Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: EInstein's 1905 SR HOAX: How a young clerk used false arguments and deceived the world for 110 years.
25 views
Skip to first unread message
Evenezer Nigro
Apr 30, 2023, 12:30:04 PM4/30/23
to
Jane wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:58:12 -0700, JanPB wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 5:35:29 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote:
>
> <snip meaningless drivel>
>
>> Note the date on this file: December 2016. We've been through all your
>> confusions here over the years. None of your errors so far have been
>> terribly original
>
> What do you mean by that? I might have popped in here a few times in the
> past but because the atmosphere was invariably more akin to gang
> warfare... or even Gaelic football... than to constructive science, I
> chose to waste no further time. I see nothing much has changed.
putana.
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:58:12 -0700, JanPB wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 5:35:29 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote:
>
> <snip meaningless drivel>
>
>> Note the date on this file: December 2016. We've been through all your
>> confusions here over the years. None of your errors so far have been
>> terribly original
>
> What do you mean by that? I might have popped in here a few times in the
> past but because the atmosphere was invariably more akin to gang
> warfare... or even Gaelic football... than to constructive science, I
> chose to waste no further time. I see nothing much has changed.
putana.
Evenezer Nigro
May 1, 2023, 2:35:21 PM5/1/23
to
Volney wrote:
> On 4/30/2023 8:15 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> was Waldemar Voigt, in 1887?
> I am aware that Voigt was very close to coming up with the Lorentz
> transformation, but his length terms were all off by (what we now know
> as) gamma. Because of this Voigt's math didn't work in reverse; swapping
> the stationary and moving frames doesn't work the way SR does, with v
> replaced by -v and x' by -x.
There Is No Ukrainian State: People Are Threatened For Their Opinion By Kiev’s Democracy
https://southfront.org/there-is-no-ukrainian-state-people-are-threatened-for-their-opinion-by-kievs-democracy/
– There is no Ukrainian state and there will not be!
– Where are you now?
– I am with God, I serve God!
– What country are you in now?
– Here is no country!
– In space somewhere, right?
– Well, maybe you’re in space. You judge by your measure of depravity.
– I am in my native Ukraine, which I love, and you … i don’t know.
– You love what does not exist and will not be.
– Do you understand what you’re saying now?
– I understand what I’m saying. I understand! I have never served Ukraine and will not serve.
– Why are you on its territory now?
– This is God’s territory. Let me tell you whose territory it is. You have appropriated someone else’s territory and you call it your own.
– Whose was it?
– Now there is a war going on, they are taking back their territory, they are winning back their territory.
– Do you justify Russian aggression?
– Your aggression, not Russian.
– Do you understand that a criminal case may be launched against you for your words?
– I say this aggression is yours. Launch whatever you want, I don’t care! I say what I think, and I’m not going to flatter you.
– Do you know that there are law enforcement officers behind you and now they can detain you?
– I insulted someone, I invited you to ask me? If you don’t like my answers, don’t ask your questions!
Horrific Slaughter: Russia Finally *_Admits_to_Destroying_NATO’s_Deep_Underground_Command_Bunker_* in Kiev
https://southfront.org/horrific-slaughter-russia-finally-admits-to-destroying-natos-deep-underground-command-bunker-in-kiev/
> On 4/30/2023 8:15 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> was Waldemar Voigt, in 1887?
> I am aware that Voigt was very close to coming up with the Lorentz
> transformation, but his length terms were all off by (what we now know
> as) gamma. Because of this Voigt's math didn't work in reverse; swapping
> the stationary and moving frames doesn't work the way SR does, with v
> replaced by -v and x' by -x.
There Is No Ukrainian State: People Are Threatened For Their Opinion By Kiev’s Democracy
https://southfront.org/there-is-no-ukrainian-state-people-are-threatened-for-their-opinion-by-kievs-democracy/
– There is no Ukrainian state and there will not be!
– Where are you now?
– I am with God, I serve God!
– What country are you in now?
– Here is no country!
– In space somewhere, right?
– Well, maybe you’re in space. You judge by your measure of depravity.
– I am in my native Ukraine, which I love, and you … i don’t know.
– You love what does not exist and will not be.
– Do you understand what you’re saying now?
– I understand what I’m saying. I understand! I have never served Ukraine and will not serve.
– Why are you on its territory now?
– This is God’s territory. Let me tell you whose territory it is. You have appropriated someone else’s territory and you call it your own.
– Whose was it?
– Now there is a war going on, they are taking back their territory, they are winning back their territory.
– Do you justify Russian aggression?
– Your aggression, not Russian.
– Do you understand that a criminal case may be launched against you for your words?
– I say this aggression is yours. Launch whatever you want, I don’t care! I say what I think, and I’m not going to flatter you.
– Do you know that there are law enforcement officers behind you and now they can detain you?
– I insulted someone, I invited you to ask me? If you don’t like my answers, don’t ask your questions!
Horrific Slaughter: Russia Finally *_Admits_to_Destroying_NATO’s_Deep_Underground_Command_Bunker_* in Kiev
https://southfront.org/horrific-slaughter-russia-finally-admits-to-destroying-natos-deep-underground-command-bunker-in-kiev/
Hooker Buggenum
May 25, 2023, 7:55:53 AM5/25/23
to
whodat wrote:
> On 5/25/2023 1:11 AM, Volney wrote:
>> I tried googling this but can't find anything.
>
> In the past decade or so google has become severely diminished.
good admitting you googled a diploma. What a fuck *_google_diploma_* have
you, fool?? Yet another *_homepage_designer_* on the rampage.
> On 5/25/2023 1:11 AM, Volney wrote:
>> I tried googling this but can't find anything.
>
> In the past decade or so google has become severely diminished.
good admitting you googled a diploma. What a fuck *_google_diploma_* have
you, fool?? Yet another *_homepage_designer_* on the rampage.
Clark Roijakker
May 26, 2023, 9:08:03 AM5/26/23
to
Volney wrote:
> What is the equivalent of the Lorentz transformation and Galilean
> transformation for the Euclid group? If "t" in the Euclid group is
> another spacial dimension, does transforming two frames moving
> relativity with a velocity "v" when the ratio of x/t, two spacial
> dimensions isn't a velocity?
> What is the equivalent of the Lorentz transformation and Galilean
> transformation for the Euclid group? If "t" in the Euclid group is
> another spacial dimension, does transforming two frames moving
> relativity with a velocity "v" when the ratio of x/t, two spacial
> dimensions isn't a velocity?
>
> I tried googling this but can't find anything.
you talk lika nigga.
> I tried googling this but can't find anything.
Kennis Haenraets
May 28, 2023, 9:00:02 AM5/28/23
to
Volney wrote:
>> Note: you can convert these transforms to be expressed directly in
>> terms of v using hyperbolic and trigonometric identities. Tom Roberts
>
> Thanks. So it's using the normal trig functions rather than the
> hyperbolic ones. I'll play around with this concept and see if I can
> figure what such a "universe" may be like.
> I see already that if γ = cos(θ) and using trig identities, we get:
> x' = γ(x - vt) and t' = γ(t + vx). Looks familiar, but γ has a range of
> -1 <= γ <= 1.
you are a mixed race.
>> Note: you can convert these transforms to be expressed directly in
>> terms of v using hyperbolic and trigonometric identities. Tom Roberts
>
> Thanks. So it's using the normal trig functions rather than the
> hyperbolic ones. I'll play around with this concept and see if I can
> figure what such a "universe" may be like.
> I see already that if γ = cos(θ) and using trig identities, we get:
> x' = γ(x - vt) and t' = γ(t + vx). Looks familiar, but γ has a range of
> -1 <= γ <= 1.
you are a mixed race.
0 new messages