info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
McGinn spanks that petulant child Pennino regularly.
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Claudius Denk
Jan 23, 2022, 11:24:23 AM1/23/22
to
On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 7:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 11:01:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:01:11 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:01:08 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 7:46:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 7:36:38 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 10:52:05 AM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL!!! So, let me get this straight. Your whole argument can be parsed down to: Orthodox theories are correct by default. Right?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, not right. Orthodox theories are considered to be the best model until evidence shows a different model is superior.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Wrong. Only a nonscientist would make such an obviously non-scientific
> >> >> >> >> >> > assertion. The best model is the one that best matches the evidence.
> >> >> >> >> >> And that best model is called the orthodox model, blithering idiot.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> <snip remaining reposted babble>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > This is how retards do science. Orthodoxy is not a sign of anything
> >> >> >> >> > other than orthodoxy. Orthodoxy IS NOT A CRITERIA OF SCEINTIFIC
> >> >> >> >> > VALIDITY, YOU MOTHER FUCKING STUPID SON OF A BITCH.
> >> >> >> >> As usual the delusional twit shows his illiteracy in not knowing the
> >> >> >> >> definition of orthodox.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Scientific validity is the criterion for calling something orthodox.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Something is not called orthodox until it has been shown to be the best
> >> >> >> >> explaination that matches the evidence.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > No, you are describing the problem that scientific methods were
> >> >> >> > created IN ORDER TO PREVENT.
> >> >> >> Nope, you are just showing once again that you are illiterate and do not
> >> >> >> understand the definition of the word orthodox as used in science.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> By definition "orthodox science" means that science that has been
> >> >> >> validated by the scientific method and has been shown to be the current
> >> >> >> best possible explaination of the evidence.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Fucking moron. There is a huge difference between saying a
> >> >> > model/theory is orthodox and saying it is scientifically correct
> >> >> > BECAUSE it is orthodox.
> >> >> And yet again in this repost you still have it wrong.
> >> >>
> >> >> Science is called orthodox AFTER it has first been shown to be
> >> >> scientifically correct and no one other than you is saying anything else.
> >> >>
> >> >> <snip reposted babble>
> >> >
> >> > You got nothing you fucking slimey piece of shit.
> >> And yet agin one more time hust for you...
> >>
> >> FIRST the science is proven to be true.
> >>
> >> THEN AND ONLY THEN the science is called orthodox.
> >
> > You morons believe orthodoxy is "evidence."
> No one said that.
It's your whole fucking argument.
> You are making this up.
Read upthread.
> > You actually stated this.
>
> Nope,
Yep.
> this is another delusion on your part.
> FIRST the science is proven to be true.
It's impossible to prove anything true, moron.
You got nothing.
McGinn regularly spanks you like the petulant child you are.
Claudius Denk
> Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 11:01:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 10:01:11 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 9:01:08 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 8:31:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 7:46:10 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 7:36:38 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 10:52:05 AM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > LOL!!! So, let me get this straight. Your whole argument can be parsed down to: Orthodox theories are correct by default. Right?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, not right. Orthodox theories are considered to be the best model until evidence shows a different model is superior.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Wrong. Only a nonscientist would make such an obviously non-scientific
> >> >> >> >> >> > assertion. The best model is the one that best matches the evidence.
> >> >> >> >> >> And that best model is called the orthodox model, blithering idiot.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> <snip remaining reposted babble>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > This is how retards do science. Orthodoxy is not a sign of anything
> >> >> >> >> > other than orthodoxy. Orthodoxy IS NOT A CRITERIA OF SCEINTIFIC
> >> >> >> >> > VALIDITY, YOU MOTHER FUCKING STUPID SON OF A BITCH.
> >> >> >> >> As usual the delusional twit shows his illiteracy in not knowing the
> >> >> >> >> definition of orthodox.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Scientific validity is the criterion for calling something orthodox.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Something is not called orthodox until it has been shown to be the best
> >> >> >> >> explaination that matches the evidence.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > No, you are describing the problem that scientific methods were
> >> >> >> > created IN ORDER TO PREVENT.
> >> >> >> Nope, you are just showing once again that you are illiterate and do not
> >> >> >> understand the definition of the word orthodox as used in science.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> By definition "orthodox science" means that science that has been
> >> >> >> validated by the scientific method and has been shown to be the current
> >> >> >> best possible explaination of the evidence.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Fucking moron. There is a huge difference between saying a
> >> >> > model/theory is orthodox and saying it is scientifically correct
> >> >> > BECAUSE it is orthodox.
> >> >> And yet again in this repost you still have it wrong.
> >> >>
> >> >> Science is called orthodox AFTER it has first been shown to be
> >> >> scientifically correct and no one other than you is saying anything else.
> >> >>
> >> >> <snip reposted babble>
> >> >
> >> > You got nothing you fucking slimey piece of shit.
> >> And yet agin one more time hust for you...
> >>
> >> FIRST the science is proven to be true.
> >>
> >> THEN AND ONLY THEN the science is called orthodox.
> >
> > You morons believe orthodoxy is "evidence."
> No one said that.
It's your whole fucking argument.
> You are making this up.
Read upthread.
> > You actually stated this.
>
> Nope,
Yep.
> this is another delusion on your part.
> FIRST the science is proven to be true.
It's impossible to prove anything true, moron.
You got nothing.
McGinn regularly spanks you like the petulant child you are.
Claudius Denk
Jim Pennino
Jan 23, 2022, 12:01:11 PM1/23/22
to
Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip old raving>
> It's impossible to prove anything true, moron.
Again, this is so blazingly insane it is not worth a response.
> McGinn regularly
You ARE McGinn, you insane idiot.
> Claudius Denk/James McGinn/Mental patient
<snip old raving>
> It's impossible to prove anything true, moron.
> McGinn regularly
You ARE McGinn, you insane idiot.
> Claudius Denk/James McGinn/Mental patient
James McGinn
Jan 23, 2022, 8:01:51 PM1/23/22
to
Claudius Denk
May 2, 2022, 12:50:43 AM5/2/22
to
Solving Tornadoes
Jun 6, 2022, 1:02:27 PM6/6/22
to
James McGinn
Jul 7, 2022, 10:40:59 AM7/7/22
to
On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 8:24:23 AM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote:
0 new messages