not accept
anything further from him.
I told Brad on 12/19/05 that I do not want any further contact from him
unless it is from a licensed lawyer. For some reason Brad has a problem
with this and has even tried to bribe me with $100 if I accept more mail
from him...
Why is Brad so afraid of having his "reknown lawyer" send mail to me?
>And why did you send it to Taylor when you claim that he doesn't even
>exist?
Exactly. If I'm Joe Jared should Brad be sending it to Joe Jared in
Orange, CA?
--
Taylor
Hammer of Thor, September 2002
xxxdarb
when MORE (by far) is accomplished as "Taylor Jimenez" continues
to show NO IDENTITY verification whatsoever. Brad just wins again.
For about the 36th time.
Brad wants the REGISTERED MAIL TO COME BACK.
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>Hey, it is ONLY "Taylor Jimenez" and Joe Jared who have ANYTHING TO
>PROVE. I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish YET MORE
>EVIDENCE THAT "Taylor Jimenez" is Joe Jared. There is already
>plenty of evidence.
Brad you are the one claiming I am Joe Jared. It is up to *YOU* to
prove that I am Joe Jared.
Why are you now whining about not paying a lawyer, Brad? Did you also
lie about meeting with a "reknown lawyer" on Monday the 19th?
>IF "Taylor Jimenez" wants to continue to do NOTHING TO PROVE HIS
>identity,
>fine. NO ONE GIVES A DAMN. But, as empirical scientists, people like
>Brad will not let you pretend you have proven ANYTHING by signing
>something
>where there was NO ID CHECK. OBVIOUSLY THAT MEANS NOTHING.
You are right about how nobody gives a damn other than you Brad on who I
am. And now that you know that I will not take any calls from you or
any mail from you, you are pissed off that any attempted harassment you
try will not work on me.
Brad, I am *NOT* taking down the FAQ or Usenet Archive.
>Brad is respected in the science world and is a great empiricist. HE
>WILL NOT BELIEVE ANY OF THE NONSENSE from "Taylor Jimenez" with
>absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IN EXISTENCE THAT THAT IS YOUR NAME.
Like I care, Brad. Nobody else cares either so why are you crying about
all this?
>ON THE OTHER HAND: REST ASSURED: The failure to collect any email where
>YOU DO HAVE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY
>shall be used against you. Dumb ASS!!!!
Big deal, Brad. When you fail to produce a lawyer like you said you
would it only goes to show once again how you do nothing but tell lie
after lie.
You got your lying arse spanked by me when I accepted your mail and I'm
not going to accept anything more from you. If you want to get to me
now you will have to do it legally.
>
>Just Taylor <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in
>news:43f08f36...@bradjesness.com:
>
>> lt.psychology.personality
>> Subject: Re: CASE CLOSED: Only decent evidence, SHOWS "Taylor Jimenez"
>> IS Joe Jared Followup-To:
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>Lawyers cost MONEY DUMBASS.
But Brad, you said you are a very wealthy individual and you met with a
"reknown lawyer" on Monday, December 12, 2005.
So why are you making such a big deal over having a lawyer send me mail?
A man of your wealth surely can afford to have his "reknown lawyer" do
such a menial task, huh?
Could it be you are not as wealthy as you claim to be, Brad?
>AND: Any unwillingness to do anything to prove
>YOUR IDENTITY AT THE ADDRESS YOU PROVIDE WILL MOST CERTAINLY have
>consequences FOR YOU AND YOUR PALS ONLY. Are you too stupid to
>know that?
You have no legal authority or any say over what I do, Brad.
>Brad will be happy to see the certified mail come back.
I'm sure you will, Brad. That way you can continue to lie about how I
am Joe Jared.
But tell me this, how has your lies about how I am Joe Jared helped you
over the past six months? What have you got from all the time you waste
trying to keep your scams from out of the publics eye?
>Can't wait, in fact. I am sure he wish he had sent it overnight.
And if it is from you Brad, it will not be accepted. I already accepted
your first Express Delivery and I told you on 12/19/05 that I will not
accept anything further from you.
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish
Case closed indeed. Brad Jesness has lied many times about having a
lawyer and even put it in writing with the mail he sent to me and I
accepted on December 19, 2005.
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
And here I quote a signed document from Brad Jesness, sent via certified
mail,
>I am meeting with a reknown lawyer on Monday to discuss this defamation
>matter
*AND*
>I am meeting with my attorney, Mon. Dec. 19th and will convey the
>results of this letter:
Yet now Brad Jesness tells us he will not spend money even though he
lied about having an attorney and has admitted that lawyers cost money,
money that Brad doesn't have.
So once again Brad Jesness has been caught in a lie, yet he expects
people to think he is not a liar!
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
wrote:
>On 2005-12-20, xxxdarb <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>>
>> Tell you what, "Taylor" -- you collect the REGISTERED MAIL AND PROVIDE
>> ANY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE YOU ARE "Taylor Jimenez" and Brad will send YOU
>> $100
>
>And if he does, what lie will you tell then, Brad? That he has a fake ID
>maybe? You've already shown several times that you cannot be trusted.
Brad doesn't have a attorney like he lied about having and sure as hell
doesn't have any money. Yet Brad time and time again has claimed to be
very wealthy, which Brad has now proved to be nothing but a lie as well.
Brad knows that I am not taking anymore of his calls or personal mail
and like I said, his only choice is to pretend he never sent any mail in
the first place that way he can continue with his Joe Jared lies.
Brad can't do anything else and the fact that he admits he has no
attorney only goes to show what I have been saying all along...
Brad Jesness can only hide behind anonymous remailers to call people
names and nothing more.
Just Taylor
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote:
>Hey, NO REASON TO WASTE REAL MONEY NEEDLESSLY ON A FINE LAWYER, especially
>when MORE (by far) is accomplished as "Taylor Jimenez" continues
>to show NO IDENTITY verification whatsoever. Brad just wins again.
>For about the 36th time.
>
>Brad wants the REGISTERED MAIL TO COME BACK.
And you will get what you want, Brad. I already have a signed document
from you that sent to me via certified mail. I also have stated that
you not welcomed to contact me anymore.
Remember that when you send unwanted mail Brad when the only reason why
you are doing so is to harass people.
And when you go berserk over it, everyone will be able to see what you
do and say at www.bradjeness.com because in the end, it doesn't come
down and you don't get to scam people.
--
Taylor
Card XII
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "Taylor Jimenez" just got lucky. I called the Postmaster
> in Grover Beach, CA. and he said that NO ID WAS ASKED FOR
> BEFORE the letter was signed for. In short, "Taylor" could
> have signed "Daffy Duck" and received the letter.
> This is not the way it is supposed to be with Certified Mail
> and the post office person admitted an error.
You're a liar, brad. Once again, a liar. You didn't phone any postmaster
at all.
Besides, even if Taylor signed a false name, you could still file a
complaint based on that.
WHERE'S THE PROOF, MORON BRAD? POST THE PROOF!!
In fact, post the name of any postmaster in Grover Beach, California.
You lying moron, you should check first to see if there actually is a
postmaster in Grover Beach.
Time for you to backpedal again. Lying fut gonna get spanked again!!
> I was told that if REGISTERED MAIL was sent, an ID would have
> to be produced and seen. At least then "Taylor Jimenez" (a man
> using an admitted alias) would have to produce some fake ID
> that looked real.
Wrong again. I have never been asked to produce an ID for registered mail.
I asked a recently retired postal clerk supervisor, and he said no ID is
requested unless there is reason to question the identity.
You're a liar, brad. AGAIN!!
> The Postmaster in Grover Beach recommend I have my people send
> REGISTERED MAIL, so no worker at the post office will fail to
> ask for ID (as happened this last time).
"My people?" You don't have any "people," you stupid, unemployed,
uneducated, lying sack. You have your suckpuppets vote for you, answer your
posts, everything. Nobody likes you, nobody believes you.
> Thus, I am having a legal representative of me, Brad Jesness,
> send REGISTERED MAIL TO "Taylor's" PO Box 699 to see if the
> psychopath will still be able or willing to pick up the letter
> WHEN ID IS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR.
>
> AT THIS POINT, OFFICIALLY ACCORDING TO THE POSTMASTER AT
> Grover Beach, CA, "Taylor Jimenez" has done nothing to prove
> his identity
More importantly, YOU, brad jesness the fut, have done nothing except
embarass yourself.
What a sad little loser you are.
You are just backing yourself farther and farther into the web of lies. How
stupid can you really get? We'll get to see now!!
Card XII
Hammer of Thor, May 2005
Prince of the Cordial Axon
Kali's Hotties List
Card XII
"xxxdarb" <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in message
news:Xns9732ABACFC7...@213.155.197.138...
> So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
> OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
> "Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
> ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
> check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
> UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
> some ID to back your alias.
What a great scientific mind you have, moron. Not only do you think a
negative is a proof, you even think a double negative proves something.
MORON!
You should have gone to a program in a science, not educational technology.
And even then, you can't get a job as a teacher. Or anything.
HARFUL!!
Card XII
"xxxdarb" <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in message
> Hey, it is ONLY "Taylor Jimenez" and Joe Jared who have ANYTHING TO
> PROVE. I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish YET MORE
> EVIDENCE THAT "Taylor Jimenez" is Joe Jared. There is already
> plenty of evidence.
Sorry, little putz. YOU, brad jesness, have the burden of proof. You made
the allegation, you therefore have to prove it.
And you have failed miserably. Spent Renee's money and failed.
What a laugher!!
> IF "Taylor Jimenez" wants to continue to do NOTHING TO PROVE HIS
> identity,
> fine. NO ONE GIVES A DAMN. But, as empirical scientists, people like
> Brad will not let you pretend you have proven ANYTHING by signing
> something
> where there was NO ID CHECK. OBVIOUSLY THAT MEANS NOTHING.
That's your problem, moron. You don't have any clue about logic, do you?
You made the allegation against Taylor, now prove it. You said that you
were going to get an attorney to send registered mail to Taylor, but you
can't get anybody to represent you, can you? The attorneys in your area
laugh their butts off at you brad.
You wife laughs at you. Your daughter is embarassed by you. Your uncle
ignores you. Your teachers kicked you out of school.
You park down the street, hoping to catch a glimpse of me, but you are
ignored at every turn.
I was up in your area a few days last week. I talked to a few neighbors.
They make fun of you. How wonderful is your life, little pismole?
> Brad is respected in the science world and is a great empiricist. HE
> WILL NOT BELIEVE ANY OF THE NONSENSE from "Taylor Jimenez" with
> absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IN EXISTENCE THAT THAT IS YOUR NAME.
So that's why the great scientist Meehl asked his colleague to post on this
group that he does not agree with you and has never supported you as you
claimed. That's why you were asked to stay away from the U of Minn
Psychology Dept. That's why you have never published a single article,
never got through grad school, never got any sort of teaching job or
psychologist job.
LOOZER!
> ON THE OTHER HAND: REST ASSURED: The failure to collect any email where
> YOU DO HAVE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY
> shall be used against you. Dumb ASS!!!!
Backpedal, backpedal, backpedal, backpedal, backpedal.
Card XII
He just got spanked to hell by Taylor, now jesness is backpedaling like hell
and claiming to have visited defeat on Taylor. Read this one only after you
cover your keyboard!
"xxxdarb" <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in message
news:Xns9732B2F35F8...@213.155.197.138...
Damn fine kook!!
Card XII
"xxxdarb" <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in message
> Lawyers cost MONEY DUMBASS.
>
> AND: Any unwillingness to do anything to prove
> YOUR IDENTITY AT THE ADDRESS YOU PROVIDE WILL MOST CERTAINLY have
> consequences FOR YOU AND YOUR PALS ONLY. Are you too stupid to
> know that?
>
>
> Brad will be happy to see the certified mail come back.
>
> Can't wait, in fact. I am sure he wish he had sent it overnight.
Talking in the third person again, brad? Sign of some real slippage.
You didn't send it overnight because you can't afford it. Spent all your
wife's money already, and you don't have a job of your own. Your lawnmowing
business failed pretty bad, didn't it?
Little weenie!!
!:?)
Het Card,
I found this on Brad's Web Site:
http://bradjesness.home.att.net/
I have a masters degree in Educational Psychology from the University
of Iowa
and have 7 years experience teaching college psychology courses. More
recently,
**I don't see a License when I look it up, wonder why?:?)**
I earned a certificate in Client/Server Technology from the U of MN
Technical College.
I also am a Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 platform. I have
experience as
a computer science instructor at both the high school and college
level. My Universal
Scorer (as both a Java and JavaScript program) is very well-known and
listed by
the jars.com Java archive. The program is popular and well-reviewed.
**But who own's the MMPI-2 he's using his Java on?:?)**
I also researched
and authored a Java Peer Counselor Effectiveness program, based on the
CPI, and
am known and positively regarded for an ethological perspective on
learning and for
a critique of the psychotherapy field.
**<snicker> I'll let you take it from here LOL!:?)**
Brad Jesness has (and asks others for) NO "mirrors" of his web site.
"Taylor Jimenez" has several "mirrors" of his site -- punks who
want to get in on some of the anonymous harassing and torturing
and defamation of "the kooks".
**Not that he didn't ask in several NG's LOL!:?)**
For an independent report on what has happened to ME, Brad Jesness
http://www.fireflysun.com/book/proxyname.php <-- CLICK THIS VERY LINK.
This report is by another psychology critic, a man with a Ph.D. in
Social Psychology and who has great
understanding about what is going on.
**Oh, your gonna love this from:
http://www.fireflysun.com/book/proxyname.php**
Wyatt Ehrenfels, a social psychologist currently employed as a senior
researcher with the federal government, reviewed the collective
behavior of professionals utilizing sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
classified the Brad Jesness FAQ as "defensive propaganda" not unlike
the defamatory dossier Brown & Williamsom circulated on corporate
whistleblower Jeffrey Weygandt in the mid-90s.
**Oh I know your gonna have fun with this!:?0)**
--
Kevin!:?)
Fight Spam Friendly Providers, use WWW.SPEWS.ORG
http://www.seige-perilous.org/spam/spam-SPEWS.html
Card XII
"!:?)" <"!:?)"@invaid.net> wrote in message
news:sN4qf.4398$u36.997@trndny01...
brad's spew stands on its own, doesn't it?
!:?)
Brad says he's not passing himself off as a Phychologist but we see
stuff like this on his web site.
masters degree in Educational Psychology from the University of Iowa
Looks to me as if he is don't it?
But it was the Wyatt Ehrenfels Web Page I thought you'd have real fun
with.
Since when did he start working for the Fed's?
Let me guess, the CIA RIGHT LOL!:?)
Dr. Wee Hung Lo
10372...@compuserve.com -- b j, behavioral SCIENTIST feb '96
This is all so confusing.
I found two unpublished papers related to B, Jesness one 160 pages long.
Definintely not peer reviewed. Other papers that were refused, they said
he plagarized himself.
Him dishonourable man.
"Card XII" <drod...@frontiers.net> wrote in message
news:BA4qf.29$qg...@news02.roc.ny...
: brad jesness of Minneapolis embarassed his daughter by claiming to be
:
:
:
:
!:?)
> In article <43a8ed6a$1...@x-privat.org>, posted 21 Dec 2005
> 06:51:43 +0100, Dr. Wee Hung Lo dr....@hocho.org says...
>
>
>>Brad said he was a scientist.
>>
>>10372...@compuserve.com -- b j, behavioral SCIENTIST feb '96
>>
>>This is all so confusing.
>>
>>I found two unpublished papers related to B, Jesness one 160 pages long.
>>Definintely not peer reviewed. Other papers that were refused, they said
>>he plagarized himself.
>
>
> lol.
>
>
>>Him dishonourable man.
>
>
> Have you seen these bloated beauties?
>
> From: Cognitee (Cogn...@aol.com)
> Subject: Re: Fwd from SPM: Minnesota Laws on "Psychologist"
> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
> Date: 1996/08/04
>
> Paul: The term I *may* use is "developmental psychologist". I
> am also a world reknown ethologist (hey, ya' I can *say* that
> too). -- b jesness, well-known behavioral scientist
>
>
> From: Cognitee (good...@hotmail.com)
> Subject: Re: (Brad) Re: Censorship on an Unmoderated OPEN
> Mailing List
> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
> Date: 1998/07/01
>
> You were informed incorrectly. Many of the resrarch
> psychologists and professors of psychology at the U of MN could
> come on the internet and say "in my work as a psychologist ..."
> Or "I have knowledge here because I am a psychologist". The
> person you talked with was an idiot BAG just like you. Full of
> self and pretense and ignorant and stupid like YOU.
>
> Teel her stupid a** I said so.
>
> P.S. To most people: YOU are not therapist (you do not have the
> appropriate degree to meaningfully call yourself one and there
> is no othjer reason to believe you are capable !!) You are a
> hag and a moron !!
>
Hi Kali,
I was checking out this link from Brad's Page:
http://www.fireflysun.com/book/proxyname.php
It belongs to Wyatt Ehrenfels.
In it I find Brad has some support for his Theories about 3/4 down the
page.
"NOTE 1: These views are backed by giants in the Counseling and
Clinical Psychology Fields, including Allen Ivey (U Mass) and Alvin
Mahrer (APA Distinguished Psychologist Award Winner."
Didn't one of them post here and tell Brad to stop using his name?
Which one was it?
I guess Brad didn't think he meant it.
Now I did some checking and found contact info on these Links.
http://www.emicrotraining.com/AllenIvey/index.html
Allen E. Ivey
Distinguished University Professor, Emeritus
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
http://www.buddhaguy.com/therap_e.html
Alvin R. Mahrer, Ph.D.
School of Psychology
University of Ottawa
Dr. Wee Hung Lo
But never heard of him in home country.
What is "resrarch" I could not find in dictionary. No reknown either.
He very sad fellow.
"Kali" <ka...@lart.com> wrote in message
news:doaqre$r0q$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
: In article <43a8ed6a$1...@x-privat.org>, posted 21 Dec 2005
: 06:51:43 +0100, Dr. Wee Hung Lo dr....@hocho.org says...
:
: >Brad said he was a scientist.
: >
: >10372...@compuserve.com -- b j, behavioral SCIENTIST feb '96
: >
: >This is all so confusing.
: >
: >I found two unpublished papers related to B, Jesness one 160 pages
long.
: >Definintely not peer reviewed. Other papers that were refused, they
said
: >he plagarized himself.
:
: lol.
:
ThePsyko
<xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> made their contribution to mankind by
stating in news:Xns9732B10D6B6...@213.155.197.138:
> Hey, it is ONLY "Taylor Jimenez" and Joe Jared who have ANYTHING TO
> PROVE. I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish YET MORE
> EVIDENCE THAT "Taylor Jimenez" is Joe Jared. There is already
> plenty of evidence.
You forgot the quote marks around the word 'evidence'.
>
> IF "Taylor Jimenez" wants to continue to do NOTHING TO PROVE HIS
> identity,
> fine. NO ONE GIVES A DAMN.
??? You sure seem to give a damn... a LOT.
> But, as empirical scientists, people like
> Brad will not let you pretend you have proven ANYTHING by signing
> something
> where there was NO ID CHECK. OBVIOUSLY THAT MEANS NOTHING.
So you wasted even MORE money to "prove" something that, by your own
words, nobody cares about... why?
>
> Brad is respected in the science world and is a great empiricist. HE
> WILL NOT BELIEVE ANY OF THE NONSENSE from "Taylor Jimenez" with
> absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IN EXISTENCE THAT THAT IS YOUR NAME.
>
> ON THE OTHER HAND: REST ASSURED: The failure to collect any email where
> YOU DO HAVE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY
> shall be used against you. Dumb ASS!!!!
I've never had to show my ID when picking up my email.
>
>
> Just Taylor <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in
> news:43f08f36...@bradjesness.com:
>
>> lt.psychology.personality
>> Subject: Re: CASE CLOSED: Only decent evidence, SHOWS "Taylor Jimenez"
>> IS Joe Jared Followup-To:
>
>
>
--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
http://prozac.iscool.net
Card XII
"Iceman" <1c3...@gl4c13r.n3t> wrote in message
news:dofuap$nc2$2...@domitilla.aioe.org...
> A bit like watching an idiot lite a cherry bomb and holding it a bit too
> long. :)
Well, whaddya expect? He didn't have a fuse to lite!
Merry Christmas to all you good guys and gals. And happy spnacking in the
new year.
Card XII
The U.S. Constitution
> On 20 Dec 2005 00:53:37 -0000, TwistyCreek <an...@comments.header>
> wrote:
>
>>But, but, but ...
>>
>>"Taylor", did they make you sign for the package????
>>
>
> http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm?from=home&page=0035tra
> ckandconfirm
>
> Tracking number, ED939329463US
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
> Status: Delivered
>
> Your item was delivered at 1:04 pm on December 19, 2005 in GROVER
> BEACH, CA 93483. The item was signed for by T JIMINEZ.
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
> Detailed Results:
>
> Delivered, December 19, 2005, 1:04 pm, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
> Notice Left, December 16, 2005, 11:00 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
> Arrival at Unit, December 16, 2005, 10:59 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93433
> Enroute, December 16, 2005, 12:09 am, GOLETA, CA 93199
> Enroute, December 15, 2005, 6:51 am, LOS ANGELES, CA 90009
> Enroute, December 14, 2005, 4:41 pm, SAINT PAUL, MN 55111
> Acceptance, December 14, 2005, 10:59 am, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
>
> So much for the lie about me not signing for the package you sent to
> me, huh Brad?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>
> --
> Taylor
>
Damn, I was in the Twin Cities three months ago or so. I wish we could
have had lunch.
--
I'm just a goddamned piece of paper.
http://beosnews.com/
http://www.bedoper.com
http://www.cafepress.com/angeldevil
The U.S. Constitution
> On 20 Dec 2005 13:13:48 EST, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>That is the way a true alias is: A criminal-type psychopath will
>>actually ***_USE_*** a true alias.
>
> Give it up, Brad. You lose. You said I couldn't get your certified
> mail and now that I have proven that you have nothing but lies, all of
> a sudden your certified mail means nothing.
>
> Just because you are a weasel with nothing but lies doesn't mean the
> USPS, with all their red-tape and regulations are.
>
> You should have stuck to your original Sanford Wallace lies, at least
> then people would have thought you actually believed your own lies.
>
>>All the evidence (A LOT OF GOOD EVIDENCE) is that "Taylor Jimenez"
>>is a TRUE ALIAS FOR
>>Joe Jared. Otherwise, why would he not collect the $1000 ???
>
> Actually it was you who proved beyond a doubt now Brad that you are a
> liar. You sent certified mail to me and it was delivered to me. You
> can continue to tell lies about how I'm Joe Jared but that would be
> pretty pathetic even for you considering how there is now proof that
> certified mail you sent me was delivered and signed for by me.
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>>
>>iQA/AwUBQ6hKJL5mfd8AI17qEQIkgwCdHBJAFxBUkQ4ElmRaZV+MyB3KS4wAoJKQ
>>3rk234h84x7KBqJKj32FXZ+J
>>=d1g3
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> Taylor
>
Do you foresee any resolution to this 8 year battle of wits?
Card XII
"The U.S. Constitution" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9734E98BC...@207.14.113.17...
brad jesness is touchy about a lot of things, and lunch is one of them.
When he was in Kg and first grade, the girls ate his lunch every day. Well,
they took it from him but they never actually ate it. They just flushed it
down the toilet.
Did the same to brad a few times. That's why his mom always referred to his
head as a 'mop.'
Daniel L. Snyder
Iceman <1c3...@gl4c13r.n3t> wrote:
> This whole scenario was just too funny.
> A bit like watching an idiot lite a cherry bomb and holding it a bit too
> long. :)
>
> Merry Christmas!
I'd say a bit more like lighting a cherry bomb, then holding it in his
teeth while bending down to tie his shoes before throwing it.
Just Taylor
>In article <43e78656...@bradjesness.com>, posted Tue, 20
>Dec 2005 14:38:30 -0800, Just Taylor tay...@wilhelp.com says...
>
>>On 20 Dec 2005 17:20:04 EST, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>Thus, I am having a legal representative of me, Brad Jesness,
>>>send REGISTERED MAIL TO "Taylor's" PO Box 699 to see if the
>>>psychopath will still be able or willing to pick up the letter
>>>WHEN ID IS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR.
>>
>>When you a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California sent
>>certified mail Brad, only then will I accept anything further from you.
>>
>>I have told you time and time again I want no contact from you unless it
>>is from a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California.
>>
>>I am not going to waste my time on this matter. You better make sure
>>your lawyer can legally practice in the state of California because I
>>will not accept anything further from you until you do.
>>
>>I have already wasted my time going to the PO on a busy day to accept
>>the certified mail you already sent, Brad. You got your one and only
>>chance to send me mail and no more will be accepted by you or any
>>fictitious, wannabe "legal representative you create."
>>
>>And just so you know Brad, I will not take down the Brad Jesness FAQ or
>>Brad Jesness Usenet Archive even if you find a lawyer to send me
>>certified mail.
>
>Hoofprints is a CA legal beagle, how about if Brad hires her?
Now I'm scared, I hear she has people committed for 72 hours all the
time. Her powerful position allows her to do so I'm told...
Just Taylor
wrote:
>brad jesness of Minneapolis embarassed his daughter by claiming to be
>"xxxdarb" <xx35jo...@liamSPAMtoh.moc> wrote in message
>news:Xns9732B10D6B6...@213.155.197.138...
>> Hey, it is ONLY "Taylor Jimenez" and Joe Jared who have ANYTHING TO
>> PROVE. I am sure Brad J will pay NO lawyer to establish YET MORE
>> EVIDENCE THAT "Taylor Jimenez" is Joe Jared. There is already
>> plenty of evidence.
>
>Sorry, little putz. YOU, brad jesness, have the burden of proof. You made
>the allegation, you therefore have to prove it.
But Brad is a "reknown" "forensic researcher" and if he says something
is true, you can rest assured it is true!!!!
>And you have failed miserably. Spent Renee's money and failed.
>
>What a laugher!!
>
>
>> IF "Taylor Jimenez" wants to continue to do NOTHING TO PROVE HIS
>> identity,
>> fine. NO ONE GIVES A DAMN. But, as empirical scientists, people like
>> Brad will not let you pretend you have proven ANYTHING by signing
>> something
>> where there was NO ID CHECK. OBVIOUSLY THAT MEANS NOTHING.
>
>That's your problem, moron. You don't have any clue about logic, do you?
>
>You made the allegation against Taylor, now prove it. You said that you
>were going to get an attorney to send registered mail to Taylor, but you
>can't get anybody to represent you, can you? The attorneys in your area
>laugh their butts off at you brad.
All Brad can do is send mail to me over and over and hope that one day I
will refuse to waste my time standing in line to pick it up. I knew
Brad was going to do this the minute I picked up the first letter he
sent me and that is why I said I wouldn't accept anymore from him.
Brad is going to lie no matter what I do so why bother?
>You wife laughs at you. Your daughter is embarassed by you. Your uncle
>ignores you. Your teachers kicked you out of school.
>
>You park down the street, hoping to catch a glimpse of me, but you are
>ignored at every turn.
>
>I was up in your area a few days last week. I talked to a few neighbors.
>They make fun of you. How wonderful is your life, little pismole?
>
>
>> Brad is respected in the science world and is a great empiricist. HE
>> WILL NOT BELIEVE ANY OF THE NONSENSE from "Taylor Jimenez" with
>> absolutely NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IN EXISTENCE THAT THAT IS YOUR NAME.
>
>So that's why the great scientist Meehl asked his colleague to post on this
>group that he does not agree with you and has never supported you as you
>claimed. That's why you were asked to stay away from the U of Minn
>Psychology Dept. That's why you have never published a single article,
>never got through grad school, never got any sort of teaching job or
>psychologist job.
But Brad sure is "reknown" here on Usenet, where his "career" is doing
just fine I might add...
>LOOZER!
>
>> ON THE OTHER HAND: REST ASSURED: The failure to collect any email where
>> YOU DO HAVE TO PROVE YOUR IDENTITY
>> shall be used against you. Dumb ASS!!!!
>
>Backpedal, backpedal, backpedal, backpedal, backpedal.
And of course as soon as I don't pick up Brad's mail, Brad will *then*
call that lawyer and sue, right? And www.bradjesness.com will no longer
be around too!
Just Taylor
wrote:
Brad also ignores the fact that when you open a PO Box, you are required
to show ID...
Card XII
"Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:43bb499...@bradjesness.com...
Whoa, fella!! Now you mentioned her "position" and that gets her
horses all jittery. The horses in the Rose Bowl Parade are even
acting up a bit!
Card XII
Have some sympathy, though. I worry about brad's health:
it has to really tax his endurance to backpedal so fast while he
is whining sooooo loud. Builds up a huge oxygen deficit.
hoofprints
Belonging to a college Association doesn't qualify me as a Legal Beagle.
However, if Taylor picked up mail at a PO Box from Brad, I would think
that would suffice as proof that Taylor indeed lives in So. Cal. I do
hope your mail was sent certified or registered mail, and that it
included a Service Of Process for lawsuit.
I would think that Taylor begging you to hire a Calif. Attorney would be
in your best interests Brad, as in this State Taylor is Electronically
Harassing you. In this State Electronic Harassment carries a fine of
$1,000.00 and a Year in Jail.
Now that you know where Taylor lives, you can serve process through the
newspapers. Must be or was to be posted in the Legal Notices 3 times.
His non response or if he ignores that Service is an automatic loss in
Ct. for Taylor. If you know where he works, I would think you could
garnish his wages.
Then there is subject matter jurisdiction based on the long arm of the
law.
I have an old Directory of Califonia Lawyers that came with my
subscription to the Banner back in the 80's. ( I looked up KAC and you
have been around for awhile, I guess down in San Diego).
You can always try the attorney that went after the Zapper Queen too!!
He practices in Calif. only his office is located up north. I believe
they call him Terry the Terrible, but I could be wrong.
hoof
Dan, one of my greatest achievements was winning Amateur handler of the
year over a club woman friend of mine who rode every year in the Rose
Parade for over 20 years.
he flowers are running off the floats but everyone is still in good
spirits.
hoof
>
> Card XII
> Hammer of Thor, May 2005
--
Kali pulls out her Sekrit Hoof Arkives a 6 year old post and
salivates, fantasizes, and masturbates, then BEGS me to leave her barn
animals alone:
In Message ID: <dov038$aj4$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
X-Trace:
blackhelicopter.databasix.com 1135805352 10852
blackhelicopter.databasix.com (28 Dec 2005 21:29:12 GMT)
> [snip *stalking filth*]
>
> >> >Poor woman, is always actively searching for online NG buddies on
> >> >holidays.
> >> >The person she exchanges posts with on the holidays is almost always
> >> >Liceman, who has nothing better to occupy his/her time.
> >> >Maybe she should learn to bake or sew or crochet, or at least find an
> >> >online game room for rest and relaxation.
> >> >hoof
> >> >
> >> Or perhaps she could learn the subtle arts and techniques of horse
> >> fellating, eh Goofy?
> >
> >Rumor has it that Kali 'already' knows the subtle art of fellating
> >horses, my fiendish friend, in fact she prefers it to her bedside rubber
> >dong, which she is afraid to use!
>
> Oh, Goooo-ooofy, please don't take your love to the barn.
>
> Kali
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
hoofprints
NOTE: Dewey, Cheetum, & Howe, would taking a case against Taylor be a
Conflict of Interest for you?
hoofprints
Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
"only then will I accept anything further from you."
Just Taylor wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:27:49 -0600, Kali <ka...@lart.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <43e78656...@bradjesness.com>, posted Tue, 20
> >Dec 2005 14:38:30 -0800, Just Taylor tay...@wilhelp.com says...
> >
> >>On 20 Dec 2005 17:20:04 EST, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>>Thus, I am having a legal representative of me, Brad Jesness,
> >>>send REGISTERED MAIL TO "Taylor's" PO Box 699 to see if the
> >>>psychopath will still be able or willing to pick up the letter
> >>>WHEN ID IS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR.
> >>
> >>When you a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California sent
> >>certified mail Brad,[ only then will I accept anything 'further' from you.] [emp.added]
> >>
> >>I have told you time and time again I want no contact from you unless it
> >>is from a lawyer, licensed to practice in the state of California.
> >>
> >>I am not going to waste my time on this matter. You better make sure
> >>your lawyer can legally practice in the state of California because [I
> >>will not accept anything 'further' from you until you do.][emp.added].
> >>
> >>I have already wasted my time going to the PO on a busy day to accept
> >>the certified mail you already sent, Brad. You got your one and only
> >>chance to send me mail and no more will be accepted by you or any
> >>fictitious, wannabe "legal representative you create."
> >>
> >>And just so you know Brad, I will not take down the Brad Jesness FAQ or
> >>Brad Jesness Usenet Archive even if you find a lawyer to send me
> >>certified mail.
> >
> >Hoofprints is a CA legal beagle, how about if Brad hires her?
>
> Now I'm scared, I hear she has people committed for 72 hours all the
> time. Her powerful position allows her to do so I'm told...
>
> --
> Taylor
>
> Hammer of Thor, September 2002
--
Just Taylor
<equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>DULY NOTED:
>Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
>mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
>"only then will I accept anything further from you."
What a shock you can't even quote me correctly even with my own words
right below.
Are you drunk or just freaking stupid, Horse Molester?
I said that Brad got his one phone call to me and I accepted mail from
him. That is it. I will not waste my time going to the PO to accept
mailing after mailing from Brad when he made it clear that...
1. He has no lawyer and can't afford one.
2. That all he wants to do is waste my personal time chasing after his
personal mailings.
Brad can cry all he wants about this, I don't care.
--
Taylor
hoofprints
Just Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:14:20 -0800, hoofprints
> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >DULY NOTED:
> >Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
> >mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
> >"only then will I accept anything further from you."
>
> What a shock you can't even quote me correctly even with my own words
> right below.
>
> Are you drunk or just freaking stupid, Horse Molester?
Nope, would you care to look up the CA CCP to see that you have indeed
been served, even if it was served by Certified mail, which you still
had to sign for?
That is of course if brad sent a complaint to your mail box which
included a 'valid' case number on it!!
>
> I said that Brad got his one phone call to me and I accepted mail from
> him. That is it. I will not waste my time going to the PO to accept
> mailing after mailing from Brad when he made it clear that...
Yes, you accepted mail from him, what was the content of that mail?
>
> 1. He has no lawyer and can't afford one.
So who do we know who is willing to work Pro Bono?
hmmmm!! Must be someone around willing to take your butt to the
cleaners.
> 2. That all he wants to do is waste my personal time chasing after his
> personal mailings.
PKB.
hoof
--
Just Taylor
<equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Just Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:14:20 -0800, hoofprints
>> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >DULY NOTED:
>> >Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
>> >mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
>> >"only then will I accept anything further from you."
>>
>> What a shock you can't even quote me correctly even with my own words
>> right below.
>>
>> Are you drunk or just freaking stupid, Horse Molester?
>
>Nope, would you care to look up the CA CCP to see that you have indeed
>been served, even if it was served by Certified mail, which you still
>had to sign for?
>That is of course if brad sent a complaint to your mail box which
>included a 'valid' case number on it!
And Brad could have sent that $1000 too. Who freaking cares. Brad said
in his certified mailing to me dated December 14, 2005 that he was
meeting with his "reknown" lawyer on December 19, 2005. If Brad has a
"reknown" lawyer working for him, then even you what Brad is doing is
stupid.
Not even a wannabe lawyer like yourself knows that you don't make any
contact with the person you are going to sue. You sure as heck don't
continue to follow the person around on Usenet and call him day and
night either.
But then again, you are as stupid as Brad Jesness so no doubt you will
ignore these little facts because like Brad Jesness, stupidity and utter
bullshit is all you have.
>> I said that Brad got his one phone call to me and I accepted mail from
>> him. That is it. I will not waste my time going to the PO to accept
>> mailing after mailing from Brad when he made it clear that...
>
>Yes, you accepted mail from him, what was the content of that mail?
See for yourself,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
>> 1. He has no lawyer and can't afford one.
>
>So who do we know who is willing to work Pro Bono?
No lawyer is going to waste their time on Brad and you know it.
>hmmmm!! Must be someone around willing to take your butt to the
>cleaners.
One doesn't really have much to stand on when all I do is point out what
one is doing via the Google archive. But again that is just a little
fact that a liar like you has to ignore because you have nothing else.
>> 2. That all he wants to do is waste my personal time chasing after his
>> personal mailings.
>
>PKB.
Can you please point out where I have sent Brad mail. Though it will be
OK if you can't or choose to ignore that seeing as how you can't really
lie about it without looking stupid.
--
Taylor
hoofprints
Just Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:46:58 -0800, hoofprints
> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Just Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:14:20 -0800, hoofprints
> >> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >DULY NOTED:
> >> >Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
> >> >mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
> >> >"only then will I accept anything further from you."
> >>
> >> What a shock you can't even quote me correctly even with my own words
> >> right below.
> >>
> >> Are you drunk or just freaking stupid, Horse Molester?
> >
> >Nope, would you care to look up the CA CCP to see that you have indeed
> >been served, even if it was served by Certified mail, which you still
> >had to sign for?
> >That is of course if brad sent a complaint to your mail box which
> >included a 'valid' case number on it!
>
> And Brad could have sent that $1000 too.
What $1,000.00?? Was that a 'bet'? So he is a welcher!! Doesn't mean
he doesn't have a case against your for defaming him and his wife in
public for years.
> Who freaking cares. Brad said
> in his certified mailing to me dated December 14, 2005 that he was
> meeting with his "reknown" lawyer on December 19, 2005.
Then Brad 'should' have the 'renown' lawyer write to you, and if you
'avoid' picking up the certified/registered mail, the 'renown' lawyer
should file the Service of Process via Legal Notifications in the local
newspaper. That would be the Orange County Register, right?
> If Brad has a
> "reknown" lawyer working for him, then even you what Brad is doing is
> stupid.
As much as I hate to admit that you are correct, you are correct. Brad,
it is better to have your attorney file the suit.
>
> Not even a wannabe lawyer like yourself knows that you don't make any
> contact with the person you are going to sue.
Yes, that is advisable, but it isn't exactly 'written in stone'. And it
also depends on how much damage his contacting you has done to his
complaint.
> You sure as heck don't
> continue to follow the person around on Usenet and call him day and
> night either.
Post proof of phone records please or counter sue, if you can prove that
remark.
>
> But then again, you are as stupid as Brad Jesness so no doubt you will
> ignore these little facts because like Brad Jesness, stupidity and utter
> bullshit is all you have.
And yet, knowing that BJ is after you, you continue to harass him in
public and follow his posts.
Please don't take my advise, I am not an attorney, and unfortunately
attorneys are not allowed to throw down their business cards to gain
clientele.
Brad seek the advise of an attorney.
>
> >> I said that Brad got his one phone call to me and I accepted mail from
> >> him. That is it. I will not waste my time going to the PO to accept
> >> mailing after mailing from Brad when he made it clear that...
> >
> >Yes, you accepted mail from him, what was the content of that mail?
>
> See for yourself,
>
> http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
>
> >> 1. He has no lawyer and can't afford one.
> >
> >So who do we know who is willing to work Pro Bono?
>
> No lawyer is going to waste their time on Brad and you know it.
No, I don't know that for a 'fact', I do know that one of my instructors
told of a classmate of hers from Fullerton who took poor peoples cases
and his office was a VW bug!1 they are out there, they just can't throw
down a business card without sanctions from the bar.
>
> >hmmmm!! Must be someone around willing to take your butt to the
> >cleaners.
>
> One doesn't really have much to stand on when all I do is point out what
> one is doing via the Google archive. But again that is just a little
> fact that a liar like you has to ignore because you have nothing else.
>
> >> 2. That all he wants to do is waste my personal time chasing after his
> >> personal mailings.
> >
> >PKB.
>
> Can you please point out where I have sent Brad mail.
Not a matter of 'you' sending Brad mail, it is a matter of you admitting
that 'you' picked up mail at the PO BOX. If it was a service of
process, you have legally been served, and should perhaps think about
taking your own advise and STFU. But I am not an Attorney, so I can't
give legal advise.
hoof
--
Brad
Hash: SHA1
The fact that Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA)
has managed to get a P.O. Box in the false name (TRUE ALIAS) of
"Taylor Jimenez" should impress no one. Anyone can easily
imagine how easy this is to do.
"Taylor Jimenez" has NEVER had to provide IDENTITY ID for any
mail collection he has done at that P.O. Box. Joe Jared is simply
going by an alias (an alias he used when he took out the P.O. Box),
like any common psychopathic individual might do.
It has not yet been seen whether this criminal-type psychopath
will use fake ID , when it is requested for Registered Mail or
whether
he will be unable to collect it.
In any case, the identity of "Taylor Jimenez" as Joe Jared, aka
Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA and of osirusoft.com and of
oretek.com HAS BEEN SHOWN _WAY_ BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. A
good web page to start on to look at the evidence that Jared is
the notorious x-no-archive stalker and spammer of Usenet is:
http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm .
Of course, this hypocritical abuser and control-freak has every
reason to want to hide from his gross insane hypocrisy and illegal
activity, which has included not only stalking/harassment and
defamation, but which has also included forgery and extortion.
Also see http://bradjesness.home.att.net for a simple HIM vs. ME
character contrast.
Hell, OF COURSE Joe Jared is embarassed about being found out to
be "Taylor Jimenez" -- the x-no-archive stalker AND THE WORST
SPAMMER IN THE HISTORY OF USENET (Jared is a hypocrite and a supposed
anti-spammer).
JUST **ONE** OF THE ALMOST 40 PIECES OF SPECIFIC EVIDENCE that
Jared is "Jimenez":
The fact that "Taylor Jimenez" BOUGHT ALL 6 joejared domains, in
A WAY THAT IS NON-TRANSFERABLE!! is really quite telling !!! SEE:
http://cyberper.cnc.net/gifHolderALL.htm
(And, YES, I have offered the criminal-type psychopath, Joe Jared
if Orange, CA $1000 if HE could prove he is NOT "Taylor Jimenez")
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ7l0975mfd8AI17qEQJVdgCcDM9P0N7x6NsARweGg9deedFZQcIAoP1A
2H7AlO+AtyNirYsTQU/oYvIe
=PEAf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Just Taylor
<equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Just Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:46:58 -0800, hoofprints
>> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Just Taylor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:14:20 -0800, hoofprints
>> >> <equspho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >DULY NOTED:
>> >> >Just Taylor admits twice in body of this post that 'he received
>> >> >mail'from Brad at the PO Box 699 and I quote:
>> >> >"only then will I accept anything further from you."
>> >>
>> >> What a shock you can't even quote me correctly even with my own words
>> >> right below.
>> >>
>> >> Are you drunk or just freaking stupid, Horse Molester?
>> >
>> >Nope, would you care to look up the CA CCP to see that you have indeed
>> >been served, even if it was served by Certified mail, which you still
>> >had to sign for?
>> >That is of course if brad sent a complaint to your mail box which
>> >included a 'valid' case number on it!
>>
>> And Brad could have sent that $1000 too.
>
>What $1,000.00?? Was that a 'bet'? So he is a welcher!! Doesn't mean
>he doesn't have a case against your for defaming him and his wife in
>public for years.
Brad only welched out on Ryan Lankford when he exposed Brad's lie about
how I was Sanford Wallace. And since it was Brad Jesness who sent
certified mail to me (Taylor Jimenez) and I accepted it, technically
Brad Jesness exposed his own lie about how I was Joe Jared so I don't
get anything.
Oh and Hoof, just for fun and all. What do you believe? Am I Sanford
Wallace, Mr. Melissa Villeneuve, Joe Jared? Brad has claimed that I am
each and everyone of these people and always had undisputable facts to
back each one.
Going along with Brad just because you don't like me is one thing... I
just wonder if you truly believe Brad every time he makes the claim on
who I am. Because if you did, that says a lot more about you and though
my personal opinion of you is mighty low, I never took you for that
stupid or gullible to follow Brad's lies as if they were gospel.
>> Who freaking cares. Brad said
>> in his certified mailing to me dated December 14, 2005 that he was
>> meeting with his "reknown" lawyer on December 19, 2005.
>
>
>Then Brad 'should' have the 'renown' lawyer write to you, and if you
>'avoid' picking up the certified/registered mail, the 'renown' lawyer
>should file the Service of Process via Legal Notifications in the local
>newspaper. That would be the Orange County Register, right?
Since when is Grover Beach, CA in Orange County, Hoof?
>> If Brad has a
>> "reknown" lawyer working for him, then even you what Brad is doing is
>> stupid.
>
>As much as I hate to admit that you are correct, you are correct. Brad,
>it is better to have your attorney file the suit.
Which only goes to prove my point that all Brad wants to do is call me
day and night, waste my personal time picking up his mail and follow me
around Usenet calling me names.
This has been going on for more than four years, Hoof. Brad first said
he was going to sue me on September 04, 2001. Why on earth has he
taking so long?
Why didn't Brad sue when he knew for fact that I was Sanford Wallace and
was calling Sanford at his dance club?
Why didn't Brad sue last June when all of a sudden I was Joe Jared
instead of just a calling Joe?
Why is Brad now sending mail when he said in the letter he sent me he
met with some "reknown lawyer" on December 19th, 2005?
>> Not even a wannabe lawyer like yourself knows that you don't make any
>> contact with the person you are going to sue.
>
>Yes, that is advisable, but it isn't exactly 'written in stone'. And it
>also depends on how much damage his contacting you has done to his
>complaint.
So Brad is a victim, right? Then even you have to admit that the victim
should never have *ANY* contact with the person victimizing him, right?
So why is Brad calling *ME* and sending *ME* mail and begging me to call
him? If Brad has a lawyer like he claims, how come Brad is doing all
the contacting?
Come on Hoof, you make yourself out to be a hypocrite when you don't
acknowledge these facts. If it was me trying to contact Brad you sure
as heck would be point these things out.
So the real question is, why is Brad not doing anything other than
trying to contact me and follow me around Usenet if he is such a victim?
>> You sure as heck don't
>> continue to follow the person around on Usenet and call him day and
>> night either.
>
>Post proof of phone records please or counter sue, if you can prove that
>remark.
Why would I counter sue? I'm not threatened by Brad Jesness. He
doesn't scare me and I don't feel like I have been harassed by him. I
have said time and time again that what Brad Jesness has done has not
been a problem for me.
My saying that (and this is not the first time, you can find me saying
the many times over) kind of shoots my own foot against any claim I make
against Brad, right?
>> But then again, you are as stupid as Brad Jesness so no doubt you will
>> ignore these little facts because like Brad Jesness, stupidity and utter
>> bullshit is all you have.
>
>And yet, knowing that BJ is after you, you continue to harass him in
>public and follow his posts.
I have nothing to fear from Brad Jesness. All I do is point out the
Google archive of Brad's posts and make it easy for anyone to see.
>Please don't take my advise, I am not an attorney, and unfortunately
>attorneys are not allowed to throw down their business cards to gain
>clientele.
>Brad seek the advise of an attorney.
Good advice, Hoof. Finally there is something we can agree on. Now ask
Brad why he has failed to do so after more than four years of claiming
he has....
>> >> I said that Brad got his one phone call to me and I accepted mail from
>> >> him. That is it. I will not waste my time going to the PO to accept
>> >> mailing after mailing from Brad when he made it clear that...
>> >
>> >Yes, you accepted mail from him, what was the content of that mail?
>>
>> See for yourself,
>>
>> http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
>>
>> >> 1. He has no lawyer and can't afford one.
>> >
>> >So who do we know who is willing to work Pro Bono?
>>
>> No lawyer is going to waste their time on Brad and you know it.
>
>No, I don't know that for a 'fact', I do know that one of my instructors
>told of a classmate of hers from Fullerton who took poor peoples cases
>and his office was a VW bug!1 they are out there, they just can't throw
>down a business card without sanctions from the bar.
Deep down Hoof you know Brad has no case. So what, you don't like me
and would like to see someone "get me." It can't be you because you
have nothing.
Just like Brad Jesness.
Multi-billion dollar lawsuits have been initiated and settled in far
less time than it has taken Brad Jesness over the past four years. Yet
you continue to "RAW RAW RAW" for Brad as if he just got around to doing
something.
Are you as truly gullible as Brad hopes you are? He has been the one
feeding you lies over the past four years. Did you believe I was
Sanford Wallace?
If so, how did you feel when Brad spent a week in February 2005 trying
to convince everyone I was someone named "Mr. Melissa Villeneuve?
How about when Brad's "forensic research" that original proved I was
Sanford Wallace now shows I am Joe Jared? Were you upset then when you
realized that Brad was at the very least wrong or worst, outright lying
to you?
>> >hmmmm!! Must be someone around willing to take your butt to the
>> >cleaners.
>>
>> One doesn't really have much to stand on when all I do is point out what
>> one is doing via the Google archive. But again that is just a little
>> fact that a liar like you has to ignore because you have nothing else.
>>
>> >> 2. That all he wants to do is waste my personal time chasing after his
>> >> personal mailings.
>> >
>> >PKB.
>>
>> Can you please point out where I have sent Brad mail.
>
>Not a matter of 'you' sending Brad mail, it is a matter of you admitting
>that 'you' picked up mail at the PO BOX. If it was a service of
>process, you have legally been served, and should perhaps think about
>taking your own advise and STFU. But I am not an Attorney, so I can't
>give legal advise.
I picked up a letter that was full of Brad's usual limp threats and
nothing more. If Brad truly had a "reknown lawyer" working for him,
don't you think the lawyer would have taken care of all this in the
first place?
And what about how Brad all of a sudden said his own work is better than
any old lawyer and how all of a sudden Brad doesn't need a lawyer
anymore?
Do you now believe Brad is doing this on his own and would you recommend
him doing so if he was?
--
Taylor
Just Taylor
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>The fact that Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA)
>has managed to get a P.O. Box in the false name (TRUE ALIAS) of
>"Taylor Jimenez" should impress no one. Anyone can easily
>imagine how easy this is to do.
Not according to you Brad in post <43A6E5...@concentric.net> and I
quote,
""Taylor" also lists a P.O. Box BUT HE CANNOT PICK UP CERTIFIED MAIL
THERE BECAUSE IT IS NOT IN THE NAME, "Taylor Jimenez.""
And now you lie about how anyone can easily do so?
Why the conflict in information from you, Brad? Is it easy to do so or
not do. I guess depending on which lie you are working on, huh Brad?
>"Taylor Jimenez" has NEVER had to provide IDENTITY ID for any
>mail collection he has done at that P.O. Box. Joe Jared is simply
>going by an alias (an alias he used when he took out the P.O. Box),
>like any common psychopathic individual might do.
So did you are did you not send mail to me, Brad?
>It has not yet been seen whether this criminal-type psychopath
>will use fake ID , when it is requested for Registered Mail or
>whether
>he will be unable to collect it.
I already told you Brad I won't accept anything further from you. I did
this on 12/19/05.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/8f1c7246bd5f468b?hl=en&
I did this Brad because I knew you were going to send mail all the time
knowing that this is all you could do now that your Joe Jared lies have
been exposed.
I will not be picking up any more mail from you or taking any of your
phones calls or returning any e-mail to you, Brad.
>In any case, the identity of "Taylor Jimenez" as Joe Jared, aka
>Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA and of osirusoft.com and of
>oretek.com HAS BEEN SHOW _WAY_ BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. A
>good web page to start on to look at the evidence that Jared is
>the notorious x-no-archive stalker and spammer of Usenet is:
And Brad Jesness has been shown to be a liar because Brad Jesness has
already sent certified mail to me at my valid WHOIS registered contact
info.
See for yourself,
http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm?from=home&page=0035trackandconfirm
Tracking number, ED939329463US
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 1:04 pm on December 19, 2005 in GROVER BEACH,
CA 93483. The item was signed for by T JIMINEZ.
Label/Receipt Number: ED93 9329 463U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered, December 19, 2005, 1:04 pm, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Notice Left, December 16, 2005, 11:00 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93483
Arrival at Unit, December 16, 2005, 10:59 am, GROVER BEACH, CA 93433
Enroute, December 16, 2005, 12:09 am, GOLETA, CA 93199
Enroute, December 15, 2005, 6:51 am, LOS ANGELES, CA 90009
Enroute, December 14, 2005, 4:41 pm, SAINT PAUL, MN 55111
Acceptance, December 14, 2005, 10:59 am, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
Lets start with the Express Delivery envelope,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope.JPG
And from a different angle just to make sure everyone can see your name
and mine,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope2.JPG
Then there was the envelope inside the package,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/envelope.JPG
And now your letter,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
- - - -
Thank you Brad Jesness for exposing your own lies. It has made my job
archiving your posts at www.bradjesness.com that much easier.
--
Taylor
Card XII
> On 02 Jan 2006 14:35:43 EST, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>The fact that Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA)
>>has managed to get a P.O. Box in the false name (TRUE ALIAS) of
>>"Taylor Jimenez" should impress no one. Anyone can easily
>>imagine how easy this is to do.
>
> Not according to you Brad in post <43A6E5...@concentric.net> and I
> quote,
>
> ""Taylor" also lists a P.O. Box BUT HE CANNOT PICK UP CERTIFIED MAIL
> THERE BECAUSE IT IS NOT IN THE NAME, "Taylor Jimenez.""
>
> And now you lie about how anyone can easily do so?
Oh hell yes! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
Owned and spnacked! Nice job, Taylor.
Just Taylor
wrote:
>
>"Just Taylor" <tay...@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
>news:43e28397...@bradjesness.com...
>> On 02 Jan 2006 14:35:43 EST, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>The fact that Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA)
>>>has managed to get a P.O. Box in the false name (TRUE ALIAS) of
>>>"Taylor Jimenez" should impress no one. Anyone can easily
>>>imagine how easy this is to do.
>>
>> Not according to you Brad in post <43A6E5...@concentric.net> and I
>> quote,
>>
>> ""Taylor" also lists a P.O. Box BUT HE CANNOT PICK UP CERTIFIED MAIL
>> THERE BECAUSE IT IS NOT IN THE NAME, "Taylor Jimenez.""
>>
>> And now you lie about how anyone can easily do so?
>
>Oh hell yes! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
>Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
>Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
>Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack! Spnack!
Pretty much sums up the level of desperation Brad is at over his Joe
Jared lies.
First I couldn't pick up the mail because I'm not Taylor Jimenez. Then
I could pick it up because it is easy to pick up mail that is not yours
at the USPS.
Brad has no choice but to hide from the certified mail he sent me
because he knows that he proved himself that he is a liar.
Brad Jesness lies about who I am
Brad Jesness lies about my having a fake address
Brad Jesness lies about having a lawyer
Brad Jesness lies. Period.
--
Taylor
Joe Jared
> Lets start with the Express Delivery envelope,
>
> http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope.JPG
There's some useful information here.
Am I seeing things right here? With at least 3 post offices within a 2
mile radius of my home, A claim exists that I'm chosing to maintain one
that is a 3 1/2 hour drive to get to, or about 7 hours round trip? Surely
someone finds this funny.
--
Listed? You must be joking http://relays.osirusoft.com
Pallorium V. Jared ruling http://www.oretek.com/lawsuite/ruling.pdf
http://www.oretek.com/lawsuite/
darb
"Taylor Jimenez"
Start here: http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm
$1000 says you are. YOUR LAWYER IN EFFECT SAYS YOU ARE.
Joe Jared <joej...@osirusoft.com> wrote in
news:pan.2006.01.18....@osirusoft.com:
darb
will find you and beat the crap out of you !!
Joe Jared <joej...@osirusoft.com> wrote in
news:pan.2006.01.18....@osirusoft.com:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:49:22 -0800, Just Taylor wrote:
darb
You are asking people to believe that the people harassing
Brad JUST HAPPEN TO BE YOUR FRIENDS!!!! They
just happened to be your "friends" that BOUGHT AND
THEN LOST **ALL THE joejared domains**!!! see:
http://cyberper.cnc.net/gifHolderALL.htm
AND: "Taylor Jimenez"
shares 35+ specific similarities with YOU (including
living in the 714 area code) and the same friends and
the same past places they lived and the same voice
and on and on and on. AND: "Taylor Jimenez" just happened
to switch his wilhelp.com domain to Rich Tietjens server
AT EXACTLY THE SAME POINT IN TIME YOU AND HE WERE IN COURT
TOGETHER!!!
Ridiculous. Your hiding days are OVER, "Taylor Jimenez" (retard)
I think your psychosis has come back. Are you drinking too?
Joe Jared <joej...@osirusoft.com> wrote in
news:pan.2006.01.18....@osirusoft.com:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:49:22 -0800, Just Taylor wrote:
Necco
"darb" <35jo...@liamtoh.moc> wrote in message
news:Xns974FAA9A1A...@213.155.197.138...
> There is plenty of evidence that YOU, Joe Jared, are
> "Taylor Jimenez"
>
> Start here: http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm
> $1000 says you are. YOUR LAWYER IN EFFECT SAYS YOU ARE.
How many $1,000 bets have you already lost, brad jesness? You still need to
pay the
last ones.
And you keep making the contracts in public. What a goofball!
Nomen Necco
Stalking Filth #17
Kali's Hotties List
Necco
"darb" <35jo...@liamtoh.moc> wrote in message
> Don't you know HOW STUPID YOU LOOK, Joe Jared??
>
<snip>
Here brad, here is your reality. The one you have made!
For an initial picture of limp inadequacy, look at brad jesness
exposing his unexposables:
news:dqa6ld$ap9$2...@domitilla.aioe.org
Then, going more in depth, let's look at the facts about
moron brad jesness, a kook of kooks,liar of liars, piss ant and loser.
First, the wonderful spnacking that Taylor gave to brad when brad jesness
was trying to "prove" (roflmao) that Taylor is somebody named Jared.
[brad jesness has been trying for years to prove that Taylor is one
person or another. That's how brad responds to the continuing spanks
he earns.
Taylor posted several bits of great information about brad's stoopid
effort. First a scan of the Express Delivery envelope,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope.JPG
abd another scan from a different angle just to make sure everyone can see
brad's name
and Taylor's,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/ed_envelope2.JPG
Then there is brad's envelope inside the package,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/envelope.JPG
and finally brad's letter,
http://www.wilhelp.com/brad/bunchofhotair.JPG
All of this led to a fantastic, Christmas kookout by brad, with his
annual kooksoot threats, backpedaling that would leave Lance Armstrong
panting for breath, and the annual miserable failure in all of his efforts.
There is a fantastic archive of brad's history on usenet and in the world at
large. First, look at the incredible list of kook awards that brad jesness
has earned:
Kook of The Month, July 1997
Looney Maroon Award, July 1997
Looney Maroon Award, December 1997
The Golden Killfile Award, December 1997
John M. Goober Memorial Award, December 1997
Unabomber Surprise Award, June 1998
The Foam Duck Award, 8th July 1998
Looney Maroon Award, June 1998
Looney Maroon Award by Acclamation, July 1998
Usenet's Biggest Crybaby
Busted Urinal Award, July 1998
Gen. George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award, August 1998
Hook Line & Sinker, February 1999
Cluless Newbie of the Month, July 1999
Tar & Feathers, July 1999
Kenny McCormick Memorial Medal, July 1999
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, July 1999
Kook of the Decade, January 2000
Coward of the Month, October 2000
Hook Line & Sinker, January 2002
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, December 2002
Hook Line & Sinker, February, 2005
Then of course there are the archived facts about brad. The newest, updated
sites for facts about brad jesness are:
http://www.bradjesness.com
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/one.html
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/archive.html
Then these sites document brad jesness being investigated as a Cyberstalker
by
the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in Minnesota. Really frosts brad's
gorns because it shows that he was warned to stop.
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/bca.JPG
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/seven.html
and then there are the dependable:
http://www.spamblocked.com/bj_faq/
http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/bj_faq/
http://www.the-foxhole.org/bjfaq/
http://www.thesbl.com/bradlee
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/brad/
http://www.seige-perilous.org/bwad/
http://www.morningmist.org/kooks/bj/
Here is some fantastic information about the brad jesness web sites.
First, the fun and accurate representation of what experts in psychology
say about brad jesness web sites:
http://www.netdisaster.com/go.php?mode=cow&url=http://cyberper.cnc.net/
Now brad, you claim that you are merely presenting 'facts' about psychology.
But actually, everybody knows that you are actually fuming and ranting
because you
couldn't get into grad school in psychology. Here are some lies you have
spewed
since 1995!, all documented and archived:
1. that you are a psychologist (licensing board told you to stop)
2. that you have the support and encouragment of the leaders in
psychology
(they have posted here that you do not!)
3. that you are a published researcher in psychology (no such
publications, anywhere)
4. that you have been a professor of psychology (proven wrong)
5. that you are a high school teacher of computer science (you taught
one semester, and
the students dissed you so badly you were never invited back. One
student even
posted his complaints on this newsgroup)
6. that you were leader of a 'consumer' support group for psychotherapy
clients, a group
you said is named "B.R.A.D." Of course, there is no such group, and
you were outed
and outed yourself. You were and are the only member.
7. you posted to a support group for depressed teens that you were a
counselor.
8. you claimed that Dr. P had been warned by law enforcement to leave
you alone,
when the letter (url above) shows that YOU were investigated and
warned. Dr. P
is a respected psychologist
9. You claimed that 5 people voted for you in the election for
moderators of sppm,
but it was easily proven that all the votes came from you.
10. You claimed that you are not "cognito, BRAD," etc., or any of the
other 1500
sockpuppets you use.
and on and on and on.
And of course, the proof that you phoned Jared in spite of your claims that
you did not:
http://www.oretek.com/jesness/20050825-tmobile.pdf
There are several mentions of the wonderful kook awards you have earned,
mentioned above, such as the Looney Maroon, Kook of the Month, Kook of the
Year, Busted Urinal, George Armstrong Custer, and many more!
Enjoy, bradley. Your own posts prove you to be a lying jerk.
Do you have any kids to watch your kookiness?
Nomen Necco
Hammer of Thor, May 2005
psychologistsAreQuacks
"Taylor Jimenez", HE WILL BE PAID $1000.
Too bad he is "Taylor Jimenez"
Pierre Capot <peterżho...@hotpopnomore.com> wrote in
news:aruvs1lalvrji9d14...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:46:15 +0000 (UTC), in
> sci.psychology.psychotherapy darb <35jo...@liamtoh.moc> wrote:
>
>>There is plenty of evidence that YOU, Joe Jared, are
>>"Taylor Jimenez"
>>
>>Start here: http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm
>> $1000 says you are. YOUR LAWYER IN EFFECT SAYS YOU ARE.
>
>
> I'll give you my account number <so you can pay me the $1,000> and the
> evidence that Joe Jared != Taylor Jimenez, but I need you to agree
> publicly, and to make available a document that is PGP signed, saying
> that you will pay up.
>
>>>
>>>
>
!:?)
news:Xns97516B7F0C...@213.155.197.138...
<--Brad Jesness Spanked Spammer & Cyberstalking Troll hiding behind
Anonymous Remailers etched this into USENET History!:?0)
> The offer is for JOE JARED ONLY. IF Joe Jared is NOT
> "Taylor Jimenez", HE WILL BE PAID $1000.
>
I don't see a PGP Sig here Brad?:?)
And using an Anon News Service too!:?)
Come back when you meet the requirements.
> <snip> Obsession removed.
>
--
Kevin!:?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"Anonymous" <anon-b...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in message
news:a32668615ea143c9...@deuxpi.ca...
<--Brad Jesness Spanked Spammer & Cyberstalking Troll hiding behind
Anonymous Remailers etched this into USENET History!:?0)
>> Now, again, some responses:
So you admit you are Trolling here for responses with your EMP & ECP Spam
Baiting your Victims.
After Posting 3 replies to my 1 that showed your Spam Post in NANAE says a
lot Brad.
>>
>> "!:?)", KEVIN: Brad was never investigated
Brad Jesness Investigated as a Cyberstalker by The Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension in Minnesota for Cyberstalking a Psychologist!:?0
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/bca.JPG
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/seven.html
>> and your LIES are MORE THAN ANNOYING
I'm annoying!:?0)...Pot...Kettle...Black...
You wouldn't know the truth if it landed on you.
That's why you can't pull http://www.bradjesness.com because it's all true
and they are ALL your own Archived Posts!:?)
>> and since you are anonymous,
>>
And how am I Anonymous?
Check my News Header Brad, Please!:?)
PGP anyone?:?)
>>
>> you are in violation of the
>> new Federal LAW!!! Anonymous harassment is now a violation of
>> FEDERAL LAW. IN FACT:
Now this *really* is Priceless my Precious!:?)
* And your name... (Drum Roll Please) IS:.....*
"Anonymous" <anon-b...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in message
news:a32668615ea143c9...@deuxpi.ca...
* And,... (You just gotta love this one!:?)*
* Your Posting through,... (another Drum Roll Please)...
******** Anonymous Remailers.********
Path:
nwrdny02.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!hw
mnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.alt.net!a
non.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
From: Anonymous <anon-b...@deuxpi.ca>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <deuxpi...@deuxpi.ca>.
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,alt.spam
Subject: Re: a 1/18 *RESPONSE* to non-stop CABAL ABUSE
* And tell me the OP's (Brad) Subject above isn't
* Baiting the Anti-Spam NG's.
References: <Tbzzf.710$Iw3.310@trndny06>
Message-ID: <a32668615ea143c9...@deuxpi.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:32:15 -0500 (EST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Xref: news.verizon.net news.admin.net-abuse.email:2207944 alt.spam:56946
X-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:34:09 EST (nwrdny02.gnilink.net)
Well, my Precious, you are Priceless, just PRICELESS LOL!:?)
>> <snip> Brad's useless Obsessive Ranting removed.
>>
A Perfect example of Brad continuously playing the Victim while accusing
others of the very things he himself is doing!:?)
For Brad Jesness FAQ's Please see;
http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq/archive.html (AKA www.bradjesness.com)
***********************************************************
And then there are the dependable:
http://www.spamblocked.com/bj_faq/
http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/bj_faq/
http://www.the-foxhole.org/bjfaq/
http://www.thesbl.com/bradlee
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/brad/
http://www.seige-perilous.org/bwad/
http://www.morningmist.org/kooks/bj/
Kevin!:?)
Fight Spam Friendly Providers, use: WWW.SPEWS.ORG
http://www.seige-perilous.org/spam/spam-SPEWS.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
Comment: http://mysite.verizon.net/vzerry8x/
iQCVAwUBQ9Ect0sJ7vwXdsA5AQJGDAQAmayrKJLXkw0pYojOHPnmgOcO0p46ayQp
nErG2arvrNnPuRYYgZQ5HHeZbcL5MSdG3BLgjZ+cnzd/CBXrsn5BNmZiRleqtNhB
wdvSw6h4BJ5orlR76yCwjjJ0gAUcvMQ5XC924w8xg7bfntWDBuGOMqpDS7vxxTR/
U49fQVMLpb4=
=Ii05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
psychologistsAreQuacks
is not "Taylor Jimenez" is on the web site and in
several digitally signed posts, some clear made
by Brad J via concentric.net
"!:?\)" <!:?)@Invalid.Nett> wrote in news:hmaAf.20$ie3.4@trndny09:
> "psychologistsAreQuacks" <qu...@quack.quack> wrote in message
> news:Xns97516B7F0C...@213.155.197.138...
psychologistsAreQuacks
SEE: <43A037...@concentric.net>
Go to groups.google.com, Advanced Search and type
43A037...@concentric.net in for Message-ID
psychologistsAreQuacks <qu...@quack.quack> wrote in
news:Xns97518E0D68...@213.155.197.138:
!:?)
"psychologistsAreQuacks" <qu...@quack.quack> wrote in message
> The offer to give Joe Jared a $1000 if he simply proves he
> is not "Taylor Jimenez" is on the web site and in
> several digitally signed posts, some clear made
> by Brad J via concentric.net
Show me one, just ONE!:?)
And don't show me this:
43A037...@concentric.net
(I have offered Joe Jared $1000 to show that he is NOT "Taylor
Jimenez".)
Without details you can use ANY excuse to not Pay Up!
There's several Archives on you Brad and you don't Digitally Sign many.
So I can tell you that you haven't Digitally Signed one on Concentric that
says much more than that.
> > I don't see a PGP Sig here Brad?:?)
> > And using an Anon News Service too!:?)
> > Come back when you meet the requirements.
Yes I'll second that!:?)
Sign one here and now Brad, it's put up or shut up time, Get Errr Done!:?)
And don't forget to put the Money in Escrow so you can't Welsh again!:?)
And even if you OUT yourself or if someone else proves Taylor is not Jared,
then Jared still gets the Money!:?)
You have a bad habit of being your own worst enemy and I figure you'll
*Outing Yourself* and I'll bet you'd use that as an excuse not to pay!
So if anyone, including yourself, proves Taylor is not Jared, then you Pay
Jared $1,000!:?)
After all, that's what this is all about right, proving once and for all
weather Jared and Taylor are the same person?:?)
After all these Years and all your Lies etc..., and you can't see your
Obsession here isn't a good thing?
What's going to happen when it's all over and you got your answer?
Or are you just going to keep charging after the same Windmill?:?)
>
> <snip> Obsession removed.
>
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kevin!:?)
Fight Spam Friendly Providers, use WWW.SPEWS.ORG
http://www.seige-perilous.org/spam/spam-SPEWS.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
Comment: http://mysite.verizon.net/vzerry8x/
iQCVAwUBQ9KqPEsJ7vwXdsA5AQLV8gP+LTRV8L/Jznk5sSbzS9s8kLhf6ZwfmAWl
x27T1TDpRM/pnyQNmvnGYLM868lzcVWiFcq9+fCTQdzryo8bo5ABzwRW8py8TaEl
/N3Ag/ostlnZMyf4UvA9J4v/CFmzqRHR77jeY4WP6JRzznTT1+wC/LK4YVLX1ioZ
6GIcZ6E3GrI=
=os2h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
!:?)
"psychologistsAreQuacks" <qu...@quack.quack> wrote in message
> The offer to give Joe Jared a $1000 if he simply proves he
> is not "Taylor Jimenez" is on the web site and in
> several digitally signed posts, some clear made
> by Brad J via concentric.net
Show me one, just ONE!:?)
And don't show me this:
43A037...@concentric.net
(I have offered Joe Jared $1000 to show that he is NOT "Taylor
Jimenez".)
Without details you can use ANY excuse to not Pay Up!
There's several Archives on you Brad and you don't Digitally Sign many.
So I can tell you that you haven't Digitally Signed one on Concentric that
says much more than that.
> > I don't see a PGP Sig here Brad?:?)
> > And using an Anon News Service too!:?)
> > Come back when you meet the requirements.
Yes I'll second that!:?)
Sign one here and now Brad, it's put up or shut up time, Get Errr Done!:?)
And don't forget to put the Money in Escrow so you can't Welsh again!:?)
And even if you OUT yourself or if someone else proves Taylor is not Jared,
then Jared still gets the Money!:?)
You have a bad habit of being your own worst enemy and I figure you'll
*Outing Yourself* and I'll bet you'd use that as an excuse not to pay!
So if anyone, including yourself, proves Taylor is not Jared, then you Pay
Jared $1,000!:?)
After all, that's what this is all about right, proving once and for all
weather Jared and Taylor are the same person?:?)
After all these Years and all your Lies etc..., and you can't see your
Obsession here isn't a good thing?
What's going to happen when it's all over and you got your answer?
Or are you just going to keep charging after the same Windmill?:?)
>
> <snip> Obsession removed.
>
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kevin!:?)
Fight Spam Friendly Providers, use WWW.SPEWS.ORG
http://www.seige-perilous.org/spam/spam-SPEWS.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
Comment: http://mysite.verizon.net/vzerry8x/
iQCVAwUBQ9KqPEsJ7vwXdsA5AQLV8gP+LTRV8L/Jznk5sSbzS9s8kLhf6ZwfmAWl
Joe Jared
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The fact that Joe Jared (Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA)
> has managed to get a P.O. Box in the false name (TRUE ALIAS) of
> "Taylor Jimenez" should impress no one. Anyone can easily
> imagine how easy this is to do.
The fact that the Post office box is well maintained and 223 miles from my
home should, however.
> "Taylor Jimenez" has NEVER had to provide IDENTITY ID for any
> mail collection he has done at that P.O. Box. Joe Jared is simply
> going by an alias (an alias he used when he took out the P.O. Box),
> like any common psychopathic individual might do.
In the absense of identify, call it property of Joe Jared, in spite of the
distance. Here's a another clue.
http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/addressblock.cgi?addr2=laptop.oretek.com&extra=
> It has not yet been seen whether this criminal-type psychopath
> will use fake ID , when it is requested for Registered Mail or
> whether
> he will be unable to collect it.
Criminal type psychopath? Writing an autobiography?
>
> In any case, the identity of "Taylor Jimenez" as Joe Jared, aka
> Stephen Joseph Jared of Orange, CA and of osirusoft.com and of
> oretek.com HAS BEEN SHOWN _WAY_ BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. A
Only by your demented deranged, and derailed perception.
> good web page to start on to look at the evidence that Jared is
> the notorious x-no-archive stalker and spammer of Usenet is:
>
> http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm .
>
> Of course, this hypocritical abuser and control-freak has every
> reason to want to hide from his gross insane hypocrisy and illegal
> activity, which has included not only stalking/harassment and
> defamation, but which has also included forgery and extortion.
Stalking/harrassing/defaming. Sure sounds like an autobiography.
> Also see http://bradjesness.home.att.net for a simple HIM vs. ME
> character contrast.
>
> Hell, OF COURSE Joe Jared is embarassed about being found out to
> be "Taylor Jimenez" -- the x-no-archive stalker AND THE WORST
> SPAMMER IN THE HISTORY OF USENET (Jared is a hypocrite and a supposed
> anti-spammer).
Embarrassed? Even the greatest of forensic scientists would wonder how
I would chose to have a PO box that is 7 hours to get to, round trip,
especially given how many PO boxes there are in the immediate vicinity. I
have had a pobox twice, both in Orange Co.
> JUST **ONE** OF THE ALMOST 40 PIECES OF SPECIFIC EVIDENCE that
> Jared is "Jimenez":
I wouldn't call what you have evidence. I'm curious to know how many
actually consider what you have to be evidence.
>
> The fact that "Taylor Jimenez" BOUGHT ALL 6 joejared domains, in A WAY
> THAT IS NON-TRANSFERABLE!! is really quite telling !!! SEE:
>
> http://cyberper.cnc.net/gifHolderALL.htm
>
> (And, YES, I have offered the criminal-type psychopath, Joe Jared
> if Orange, CA $1000 if HE could prove he is NOT "Taylor Jimenez")
Keep your money. You proved it all by your self, the moment you sent mail
to Taylor. One more item. Even the greatest of forensic scientists know
when to back off of a theory. You're dead wrong. Try to come up with
enough humility to admit it to yourself.
Brad
Hash: SHA1
Joe Jared --
Did you ever take a single science course? Do you have any concept
of good evidence?? You sure as hell have not provided any reasoable
evidence that you are not the notorious X-NO-ARCHIVE stalker,
"Taylor Jimenez" (author of approx. 10,000 off-topic personally
harassing spam posts against several people on several newsgroups).
In fact, NOW further evidence exists that you ARE "Taylor Jimenez".
I got returned Registered Mail that shows that "Taylor Jimenez"
cannot or will not pick up Mail when actual identity ID is required.
Just go to http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm and
Enter RB152077246US and then "View Details" . There, evidence
"Taylor Jimenez" is not real. In addition, I have gotten evidence
that there is/was only one adult "Taylor Jimenez" in California and
he
lives (actually, he lived) near San Diego and apparently he is
deceased.
Provide real reasonable proof. Earn the $1000 and take the $1000
or shut the f*** UP!! A**hole!!!
I resubmit: http://bradjesness.home.att.net/joe_jared.htm
and http://cyberper.cnc.net?JaredIsJimenez.htm
- -- Brad Jesness
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ9Yzx75mfd8AI17qEQKyUwCfatxUtjuGpSgGWEabvSFGrtn05IwAoIDn
Y7qdxuiTI3u+ZNuCJZsxX0Tl
=iEND
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Brad
Hash: SHA1
Let me just remind readers that for a while "Taylor Jimenez" was
so intent on showing that he lived in "smoky" (smoky because of the
fires at the time) Orange County that he was putting up a picture of
an Orange County newspaper on his wilhelp web site EVERY SINGLE DAY.
Now, Joe Jared
(who coincidentally supposedly has this friend named "Taylor Jimenez"
who buys many domains IN HIS joejared name --
though there is no such adult in all of California) is trumpeting
how "Taylor" lives way up in Grover Beach -- LIKE HE KNOWS!!!???
Joe Jared's support for this lying thug hoodlum from the first moment
has always been very interesting.
http://cyberper.cnc.net/JaredIsJimenez.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ9aT6L5mfd8AI17qEQL/vACdFM89UGY8mQLqYXyc/s4M46lrhQMAn1Uz
k9GH/HUIzjEIo0Bb9cLkftFI
=6ZzX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Brad
Hash: SHA1
Now, about not picking up the mail he would have signed for:
At the very least, "Taylor Jimenez" has NOT shown he is able
to produce identity ID.
I was wondering if he would produce forged ID, but I guess he
made the smarter choice. (There is NO adult living "Taylor
Jimenez"!!)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ9aUI75mfd8AI17qEQLWiQCgobwhrWqu5y2WdP1+NFQt09TQYYoAoJUr
88Y9H+UYsEHWKL4tQWSaU/Zi
=vZW2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Angel wrote:
>
> On 2006-01-24, Brad <cybe...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> > Joe Jared --
> >
> > Did you ever take a single science course? Do you have any concept
> > of good evidence?? You sure as hell have not provided any reasoable
> > evidence that you are not the notorious X-NO-ARCHIVE stalker,
> > "Taylor Jimenez" (author of approx. 10,000 off-topic personally
> > harassing spam posts against several people on several newsgroups).
>
> You're the one making the claim. You back it up. Why should Taylor do
> your homework for you, Brad?
>
> > In fact, NOW further evidence exists that you ARE "Taylor Jimenez".
> > I got returned Registered Mail that shows that "Taylor Jimenez"
> > cannot or will not pick up Mail when actual identity ID is required.
>
> You have a very strange definition of evidence. Taylor stated weeks ago
> that he will not accept further mail from you. He's just staying true to
> his word. It doesn't prove any of your assertions.
>
> Not that anyone expected any better from you, of course.
>
> But do tell, what kind of lie would you have invented next if he did
> pick up the mail?
>
> --
> Your friendly neighborhood Bastard Operator from Heaven. :-)
>
> I spoke: "Let there be light!"
> And behold! As soon as I threw the switch, there was light!
Brad
(actually initial for) mail where absolutely NO proof of identity
was required.
But it is shown: he has NOT signed for mail where IDENTITY ID IS
REQUIRED. In short, HE HAS YET TO SHOW ANY EVIDENCE OF HIS
IDENTITY AS "Taylor Jimenez". Simple as that. AND: He never will,
since the only adult "Taylor Jimenez" in California lived near San
Diego and is now apparently deceased.
Joe Jared
> Now, Joe Jared
> (who coincidentally supposedly has this friend named "Taylor Jimenez"
> who buys many domains IN HIS joejared name --
> though there is no such adult in all of California) is trumpeting
> how "Taylor" lives way up in Grover Beach -- LIKE HE KNOWS!!!???
I didn't know until you sent him mail. I wasn't looking for him, you
were. However, when I looked up the ZIP code of your letter's
destination, it became blatantly obvious. You need do manufacture a story
why I would have a PO Box 223 miles away from my residence to support your
hypothesis. I'm quite sure you can be creative. As for your $1000.00
promise, I could care less what you do with that money. Use it to hire
an attorney to drag me into an Orange County court, if you like.
As to science courses, I have studied physics, chemistry, several types of
mathematics, and did in fact stay at a holiday inn once.
Brad
Hash: SHA1
I find it extraordinarily interesting that "Taylor Jimenez" claims
to be FRIENDS WITH YOU, Joe Jared -- that is why he bought all
the joejared domains, HE SAID!! Yet, YOU (Joe Jared) have pretended
more than once NOT EVEN TO KNOW HIM!!
I wonder how many people have friends where THEIR FRIEND DOES NOT
EVEN KNOW HIM???!!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQ9aghL5mfd8AI17qEQLq5ACfTrVzmCTPdZkb7kxcHOGh2wwrR4kAnRCq
jYTEKJxsfobz+m/8cdRWE144
=bPeq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----