Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games
177 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Arindam Banerjee
Nov 3, 2021, 6:35:56 PM11/3/21
to
On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
What abysmally low standards they have sunk to now, in US unis, if this Sylvia entity is as real as you say, Archie.
She came across as the most truly anti scientific creature, in the same class as the Mad Trio who do not claim to have top uni affiliations.
No wonder China is thrashing the US in the fields of science! No Chinese person has made ad hominem attacks to pull down my brilliant new physics, supported by proof from my experiments that pave the way to the future. They have much more sense and are not inhibited by silly dogmas enforced by assertions and persecutions, in science and engineering at any rate.
I feel sad, for the US. In the 70s they were so admirable as engineers, as they were not then so corrupted by Einsteinism, a debilitating virus from which the Chinese have kept themselves free.
Mass sackings are an imperative. The physics stables must be cleaned.
>
> Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
>
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
> 7k views
> Subscribe
>
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Nov 2, 2021, 7:24:09 PM (19 hours ago)
>
>
>
> to sci.math and sci.physics
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Nov 2, 2021, 7:14 PM
> to sci.physics
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 5:36:42 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > Back to your abuse approach I see.
> >
> > That didn't take long.
> >
> > Sylvia.
>
> AP, King of Science has been patient too long with Sylvia and Dr. Hau.
>
>
> Sylvia, no abuse at all, the King of Science is 100% serious on science, but you seem to want to waste time on chit chat b.s. that amounts to nothing overall.
>
> The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
>
> So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.
>
> Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
>
> It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
>
> What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
>
> So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
>
> So get off your lazy butt and finish the experiment.
>
> Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
>
> Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.
>
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
> Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
What abysmally low standards they have sunk to now, in US unis, if this Sylvia entity is as real as you say, Archie.
She came across as the most truly anti scientific creature, in the same class as the Mad Trio who do not claim to have top uni affiliations.
No wonder China is thrashing the US in the fields of science! No Chinese person has made ad hominem attacks to pull down my brilliant new physics, supported by proof from my experiments that pave the way to the future. They have much more sense and are not inhibited by silly dogmas enforced by assertions and persecutions, in science and engineering at any rate.
I feel sad, for the US. In the 70s they were so admirable as engineers, as they were not then so corrupted by Einsteinism, a debilitating virus from which the Chinese have kept themselves free.
Mass sackings are an imperative. The physics stables must be cleaned.
>
> Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
>
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
> 7k views
> Subscribe
>
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Nov 2, 2021, 7:24:09 PM (19 hours ago)
>
>
>
> to sci.math and sci.physics
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Nov 2, 2021, 7:14 PM
> to sci.physics
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 5:36:42 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > Back to your abuse approach I see.
> >
> > That didn't take long.
> >
> > Sylvia.
>
> AP, King of Science has been patient too long with Sylvia and Dr. Hau.
>
>
> Sylvia, no abuse at all, the King of Science is 100% serious on science, but you seem to want to waste time on chit chat b.s. that amounts to nothing overall.
>
> The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
>
> So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.
>
> Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
>
> It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
>
> What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
>
> So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
>
> So get off your lazy butt and finish the experiment.
>
> Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
>
> Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.
>
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
whodat
Nov 3, 2021, 7:08:40 PM11/3/21
to
Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
Michael Moroney
Nov 3, 2021, 8:06:09 PM11/3/21
to
🦨 of Math and 🦟 of Physics Archimedes "little fish" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
Dr. Hau isn't even here.
> neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because
Again, you got the order of things all screwed up. This is what real
scientists do: First you come up with a hypothesis. Then you come up
with a situation where your hypothesis makes a measurable prediction,
one which is different from "standard" physics. Then you PERFORM THE
EXPERIMENT. Then you see whether the experimental outcome matches your
hypothesis. If so, maybe you're on to something. If not, back to the
drawing board, as the expression goes.
Not only do you proclaim from on high that you "proved" something, you
do so BEFORE any experiment supports or refutes it. And not only that,
you want uninvolved people (like Sylvia or Dr. Hau) to perform your
experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
> they do not want to credit AP.
If the experiment has never been done, nobody knows whether anyone
should be credited or blamed. Sorry, but part of physics is doing the
experiments (or collaborating with someone to do it for you) and then
see IF you are correct.
> They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
Nope. You just want credit without doing any of the work any scientist
needs to do. You don't even care if you are right or wrong, you just
want credit without doing any work.
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics
Why should either do YOUR "physics"?
> rather than your utter hatred of AP.
Why do you think Sylvia has any "utter hatred" for you? Why do you
think that Dr. Hau has EVER even heard of you? How can she have "utter
hatred" for someone she has never heard of?
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
There you go again, trying to foist off work on someone else. You don't
get to dictate what Dr. Hau's experiment is.
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
>
> Whenever physics proves AP is correct,
When has that EVER happened?
> Whenever physics proves AP is correct,
> neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because
scientists do: First you come up with a hypothesis. Then you come up
with a situation where your hypothesis makes a measurable prediction,
one which is different from "standard" physics. Then you PERFORM THE
EXPERIMENT. Then you see whether the experimental outcome matches your
hypothesis. If so, maybe you're on to something. If not, back to the
drawing board, as the expression goes.
Not only do you proclaim from on high that you "proved" something, you
do so BEFORE any experiment supports or refutes it. And not only that,
you want uninvolved people (like Sylvia or Dr. Hau) to perform your
experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
> they do not want to credit AP.
should be credited or blamed. Sorry, but part of physics is doing the
experiments (or collaborating with someone to do it for you) and then
see IF you are correct.
> They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
needs to do. You don't even care if you are right or wrong, you just
want credit without doing any work.
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics
> rather than your utter hatred of AP.
think that Dr. Hau has EVER even heard of you? How can she have "utter
hatred" for someone she has never heard of?
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
get to dictate what Dr. Hau's experiment is.
Message has been deleted
Arindam Banerjee
Nov 4, 2021, 2:08:34 AM11/4/21
to
On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
Wrong as usual.
> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
No peers for me in this century.
Michael Moroney
Nov 4, 2021, 2:18:07 AM11/4/21
to
On 11/4/2021 2:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
>> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
>
> Wrong as usual.
> No peers for me in this century.
So you are inferior to everyone, even Plutonium? Glad you cleared that up.
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
>> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
>
> Wrong as usual.
> No peers for me in this century.
Message has been deleted
Mostowski Collapse
Nov 4, 2021, 9:25:47 AM11/4/21
to
Where is Dan-O-Matik, our chief anti-troll. Is he mad
at something, that math uses classes and not only sets?
at something, that math uses classes and not only sets?
Mostowski Collapse
Nov 4, 2021, 9:27:09 AM11/4/21
to
Ok I see, wrong group, Dan-O-Matik is only anti-trolling in sci.math.
whodat
Nov 4, 2021, 10:59:33 AM11/4/21
to
On 11/4/2021 1:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
>> On 11/3/2021 5:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11,
plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
>
> Wrong as usual.
> No peers for me in this century.
As always, Arindam Banerjee thinks too highly of himself.
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
>> On 11/3/2021 5:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11,
plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
>
> Wrong as usual.
> No peers for me in this century.
Master of insanity Archie Plutonium is you peer. Neither of you has
produced anything worthwhile.
Arindam Banerjee
Nov 4, 2021, 5:38:09 PM11/4/21
to
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 01:59:33 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
> On 11/4/2021 1:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
> >> On 11/3/2021 5:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11,
> plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
> >
> > Wrong as usual.
> > No peers for me in this century.
> As always, Arindam Banerjee thinks too highly of himself.
I am the greatest genius of all time, and sole god among lotsa devils.
> On 11/4/2021 1:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 10:08:40 UTC+11, whodat wrote:
> >> On 11/3/2021 5:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11,
> plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> Congratulations Banerjee, you have engaged your peer.
> >
> > Wrong as usual.
> > No peers for me in this century.
> As always, Arindam Banerjee thinks too highly of himself.
That is my claim. Has been so for a while.
To be modest is dishonesty and disservice to the planet imperilled by unscrupulous scoundrels.
>
> Master of insanity Archie Plutonium is you peer. Neither of you has
> produced anything worthwhile.
At least Archie is not instrumental for wasting billions of money on wrong and useless pseudo physics thrust upon the gullible public with massive propaganda.
> Master of insanity Archie Plutonium is you peer. Neither of you has
> produced anything worthwhile.
You are lying as usual about me.
I have updated the Newtonian laws, set physics right, and thus made interstellar travel possible in theory back in1999, and provided sound confirming experimental work from 2015 to now.
For that I will be remembered as long as men can breathe and eyes can see, to quote what Master Shakespeare anticipated.
Following the vision of Asimov and other scifi writers, humanity will get out of Earth and travel all around in the galaxy. With direct energy creation, following my physics which chucks out the enetgy conservation laws, they could live anywhere in deep space with the suitable resources. No end of space in infinity.
Before that, they will use my internal force engines for very fast travel on Earth, as these will replace jet engines. Rockets will be obsolete, of course. Travel from London to Melbourne could take 2 hours or so. Trips to the Moon and back on a daily basis. No pollution of the air with jet engine exhausts. A totally green planet, with the hydrogen economy.
A few centuries from now, chaps will not believe that once the world actually believed in such rubbish notions as relativity, big bang theory, quantum bunkum stuff, etc.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 30, 2023, 4:45:14 PM3/30/23
to
Harvard's Dr. Hau only needs to turn the light switch off in BEC slow light experiment to prove to physics that slow light and normal light all disappear simultaneously!!!! Why??? Because light waves are not straight line arrows with head and tail end. No. Light Waves are pencil closed looped ellipses with the source in the circuit of these pencil ellipse waves. This is what causes Quantum Entanglement-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits. Yet Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to be a stubborn bozo and deny science truth just so AP does not get credit.
> Village idiot William Frazer, Mary K. Gaillard, Martin Halpern, Allan Kaufman, says Kibo Parry M. Why Kibo? Is it because they lack the brains to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because, like you Kibo who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945?
>
> On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 1:20:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Village Idiot"
> >"psychoceramic"
>
> Carolyn Abbot-- geometry group theory
> Ian Agol -- low dimensional topology
> Alexander Alldridge -- Supergeometry (never heard of such a thing, let's hope he can super solve Jan's error of never understanding that a entry cut near the cone apex has a asymmetrical arclength compared to exit cut)
> Denis Auroux-- symplectic topology and mirror symmetry (this expertise in symmetry is called for-- so many think a cut of a cone is a ellipse when anyone with a experiment can see it is a oval)
> Richard Bamler-- geometric analysis, differential geometry (sounds like a heavy weight in geometry and this cone problem should be easy for Richard)
> Robert Bryant-- many geometry expertises
> Zhiqi Chen -- differential geometry and although a visiting scholar, we should never play bias to whomever can answer the question of no ellipse is a conic but only a cylinder section
> James Conway-- contact and symplectic geometry (what in the world is symplectic-- better not ask)
> Heinz Cordes-- classical analysis (hope that does not mean classical Old Math)
> Ved Datar-- differential geometry
> David Eisenbud-- algebraic geometry
> Mark Haiman-- algebraic geometry
> Jenny Harrison-- geometric measure (perhaps measuring the arclength of cone sections is what is needed)
> Robin Hartshorne-- history of geometry (well, well, why does it take till 2016, for any mathematician to realize the ellipse was never a conic section, rather, it was the oval)
> Wu-Yi Hsiang-- differential geometry (and a long long time ago Dr. Hsiang sent me his manuscript of a alleged proof of Kepler Packing, thanks)
> Michael Hutchings-- geometry
> Marina Iliopoulou-- incidence geometry
> Brian Krummel -- geometric analysis
> Tim Laux -- geometric analysis
> David Li-Bland-- differential geometry
> John Lott-- differential geometry
> Kathryn Mann-- geometry
> David Nadler-- geometric representation
> Martin Olsson-- arithmetic geometry
> Kenneth Ribet-- algebraic geometry
> Alan Schoenfeld-- math education
> Vivek Shende-- geometry
> Isadore Singer-- geometry
> Zvezdelina Stankova-- algebraic geometry
> Bernd Sturmfels-- algebraic geometry
> Hongbin Sun-- hyperbolic geometry (the hyperbolic geometry may come in handy in showing that the cone section cannot be an ellipse)
> Peter Teichner-- geometric topology
> Dmitry Tonkonog-- geometry
> Michael Viscardi-- geometric representation
> Alan Weinstein-- geometry
> Lauren Williams-- geometry
> Mariusz Wodzicki-- geometry
> Joseph Wolf-- geometry
> Hung-Hsi Wu-- geometry
>
> UC Berkeley Physics dept emeritus
> THEORISTS
>
> Jonathan Arons (E)
>
> Korkut Bardakci (E)
>
> Geoffrey Chew (E)
>
> Marvin Cohen (E)
>
> William Frazer (E)
>
> Mary K. Gaillard (E)
>
> Martin Halpern (E)
>
> Allan Kaufman (E)
>
> Charles Kittel (E)
>
> Christopher McKee (E)
>
> Rainer Sachs (E)
>
> Charles Schwartz (E)
>
> Mahiko Suzuki (E)
>
> Eyvind Wichmann (E)
> EXPERIMENTALISTS
>
> Dmitry Budker (E)
>
> William Chinowsky (E)
>
> John Clarke (E)
>
> Marc Davis (E)
>
> Robert Ely (E)
>
> Reinhard Genzel (E)
>
> Richard Marrus (E)
>
> Forrest Mozer (E)
>
> Richard Muller (E)
>
> Richard Packard (E)
>
> P. Buford Price (E)
>
> Paul Richards (E)
>
> Charles Shank (E)
>
> Yuen-Ron Shen (E)
>
> James Siegrist (E)
>
> George Smoot III (E)
>
> Herbert Steiner (E)
>
> M. Lynn Stevenson (E)
>
> Mark Strovink (E)
>
> George Trilling (E)
>
> Robert Tripp (E)
>
> Peter Yu (E)
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
> On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "The CCP's Stooge"
>
> Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"antiscience"
> Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
> AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"
> Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
>
> Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Math Minnow
>
> Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
>
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney stalking attacks on
>
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> Arthur B. McDonald
> Francois Englert
> Saul Perlmutter
> Brian P. Schmidt
> Adam G. Riess
> Makoto Kobayashi
> Toshihide Maskawa
> Yoichiro Nambu
> John C. Mather
> George F. Smoot
> Roy J. Glauber
> David J. Gross
> Hugh David Politzer
> Frank Wilczek
> Raymond Davis Jr.
> Masatoshi Koshiba
> Riccardo Giacconi
> Gerardus 't Hooft
> Martinus J.G. Veltman
> Jerome I. Friedman
> Henry W. Kendall
> Richard E. Taylor
> Carlo Rubbia
> Simon van der Meer
> William Alfred Fowler
> Kenneth G. Wilson
> James Watson Cronin
> Val Logsdon Fitch
> Sheldon Lee Glashow
> Steven Weinberg
> .
> .
> little fishes
> .
> .
> Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
>
> Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> more and more layers of error thinking physics
> .
> .
> John Baez
> Brian Greene
> Lisa Randall
> Alan H. Guth
> Michael E. Brown
> Konstantin Batygin
> Ben Bullock
> Larry Harson
> Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> Edward Witten
>
>
> Quoting Wikipedia—
>
> In the early 1990s, as public awareness grew of the Internet and Usenet, Parry received publicity, including a cover story in Wired magazine..
> --- end quote ---
>
> Wired (magazine) editor in chief, Nicholas Thompson
>
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
> > Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >Failure
> >
> >
> > Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >blithered:
> > On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "FireD your ass"
> >
> > snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
> >
> > AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
> >
> > Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> > by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
> >
> > Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> > by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
> >
> > Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> > by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
> >
> > Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> > by
> > Michael Moroney
> > Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> > 1481 views
> > by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> > 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> > Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> > by
> > Graham Cooper
> >
> >
> > Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> > Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> > Jun 16, 2021
> > by
> > Efftard K. Donglemeier
> >
> >
> > Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> > by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
> >
> > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> > by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> > 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> > by Wayne Decarlo
> >
> > Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> > May 10, 2021
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
> >
> > Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
> >
> > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
> >
> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
> >
> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
> >
> > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
> >
> > Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> > 12/30/18
> > by j4n bur53
> >
> > Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> > Ebenezer Splooge
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> > by Roger Davis
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> > by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
> >
> > Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
> >
> > Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> > by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
> >
> > Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> > By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> > 285 views
> > by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Village idiot William Frazer, Mary K. Gaillard, Martin Halpern, Allan Kaufman, says Kibo Parry M. Why Kibo? Is it because they lack the brains to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because, like you Kibo who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945?
>
> On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 1:20:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Village Idiot"
> >"psychoceramic"
> >people (like Sylvia or Dr. Hau) to perform your
> > experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
> Univ California Berkeley math department
> > experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
>
> Carolyn Abbot-- geometry group theory
> Ian Agol -- low dimensional topology
> Alexander Alldridge -- Supergeometry (never heard of such a thing, let's hope he can super solve Jan's error of never understanding that a entry cut near the cone apex has a asymmetrical arclength compared to exit cut)
> Denis Auroux-- symplectic topology and mirror symmetry (this expertise in symmetry is called for-- so many think a cut of a cone is a ellipse when anyone with a experiment can see it is a oval)
> Richard Bamler-- geometric analysis, differential geometry (sounds like a heavy weight in geometry and this cone problem should be easy for Richard)
> Robert Bryant-- many geometry expertises
> Zhiqi Chen -- differential geometry and although a visiting scholar, we should never play bias to whomever can answer the question of no ellipse is a conic but only a cylinder section
> James Conway-- contact and symplectic geometry (what in the world is symplectic-- better not ask)
> Heinz Cordes-- classical analysis (hope that does not mean classical Old Math)
> Ved Datar-- differential geometry
> David Eisenbud-- algebraic geometry
> Mark Haiman-- algebraic geometry
> Jenny Harrison-- geometric measure (perhaps measuring the arclength of cone sections is what is needed)
> Robin Hartshorne-- history of geometry (well, well, why does it take till 2016, for any mathematician to realize the ellipse was never a conic section, rather, it was the oval)
> Wu-Yi Hsiang-- differential geometry (and a long long time ago Dr. Hsiang sent me his manuscript of a alleged proof of Kepler Packing, thanks)
> Michael Hutchings-- geometry
> Marina Iliopoulou-- incidence geometry
> Brian Krummel -- geometric analysis
> Tim Laux -- geometric analysis
> David Li-Bland-- differential geometry
> John Lott-- differential geometry
> Kathryn Mann-- geometry
> David Nadler-- geometric representation
> Martin Olsson-- arithmetic geometry
> Kenneth Ribet-- algebraic geometry
> Alan Schoenfeld-- math education
> Vivek Shende-- geometry
> Isadore Singer-- geometry
> Zvezdelina Stankova-- algebraic geometry
> Bernd Sturmfels-- algebraic geometry
> Hongbin Sun-- hyperbolic geometry (the hyperbolic geometry may come in handy in showing that the cone section cannot be an ellipse)
> Peter Teichner-- geometric topology
> Dmitry Tonkonog-- geometry
> Michael Viscardi-- geometric representation
> Alan Weinstein-- geometry
> Lauren Williams-- geometry
> Mariusz Wodzicki-- geometry
> Joseph Wolf-- geometry
> Hung-Hsi Wu-- geometry
>
> UC Berkeley Physics dept emeritus
> THEORISTS
>
> Jonathan Arons (E)
>
> Korkut Bardakci (E)
>
> Geoffrey Chew (E)
>
> Marvin Cohen (E)
>
> William Frazer (E)
>
> Mary K. Gaillard (E)
>
> Martin Halpern (E)
>
> Allan Kaufman (E)
>
> Charles Kittel (E)
>
> Christopher McKee (E)
>
> Rainer Sachs (E)
>
> Charles Schwartz (E)
>
> Mahiko Suzuki (E)
>
> Eyvind Wichmann (E)
> EXPERIMENTALISTS
>
> Dmitry Budker (E)
>
> William Chinowsky (E)
>
> John Clarke (E)
>
> Marc Davis (E)
>
> Robert Ely (E)
>
> Reinhard Genzel (E)
>
> Richard Marrus (E)
>
> Forrest Mozer (E)
>
> Richard Muller (E)
>
> Richard Packard (E)
>
> P. Buford Price (E)
>
> Paul Richards (E)
>
> Charles Shank (E)
>
> Yuen-Ron Shen (E)
>
> James Siegrist (E)
>
> George Smoot III (E)
>
> Herbert Steiner (E)
>
> M. Lynn Stevenson (E)
>
> Mark Strovink (E)
>
> George Trilling (E)
>
> Robert Tripp (E)
>
> Peter Yu (E)
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
> On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "The CCP's Stooge"
>
> Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"antiscience"
> Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
> AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"
> Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
>
> Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.
> > fails at math and science:
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Math Minnow
>
> Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
>
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney stalking attacks on
>
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> Arthur B. McDonald
> Francois Englert
> Saul Perlmutter
> Brian P. Schmidt
> Adam G. Riess
> Makoto Kobayashi
> Toshihide Maskawa
> Yoichiro Nambu
> John C. Mather
> George F. Smoot
> Roy J. Glauber
> David J. Gross
> Hugh David Politzer
> Frank Wilczek
> Raymond Davis Jr.
> Masatoshi Koshiba
> Riccardo Giacconi
> Gerardus 't Hooft
> Martinus J.G. Veltman
> Jerome I. Friedman
> Henry W. Kendall
> Richard E. Taylor
> Carlo Rubbia
> Simon van der Meer
> William Alfred Fowler
> Kenneth G. Wilson
> James Watson Cronin
> Val Logsdon Fitch
> Sheldon Lee Glashow
> Steven Weinberg
> .
> .
> little fishes
> .
> .
> Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
>
> Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> more and more layers of error thinking physics
> .
> .
> John Baez
> Brian Greene
> Lisa Randall
> Alan H. Guth
> Michael E. Brown
> Konstantin Batygin
> Ben Bullock
> Larry Harson
> Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> Edward Witten
>
>
> Quoting Wikipedia—
>
> In the early 1990s, as public awareness grew of the Internet and Usenet, Parry received publicity, including a cover story in Wired magazine..
> --- end quote ---
>
> Wired (magazine) editor in chief, Nicholas Thompson
>
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
> > Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >Failure
> >
> >
> > Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >blithered:
> > On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "FireD your ass"
> >
> > snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
> >
> > AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
> >
> > Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> > by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
> >
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
> >
> > Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> > by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
> >
> > Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> > by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
> >
> > Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> > by
> > Michael Moroney
> > Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> > 1481 views
> > by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> > 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> > Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> > by
> > Graham Cooper
> >
> >
> > Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> > Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> > Jun 16, 2021
> > by
> > Efftard K. Donglemeier
> >
> >
> > Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> > by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
> >
> > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> > by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> > 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> > by Wayne Decarlo
> >
> > Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> > May 10, 2021
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
> >
> > Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
> >
> > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
> >
> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
> >
> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
> >
> > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
> >
> > Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> > 12/30/18
> > by j4n bur53
> >
> > Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> > Ebenezer Splooge
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> > by Roger Davis
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> > by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
> >
> > Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
> >
> > Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> > by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
> >
> > Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> > By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> > 285 views
> > by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Arindam Banerjee
Apr 13, 2023, 12:36:11 AM4/13/23
to
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 13, 2023, 9:07:10 PM4/13/23
to
Arindam the same crackpot of physics that Dr.Hau who cannot turn the light switch off and prove AP correct-- Light waves are closed loop pencil ellipses with the source always in the loop
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Quarks are imaginary stuff
Quarks are imaginary stuff, very Einsteinian thus. Imagination works in arts, fiction, kid stuff,
7:07 PM
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Paul Alsing
77
unread,
Up Newton Down Einstein
On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 09:47:01 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 3
7:03 PM
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Quarks are imaginary stuff
Quarks are imaginary stuff, very Einsteinian thus. Imagination works in arts, fiction, kid stuff,
7:07 PM
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Paul Alsing
77
unread,
Up Newton Down Einstein
On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 09:47:01 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 3
7:03 PM
Arindam Banerjee
Apr 13, 2023, 10:55:20 PM4/13/23
to
On Friday, 14 April 2023 at 11:07:10 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam the same crackpot of physics that Dr.Hau who cannot turn the light switch off and prove AP correct-- Light waves are closed loop pencil ellipses with the source always in the loop
A light pulse, called a photon, is a brief burst of electromagnetic radiation propagating through aether, caused by a moving electron going out and in of its usual orbit around the nucleus, under some external excitation.
> Arindam the same crackpot of physics that Dr.Hau who cannot turn the light switch off and prove AP correct-- Light waves are closed loop pencil ellipses with the source always in the loop
This is a straightforward extension of Maxwellian electrodynamics, and naturally outs all the e=mcc=hv nonsenses.
Cheers, Archie, grow up.
Arindam Banerjee
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 17, 2023, 1:56:15 AM4/17/23
to
Kibo_I want to fuck her corpse-Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > tarded:
>
> NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
>
> 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > >
> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > >
> > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > >
> > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1035 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
> > > • Publication date : February 27, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 675 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 41 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date : March 12, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 74 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date : March 21, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 66 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > Not again!
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
>
> Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Imp of Math"
>
>
> Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Court Jester of Math"
>
> Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
>
> Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > Not again!
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
>
> Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > tarded:
>
> NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
>
> 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > >
> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > >
> > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1035 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
> > > • Publication date : February 27, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 675 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 41 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date : March 12, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 74 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date : March 21, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 66 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > fails at math and science:
> Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
> > fails at math and science:
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > Not again!
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
>
> Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Imp of Math"
> On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> > fails at math and science:
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
>
> Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Court Jester of Math"
>
> Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
>
> Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> > fails at math and science:
>
> Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
> > fails at math and science:
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > Not again!
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
>
> Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 22, 2023, 8:27:07 PM4/22/23
to
Mumbai,Kolkata▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shanghai with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
Arindam Banerjee anti-science posts, everyday spam in sci.physics, like the time he posted the Moon walk of Apollo 11, in 1969 was a fake, and actors in Mumbai and Arizona desert simulated the walk. Arindam Banerjee is Paid to spam sci.physics & sci.math with his mindless b.s.
Re: Edward Witten needs a Balanced Google Search with Counterpoint in his first page, just as the science failure Arindam Banerjee has counterpoints in first page of a Google Search list. Witten has millions of sugar coated nonsense about Witten for
by
banerjee...@gmail.com Mar 21, 2022, 3:57:15 PM
On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 8:27:09 AM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 4:37:17 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 5:51:31 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > This is also an interesting read:
> > >
> > > Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range
> > > Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
> > > Updated July 16, 2021
> > > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 1. März 2022 um 00:46:13 UTC+1:
> > > > Who was Putins Doktor Faust?
> > > >
> > > > Putin: Hypersonic Avangard Changes Everything!
> > > Today in sci.physics yan wyck in his daily spam says Beijing was nothing in 1999 and apparently a Russian Sarmat returned Beijing to "nothingness once again".
> > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > >
> > > Kibo Parry M. in his CIA disguise
> > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:39:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Putin's minion"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > >*still* lusting after the Queen's corpse?
> > > >
> > > > Are you upset that I haven't been paying enough attention to you? You
> > > > have been hoping for more punishment for attacking me? Or as Chris
> > > > states, it's time for your spanking?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> > > >
> > > > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 1:16:55 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > "Imp of Science"
> > > > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
> > > >
> > > > Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > >
> > > > & wrote:
> > > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > > 2m views
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 2> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > 2> So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is little wonder that both Russia and China dictators are combative towards the West. Because dictators never want to give up on power but stay in power all their life long. So they oppose the West because the West has grown up to democracy-- let the people have power, not one single idiot having power all his life time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Naturally, Putin will want to keep the Russian people suppressed and have Russia be a second rate government as a dictator. Same goes for China-- they never want to give up power so the people themselves choose their leader.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/22, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/23, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/24, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/25, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/26, AP tards:
Arindam Banerjee
Apr 23, 2023, 12:51:57 AM4/23/23
to
On Sunday, 23 April 2023 at 10:27:07 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee anti-science posts,
Science now is anti-science, what with Einsteinian thugs having corrupted it on a grand, global, institutionalized scale. Never was the most ridiculous nonsense posing as supreme science more glorified.
So my anti-science as you call it is anti-anti-science.
Like ECCM, or electronic counter counter measures.
> Arindam Banerjee anti-science posts,
Science now is anti-science, what with Einsteinian thugs having corrupted it on a grand, global, institutionalized scale. Never was the most ridiculous nonsense posing as supreme science more glorified.
So my anti-science as you call it is anti-anti-science.
Like ECCM, or electronic counter counter measures.
Archimedes Plutonium
May 11, 2023, 10:13:34 PM5/11/23
to
Does Melbourne Uni, Dr.Hollenberg agree with Arindam Banerjee the flake of physics, that Dr. Hau is a physics failure that cannot turn out the light proving AP's claim-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits --- not arrow rays with two ends.
Re: Melbourne Uni Lloyd L Hollenberg Geoffrey N Taylor Raymond R Volkas can you please vouch for the fact that Australia...
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
35
unread,
Re: Bhattacharya Saswata,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy on
May 2
mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
, …
Arindam Banerjee
22
unread,
Re: Anurag Sharma,Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha,Bhattacharya Saswata of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as stupid and pandering fools of Climate Change like Jai Maharaj// thus never able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole?
May 1
unread,
Re: Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics,so stupid in physics I am too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and thus I attempt to keep Indian Institute of Technology as dumb as Arindam Banerj
Apr 28
Alan Folmsbee's profile photo
Alan Folmsbee
, …
5
unread,
Graphite has flat crystals because C nucleus has planes of protons
Apr 26
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S.,Narendra Modi if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the same as C'
Apr 25
unread,
Re: Paid for anti-science spammers of disinformation like Banerjee & Valev banned from sci.math, sci.physics simply from Economic Sanctions on Russia, Iran, NK, et al
Apr 21
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee, the anal fuckdog of science, physics, when he never learned what 1st year students learn-- Units, units units-- E=mc^2 multiplied by a scalar makes no changes-- no changes to Old Ohm's law or New Ohm's law when multiplied by sca
Apr 19
unread,
Re: Melbourne Uni Lloyd L Hollenberg Geoffrey N Taylor Raymond R Volkas can you please vouch for the fact that Australia never had rail gun research and that the spammer Arindam Banerjee is just one liaring b.s. cluttering up sci.physics
Apr 10
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee claims do not square up Uni Melbourne--Harry M Quiney Jeffrey C McCallum Lloyd L Hollenberg, can Australia verify
Apr 10
unread,
Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?
Apr 15
unread,
Re: Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as insane nutjob of physics as Arindam Banerjee // not able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole and real electron is
Apr 9
unread,
Bhatnagar M.C. ,Indian Institute of Technology,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu,Dhaka Rajendra S.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-- too busy on Arindam??
Apr 9
unread,
Re: Banerjee Varsha,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhattacharya Saswata,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy with imp Arindam??
Apr 9
9
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the sam
Apr 9
unread,
Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore--are you as dumb as Arindam Banerjee never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
Apr 9
My 137th published book
◦ Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
◦ Print length : 124 pages
◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1048 KB
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)
#2-8, 202nd published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B0BC5T9JBH
• Publication date : August 27, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 801 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
Re: Melbourne Uni Lloyd L Hollenberg Geoffrey N Taylor Raymond R Volkas can you please vouch for the fact that Australia...
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Re: Bhattacharya Saswata,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy on
May 2
mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
, …
Arindam Banerjee
22
unread,
Re: Anurag Sharma,Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha,Bhattacharya Saswata of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as stupid and pandering fools of Climate Change like Jai Maharaj// thus never able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole?
May 1
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
53
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Re: Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics,so stupid in physics I am too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and thus I attempt to keep Indian Institute of Technology as dumb as Arindam Banerj
Apr 28
Alan Folmsbee's profile photo
Alan Folmsbee
, …
5
unread,
Graphite has flat crystals because C nucleus has planes of protons
Apr 26
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
8
Arindam Banerjee
,
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S.,Narendra Modi if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the same as C'
Apr 25
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
2
Arindam Banerjee
,
unread,
Re: Paid for anti-science spammers of disinformation like Banerjee & Valev banned from sci.math, sci.physics simply from Economic Sanctions on Russia, Iran, NK, et al
Apr 21
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
6
Arindam Banerjee
,
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee, the anal fuckdog of science, physics, when he never learned what 1st year students learn-- Units, units units-- E=mc^2 multiplied by a scalar makes no changes-- no changes to Old Ohm's law or New Ohm's law when multiplied by sca
Apr 19
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
2
Arindam Banerjee
,
unread,
Re: Melbourne Uni Lloyd L Hollenberg Geoffrey N Taylor Raymond R Volkas can you please vouch for the fact that Australia never had rail gun research and that the spammer Arindam Banerjee is just one liaring b.s. cluttering up sci.physics
Apr 10
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
3
Arindam Banerjee
,
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee claims do not square up Uni Melbourne--Harry M Quiney Jeffrey C McCallum Lloyd L Hollenberg, can Australia verify
Apr 10
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
32
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?
Apr 15
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
49
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Re: Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as insane nutjob of physics as Arindam Banerjee // not able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole and real electron is
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
50
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Bhatnagar M.C. ,Indian Institute of Technology,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu,Dhaka Rajendra S.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-- too busy on Arindam??
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
66
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Re: Banerjee Varsha,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhattacharya Saswata,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy with imp Arindam??
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Arindam Banerjee
, …
9
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the sam
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
52
Arindam Banerjee
, …
unread,
Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore--are you as dumb as Arindam Banerjee never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
Apr 9
My 137th published book
◦ Print length : 124 pages
◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 404 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B0BC5T9JBH
• Publication date : August 27, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 801 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 45 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
Arindam Banerjee
May 12, 2023, 1:57:18 AM5/12/23
to
On Friday, 12 May 2023 at 12:13:34 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Does Melbourne Uni, Dr.Hollenberg agree with Arindam Banerjee the flake of physics, that Dr. Hau is a physics failure that cannot turn out the light proving AP's claim-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits --- not arrow rays with two ends.
Never met him, or any other such, Archie.
> Does Melbourne Uni, Dr.Hollenberg agree with Arindam Banerjee the flake of physics, that Dr. Hau is a physics failure that cannot turn out the light proving AP's claim-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits --- not arrow rays with two ends.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
May 19, 2023, 1:28:23 PM5/19/23
to
Kibo's corpse fucking--Harvard's Dr. Hau. Why Kibo Parry has your 30 year nonstop stalking come to necrophilia. And why Harvard's Dr. Hau?? Is it because she refuses to turn the light off in slow light experiments and prove AP correct, that Light Waves are close loop circuits and __not arrow rays with head and tail__?
Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 11:23:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)
Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) More progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed.
2) Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
3) Explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
4) Explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
5) Comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
6) Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
7) Name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed.
8) Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3x10^8meters/second.
9) Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
10) Apparently the light in BEC vanishes also as the laser is turned off Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" challenge.
11) Mysteries start to unveil Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular.
12) Slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light.
13) Zeilinger & Kaiser team //Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
14) Summary.
--- end quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"mindless barking fuckdog"
> > "math hater"
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > >"certifiably insane"
Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 11:23:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
--- quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)
Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) More progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed.
2) Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
3) Explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
4) Explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
5) Comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
6) Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
7) Name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed.
8) Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3x10^8meters/second.
9) Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
10) Apparently the light in BEC vanishes also as the laser is turned off Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" challenge.
11) Mysteries start to unveil Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular.
12) Slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light.
13) Zeilinger & Kaiser team //Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
14) Summary.
--- end quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> >"mindless barking fuckdog"
> > "math hater"
> > fails at math and science:
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • File size : 1035 KB
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >
> > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Imp of Math"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >
> > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Imp of Math"
> > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> >
> >
> > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Court Jester of Math"
> >
> > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> >
> > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> >
> > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> >
> >
> > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Court Jester of Math"
> >
> > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> >
> > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> >
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> >
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
Volney
May 20, 2023, 1:52:34 AM5/20/23
to
On 5/12/2023 1:57 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Friday, 12 May 2023 at 12:13:34 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Does Melbourne Uni, Dr.Hollenberg agree with Arindam Banerjee the flake of physics, that Dr. Hau is a physics failure that cannot turn out the light proving AP's claim-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits --- not arrow rays with two ends.
>
> Never met him, or any other such, Archie.
ArchiePoo likes to stalk professors teaching near where his target lives
> On Friday, 12 May 2023 at 12:13:34 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Does Melbourne Uni, Dr.Hollenberg agree with Arindam Banerjee the flake of physics, that Dr. Hau is a physics failure that cannot turn out the light proving AP's claim-- Light Waves are closed loop circuits --- not arrow rays with two ends.
>
> Never met him, or any other such, Archie.
for some strange reason. Maybe he thinks they will magically see his
post? And if so, then what? Do something about the poster? Like what?
I've taunted him by not letting on where I live or my university. For
some reason he has substituted RPI (sometimes MIT or Harvard) for "my"
university or nearby professors to stalk. He hasn't guessed correctly yet...
Archimedes Plutonium
May 23, 2023, 7:52:57 PM5/23/23
to
Evidence Dr.Hau is absurd, is there plenty evidence Arindam, because she cannot be bothered of turning the Slow Light switch off and see all light, regardless of slow or fast vanishes in the instant the light switch is off.
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
Volney
2
unread,
Evidences of relativity etc. being absurd
On 5/23/2023 2:06 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> Relativity is absurd, for as the
6:45 PM
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,
2
unread,
Evidences of relativity etc. being absurd
On 5/23/2023 2:06 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> Relativity is absurd, for as the
6:45 PM
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
May 27, 2023, 3:05:53 PM5/27/23
to
Arindam, how many switches does your rail gun (if it exists) have? And why is it so difficult for Harvard's Dr.Hau to switch the light off in slow light experiment proving AP correct-- Light waves are closed loop circuits?
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 5:35:56 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
>
> What abysmally low standards they have sunk to now, in US unis, if this Sylvia entity is as real as you say, Archie.
>
> She came across as the most truly anti scientific creature, in the same class as the Mad Trio who do not claim to have top uni affiliations.
>
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 5:35:56 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 06:47:03 UTC+11, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> What abysmally low standards they have sunk to now, in US unis, if this Sylvia entity is as real as you say, Archie.
>
> She came across as the most truly anti scientific creature, in the same class as the Mad Trio who do not claim to have top uni affiliations.
>
Archimedes Plutonium
May 31, 2023, 10:56:36 PM5/31/23
to
Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??
Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
50
unread,
The law of conservation of energy
sobota, 27 maja 2023 o 23:38:22 UTC+2 Paul Alsing napisał(a): > On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 2:10:
5:16 PM
19
unread,
About the MMI bungle, leading to the horrendous disaster that is absurd physics
4:55 PM
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Enes Richard
Arindam Banerjee
, …
50
unread,
The law of conservation of energy
sobota, 27 maja 2023 o 23:38:22 UTC+2 Paul Alsing napisał(a): > On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 2:10:
5:16 PM
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Enes Richard
Arindam Banerjee
, …
19
unread,
About the MMI bungle, leading to the horrendous disaster that is absurd physics
4:55 PM
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Arindam Banerjee
Jun 1, 2023, 2:07:46 AM6/1/23
to
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 12:56:36 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??
We do not care for gibberish in the IITs, Archie.
> Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??
>
> Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
As only Sir Isaac Newton is greater than I in physics, that is not a failure, Archie.
> Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
Reducing all the Einsteinian pseudophysicists to the level of blithering baboons, and that too singlehandedly, is not such a great success as revising the Newtonian laws of motion, but interesting nevertheless.
>
>
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 13, 2023, 10:48:25 PM7/13/23
to
Kibo's kookfight
Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else, why cannot the lights be turned off in Slow Light experiment and report the result that all the light no matter if slow or normal disappears at the same time because light waves are closed loop circuits, proving AP correct.
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:48:26 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Kookfight!!!
Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, why is this stalker arsewipe allowed to even post in sci.math or sci.physics, instead, he should be flushed down the toilet some 30 years ago.
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 10:03:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>Re: Showing the flaws in Stewart,Fisher & Ziebur, Ellis & Gulick, Strang, Apostol of their fake proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in AP's new book // Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology (Amazon's Kindle)
53rd published book
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
Product details
ASIN : B07VMZ698G
Publication date : July 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1801 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books)
Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else, why cannot the lights be turned off in Slow Light experiment and report the result that all the light no matter if slow or normal disappears at the same time because light waves are closed loop circuits, proving AP correct.
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:48:26 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Kookfight!!!
Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, why is this stalker arsewipe allowed to even post in sci.math or sci.physics, instead, he should be flushed down the toilet some 30 years ago.
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 10:03:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>Re: Showing the flaws in Stewart,Fisher & Ziebur, Ellis & Gulick, Strang, Apostol of their fake proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in AP's new book // Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology (Amazon's Kindle)
> Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics
>"mentally ill"
53rd published book
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
ASIN : B07VMZ698G
Publication date : July 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1801 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 22 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books)
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 2, 2023, 12:39:25 AM8/2/23
to
NSF Dr. Panchanathan,Purdue's France Anne Cordova,Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, why does Kibo continue to defile the Pope, for he continues to defile and demonize AP everyday?
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Village Idiot of Meckling SD"
> Drag Queen of Science
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
NSF Dr. Panchanathan,Purdue's France Anne Cordova,Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, why does Kibo continue to defile the Pope, for he continues to defile and demonize AP everyday?
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--
Paid 30 yr. stalker Kibo Parry (Volney)
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 1:06:17 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics
>"Kim Jong Un's lackey"
>"psychoceramic"
>Drag Queen of Science especially Physics and Logic
Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him.
Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.
NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet-- Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.
Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 1:16:12 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
> >Re: "howling crazy fuckdog"
> >"Putin's minion"
> > defiles the Pope before tarding:
> > Eric Spina,Elizabeth Smith,Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton--
> > Dayton? Are you trying to guess universities one by one to find mine?
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 4:51:55 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "imp of physics"
> > defiles the pope and then tards:
> > Turd Soup Machine".
>
> But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 11:50:15 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Re: "mindless fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > Excellent numerology!
> >
> >
> > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > down completely:
> > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > > down completely:
> > > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > > > > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics
> > > > > >"necrophile"
> > > > > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > > > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kibo in CIA
> > >
> > > > Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney
> > > >
> > > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew
> > >
> > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking
> > > > > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rex L. Berney
> > > > > > Bob Brecha
> > > > > > Bruce Craver
> > > > > > John Erdei
> > > > > > Thomas P. Graham
> > > > > > Donald Hirst
> > > > > > Jenn Hyland
> > > > > > Jay Mathews
> > > > > > Robert Merithew
> > > > > > Brendon Mikula
> > > > > > George K. Miner
> > > > > > J. Michael O'Hare
> > > > > > Leno M Pedrotti
> > > > > > William N. Plick
> > > > > > Randall Schaurer
> > > > > > Elizabeth Smith
> > > > > > Ivan Sudakow
> > > > > > Perry Yaney
> > > > > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"
> > > > > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki
> > > > > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)
> > > > > ep@toddbsmith dot com
> > > > >
> > > > > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > > > Controversy
> > > > > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > > > > --- end quote ---
> > > > >
> > > > > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> > > > >
> > > > > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > > > > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> > > > > France Anne Cordova
> > > > > Subra Suresh
> > > > > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > > > > Rita R. Colwell
> > > > > Neal Francis Lane
> > > > > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > > > > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > > > > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > > > > > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > > > > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> > > > > > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.
Kibo, who never did a math proof in all his life, insanely attempts one here--
> > > > > > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some preliminaries:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > > > > > > > in the proof:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ^ x
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > -+- <= x=h
> > > > > > > > .' | `.
> > > > > > > > . | .
> > > > > > > > | | |
> > > > > > > > ' | '
> > > > > > > > `. | .'
> > > > > > > > y <----------+ <= x=0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cone (side view):
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > /|\
> > > > > > > > / | \
> > > > > > > > /b | \
> > > > > > > > /---+---' <= x = h
> > > > > > > > / |' \
> > > > > > > > / ' | \
> > > > > > > > / ' | \
> > > > > > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> > > > > > > > / a | \
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Proof:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > qed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:58:49 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > > On 9/29/2022 10:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > >"antiscience"
> > > > > > >is into necrophilia... Wow! Talk about learning
> > > > > > > something new everyday! ;^o
> > >
> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 675 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
>
> > >
> > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
> > > • Publication date : September 24, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 576 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 23 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-2, 45th published
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > >
> > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > >
> > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B07RG7BVZW
> > > Publication date : May 2, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 2024 KB
> > > Print length : 423 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > >
> > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > >
> > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > >
> > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > >
> > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > >
> > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B07WN9RVXD
> > > • Publication date : August 16, 2019
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1390 KB
> > > • Print length : 236 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > >
> > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > Length: 54 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > X-Ray: Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > >
> > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > Length: 105 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B0828M34VL
> > > • Publication date : December 2, 2019
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 952 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 105 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Length: 175 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 741 KB
> > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > >
> > > Length: 110 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B084V11BGY
> > > Publication date : February 15, 2020
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 826 KB
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > >
> > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > >
> > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > >
> > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > Length: 296 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B085DF8R7V
> > > Publication date : March 1, 2020
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 828 KB
> > > Print length : 296 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-9, 221st published book
> > >
> > > An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> > >
> > > Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.
> > >
> > > My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ
> > > • Publication date : December 16, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 551 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-10, 160th published book
> > >
> > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > >
> > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > >
> > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > >
> > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > >
> > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC
> > > • Publication date : December 2, 2021
> > > • Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC
> > > • Publication date : May 8, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1154 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Village Idiot of Meckling SD"
> Drag Queen of Science
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
NSF Dr. Panchanathan,Purdue's France Anne Cordova,Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, why does Kibo continue to defile the Pope, for he continues to defile and demonize AP everyday?
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--
Paid 30 yr. stalker Kibo Parry (Volney)
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 1:06:17 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics
>"Kim Jong Un's lackey"
>"psychoceramic"
>Drag Queen of Science especially Physics and Logic
Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him.
Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.
NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet-- Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.
Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 1:16:12 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
> >Re: "howling crazy fuckdog"
> >"Putin's minion"
> > defiles the Pope before tarding:
> > Eric Spina,Elizabeth Smith,Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton--
> > Dayton? Are you trying to guess universities one by one to find mine?
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 4:51:55 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "imp of physics"
> > defiles the pope and then tards:
> > Turd Soup Machine".
>
> But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 11:50:15 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Re: "mindless fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > Excellent numerology!
> >
> >
> > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > down completely:
> > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > > down completely:
> > > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > > > > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics
> > > > > >"necrophile"
> > > > > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > > > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kibo in CIA
> > > > > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > > > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > The time in late 2022 when AP was giving condolences to a special deceased person, yet here comes Kibo with his hate channel gang of stalkers forging necrophila onto AP posts. Forgery that cost a ISP job of one of the forgers and trimmed Kibo's spamm, but not enough. And that Kibo needs to be banned altogether from sci.math and sci.physics, and all his morphed names.
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > > > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney
> > > >
> > > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew
> > >
> > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking
> > > > On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:
> > > > >"Drag Queen of Science"
> > > > >"Drag Queen of Science"
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You already said that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You're really sick, Pluto!
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > Necrophile
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You already said that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Todd B. Smith
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rex L. Berney
> > > > > > Bob Brecha
> > > > > > Bruce Craver
> > > > > > John Erdei
> > > > > > Thomas P. Graham
> > > > > > Donald Hirst
> > > > > > Jenn Hyland
> > > > > > Jay Mathews
> > > > > > Robert Merithew
> > > > > > Brendon Mikula
> > > > > > George K. Miner
> > > > > > J. Michael O'Hare
> > > > > > Leno M Pedrotti
> > > > > > William N. Plick
> > > > > > Randall Schaurer
> > > > > > Elizabeth Smith
> > > > > > Ivan Sudakow
> > > > > > Perry Yaney
> > > > > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"
> > > > > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki
> > > > > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)
> > > > > ep@toddbsmith dot com
> > > > >
> > > > > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > > > Controversy
> > > > > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > > > > --- end quote ---
> > > > >
> > > > > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> > > > >
> > > > > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > > > > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> > > > > France Anne Cordova
> > > > > Subra Suresh
> > > > > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > > > > Rita R. Colwell
> > > > > Neal Francis Lane
> > > > > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > > > > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > > Necrophile
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You already said that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
Kibo so dumb and pathetic failure of math and science-- he thinks 938 is 12% short of 945.
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > > > > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > > > > > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > > > > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> > > > > > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.
Kibo, who never did a math proof in all his life, insanely attempts one here--
> > > > > > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some preliminaries:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > > > > > > > in the proof:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ^ x
> > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > -+- <= x=h
> > > > > > > > .' | `.
> > > > > > > > . | .
> > > > > > > > | | |
> > > > > > > > ' | '
> > > > > > > > `. | .'
> > > > > > > > y <----------+ <= x=0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cone (side view):
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > /|\
> > > > > > > > / | \
> > > > > > > > /b | \
> > > > > > > > /---+---' <= x = h
> > > > > > > > / |' \
> > > > > > > > / ' | \
> > > > > > > > / ' | \
> > > > > > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> > > > > > > > / a | \
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Proof:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > qed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:58:49 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > > On 9/29/2022 10:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > >"antiscience"
> > > > > > >> I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Once again, it looks like I triggered another autism meltdown by
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >is into necrophilia... Wow! Talk about learning
> > > > > > > something new everyday! ;^o
> > >
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, My 137th published book
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > >
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > >
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ◦ ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > ◦ Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > ◦ Language : English
> > > ◦ File size : 794 KB
>
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ◦ ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > ◦ Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > ◦ Language : English
> > > ◦ File size : 794 KB
> > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
> > > • Publication date : February 27, 2022
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 675 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 41 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date : March 12, 2022
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 74 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date : March 21, 2022
> > > • Print length : 74 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 66 pages
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
>
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-1, My 134th published book
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
> > > • Publication date : September 24, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 576 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 23 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-2, 45th published
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > >
> > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > >
> > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B07RG7BVZW
> > > Publication date : May 2, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 2024 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Print length : 423 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > >
> > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > >
> > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > >
> > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > >
> > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > >
> > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B07WN9RVXD
> > > • Publication date : August 16, 2019
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1390 KB
> > > • Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 236 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > >
> > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > Length: 54 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > X-Ray: Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > >
> > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > Length: 105 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B0828M34VL
> > > • Publication date : December 2, 2019
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 952 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 105 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Length: 175 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 741 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > >
> > > Length: 110 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B084V11BGY
> > > Publication date : February 15, 2020
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 826 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Enabled
> > > Print length : 110 pages
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Enabled
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > >
> > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > >
> > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > >
> > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > Length: 296 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B085DF8R7V
> > > Publication date : March 1, 2020
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 828 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Print length : 296 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-9, 221st published book
> > >
> > > An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> > >
> > > Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.
> > >
> > > My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ
> > > • Publication date : December 16, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 551 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
> > > • Print length : 65 pages
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-10, 160th published book
> > >
> > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > >
> > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > >
> > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > >
> > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > >
> > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC
> > > • Publication date : December 2, 2021
> > > • Product details
> > > • ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC
> > > • Publication date : May 8, 2022
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 1154 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
> > > • Print length : 71 pages
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 2, 2023, 5:31:13 PM8/2/23
to
Can Harvard run a electrolysis experiment on Water, for I believe water is really H4O and not H2O.
Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
Kibo Parry M-Volney the ranting lunatic of sci. newsgroups for 30 years nonstop
On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 8:12:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"antiscience"
> humiliates himself by writing:
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--
Can_University Dayton --Please- please-step into the Univ Dayton, Ohio physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O.
> > > > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> > > > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> > > >
> > > > 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > > In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
> > > >
> > > > In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
> > > >
> > > > A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
> > > >
> > > > The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
> > > >
> > > > Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
> > > >
> > > > Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
> > > >
> > > > You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
> > > >
> > > > The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
> > > >
> > > > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > >
> > > > --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > > > Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
> > > >
> > > > m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
> > > >
> > > > m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
> > > >
> > > > This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
> > > >
> > > > m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
> > > >
> > > > --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > > >
> > > > Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
> > > >
> > > > Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
> > > >
> > > > --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > > A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> > > > x/v atoms are discharged.
> > > >
> > > > So the mass m discharged is
> > > >
> > > > m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> > > > where
> > > > N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> > > > Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> > > > F is the Faraday constant.
> > > > --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > >
> > > > No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > > So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
> > > >
> > > > So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
> > > >
> > > > But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
> > > >
> > > > Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > Cosmic Rays from Sun
> > > >
> > > > 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
> > > >
> > > > When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
> > > >
> > > > I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > > Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
> > > >
> > > > Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
> > > >
> > > > So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
> > > >
> > > > How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
> > > >
> > > > I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
> > > >
> > > > So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
> > > >
> > > > There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
> > > >
> > > > But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
> > > >
> > > > So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
> > > >
> > > > A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
> > > >
> > > > Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
> > > >
> > > > So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
> > > >
> > > > If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > to
> > > > So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
> > > >
> > > > In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
> > > >
> > > > For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
> > > >
> > > > The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
> > > >
> > > > When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP, King of Science
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> > > >
> > > > Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
> > > >
> > > > To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
> > > >
> > > > The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
> > > >
> > > > No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
> > > >
> > > > AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
> > > >
> > > > Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
> > > >
> > > > AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
> > > >
> > > > Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
> > > >
> > > > AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
> > > >
> > > > Chemistry Europe--
> > > > "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
> > > >
> > > > P Vermeeren, 2023
> > > > "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> > > > "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
> > > >
> > > > AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
> > > >
> > > > AP
>
>
> My 250th published book.
>
> TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
>
> Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
>
> Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
> • Publication date : July 21, 2023
> • Language : English
> • File size : 784 KB
Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
Kibo Parry M-Volney the ranting lunatic of sci. newsgroups for 30 years nonstop
On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 8:12:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"antiscience"
> humiliates himself by writing:
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--
> > > > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> > > > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> > > >
> > > > 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > > In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
> > > >
> > > > In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
> > > >
> > > > A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
> > > >
> > > > The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
> > > >
> > > > Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
> > > >
> > > > Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
> > > >
> > > > You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
> > > >
> > > > The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
> > > >
> > > > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > >
> > > > --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > > > Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
> > > >
> > > > m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
> > > >
> > > > m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
> > > >
> > > > This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
> > > >
> > > > m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
> > > >
> > > > --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > > >
> > > > Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
> > > >
> > > > Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
> > > >
> > > > --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > > A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> > > > x/v atoms are discharged.
> > > >
> > > > So the mass m discharged is
> > > >
> > > > m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> > > > where
> > > > N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> > > > Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> > > > F is the Faraday constant.
> > > > --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > >
> > > > No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > > So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
> > > >
> > > > So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
> > > >
> > > > But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
> > > >
> > > > Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > Cosmic Rays from Sun
> > > >
> > > > 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
> > > >
> > > > When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
> > > >
> > > > I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > > Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
> > > >
> > > > Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
> > > >
> > > > So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
> > > >
> > > > How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > > > 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > > > Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
> > > >
> > > > I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
> > > >
> > > > So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
> > > >
> > > > There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
> > > >
> > > > But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
> > > >
> > > > So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
> > > >
> > > > A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
> > > >
> > > > Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
> > > >
> > > > So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
> > > >
> > > > If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > to
> > > > So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
> > > >
> > > > In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
> > > >
> > > > For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
> > > >
> > > > The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
> > > >
> > > > When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
> > > >
> > > > AP, King of Science
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> > > >
> > > > Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
> > > >
> > > > To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
> > > >
> > > > The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
> > > >
> > > > No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
> > > >
> > > > AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
> > > >
> > > > Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
> > > >
> > > > AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
> > > >
> > > > AP
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > to
> > > > So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
> > > >
> > > > Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
> > > >
> > > > AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
> > > >
> > > > Chemistry Europe--
> > > > "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
> > > >
> > > > P Vermeeren, 2023
> > > > "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> > > > "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
> > > >
> > > > AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
> > > >
> > > > AP
>
>
> My 250th published book.
>
> TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
>
> Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
>
> Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
> • Publication date : July 21, 2023
> • Language : English
> • File size : 784 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
> • Print length : 160 pages
Arindam Banerjee
Aug 5, 2023, 9:04:16 PM8/5/23
to
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 16:07:46 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 12:56:36 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??
> We do not care for gibberish in the IITs, Archie.
Actually once we did, when I had to do the Quantum Mechanics course as a mandatory course.
> On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 12:56:36 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??
> We do not care for gibberish in the IITs, Archie.
These days, I am told, it is optional.
Progress, what.
> >
> > Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
> As only Sir Isaac Newton is greater than I in physics, that is not a failure, Archie.
> Reducing all the Einsteinian pseudophysicists to the level of blithering baboons, and that too singlehandedly, is not such a great success as revising the Newtonian laws of motion, but interesting nevertheless.
> >
> >
> > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > Arindam Banerjee
> Only Sir Isaac Newton was handsomer.
He had the same problems as I have, with the toxic academics.
> > Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???
> As only Sir Isaac Newton is greater than I in physics, that is not a failure, Archie.
> Reducing all the Einsteinian pseudophysicists to the level of blithering baboons, and that too singlehandedly, is not such a great success as revising the Newtonian laws of motion, but interesting nevertheless.
> >
> >
> > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > Arindam Banerjee
> Only Sir Isaac Newton was handsomer.
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 6, 2023, 9:02:17 PM8/6/23
to
Can_Dr.Martin Karplus,Dr.Arieh Warshel,Dr.Roger Kornberg,Dr.Walter Gilbert,Dr.Elias J. Corey,Dr.Dudley R. Herschbach,Dr.William N. Lipscomb,Dr.Robert Burns Woodward,Dr.T.W. Richards - -PLEASE--step into Harvard Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
>
Can Harvard run a electrolysis experiment on Water, for I believe water is really H4O and not H2O.
>
> Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
>
> If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
>
> Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
On Sunday, August 6, 2023 at 1:09:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Can Harvard run a electrolysis experiment on Water, for I believe water is really H4O and not H2O.
>
> Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
>
> If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
>
> Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
> "Pope of Failure"
>... Village Idiot"
Re:Kibo >I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher,Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse
> > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
> > • Print length : 168 pages
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 7, 2023, 12:57:09 PM8/7/23
to
Can_Dr.Walter Gilbert,Dr.Martin Karplus,Dr.Arieh Warshel,Dr.Roger Kornberg,Dr.Elias J. Corey,Dr.Dudley R. Herschbach,Dr.William N. Lipscomb,Dr.Robert Burns Woodward,Dr.T.W. Richards - -PLEASE--step into Harvard Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 27, 2023, 11:10:32 AM8/27/23
to
2-Can_Dr.Walter Gilbert,Dr.Martin Karplus,Dr.Arieh Warshel,Dr.Roger Kornberg,Dr.Elias J. Corey,Dr.Dudley R. Herschbach,Dr.William N. Lipscomb,Dr.Robert Burns Woodward,Dr.T.W. Richards - -PLEASE--step into Harvard Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. My weighing scale is puny and insufficient for the job at hand, 0.00001 gram or less of hydrogen and oxygen test tubes. If AP is correct the hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen, if mainstream chemistry, physics is correct the hydrogen is 1/8 in amu to oxygen.
Volney's profile photo
Volney (Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney writes:)
,
3
Re: .."Pope of the Cult of Failure"
Screwfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics .."Kim Jong Un's lackey" ..
by Volney
Aug 26, 2023, 12:23:45 AM
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:26:15 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Once again, it looks like I triggered another one of
> meltdowns!
>
> Autistic necrophile
>Cult of Failure?
> > >
> >
> > Can Harvard run a electrolysis experiment on Water, for I believe water is really H4O and not H2O.
> > >
> > > Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
> > >
> > > If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
> > >
> > > Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
> >
> > Can Harvard run a electrolysis experiment on Water, for I believe water is really H4O and not H2O.
> > >
> > > Harvard did have a Nobel Chemistry winners in Martin Karplus, Arieh Warshel, Roger Kornberg, Walter Gilbert, Elias J. Corey, Dudley R. Herschbach, William N. Lipscomb, Robert Burns Woodward, T.W. Richards.
> > >
> > > If AP is correct the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/4 of the oxygen in atomic mass units. If mainstream chemistry and physics is correct, the hydrogen test tube weighs 1/8 of the oxygen test tube in a.m.u.
> > >
> > > Would the physicists and chemists of Harvard be interested in conducting the experiment. My home grown lab cannot weigh to 0.00001 gram or less.
Volney's profile photo
Volney (Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney writes:)
,
3
Re: .."Pope of the Cult of Failure"
Screwfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics .."Kim Jong Un's lackey" ..
by Volney
Aug 26, 2023, 12:23:45 AM
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:26:15 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Once again, it looks like I triggered another one of
> meltdowns!
>
> Autistic necrophile
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> Not again!
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
>
> wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> Is corpse fucking some sort of initiation rite when joining the Evil
>
> wanting to fuck her corpse
>
>Cult of Failure?
Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 3, 2023, 3:04:25 AM9/3/23
to
Volney on.. CalTech_Dr.Barry Barish,Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem),Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, shithead oaf of math,Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 12:31:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"illogical"
>"shithead oaf of math> fails at math and science:
Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. And to think, Caltech discovered the muon, but cannot even finish water electrolysis.
Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:38:41 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"
>"howling crazy fuckdog> fails at math and science:
Volney is the NSF staff and CalTech physics department a leftover relic of too many Dunning-Kruger on staff before Roberts Supreme Court overturned it. And now Dunning-Kruger physicists and Dunning-Kruger Dr. Panchanathan are in jeopardy of their Dunning-Kruger view of science???
Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
3-Volney on NSF Dr.Panchanathan on Purdue Dr. France Cordova "Drag Queen of Science" "irrelevant" Why Volney?? Is it because Dr.Panchanathan is a math failure with his slant cut of cone a ellipse, when in reality it is a oval
Kibo on..NSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser,Dunning-Kruger Arden Lee Bement Jr. Fuckhole Dr.Panchanathan of science
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 8:18:48 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
>"irrelevant"
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 5:58:25 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "the FUCKHOLE of math"
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 12:08:44 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> is *always* wrong.
Kibo, Volney, does Dr. Panchanathan remind you of Dr. Silberman in the Terminator movies--rock hard insanity
Re: kibo-Parry-Moroney, the FUCKHOLE of sci.math, sci.physics
By Richard Tobin Jul 4, 2019, 9:45:05 AM
Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo
Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM
by Herp Derpington
Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
3 views
Subscribe
Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM (yesterday)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.
The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.
Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.
I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.
The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.
Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.
Thanks for the news!!!!!
AP
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
Aug 31, 2023, 11:11:46 AM (yesterday)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.
The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase.
Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.
So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.
So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.
SECOND EXPERIMENT:
Much harder than Water Electrolysis.
We need to get two identical containers.
We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.
So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.
We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.
We now weigh both of them.
If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.
If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.
But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.
Aug 31, 2023, 5:25:19 PM (21 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.
Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.
Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.
Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.
If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.
Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
5:05 AM (9 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance.
If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.
If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.
So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.
These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.
2:33 PM (now)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 5:07:13 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
>
> Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
>
> H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
>
> Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
>
> So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
>
> EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
>
> So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
>
Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.
AP, King of Science
_Volney's physics morons MIT_Dr.Frank Wilczek,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr.Carolyn Bertozzi(chem), K. Barry Sharpless(chem), NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke,
My 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 12:31:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"illogical"
>"shithead oaf of math> fails at math and science:
Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. And to think, Caltech discovered the muon, but cannot even finish water electrolysis.
Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:38:41 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"
>"howling crazy fuckdog> fails at math and science:
Volney is the NSF staff and CalTech physics department a leftover relic of too many Dunning-Kruger on staff before Roberts Supreme Court overturned it. And now Dunning-Kruger physicists and Dunning-Kruger Dr. Panchanathan are in jeopardy of their Dunning-Kruger view of science???
Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
3-Volney on NSF Dr.Panchanathan on Purdue Dr. France Cordova "Drag Queen of Science" "irrelevant" Why Volney?? Is it because Dr.Panchanathan is a math failure with his slant cut of cone a ellipse, when in reality it is a oval
Kibo on..NSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser,Dunning-Kruger Arden Lee Bement Jr. Fuckhole Dr.Panchanathan of science
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 8:18:48 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 5:58:25 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "the FUCKHOLE of math"
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 12:08:44 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> is *always* wrong.
Kibo, Volney, does Dr. Panchanathan remind you of Dr. Silberman in the Terminator movies--rock hard insanity
Re: kibo-Parry-Moroney, the FUCKHOLE of sci.math, sci.physics
By Richard Tobin Jul 4, 2019, 9:45:05 AM
Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo
Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM
by Herp Derpington
Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
3 views
Subscribe
Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM (yesterday)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.
The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.
Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.
I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.
The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.
Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.
Thanks for the news!!!!!
AP
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
Aug 31, 2023, 11:11:46 AM (yesterday)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.
The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase.
Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.
So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.
So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.
SECOND EXPERIMENT:
Much harder than Water Electrolysis.
We need to get two identical containers.
We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.
So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.
We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.
We now weigh both of them.
If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.
If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.
But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.
Aug 31, 2023, 5:25:19 PM (21 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.
Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.
Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.
Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.
If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.
Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
5:05 AM (9 hours ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance.
If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.
If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.
So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.
These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.
2:33 PM (now)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 5:07:13 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
>
> Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
>
> H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
>
> Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
>
> So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
>
> EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
>
> So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
>
Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.
AP, King of Science
_Volney's physics morons MIT_Dr.Frank Wilczek,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr.Carolyn Bertozzi(chem), K. Barry Sharpless(chem), NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke,
My 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog
0 new messages