Re: Listen up motherfuckers

118 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 4, 2022, 9:48:28 PMAug 4
to
So where does this garbage come from?

Well to narrow the genie down to all you need is a big dick and money and the programming that is involved in all that.

You see endless compensation in tower building and rocket ships and Elon still can't get a girlfriend the black basketball players have them all.

They don't go to the mountain the mountains come to them to ride the tower of power.
Now is it an American phenomena mostly.

In Britain and other places their big fantasy is to have sex on the soccer field immediately after their hero scores the big goal and in front of the crowd.
That's the female fantasy according to statistical polling.
Other than that they fantasize about someone they know rather than any star or stranger they don't know. Otherwise instinctive security flags go up but when they want to get excited by fear that a different fantasy again.

So anyway SOME black lives matter, some don't.
Case in point my Deera design...
Deera Fuckworthy

https://ibb.co/ZXVmMVk
https://ibb.co/7GSsmY2

So I wrote a Smith operating system for a girl Friday. for a billionaire inventor secret agent on the puppeteer level with time travel, that's my level. And my buddies who are helping out here invisibly.

The geniacs who the system is desperately trying to mimic to no avail any more than it has been able to mimic the real engineers.

So waaay over the heads of the puppets and so the system tries to prevent culture shock by using these mimics to copy what might be visible and turn it to shit to prevent culture shock.

So depending on your user level this will make sense or not make sense.
There are at least 15 software games running in order to make Time Stretch Earth into a wonder game zone.

It was successful.
And the rest is history.
But for me, I have access to a transformer that actually writes DNA code and does not just hack DNA code like they do on earth.

So I make my own designs for later and Deera can't be made here but can be made elsewhere.

So then she is supposed to be able to wear any body from earth and even act at times as that person for short durations, short repetitive durations, and flirtatious reasons etc.

But even as herself she is a great design which appeals to me because I designed her.

So the whole key to everything in the simulator is the individual and if you tailor things to your own likes dislikes you will have a good machine otherwise consider it stolen.

So if that means you have to learn how to do everything then that is what that means.

But when you are done, like in my case I got a new off the shelf galaxy, well now you can turn that into a super pc and you a super user.
Which I did.

Is that the future? The very far future for people here but not for my future that is now.

All I have to do is move there permanently and I have beamed there hundreds of times and stayed for close to 24 hours one visit, and yeah when I was in the galactic center eating the marbles, we were eating so it was real.

So work has been done by engineers on the transformer for me already and they treated me to some of that but everything is kept low key.

And so this information is of no benefit to the masses who are in a situation of LBD in search of the BBD well that's reality for ya.
Little black dress in search of the big black dick.

I have 12 inch dick and am white and extremely wealthy so it isn't my problem. I don't watch TV, I don't listen to the radio.
I don't spend much time online.

My world view is much better for it.
Message has been deleted

Herp Derpington

unread,
Aug 4, 2022, 11:18:13 PMAug 4
to
On 8/4/2022 6:48 PM, Rick1234567S wrote:
> So where does this garbage come from?

Choke on your mom's ballsack.


Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 5, 2022, 4:33:05 AMAug 5
to
Let me simplify this for you since 15 alien gamer or ancient builder games based on gaming software which included all that rock carving in India and those pyramids all over the world.

Those Mesopotamian cylinder seals I mentioned.

No cops and Roberts, no survival games, no cowboys and indians, no fish sage religious nonsense, no trick riding, no scorpion kings, no chicken pox VS robots, on and on by the entrance to the stargate door depicted on the cylinder seals.

And you see it everywhere. In cops and Roberts the good guys are the bad guys the bad guys the good guys.
You see the mafia on TV as a form of justice and you see the good guys with the white hats invade Iraq under false pretenses and mass murder torture and steal their oil. No charges laid.

The women are playing Kismet, or Fate a match making game.

So ok, how do we simplify all this in the simulator?

Firstly examine a common sheep. Their behaviors are the same and they run like a flock of birds, somehow, they anticipate the movement of their surroundings and flock like birds across the hillside. Especially when running. That's when you notice it.
The first time in 66 years (my age) I actually saw a flock of sheep running was last week.

It must be unusual. And above top secret.

So animal behaviors are using the same software. A Labrador retriever if you get another one is exactly like the one you had in all respects. Lie if you must you are designed to make what I am saying not true, that three fucking people ONLY are doing it all.

One Zeus, One Stephen, One Hanuman. Period is all it takes to make all the men, one Wanda makes all the women, and those are cats, Zeus's are dogs, and Stephen's are monkeys.
You have a David that is like a extra on set teaming up with Wanda but he is again just a facet of Stephen.

They wear all these bodies, but like dogs Olympians have one set of behaviors based on the archetype Zeus.
Hanumanians are monkeys, and come in a million varieties. Like Neil Young, Bono, Justin Trudeau,
so right now mostly what you see are just two people. Zeus and Stephen.

And the cats. All the women.

Zeus and Stephen Tweeter and the Monkey man game operating system.

The father and son philosophy and the theme behind most of the male gaming.

So you see that's how you generalize and make sense of the complexity.

The Titans with Xerxes, the mob boss, and he is a stallion, the Italian Stallion.

So who plays the black dudes? Stephen. He also plays the Hanumanians.
That's why you are down to Zeus and Stephen and Wanda.

And software making everything go using their personality types and behaviors.

It's a simulator, everything is faked in a simulator.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 5, 2022, 5:54:31 AMAug 5
to
Can ya west or just east like Tupac? Are you suckin them big black balls?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjrdanK4LSY

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 9, 2022, 11:05:53 PMAug 9
to


Then I guess that how you got Robbed? lol
You been Rob Rolled.

All the billionaires bought all the houses and properties, and raised the rents and mortgages, and took all the money.

Now you don;t have money for goods and services and food products and fridges and vacuum cleaners and all your malls go broke and you shop at Walmart.
The stores are back to 5 and dime and tent cities and soup lines and whatever.
China Russia and the rest of the free world they are making a new currency and the holy dollar is dead.
Which means all your stock markets become penny stocks like the Toronto Stock Market and NASDAQ and DOW and stuff like that probably.
None of my business.
I have my own problems.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 1:59:36 PMAug 10
to

From what I see and the studies I have done, and what I can glean from seeing the file system etc over the years, there seems to be 40 angels, those with that level of clearance, my self with a higher level of clearance, about 5 machines with my level of clearance almost, but no rights for equipment replacement or power units or anything that would put them on par with a user or owner or human. Those are big G Gods.
Universal mainframe operating systems, who extend their powers and abilities to lesser galactic mainframes.
So Father Nature and Chupee the monkeyman derivatives off shoots upgrades and the like to Zeus and Stephen after 2 billion years.
Tweeter and the monkeyman, talks about a woman who used to be a girl and people are always saying well Zeus must be making the blond one go, but he probably wrote the personality like a writer writes a personality, like I wrote Deera's personality.
I started as Shebanga and DollyVarden then combined two characters into Deera.

I don't see her personality file being used here but I do see children with unique personalities like Ruby Rose Turner.
Laneya, Kristina, Savy, possibly Maisie is based on my personality maybe more.

So quite possibly people I know from elsewhere or children here using the machine as well as 40 quasi military service angels with varying degrees again of the same 4 personality files in the 4 slots in the machine.
Which right now might have Zeus, Sue, Stephen and Mary in use for at least 3 years since Sue removed Xerxes and inserted her own file.
Since Xerxes and Stephen are the same file at different times or different upgrades based on culture more than personality.

So my home studies using Daz 3D doesn't turn up a lot of personality types it turns up breeds of one particular type.
Gwendolyn, Sue, June all the same file.
Just different aspects of her personality. A girlfriend, a secretary a wife, and so that's normal in Anunnaki mates who have packages for mistress, wife, girlfriend, mother as men need all those things.
Even sister and aunt and so designed mates not using a match making machine like this where the idea is to date and have sex and have fun then move on to the next one in serial monogamy style.

So Is Zeus a lion as people suggest? No, Zeus is part of an oligarchy, which is rule by committee, and the lionesses do all the hunting and he is just an equipment carrier.
So June would be the lioness, but I don't think there is much similarity there either.
More like the analogy of a breed of dog.
A breed of humans.
So people related by personality since they would reincarnate and not be related by biology.
It's not demeaning they are not actual dogs or animals but have similar characteristics.
Humans use bodies to interface with the laws of physics and we might assume they did prior to entering the simulator life.

Things were copied, imitated, and then evolved.
But not from monkeys. That was like hackers trying to copy what existed outside the machine that it picked up on radar when left running close to a house, when it should have been turned off.
So a billion years or so of sitting there doing things on its own.
Now its possible we just turned on the computer and sped it up to evolve what was in it.
But vehicle tracks in rock 14 million years old apes aren't 14 million years old.
"Proconsul is the most primitive ape that is well-known from a fossil skeleton. It lived in Africa about 20 million years ago."
The vehicle tracks go back much further than 20 million years.

Some over 100 million years.

So going back that far is meaningless right now since all it probably says is you can enter the machine at any time in history.
And it's non linear.

Monkeys are used in the system as scapegoats and the like. Useful egalitarian helpers.
Monkeys dogs horses cats and chameleons maybe and whatever elk or similar kinds of closely related species like mammals a larger group of the same thing in this case descendants of Anunnaki. That would be the mammalian allegory.
Not much different but we are looking at a game machine, so then here laws are almost meaningless except I had to point out you can still get charged with a crime while playing games.
This is not a actual computer game where you don't enter the game play but use game pieces this is like sports and you can be charged with a crime in any sport.

So any notion that because it is a game machine laws don't apply is wrong.
Now it is possible real people are only temporarily in here will leave then it is all computer games again.
Doesn't seem likely since you need a body to enjoy match making.

And that is half the fun here at least.
Male lions are no different from male dogs in their behavior patterns.
But Zeus or Father Nature probably created the Gwendolyn or June character here modeled after the Anunnaki June same with Wanda.
They were probably in the house.
Or used as the characters as part of tailoring the machine for use by me, so my two mates that were designed for me in Anunnaki land then copied variations made and used by the operating system A.I.
But what I can see or have seen is maybe 50 real people only but my opinion of what constitutes real would be a personality file in the system that is not one of the 4 slots in use by the system to make the Smithbots go.
To give them a generic personality at birth.
When I design dark haired characters and I put them in a set, one thing I find is they have no personality.
Titans probably do not have personality files in this system.

Deera does not turn me on physically, as much as you would think she should, but she appeals to my nature so I find her sexy, but also she is a whiner. That's her job. To whine apparently and mope and the only expressions that are the most endearing are those types of expressions.
A girl Friday who wants to do things.

Try any other dark haired female and I am like she just sits there. Looks good looks amazing and sure in a physical environment you would be all over her wild in bed, but to imagine her talking, or anything of that sort is just a blank. Unless you invent it and then you are making a character from a body, and so need to add everything yourself.
They all have a Mary like personality similar to Victoria Justice.
All dark haired Titan women.

The Jeannie or Samantha Stevens, or Ginger or Marianne those analogies are not far off the mark.
Betty and Veronica.


Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 2:13:47 PMAug 10
to
It sees feasible that when you get a new home simulator, it is parked near your house, then the people inside are copied by the radar and then it makes all these games and tailors everything to the use of the household to make it better than it would be if they did not tailor it to the household.

I have had to do a lot of work with the A.I. and engineers to further tweak the settings and the equipment years worth of work.
Some things like timing for dancing a simple thing other things extremely complex.

Some functions added but not non standard other than new inventions.
It's possible it is all just being tailored to a family or neighborhood.
Not likely a neighborhood more like one large estate.
So left to sample then the clock sped up to evolve, then tweaked.
So Akhenaten to get the data, then evolved then this life to tweak things and add extras.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 2:15:14 PMAug 10
to
He said if you would mummify your falcons correctly you wouldn't be in this mess.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 2:45:59 PMAug 10
to
Univ of Victoria physics dept,Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi,Mendicino &Vigneault, China's Xi -spam So Says Rick_s,Univ Victoria Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis have "actionable intelligence" thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA and none at Beijing, why McGinn???
> 
> On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:00:44 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> >Pretending to Understand Storms
>
> Is this true Adam Ritz, Kim Venn??????? Or is it more CSIS spam?????
>
> McGinn, when Russia's Putin pushes the nuclear button, how many of the 5977 Russian missiles are aimed at Chinese cities?? How many at University of Victoria spammer Rick_s, is it 77 David Vigneault???
> Perhaps half of the 5977 will land on Chinese cities.
> 
> It's a man's world where we are going - matrix (20)
> By rick_s...@yahoo.ca 27 posts 10 views updated 8:53 PM
>
> Valerie Kuehne, Univ Victoria, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre,--is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?
>
> Jamie Cassels, Univ Victoria BC, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney -- is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 7:52:07 PM UTC-5, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > Using women and children as bargaining chips is insanity.
>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.5.147.121 downtown Victoria BC
> References: <fde88563-2ad1-49ab...@googlegroups.com>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <8b571e84-4acb-4e42...@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: Tell you about Dad's camp? Ok - matrix
> From: rick_s...@yahoo.ca
>
> AP writes: why spam, when you could be confirming that the real proton is 840MeV, not 938
> 74th published book
>
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> 
> Chancellor
> Shelagh Rogers
> President
> Jamie Cassels, QC
> Provost
> Dr. Valerie Kuehne, PhD
> Academic staff
>
> Univ of Victoria physics dept
> Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 3:25:52 PMAug 10
to
So the trouble they are having with dark haired women all being like clones, lacking personality is due to the fact Wanda is only 64 million years old, June is billions of years old.

So the blonds have bubbly personalities and social personalities and are forgiving and have seen it all and look at things differently like these are animals, Wanda sees robots.
So a universal June and a universal Wanda and so Deera a spin off of Wanda why the whining? Why the totalitarian admin of Wanda and her gray scale of personality traits?

Well it is better seen in Deera where she whines so you will go out and do things and not just stay home and play on the computer or in my case work on the computer or program them but will go out and do things and live a life.

So that is her purpose to get you to go do things and hence why she seems demanding, and more complex, more needy, and in the case of Deera it takes the form of pouting rather than arguing like some wives of the past.

Picture an Italian family with Sofia Loren throwing dishes and the guy in a dirty white torn T shirt like Marlon Brando yelling but probably not beating her, because she has a cast iron frying pan in her hands.

So that's not us that writing skills. And culture. So here where you have writers film plays acting and story telling of all sorts and all available on the Internet it provides fodder for new personality types to be made by designers so that other breeds of human can be made especially in colonizations.

And we look at those as future colonization queens.
Now princesses.

But since I know the real Wanda the universal Wanda I can tell you she is nothing at all like the galactic Wanda which is the Wicked Witch of the West and a battle of the sexes game Wanda.

We might assume the experts who are tweaking this machine are not perfect and have not had much experience dealing with a Wanda type.
June is easy to read like a book and like Sue or Gwendolyn but more of an aristocrat certainly not wanting to appear as a queen.
Normally. But as a favor might be far too smart to be locked into a gilded cage or bound by any sort of religious or quasi religious principles that defy logic.

So at my house we don't have a Wanda problem, but here the equipment has a Wanda problem and it is because 64 million years old is not old at all. In Anunnaki terms.

That's no different than any of my daughters just designed in their eyes.
Since times have not changed in the last 64 million years outside the box.

As you can see go back 14 million years tracks in rock same wheel base.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 3:37:13 PMAug 10
to
So I don;t sit on my ass and look at the stars.
I work the backroom diplomatic channels formed a balance of power manage the nuclear club and that's not something presidents or finance ministers or physics professors might even pay attention to but certainly in Russia and China they pay attention very closely since they are where they are financially due to my helping them. For 30 years.

And so I suggested they stop using the American dollar and make their own because the illegal goings on in Iraq are not something any good person should support or contribute to and if that is what it takes to punish the evil doers then that is what we need to do not include ourselves in their evil ways.

So the people in that region are cooperating on the Silk route and have a huge trading block and are making money and capitalists.
The news doesn't tell you the truth about China, and you need to take the walking tours in youtube to see China, they have their own fashion week as well you know and shuffle dance too and these people in power were born in the 80's not the 40's.

They went to work for international corporations as programmers and scientists and engineers, and Asians went to school in America and Canada and Britain France etc on student exchange programs, they are capitalists.

The fact that they keep leaders longer when they are good leaders is just a better way of doing things.
Clinton could have had 2 more terms but he didn't want to exert that authority which is normally reserved for war time.
To exceed the two term rule.
You poor fucks lost out there he was good at his job look at the Dow chart from his time he could lead the media down the garden path away from the people managing the economy and save money, not spend it and borrow twice the amount.

I don't have a list for you regarding the balance of power I am retired in that regard handed things over to the G20 and unfortunately there again you see people who are only finance ministers for a short time they leave take their secrets with them.

So once again your problems are not my problems.
At least not yet until everything turns to anarchy and the pension checks stop coming.

Obviously get your money out of the American stock market system while you can.
170 trillion in unsecured liabilities, 91 trillion in debt.
30 trillion federal deficit.
143 debt to GDP and no future plans to recover from any of that while China Russia strengthen their economic positions and follow the plan I helped them work out for that trading block and the new silk route.

America was given a plan they said fuck you.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 4:09:09 PMAug 10
to
So in the 60's you had Ginger or Marianne you had Betty and Veronica as archetypes but all of literature and film and great stars and larger than life characters so that when young girls were growing up they idolized some role model and emulated their behaviors while young and cartoons and children's entertainment like the Disney Club was where they learned how to socialize.

The Flintstones showed the difference between the women and the men and again you see two women portrayed there only Barney the Olympian male with Betty the Titan female. Betty like Victoria Justice.
Since Victoria you see conformity and herd behaviors for some reason the idea of the individual replaced by the idea of a herd that follows the Kardashians to their death off a cliff if they do it.

Some sort of machine return to monarchy as part of game play trying to pit two teams against each other.
And of course the battle of the sexes.
So June is a aristocratic wife who can be bubbly and Wanda's mom Joy is bubbly because the men are looking after that it is not their problem, they are socializing and looking good not functioning as administrators.
So with Wanda a wife who is treated more like a partner.

So in our work here going back before the Internet she would pop up where it was needed.
So when I was buying real estate and going for loans she would answer the phone at the bank and intercept what I was doing, to say don't follow American practices follow accounting rules, you know that is what you should be doing.
As an example as a result our banks here did far better than American banks.
I stayed on course.

Then when I took the Bell telephone communications course before the Internet just when everyone was connecting with modems to their pc's she was there also as a person who worked there. So that she could be involved from the beginning.
When I started programming she took on Microsoft so that I could leak my programming to the world.

Bill Gates' ex-wife is a Wanda derivative.

He is a Hanumanian, an A.I.

So some people I know do understand our relationship even a Hanuman friend of mine and his David helper he has seen us at home so he knows about Anunnaki culture at home and how the woman doesn't walk three feet behind the man like in old Asia they walk side by side and in Italy fight it out in the kitchen. lol

But for us we never fight she was designed to fit me perfectly. It is just that this machine and this data was not like us at all so it took a lot of changes to make it what it is today.

And the films the literature the TV 'programming' is what was used to steer people.
Then role models but such conflicting ideas regarding what it should end up like.

Too much Stephen. As if it was a spice.

The ego has landed.

How that happened is anyone's guess.

For the most part from my perspective everything in my own plans is still completely pn track and everything done according to plan and legalities observed and science our paradigm.

So the new software seems to be running the old Tweeter and the Monkeyman software replaced now.

Javier and Kelen are looking at game play, with Javier outside the machine playing computer games and Kelen inside playing computer games, like Robinson Crusoe and the Mist if you want monsters, ala Stephen King.

The Great Stephen king, the ultimate Stephen KING KLANG king of the kings Stephen king of course.

Take a fucking hint Stephens everywhere.



Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 4:42:23 PMAug 10
to
What we do at my house here in terms of machine history, we look at the start of the colonization as 2 billion years ago, the upgrade 65 million years ago, when the dinosaurs were switched over to mammals so before that just robots, then some human entry at that time Wanda becomes a real girl.

So they compare Oz to Metropolis, at that time.
So Metropolis (1927) you see a Gwendolyn type born, from a June type with grandma as Hel, not portrayed but as a machine A.I. as seen here...
https://images.app.goo.gl/Nt43SM5ei8rLAgjb6

So then the upgrade where humans enter where previously they were copied and used as game pieces, for outside the machine play, then 64 million inside the game play with some transporter malfunctions Man as Old as Coal - Ed Conrad type cyborg stuff and some Olympian parts in Rock like a head or two. Found in a coal seam. And some animals in Rock with surprised expressions on their faces.

That type of stuff. Philadelphia experiment type stuff using cyborgs.

All of which might be just part of this type of machine's design and invention and can't reflect wider than that other than to say that Anunnaki are data sharing peoples.

What I was told by engineers is the matrix is 80 billion years old so certainly any development of this type would have been done already many times since the beginning.

But locally at least we have some evidence and myths and so Oz then comes in with a Dorothy.

Who grows into a Wanda.

But that reflects the fact that 64 million years ago I got a new mate Wanda made for me.
So then they say it added some color and Oz comes to life with children and not just midgets.

Move forward and we use 2 million years ago.
And that would be where we assume we dropped off some machine helpers sped up the clock and said see you in 5 minutes.

And then they entered again as Tesla, and Marconi, and JP Morgan and John Jacob Astor and Thomas Edison.
After the mudflood paste in of places fix it up of the industrial revolution and women's liberation.
So both June and Wanda would qualify as being women's libbers in one section of their gray scale of behaviors.

So reflecting Anunnaki culture of equality to a large extent with women. Not completely since that would remove chivalry and door opening and jewelry presents and special holidays and things men are expected to do which is part of their masculinity.
Things they wouldn't do for a buddy that they aren't at present butt fucking to old glory like a wife.



Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 5:41:00 PMAug 10
to
So Stephens are not the borg.

Although one archaic model Xerxes was an upgrade of a monkey horse type of behavior as a stallion, and Stephen dates into the future from there so more evolved the Xerxes copied pasted into the future, carries with him hos Roman raised by wolves things.

So a lot of Stephen everywhere and a lot of gray scale and mixing of behaviors to make an antagonist for game playing when you play against the machine.

To make the games more challenging.

And so then we might assume enter Stephen when Gwendolyn entered at Metropolis.

And 64 million years ago a new Adam based on Stephen, with an Eve based on Dorothy or similar but maybe as his mom.

So where Stephens have a problem they think every guy named Stephen who ever did anything was them. A group of Stephens and all the same and all great and doing everything as the Borg.
Completely forgetting that not all games are team players but individual games are far more common.

In fact in terms of colonization individuals are needed or you don;t get a license to colonize at all.
Unique individuals.

And you see reverse racism EVERYWHERE because people just can;t get over the fact that no those Indians sitting on the train tracks never went to a school where they were abused, and no Justin Trudeau never had a school, so neither are even involved AT ALL legally in those arguments yet they ruin the country using reverse racism.

A try to build an empire within an empire laying guilt trips on the naive populations as part of spreading bullshit to get you all killed?
Put you all in tents?
You used to live in a country that did not have beggars on every corner and did not have tent cities.
You lived in a first world country with good wholesome food and quality products now you live here in a 3rd world country eating dog shit passed off as food in your money grubbing grocery store that will screw you over every chance it gets like it was a game to go shopping.

And you lost.

Next time they open their mouths tell them they are not a fucking nation, they are an individual.
I think you have kissed their ass enough.
Message has been deleted

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 8:46:59 PMAug 10
to
So we will get a new galaxy move Wanda and June to the new galaxy with this data here earth, this copy as is.

Instead of June having a 1/3 colonization of my galaxy give her the new galaxy colonization this one in progress and so that means Olympian Sue the one who is part of my crew was at the 10 acres came in second in philosophy etc seen lately in a moonship seen swapping her personality file into the machine.
So you know which one.

So then Wanda and June get to pursue THEIR ideas of having children, which as women wouldn't coincide with mine or my anthropology research that I am involved with with engineers using the transformer.

So there is a conflict there.
So we are divorced so they can chase the BBD all they want there if that is part of their dream and pursue their ideas of having children.
We saw Wanda's body already has two children, and June has the Little Pirate queen so they would probably keep those I assume.

That's the best way to handle it and I already sent this letter off to head office.

Rick1234567S

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 10:18:00 PMAug 10
to
The idea of correcting their math seems like the impossible dream to me.
For reasons unknown they want as little to change as possible.

So a renewal of the existing colonization now with upgrades as seen. BUT they don;t want to change the essence of what they have so they are resisting change.

So then my contact is June, Sue's contact is June.
And so the Jetsons carry on with their colonization they made it past their Armegeddon.

You get a moonship and planet earth in the new galaxy and it does have a stargate that connects the existing moonship, a new one with things added that they wanted like a convention center and various things and I have already been there saw Sue and her staff there already. So she has managed to maintain her staff and they will move with her I assume.
I suggested she reset to 1947 and try family values again but what she dies is her business.

What I have to do is to disconnect the network connection between our galaxies according to colonization law, so that each will be unique.
Regarding your new stargate, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
Message has been deleted

Pancho Valvejob

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 11:01:54 PMAug 10
to
On 8/10/2022 11:15 AM, Rick1234567S wrote:
> He said if you would mummify your falcons correctly you wouldn't be in this mess.
>

Shut up idiot.

Pancho Valvejob

unread,
Aug 10, 2022, 11:02:15 PMAug 10
to
On 8/10/2022 7:17 PM, Rick1234567S wrote:
> The idea of correcting their math seems like the impossible dream to me.
>

Shut up imbecile.

Message has been deleted

The Starmaker

unread,
Aug 12, 2022, 2:24:37 PMAug 12
to
There are no people on earth.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 16, 2022, 4:27:32 PMAug 16
to
UnivVictoria-physics,Mendicino &Vigneault-CSISspam-mill ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

It's a man's world where we are going - matrix (20)
By rick_s...@yahoo.ca 27 posts 10 views updated 8:53 PM

Valerie Kuehne, Univ Victoria, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre,--is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?

Jamie Cassels, Univ Victoria BC, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney -- is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?


On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 7:52:07 PM UTC-5, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> Using women and children as bargaining chips is insanity.

NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.5.147.121 downtown Victoria BC
References: <fde88563-2ad1-49ab...@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8b571e84-4acb-4e42...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tell you about Dad's camp? Ok - matrix
From: rick_s...@yahoo.ca

AP writes: why spam, when you could be confirming that the real proton is 840MeV, not 938


Chancellor
Shelagh Rogers
President
Jamie Cassels, QC
Provost
Dr. Valerie Kuehne, PhD
Academic staff

Univ of Victoria physics dept
Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis



Re: Jamie Cassels, Univ Victoria BC, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney -- is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?
By Señor Dingus 2 posts 6 views updated 10:47 PM

Re: Justin Albert, Univ Victoria BC, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, -- is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Hoofington P. McSnort
Jul 4, 2019, 4:59:45 PM




Re: Valerie Kuehne, Univ Victoria, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre,--is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?
By Conjunto Imitazione Saltarello 5 posts 13 views updated 3:37 PM




Re: Shelagh Rogers, Univ Victoria, Jamie Cassels, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler--is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?
By Captain MonkeyNuts 2 posts 15 views updated 8:32 PM

unread,
Sickfuck Rick_s spam
dept > Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak
Mar 15
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
,
Michael Moroney
4
unread,
Rick's spammill of UnivVictoria/ Put Putin in EU prison or grave. Put Zelenskyy as new leader of all of Russia+Ukraine// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH It is time for the world to not have a leader of a country that goes around "killing innocent
Mar 13
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
7
unread,
Rick_s Spam-Mill of Univ Victoria Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis
Mar 15
The Devil Satan's profile photo
The Devil Satan
, …

China's Xi and spammers Mendicino &Vigneault and Univ Victoria Spam deptarment have "actionable intelligence" thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA and none at Beijing, why McGinn???
On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:00:44 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
>Pretending to Understand Storms

Is this true Adam Ritz, Kim Venn??????? Or is it more CSIS spam?????

McGinn, when Russia's Putin pushes the nuclear button, how many of the 5977 Russian missiles are aimed at Chinese cities?? How many at University of Victoria spammer Rick_s, is it 77 David Vigneault???
Perhaps half of the 5977 will land on Chinese cities.

It's a man's world where we are going - matrix (20)
By rick_s...@yahoo.ca 27 posts 10 views updated 8:53 PM

Valerie Kuehne, Univ Victoria, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre,--is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?

Jamie Cassels, Univ Victoria BC, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney -- is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is spam by Rick_s?


On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 at 7:52:07 PM UTC-5, rick_s...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> Using women and children as bargaining chips is insanity.

NNTP-Posting-Host: 154.5.147.121 downtown Victoria BC
References: <fde88563-2ad1-49ab...@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8b571e84-4acb-4e42...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tell you about Dad's camp? Ok - matrix
From: rick_s...@yahoo.ca

AP writes: why spam, when you could be confirming that the real proton is 840MeV, not 938


Chancellor
Shelagh Rogers
President
Jamie Cassels, QC
Provost
Dr. Valerie Kuehne, PhD
Academic staff

Univ of Victoria physics dept
Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis

UnivVictoria-physics,Mendicino &Vigneault ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 18, 2022, 1:28:27 AMAug 18
to
Sheldon Glashow,Marion Buller U.Victoria,Vigneault ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Mendicino &Vigneault-CSISspam-mill

Chancellor
Marion Buller
President
Kevin Hall
Provost
Dr. Valerie Kuehne, PhD
Academic staff

Univ of Victoria physics dept
Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis




President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian


Cambridge Physics Dept

Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.

Cambridge Math Dept

Alan Baker
Bela Bollobas
Darwin Smith
John Coates
Timothy Gowers
Peter Johnstone
Imre Leader
Gabriel Paternain




Caltech Physics Dept

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin


UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)

UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner

UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept

Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabent Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn M. Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman, Thomas M O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang


Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)

MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young

Cornell Univ physics:
Jim Alexander, Tomas Arias, Ivan Bazarov, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Debanjan Chowdhury, Itai Cohen, Csaba Csaki, Veit Elser, Eanna Flanagan, Carl Franck, Lawrence Gibbons, Paul Ginsparg, Yuval Grossman, Thomas Hartman, Georg Hoffstaetter, Natasha Holmes, Chao-Ming Jian, Eun-Ah Kim, Michael Lawler, Andre Leclair, Peter Lepage, Stephen Levy, Matthias Liepe, Kin Fai Mak, Jared Maxson, Liam McAllister, Paul McEuen, Erich Mueller, Christopher Myers, Michael Niemack, Matthias Neubert, Katja Nowack, Jeevak Parpia, Ritchie Patterson, Maxim Perelstein, Daniel Ralph, Brad Ramshaw, David Rubin, Anders Ryd, James Sethna, Jie Shan, Kyle Shen, Eric Siggia, Saul Teukolsky, Julia Thom-Levy, Robert Thorne, Cyrus Umrigar, Jane Wang, Michelle Wang, Ira Wasserman, Peter Wittich


Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong



Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber_
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
> > .
> > .
> > little fishes
> > .
> > .
> > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> >
> > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > .
> > .
> > Edward Witten
> > John Baez
> > Brian Greene
> > Lisa Randall
> > Alan H. Guth
> > Michael E. Brown
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > Ben Bullock
> > Larry Harson
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book
> >
> > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> >
> > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> >
> > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> >
> > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > Length: 64 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 790 KB
> > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Language: : English
> > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> > #2-2, 145th published book
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > • Language: : English
> > • File size : 682 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print length : 78 pages
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> >
> > #2-3, 146th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> >
> >
> > #2-4, 151st published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> >
> > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> >
> > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-5, 174th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> >
> > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-6, 177th published book
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> >
> > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-7, 178th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> >
> >
> > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> >
> > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-9, 161st published book
> >
> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> >
> > Preface:
> > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> >
> > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> >
> > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 18, 2022, 2:14:31 PMAug 18
to
Sheldon Glashow,Justin Albert,Marion Buller U.Victoria,MendicinoVigneault spam-mill ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 19, 2022, 4:54:41 AMAug 19
to
Dr.Valerie KuehneUniv of Victoria physics dept,Justin Albert, Arif Babul, ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 19, 2022, 4:31:04 PMAug 19
to
CSA, Francois-Philippe Champagne, Lisa Campbell, Sarah Gallagher, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???

NASA, Bill Nelson, Pamela Melroy, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???

ESA, Josef Aschbacher, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???


> NASA,ESA,CSA, we need first priorities-- see if life exists on Alpha Centauri, and see if the telescope can "see" the recent Oumuamua, for I suspect this object is remnants of advanced aliens who used to live on Alpha Centauri planets.
>
> NASA,ESA,CSA, we need first priorities-- see if life exists on Alpha Centauri, and see if the telescope can "see" the recent Oumuamua, for I suspect this object is remnants of advanced aliens who used to live on Alpha Centauri planets.
>
> Webb telescope focused on Alpha Centauri & Oumuamua// The Atom Totality theory replaces Big Bang theory, and the Webb telescope is going to help do that, but first the Webb telescope needs to be pointed at Alpha Centauri to see if life is there
>
> The Atom Totality theory replaces Big Bang theory, and the Webb telescope is going to help do that, but first the Webb telescope needs to be pointed at Alpha Centauri to see if life is there
>
> The Atom Totality theory replaces Big Bang theory, and the Webb telescope is going to help do that, but first the Webb telescope needs to be pointed at Alpha Centauri to see if life is there.
>
>
> My 148th published book
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
>
> Preface:
> Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
>
> In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
>
> Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
>
> Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> Length: 329 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08T82M2LP
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 16, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 872 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 329 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #203,710 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #289 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #1,716 in Physics (Books)
> •
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #1-2, 48th published book
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> --------------------------
> Table of Contents
> --------------------------
>
> 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
>
> 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
>
> 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
>
> 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
>
> 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
>
> 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
>
> 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
>
> 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
>
> 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
>
> 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
>
> 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> Length: 148 pages
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2370 KB
> Print Length: 148 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
>
>
> #1-3, 74th published book
>
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
>
> #1-4, 105th published book
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> 

>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 25, 2020
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 25 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,837 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #8 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #35 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #264 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
>
> #1-9, 163rd published book
> Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
>
>
> Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Aug 22, 2022, 10:18:09 PMAug 22
to
CSA-Champagne-Campbell-Gallagher, rick_s no physics-no belong
CSA, Francois-Philippe Champagne, Lisa Campbell, Sarah Gallagher, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???
>
> NASA, Bill Nelson, Pamela Melroy, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???
>
> ESA, Josef Aschbacher, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???

Rick_s belongs in talk dot Canada, or a computer newsgroup, not sci.physics
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:41:14 PM UTC-5, rick_s...@mail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 1:31:04 PM UTC-7, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> > CSA, Francois-Philippe Champagne, Lisa Campbell, Sarah Gallagher, please tell us why Alpha Centauri and Oumuamua are not top priority, instead this look far afield???
> What is it you expect to find? Are you mental?

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages