TIME HAS INERTIA, ALTERING THE ORBIT OF VENUS AND THE TILT OF EARTH
Alexander Abian
I received many anonymous telephone calls in strong and fervid support
of my proposals: (i) TIME HAS INERTIA and the rejection of the Principles of
Conservation of Energy and Constancy of the Speed of Light, (ii) PUTTING
VENUS IN AN ORBIT SIMILAR TO THE ORBIT OF THE EARTH, (iii) ALTERING THE
TILT OF THE EARTH to avert meteorological disasters and pernicious epidemics.
The callers feel that the current explanations of the nature of TIME
(various variations on the Space-Time Riemannian Manifold-themes) are total-
ly unconvincing and unsound. They feel that my proposals are sound, con-
vincing, cogent and realistic.
The anonymity of the callers is understandable. Association with
radically bold and dauntless ideas is very often treated as an act of
recusancy (recall that Copernicus, Galileo and many others were silenced
and subject to a great deal of hardship for their bold and intrepid ideas).
I do not expect from anyone any heroic action on my behalf, however,
I would like to encourage those who find my proposals to their liking
to express their feelings and rely on the openmindedness of the others.
Alexander ABIAN
SCOTT I CHASE
> I received many anonymous telephone calls in strong and fervid support
> The callers feel that the current explanations of the nature of TIME
>(various variations on the Space-Time Riemannian Manifold-themes) are total-
>ly unconvincing and unsound. They feel that my proposals are sound, con-
>vincing, cogent and realistic.
> The anonymity of the callers is understandable. Association with
>radically bold and dauntless ideas is very often treated as an act of
>recusancy (recall that Copernicus, Galileo and many others were silenced
>and subject to a great deal of hardship for their bold and intrepid ideas).
Beware of the physics mafia. They are out to control society through the
control of the physical world. Already, they have prevented generations of
otherwise ambitious and adventurous souls from travelling faster than the
speed of light. Who knows where it will stop? By keeping the secrets
of the Inertia of Time, Biological Transmutations, Neutrino Souls, patented
Antigravity machines, the great Larson (peace be with him!), and the
fatal and obvious flaws that would destroy quantum mechanics and special
relativity, all to themselves, they are seeking to ruin humanity and
take total control of our lives.
I even know who they are. But if I told you, I would have to kill you.
-Scott
--------------------
Scott I. Chase "The question seems to be of such a character
SIC...@CSA2.LBL.GOV that if I should come to life after my death
and some mathematician were to tell me that it
had been definitely settled, I think I would
immediately drop dead again." - Vandiver
Bruno W. Repetto
.. by Alexander Abian@iastate.
> From: ab...@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
> Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA, ALTERING THE ORBIT OF VENUS AND THE TILT OF EARTH
> Date: 6 Oct 92 17:36:10 GMT
>
> I received many anonymous telephone calls in strong and fervid support
> of my proposals: (i) TIME HAS INERTIA and the rejection of the Principles of
> Conservation of Energy and Constancy of the Speed of Light, (ii) PUTTING
> VENUS IN AN ORBIT SIMILAR TO THE ORBIT OF THE EARTH, (iii) ALTERING THE
> TILT OF THE EARTH to avert meteorological disasters and pernicious epidemics.
Some of these ideas have a strong stench of the influence of Velikovski's.
> The callers feel that the current explanations of the nature of TIME
> (various variations on the Space-Time Riemannian Manifold-themes) are total-
> ly unconvincing and unsound. They feel that my proposals are sound, con-
> vincing, cogent and realistic.
>
> The anonymity of the callers is understandable. Association with
> radically bold and dauntless ideas is very often treated as an act of
> recusancy (recall that Copernicus, Galileo and many others were silenced
> and subject to a great deal of hardship for their bold and intrepid ideas).
Big brother *IS NOT* watching you (or your friends...)
> I do not expect from anyone any heroic action on my behalf, however,
> I would like to encourage those who find my proposals to their liking
> to express their feelings and rely on the openmindedness of the others.
>
> Alexander ABIAN
Imagine that... Public-opinion polls to do science. Let me then go one step
further and propose media-directed science! (NOT!!!) :-)
I absolutely don't care how many people THINK whether you're right or wrong
(named or anonymous), or how the public FEELS about your "radically bold"
ideas. If you can back up your ideas, then and only then do you have sound,
CONVINCING, cogent and realistic proposals. That is why there are
specialized-field refereed periodicals. If you can convince the referees,
your proposals have a future; otherwise, your ideas fall in the category of
perpetual motion engines. Live with it.
Bruno. br...@andrew.cmu.edu
sometimes a Wombat
>
> I received many anonymous telephone calls in strong and fervid support
>of my proposals: (i) TIME HAS INERTIA and the rejection of the Principles of
>Conservation of Energy and Constancy of the Speed of Light, (ii) PUTTING
>VENUS IN AN ORBIT SIMILAR TO THE ORBIT OF THE EARTH, (iii) ALTERING THE
>TILT OF THE EARTH to avert meteorological disasters and pernicious epidemics.
I must have missed the cosmic engineering posts. What did THEY claim?
How did they propose to DO this? How would an NEW TILT affect
epidemics? Does SCI.MED knwo about this?
> The anonymity of the callers is understandable. Association with
>radically bold and dauntless ideas is very often treated as an act of
>recusancy (recall that Copernicus, Galileo and many others were silenced
>and subject to a great deal of hardship for their bold and intrepid ideas).
So, for that matter, did hundreds of cranks.
How can an idea be daunted?
Larry "I wear this tin-foil hat to protect myself from N-rays" Hammer
--
L...@physics.arizona.edu \ Hidden harmony is better than
GEnie: L.HAMMER2 \ manifest. -- Heraclitus, #47