BIG SUCK THERORY (A DROP OF INK IN A JAR OF WATER)
Alexander Abian
Dear Emma,
Yes, I maintain that:
The expansion of A DROP OF INK IN A JAR OF WATER explains much
more rationally the creation and the expansion of the Universe
than all the differential equations of Newton, Maxwell,Einstein
Schroedinger and co. They explain nothing. The drop of INK plays
the role of the primeval fireball and the WATER plays the role of the
void of space which sucked and continues to suck in the Cosmic mass
(BIG SUCK THEORY and no Big Bang Theory).
And please do not try to convince me that "scientists do not ask
'WHY" - and that they only ask 'HOW' "
Scientists constantly ask WHY, constantly - they even constantly
ask "Why How ?" A sign of intelligence, intellectual curiosity,
intellectual rebellion, intellectual revolution, intellectual
creativity is precisely the asking of the question WHY?
Forbidding to ask "WHY" is the most usual policy of dictatorship
which suffocates the freedom of thought and critical evaluation
of issues and administers blind obedience to the dictatorship of
the scientific politbureau !
Yes, I do consider Einstein's definition of TIME, i.e.,
TIME is what a watch measures (A.Einstein)
as nonconvincing and refuse to accept it. It is as nonconvincing as
accepting that
INTELLIGENCE is what IQ-test measures
Experience shows that many "very intelligent persons" score dismally on
the best designed IQ tests.
TIME is that cosmic mass which is spent to overpower the
tendency of maintaining the status quo of the present instant
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABIAN TIME-MASS EQUIVALENCE FORMULA T = A m^2 in Abian units.
ALTER EARTH'S ORBIT AND TILT TO STOP GLOBAL DISASTERS AND EPIDEMICS.
JOLT THE MOON TO JOLT THE EARTH INTO A SANER ORBIT.ALTER THE SOLAR SYSTEM.
REORBIT VENUS INTO A NEAR EARTH-LIKE ORBIT TO CREATE A BORN AGAIN EARTH(1990)
THERE WAS A BIG SUCK AND DILUTION OF PRIMEVAL MASS INTO THE VOID OF SPACE
kreeg
>
> Yes, I do consider Einstein's definition of TIME, i.e.,
>
> TIME is what a watch measures (A.Einstein)
>
> as nonconvincing and refuse to accept it. It is as nonconvincing as
> accepting that
>
> INTELLIGENCE is what IQ-test measures
>
> Experience shows that many "very intelligent persons" score dismally on
> the best designed IQ tests.
>
> TIME is that cosmic mass which is spent to overpower the
> tendency of maintaining the status quo of the present instant
>
Ya, what ever, I consider those answers to be the best answers yet for those
questions. It is almost imposible to define inteligence. The definition can
strech on and finnaly (without noticing) include such obviously non-intelligent
things such as crystal or mother nature.
Time is what a watch measures, that has to be the most intelligent answer I have
ever seen. "Time" is the creation of humans, made to differ from the memories we
are having and the memories we had. Time does not exsist. We cannot go into time,
and we cannot go back in time.
-Bobby Kreegier
Silica Terra Digita Arts
http://silicatera.hypermart.net
Warren York
moment. The second is the SI unit of time, defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770
periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine
levels of the ground state of caesium-133. Time in a absolute or Newtonian sense is
that which enables a date to be uniquely associated with any given event. Operational
time allows time to be treated as an independent variable infinitely divisible and
extending to an infinite distance in both positive or negative directions. The
concept of quantized time arises in quantum mechanics, with a quantum particle, or
chronon, corresponding to the time taken for a photon to cross the diameter of an
electron (4.5 = 10^-24 s). Solar time relates to successive intervals between
transits of the Sun across the meridian, while sidereal time, used in astronomy,
relates to successive intervals between transits of a point (related to the vernal
equinox) across the meridian. " Dictionary of Theories by Jennifer Bothamley
Warren
warre...@juno.com
http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/~infonet
======================================
and...@ibm.net
>
> >
> >
> > Yes, I do consider Einstein's definition of TIME, i.e.,
> >
> > TIME is what a watch measures (A.Einstein)
> >
> > as nonconvincing and refuse to accept it. It is as nonconvincing as
> > accepting that
> >
> > INTELLIGENCE is what IQ-test measures
> >
> > Experience shows that many "very intelligent persons" score dismally on
> > the best designed IQ tests.
> >
> > TIME is that cosmic mass which is spent to overpower the
> > tendency of maintaining the status quo of the present instant
> >
>
> Ya, what ever, I consider those answers to be the best answers yet for those
> questions. It is almost imposible to define inteligence. The definition can
> strech on and finnaly (without noticing) include such obviously non-intelligent
> things such as crystal or mother nature.
>
> Time is what a watch measures, that has to be the most intelligent answer I have
> ever seen. "Time" is the creation of humans, made to differ from the memories we
> are having and the memories we had. Time does not exsist. We cannot go into time,
> and we cannot go back in time.
>
> -Bobby Kreegier
>
Can I ask what the point of your vacuous postings is?
John Anderson
Tom Potter
news:3726D288...@bellsouth.net...
> "TIME: Physics- A fundamental quantity usually indicating duration or a
precise
> moment. The second is the SI unit of time, defined as the duration of
9,192,631,770
> periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two
hyperfine
> levels of the ground state of caesium-133.
I must point out, that the
"duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding
to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of
caesium-133"
is an arbitrary count of observed reference cycles, that is used to define
some convenient unit of time, in this case the "second".
As I have pointed out many times, time is the ratio of cycles.
time(units) = cycle count(reference) / cycle count(units)
Note that cycle count(units) can be any number
depending upon how one defines the arbitrary PERIOD
that becomes their prefered units of time.
I must also point out, that space is the interval between events,
and it is quantized using the same reference cycle as is used to quantize
time.
space(X) = cycle count(reference) / interval(X)
Space is normally multiplied by a constant "C"
and called distance, in order to differentiate time periods from time
intervals.
Mass is an aggregate of time and space.
One "objects" mass is another objects media ( Time and space ).
mass(A) * G = space(B)^3 / time(common)^2
Note that "G" is simply a constant used to define the units of mass.
Time is a cycle ( Closed loop )
whereas space is a diameter ( Open loop ),
and mass is an aggregate of time and space.
Cycles = closed loops = fermions = time = objects = being
Radii = open loops = bosons = space = change = becoming
Note that "String Theory" must incorporate both "being" ( Closed loops )
and "becoming" ( Open loops ) in order to accurately model reality.
For details on this, visit my Web site.
--
Tom Potter http://jump.to/tp