The world's simplist overview of physics
Tom Potter
The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
overview of physics.
Man's perception is limited to changes ( Events) occurring
at four points:
One point is perceived as a point. (Point)
Two points is perceived as a line. (Distance)
Three points is perceived as a surface. (Area)
and four points is perceived as a volume. (Volume)
Note that when changes involve more than four points
man breaks down the changes into the groups listed,
as he is not hardwired to handle higher order dimensions.
I might mention, that some people are hardwired to do so,
and a daughter of George Boole, of Boolean algebra fame,
seems to be the best historical example of this.
Man perceives changes in reference to an external (To the
system under observation)
periodic reference system. (A clock)
Physics quantizies the changes at 1,2,3 and 4 points
in terms of the external reference, and calls the changes
over clock periods, derivatives..
The chart below lists the common names of the physical
properties
in terms of their perceived dimensions in the horizontal
direction,
and in terms of the derivatives of these properties in the
vertical direction.
For example, note that the derivatives of distance,
are velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap, crackle and pop,
respectively.
It appears to me that angular momentum is basically jerk
times a constant,
that energy equals snap time a constant, power equals
crackle times a constant,
that H is basically pop times a constant,
and that jerk, like angular momentum occurs in little
quanta..
**** Chart dimensions are "points" across and "derivatives"
down *****
0ne Two Three
Four
==============================================
point distance area
volume
time^-1 velocity diffusity
volume flow
density acceleration phi
mass
momentum angular mom viscosity mass flow
force energy pressure
spring constant
D power charge
poynting vector
J H current
capacitance^-1
==============================================
Note that all dimensions are fundamentally referenced to
a external periodic reference system, and that all
properties must be multiplied
by some constant to express them in the desired units.
For example, distance is fundamentally a time interval
(Between two points)
and is multiplied by a constant "C" to be expressed in
distance units,
rather than time units. Masses perceived to be fix in media
(Time and space)
are perceived as gravitational, and must be multiplied by a
constant "G"
in order to differentiate them from masses which are
perceived as inertial.
In other words, the constant "C" is used to differentiate
between
time periods (A one point/body property) and time intervals
(A two point/bodyproperty),
and "G: is used to differentiate between a
point/bodyperceived to be fixed in media,
from a point/bodyperceived to be varying in media. For
example, in the Sun/Earth system,
the Earth is perceived to be varying in media and it gets
the 365.25 days and the
93,000,000 miles, while the Sun is perceived to be fixed in
media, so it gets
the "G" so the equations will balance.
For more details on this, visit my web site.
--
Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
http://www.usenet.com
Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dirk Van de moortel
"Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3cc5...@post.usenet.com...
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
> The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
White noise, indeed.
Dirk Vdm
Uncle Al
>
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
> The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
> overview of physics.
>
> Man's perception is limited to changes ( Events) occurring
> at four points:
> One point is perceived as a point. (Point)
> Two points is perceived as a line. (Distance)
> Three points is perceived as a surface. (Area)
> and four points is perceived as a volume. (Volume)
[snip]
Five points constitute spacetime - but the fifth one is rather
elongated in a hyperbolic direction.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Mike Varney
>
> The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
> overview of physics.
8-0 <----
---
--- *Speechless expression*
Dirk Van de moortel
"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message news:2xkx8.82$5m.1...@news.uswest.net...
I must admit I was somewhat enchanted by the naivety of his
table, and specially by the appearance of the spring constant:
> 0ne Two Three Four
> ===================================
> point distance area volume
> time^-1 velocity diffusity volume flow
> density acceleration phi mass
> momentum angular mom viscosity mass flow
> force energy pressure spring constant
> D power charge poynting vector
> J H current capacitance^-1
> ===================================
(I do wonder why he felt an urge to drag his mom in).
This poster is certainly not a troll, but an intelligent engager
in mature, adult and rational dichotomies.
I love this guy and so does my youngest son ;-)
Dirk Vdm
Mike Varney
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:37lx8.35682$Ze....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
>
> "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
news:2xkx8.82$5m.1...@news.uswest.net...
> >
> > "Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:3cc5...@post.usenet.com...
> > > **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
> > >
> > > The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
> > > overview of physics.
> >
> > 8-0 <----
> > ---
> > --- *Speechless expression*
>
> I must admit I was somewhat enchanted by the naivety of his
> table, and specially by the appearance of the spring constant:
>
> > 0ne Two Three Four
> > ===================================
> > point distance area volume
> > time^-1 velocity diffusity volume flow
> > density acceleration phi mass
> > momentum angular mom viscosity mass flow
> > force energy pressure spring constant
> > D power charge poynting vector
> > J H current capacitance^-1
> > ===================================
>
> (I do wonder why he felt an urge to drag his mom in).
Is it beter than his having a curvy mom?
> This poster is certainly not a troll, but an intelligent engager
> in mature, adult and rational dichotomies.
Oh.. no doubt... it would be wrong to think otherwise!
> I love this guy and so does my youngest son ;-)
LOL.
Tom Potter
As your "youngest son" is an expert in physics,
why not have him read my post, think about it,
and point out why, it is, or is not,
"The world's simplist overview of physics",
or why it is, or is not,
"white noise".
It would also be interesting to get some
logical, rational comments from Mike Varney
about the post,
rather than an immature, open loop comment.
For example, If he is "enchanted by the naivety of his
table, and specially by the appearance of the spring constant:"
perhaps he can explain why he is "enchanted" by the
"appearance of the spring constant" and
what leads him to think that that naivee folks,
unacquainted with physics, could construct such a chart.
Is Varney privy to information about the "spring constant"
that suggests that it is placed wrong in the table,
does he think that it is a point, line or area property,
or is he just blowing wind???
Hopefully, Varney can make a contribution to this thread
by analysing the "spring constant" and its' relationship
to the other physical properties. I would certainly welcome
some intelligent input.
Tom Potter
Mike Varney
> I would certainly welcome
> some intelligent input.
For your brain?
GIGO.
Tom Potter
"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
news:2erx8.140$5m.1...@news.uswest.net...
It is interesting to see that AS this poster (Varney),
who specializes in garbage, seems to understands
that when you despense garnage, you get garbage back,
that he should make an effort
to input mature, logical, rational, content
into this news group,
rather than spew the garbage that he does.
I suggest that if he has any concern for the human race
that he should cease despensing garbage,
or post it to a newsgroup that welcomes it
such as alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
or some other low brow news group.
Mike Varney
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>
> "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> news:2erx8.140$5m.1...@news.uswest.net...
> >
> > "Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:f76e0bb3.02042...@posting.google.com...
> > > "Dirk Van de moortel"
> <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
> > in message news:<37lx8.35682$Ze....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>...
> > > > "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> > news:2xkx8.82$5m.1...@news.uswest.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:3cc5...@post.usenet.com...
> > > > > > **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com
> ****
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following table provides a simple, easy to grasp,
> > > > > > overview of physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > 8-0 <----
> > > > > ---
> > > > > --- *Speechless expression*
> > > >
> > > > I must admit I was somewhat enchanted by the naivety of his
> > > > table, and specially by the appearance of the spring constant:
> > > > (I do wonder why he felt an urge to drag his mom in).
> > > >
> > > > This poster is certainly not a troll, but an intelligent engager
> > > > in mature, adult and rational dichotomies.
> > > > I love this guy and so does my youngest son ;-)
> > >
> > <SNIP>
> > > I would certainly welcome
> > > some intelligent input.
> >
> > For your brain?
> > GIGO.
>
> It is interesting to see that AS this poster (Varney),
<SNIP Crackpotter rant>
But aren't you well known as a crank?
http://www.crank.net/maths.html
Go elsewhere crackpot.
Tom Potter
"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
news:jDvx8.4$6b1....@news.uswest.net...
It is interesting to see that this poster (Varney) believes everything
that he reads on personal web pages. The web page he refers to
was created by a sci.poster that I drove out of sci.physics
by exposing his ignorance and childishness, and it is not
surprising that he tries to bushwhack me, rather than simply
posting in sci.physics and engaging in intelligent discussions.
Apparently, this poster (Varney) would believe that
the moon was made of green cheese, if I posted it on my web page,
and the idea fit his childish needs.
One also has to wonder why this poster (Varney)
snipped my post. Is he ashamed to leave it,
and try to address the issues raised?
I suggest that if the poster (Varney) cannot conduct himself
in an intelligent, mature way and make posts that contribute
to the threads, rather than try to massage his weak ego,
that he leave sci.physics, and post in alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
or other news group more in tune with his personality and breeding.
Mike Varney
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>
> "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> news:jDvx8.4$6b1....@news.uswest.net...
> > <SNIP Crackpotter rant>
> >
> > But aren't you well known as a crank?
> > http://www.crank.net/maths.html
> >
> > Go elsewhere crackpot.
>
> It is interesting to see that this poster (Varney) believes everything
> that he reads on personal web pages.
Not at all. I looked at you site and could not believe that someone could
be a genetically damaged as you to spew your crap about physics.
> The web page he refers to
> was created by a sci.poster that I drove out of sci.physics
You did no such thing, crank.
> by exposing his ignorance and childishness, and it is not
> surprising that he tries to bushwhack me, rather than simply
> posting in sci.physics and engaging in intelligent discussions.
Engaging in intelligent conversation with you is futile, since you are a
dolt.
> Apparently, this poster (Varney) would believe that
> the moon was made of green cheese, if I posted it on my web page,
> and the idea fit his childish needs.
That would be the most sane thing you would post on your web at that point.
> One also has to wonder why this poster (Varney)
> snipped my post. Is he ashamed to leave it,
> and try to address the issues raised?
No, I snipped it because it was a waste of bandwidth. I also trim dead buds
from the rose bush. In your case it would be better do dig up the plant and
burn it.
> I suggest that if the poster (Varney) cannot conduct himself
> in an intelligent, mature way and make posts that contribute
> to the threads, rather than try to massage his weak ego,
> that he leave sci.physics, and post in alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
> or other news group more in tune with his personality and breeding.
I reiterate: Go elsewhere crackpot.
Tom Potter
I reiterate:
I suggest that if the poster (Varney) cannot conduct himself
in an intelligent, mature way and make posts that contribute
to the threads, rather than try to massage his weak ego,
that he leave sci.physics, and post in alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
or other news group more in tune with his personality and breeding.
As I see much hostility and frustration,
and little or no content, in this poster's posts,
I suggest that he seek medical help, as
this might help him overcome his father's abuse
of him when he was a child.
Tom Potter
Mike Varney
> "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
news:<WYWx8.54$W83....@news.uswest.net>...
> > "Tom Potter" <t...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:3cc7...@post.usenet.com...
> > > **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
> > >
> > >
> > > "Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> > > news:jDvx8.4$6b1....@news.uswest.net...
> > ><SNIP>
> > > > <SNIP Crackpotter rant>
> > > >
> > > > But aren't you well known as a crank?
> > > > http://www.crank.net/maths.html
> > > >
> > > > Go elsewhere crackpot.
> > I reiterate: Go elsewhere crackpot.
>
> I reiterate:
Cranks reiterate all they want and are still cranks.
Go elsewhere crank.
Richard Herring
writes
>>
>> But aren't you well known as a crank?
>> http://www.crank.net/maths.html
>>
>> Go elsewhere crackpot.
>
>It is interesting to see that this poster (Varney) believes everything
>that he reads on personal web pages. The web page he refers to
>was created by a sci.poster that I drove out of sci.physics
>by exposing his ignorance and childishness,
References?
>and it is not
>surprising that he tries to bushwhack me, rather than simply
>posting in sci.physics and engaging in intelligent discussions.
>
>Apparently, this poster (Varney) would believe that
>the moon was made of green cheese, if I posted it on my web page,
>and the idea fit his childish needs.
>
>One also has to wonder why this poster (Varney)
>snipped my post. Is he ashamed to leave it,
>and try to address the issues raised?
Or is he merely ashamed to be seen in the same room with it?
>
>I suggest that if the poster (Varney)
Interesting rhetorical device you have there. What's it meant to do?
--
Richard Herring
Tom Potter
"Richard Herring" <richard...@baesystems.com> wrote in message
news:ewLmRvr7...@baesystems.com...
> In message <3cc7...@post.usenet.com>, Tom Potter
<t...@earthlink.net>
> writes
> >"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> >news:jDvx8.4$6b1....@news.uswest.net...
> >>
> >> <SNIP Crackpotter rant>
> >>
> >> But aren't you well known as a crank?
> >> http://www.crank.net/maths.html
> >>
> >> Go elsewhere crackpot.
> >
> >It is interesting to see that this poster (Varney) believes
everything
> >that he reads on personal web pages. The web page he refers to
> >was created by a sci.poster that I drove out of sci.physics
> >by exposing his ignorance and childishness,
>
> References?
Review the old posts with Google
and come to your own conclusion.
Note that I still post in sci.physics
and Erich Max Francis does not.
You, Varney and Moortel would have liked him though.
He also had an inferiority complex,
and tried to boost his ego by demeaning folks.
> >and it is not
> >surprising that he tries to bushwhack me, rather than simply
> >posting in sci.physics and engaging in intelligent discussions.
> >
> >Apparently, this poster (Varney) would believe that
> >the moon was made of green cheese, if I posted it on my web page,
> >and the idea fit his childish needs.
> >
> >One also has to wonder why this poster (Varney)
> >snipped my post. Is he ashamed to leave it,
> >and try to address the issues raised?
>
> Or is he merely ashamed to be seen in the same room with it?
> >
> >I suggest that if the poster (Varney)
>
> Interesting rhetorical device you have there. What's it meant to do?
Hopefully convince Varney to flock together with birds of a like
feather in newsgroups like alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
and other newsgroups populated by childish people with inferiority
complexes.
I think that you might feel at home with those birds also.
Tom Potter
"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
news:xB7y8.164$Sm3.1...@news.uswest.net...
As I said,
I suggest that you quit posting to sci.physics,
unless you can post something with intellectual content.
I think that you would feel more at home with the childish people
with inferiority complexes in alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
and such newsgroups.
Or maybe a doctor could help you get over your feeling of inferiority,
and make you into a decent human being.
Note that this poster (Varney) quotes the web site of a former
poster to sci.physics who, like Varney, has an inferiority complex.
If anyone wants to know what Varney is all about,
they don't have to visit the web site of some social misfit,
they can just do a google search using "varney" and "sci.physics'
and the posts tell the story.
The boy is sick and needs help.
Mike Varney
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>
> "Richard Herring" <richard...@baesystems.com> wrote in message
> news:ewLmRvr7...@baesystems.com...
> > In message <3cc7...@post.usenet.com>, Tom Potter
> <t...@earthlink.net>
> > writes
> > >"Mike Varney" <var...@collorado.edu> wrote in message
> > >news:jDvx8.4$6b1....@news.uswest.net...
> > >>
> > >> <SNIP Crackpotter rant>
> > >>
> > >> But aren't you well known as a crank?
> > >> http://www.crank.net/maths.html
> > >>
> > >> Go elsewhere crackpot.
> > >
> > >It is interesting to see that this poster (Varney) believes
> everything
> > >that he reads on personal web pages. The web page he refers to
> > >was created by a sci.poster that I drove out of sci.physics
> > >by exposing his ignorance and childishness,
> >
> > References?
>
> Review the old posts with Google
> and come to your own conclusion.
> Note that I still post in sci.physics
> and Erich Max Francis does not.
Come on Crack-Potter. Eric left most likely due to having better things to
do, not because of you.
> You, Varney and Moortel would have liked him though.
Already know him, twit.
> He also had an inferiority complex,
> and tried to boost his ego by demeaning folks.
*Whine whine snivel snivel* Go cry elsewhere Crack-potter.
> > >and it is not
> > >surprising that he tries to bushwhack me, rather than simply
> > >posting in sci.physics and engaging in intelligent discussions.
> > >
> > >Apparently, this poster (Varney) would believe that
> > >the moon was made of green cheese, if I posted it on my web page,
> > >and the idea fit his childish needs.
> > >
> > >One also has to wonder why this poster (Varney)
> > >snipped my post. Is he ashamed to leave it,
> > >and try to address the issues raised?
> >
> > Or is he merely ashamed to be seen in the same room with it?
> > >
> > >I suggest that if the poster (Varney)
> >
> > Interesting rhetorical device you have there. What's it meant to do?
>
> Hopefully convince Varney to flock together with birds of a like
> feather in newsgroups like alt.flame, alt.religion.kibo,
> and other newsgroups populated by childish people with inferiority
> complexes.
>
> I think that you might feel at home with those birds also.
Yup, you are a crackpot alright.
Dirk Van de moortel
[snip green noise]
> >
> >I suggest that if the poster (Varney)
>
> Interesting rhetorical device you have there. What's it meant to do?
Up to now 533 hits (threads!) with the words "poster" and "suggest"
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=suggest%20poster&as_uauthors=tom%20potter
and counting ;-)
Dirk Vdm