Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
James McGinn: I'm not different because I think outside the box
74 views
Skip to first unread message
James McGinn
Mar 12, 2016, 10:51:17 PM3/12/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 5:12:59 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
Sergio:
BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
James McGinn:
I don't think I'm different because I think
outside of the box.
You believe moist air contains cold steam, making
it 1% lighter than dry air. And, as it convects
up it condenses, releasing latent heat. And even
though this latent heat has never actually been
detected, this is what you believe powers all
storms and all atmospheric flow, including the jet
streams.
Do you actually believe this? I'm going to give
you the benefit of the doubt and just asssume that,
like most everybody else, you never actually gave
it any thought.
I'm not different because I think outside the box.
I'm different because I think.
Sergio:
BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
James McGinn:
I don't think I'm different because I think
outside of the box.
You believe moist air contains cold steam, making
it 1% lighter than dry air. And, as it convects
up it condenses, releasing latent heat. And even
though this latent heat has never actually been
detected, this is what you believe powers all
storms and all atmospheric flow, including the jet
streams.
Do you actually believe this? I'm going to give
you the benefit of the doubt and just asssume that,
like most everybody else, you never actually gave
it any thought.
I'm not different because I think outside the box.
I'm different because I think.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 12, 2016, 11:59:11 PM3/12/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:f05de7f9-9b54-412a...@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 5:12:59 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
> Sergio:
> BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
> hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
>
> James McGinn:
> I don't think I'm different because I think
> outside of the box.
>
> You believe moist air contains cold steam, making
> it 1% lighter than dry air. And, as it convects
> up it condenses, releasing latent heat. And even
> though this latent heat has never actually been
> detected, this is what you believe powers all
> storms and all atmospheric flow, including the jet
> streams.
Awww, look at the kook deny reality. Again. LOL
James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
formation?
<http://atmospheres.gsfc.nasa.gov/meso/index.php?section=21>
============================================================
The circulation of the atmosphere is affected by the horizontal,
vertical, and temporal distribution of atmospheric constituents such
as water vapor, aerosols, clouds, precipitation, and latent heat
released by cloud formation. Improving our ability to predict weather
and climate depends upon accurate representation of these constituents
in the vertical dimension.
Laboratory researchers are developing computer algorithms for
diagnosing precipitation rates, vertical structure, and latent heating
from a combination of the DPR and GMI data; see Grecu et al. (2004,
2009, 2011).
============================================================
Now, Jim... stop running away from those tough questions that expose
your kooky conspiracy theory as the mad ranting of a delusional
Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktard...
How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?
How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?
Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm, extremely
strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons
with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the
troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?
How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?
Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.
Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.
I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.
<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;
That superposition is the same as wave interference;
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;
That RMS isn't a DC voltage;
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;
What a positive or negative vector is;
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:f05de7f9-9b54-412a...@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 5:12:59 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
> Sergio:
> BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
> hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
>
> James McGinn:
> I don't think I'm different because I think
> outside of the box.
>
> You believe moist air contains cold steam, making
> it 1% lighter than dry air. And, as it convects
> up it condenses, releasing latent heat. And even
> though this latent heat has never actually been
> detected, this is what you believe powers all
> storms and all atmospheric flow, including the jet
> streams.
James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
formation?
<http://atmospheres.gsfc.nasa.gov/meso/index.php?section=21>
============================================================
The circulation of the atmosphere is affected by the horizontal,
vertical, and temporal distribution of atmospheric constituents such
as water vapor, aerosols, clouds, precipitation, and latent heat
released by cloud formation. Improving our ability to predict weather
and climate depends upon accurate representation of these constituents
in the vertical dimension.
Laboratory researchers are developing computer algorithms for
diagnosing precipitation rates, vertical structure, and latent heating
from a combination of the DPR and GMI data; see Grecu et al. (2004,
2009, 2011).
============================================================
Now, Jim... stop running away from those tough questions that expose
your kooky conspiracy theory as the mad ranting of a delusional
Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktard...
How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?
How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?
Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm, extremely
strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons
with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the
troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?
How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?
Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.
Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.
I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.
<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;
That superposition is the same as wave interference;
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;
That RMS isn't a DC voltage;
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;
What a positive or negative vector is;
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
Sergio
Mar 13, 2016, 12:51:51 AM3/13/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On 3/12/2016 9:51 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 5:12:59 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>
> Sergio:
> BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
> hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
>
> James McGinn:
> I don't think I'm different because I think
> outside of the box.
re-read that sentence.
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 5:12:59 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>
> Sergio:
> BS, you don't know scientific method, and you
> hate the truth, you "think outside the box"
>
> James McGinn:
> I don't think I'm different because I think
> outside of the box.
You are thinking outside the box, and you are thinking differently. This
is called the Citizen Toxie effect, he was always outside the box and
thinking differently, became a hero and they made a movie after him.
>
> You believe moist air contains cold steam, making
> it 1% lighter than dry air.
where did you get 1% lighter ?
did you pullith suchith number outta yer plasma ?
> And, as it convects
> up it condenses, releasing latent heat.
got any evidence? or are you just making stuff up ?
> And even
> though this latent heat has never actually been
> detected,
you have latent Brain.
> this is what you believe powers all
> storms and all atmospheric flow, including the jet
> streams.
you are projecting again, so I fix...
> Do I actually believe this? Your going to give
> me the benefit of the doubt and just asssume that,
> like most everybody else, I never actually gave
> it any thought.
>
>I'm not different because I think outside the box.
you redefine standard words into some airy-fairy fluff+puff stuff, you
>
>I'm not different because I think outside the box.
way outta the box, off this planet for sure.
>I'm different because I think.
know, but dont into a mush of disconnected imagination whorlies with
cogs missing, airy-fairy non-funny and poop it into newsgroups, videos,
and books.
Have you had any good reviews on anything ?
Sam Wormley
Mar 14, 2016, 3:12:57 PM3/14/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Unfortunately, you don't even understand what's in the box. :-o
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
James McGinn
Mar 15, 2016, 2:58:39 PM3/15/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:59:11 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> formation?
Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?" Or should we just take your word on that -- and NASAs?
> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> formation?
Maybe you can get Gavin Schmidt to explain it: www.realclimate.org
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 16, 2016, 12:15:35 AM3/16/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:59d41d8d-c502-490e...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:59:11 PM UTC-8,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
>> formation?
> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
>> formation?
> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
absorbed and released by atoms. I'd suggest you go back to school, but
your Dunning-Kruger affliction and associated psychological
aberrations preclude your ever receiving knowledge from anyone you
deem to be smarter or saner than yourself. Hence, just as are most
Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards, you're stuck in a downward spiral
toward clinical psychosis.
> Or should we just take your word on that -- and NASAs?
profiling, James. Perhaps you could start by looking at photons, given
that is the key.
Then, when you realize exactly how insane, retarded and uneducated you
truly are, do take a hammer and smash it repeatedly against your skull
in frustration over having spent the last quarter century proving how
insane, retarded and uneducated you are.
<snicker>
Or, we could look at the multiple agencies I've already listed, which
all have satellites monitoring the clouds... are all those agencies
around the entire world in on your kooky manufactured conspiracy
theory, James?
Or would the more likely explanation be that you suffer from a rapidly
encroaching paranoid schizophrenia induced by your Dunning-Kruger
affliction preventing you from self-correcting your aberrational
thought processes?
Now, on to those questions you've been dodging, James...
============================================================
Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?
Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your k'laming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further k'laming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?
How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?
Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?
How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct so your claims have even a semblance of
plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation
energy of water are identical, and thus the water will dissociate into
hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim?
Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
James McGinn
Mar 16, 2016, 12:50:27 AM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 9:15:35 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> >> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> >> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> >> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> >> formation?
>
> > Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
> absorbed and released by atoms.
I'll take that as a "no."
> >> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> >> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> >> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> >> formation?
>
> > Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
> absorbed and released by atoms.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 16, 2016, 3:55:06 AM3/16/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:ea9a4876-fc5f-4b1c...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
photons, as that is the key... or did you not realize that latent heat
of condensation in water has a specific band of photon wavelengths
emitted?
Which not only proves that latent heat of condensation exists (and
thus latent heat of evaporation *must* exist), it also proves gaseous
phase monomer water is being evaporated, and it proves you're an
insane moron who is so uneducated you can't even fathom how the world
works.
Hence your kooky theory, which has been proven wrong via more than a
half-dozen different avenues.
It's sad that you've been driven so insane that you're now denying the
Laws of Thermodynamics, James. It's sad that you've been driven so
insane that rather than admit you're wrong, you're going to sue
*science*. But it sure is entertaining watching you spiral down into
psychosis.
<snicker>
Now, before you run away again, James, how about you take a crack at
substantively answering those tough questions by providing
corroborable proof of your kooky claims... referring back to your own
retarded blathering just shows how badly afflicted you are with
Dunning-Kruger, exacerbated by your lack of education...
============================================================
Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?
the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and
know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather
than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is
your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?
Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK
pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended
up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from
being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with
recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her
dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject
from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck
goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative
Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost
his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up
with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got
growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had
plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety,
given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be
light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling
abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half
his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling.
"Big things are made out of little things."
HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe.
Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a...@dizum.com>
"all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e.
everywhere at the same time)"
Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear
transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most
universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very
means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big
bang, and most importantly, reality.
Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30d...@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing...
he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements:
1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the
negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other."
2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your
consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness."
MID: <269e51973939871b...@dizum.com>
"Who said it's your eyes that see?"
HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity.
"The Turing test is overrated anyway."
HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test.
"The now you experience now simply moves to this now."
HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past.
Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a73...@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself:
"A fairyboy with an inadequate penis."
Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074e...@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot
he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold
contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when
challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and
contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task
for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling
insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right
alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the
appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to
tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming,
fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his
otherwise-dumbstruck mouth.
<snicker>
Sergio
Mar 16, 2016, 11:39:14 AM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
you do not have the capacity, nor the training to be able to understand it.
If you did, you could find out all the information yourself, do you own
experiments and verify the heat capacity of latent heat, and convince
yourself.
but you don't, and you won't, and you can't.
Keep thinking outside the box, that is where you are, and you have yet
to show any data, experiments, math, urls that make any of your
imaginatory ideas even close to reality.
James McGinn
Mar 16, 2016, 12:35:03 PM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 12:55:06 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:ea9a4876-fc5f-4b1c...@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 9:15:35 PM UTC-7,
> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
> >>>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> >>>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> >>>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> >>>> formation?
>
> >>> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> >> It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
> >> absorbed and released by atoms.
>
> > I'll take that as a "no."
>
> No, James, you have no fucking clue...
Apparently you don't either.
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:ea9a4876-fc5f-4b1c...@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
> > On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 9:15:35 PM UTC-7,
> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
> >>>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> >>>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> >>>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> >>>> formation?
>
> >>> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> >> It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
> >> absorbed and released by atoms.
>
> > I'll take that as a "no."
>
> No, James, you have no fucking clue...
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 16, 2016, 1:37:45 PM3/16/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:3b17d333-4f18-4eb0...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>> No, James, you have no fucking clue... I'd told you to study on
>> photons, as that is the key... or did you not realize that latent heat
>> of condensation in water has a specific band of photon wavelengths
>> emitted?
>>
>> Which not only proves that latent heat of condensation exists (and
>> thus latent heat of evaporation *must* exist), it also proves gaseous
>> phase monomer water is being evaporated, and it proves you're an
>> insane moron who is so uneducated you can't even fathom how the world
>> works.
>>
>> Hence your kooky theory, which has been proven wrong via more than a
>> half-dozen different avenues.
>>
>> It's sad that you've been driven so insane that you're now denying the
>> Laws of Thermodynamics, James. It's sad that you've been driven so
>> insane that rather than admit you're wrong, you're going to sue
>> *science*. But it sure is entertaining watching you spiral down into
>> psychosis.
>>
>> <snicker>
>> photons, as that is the key... or did you not realize that latent heat
>> of condensation in water has a specific band of photon wavelengths
>> emitted?
>>
>> Which not only proves that latent heat of condensation exists (and
>> thus latent heat of evaporation *must* exist), it also proves gaseous
>> phase monomer water is being evaporated, and it proves you're an
>> insane moron who is so uneducated you can't even fathom how the world
>> works.
>>
>> Hence your kooky theory, which has been proven wrong via more than a
>> half-dozen different avenues.
>>
>> It's sad that you've been driven so insane that you're now denying the
>> Laws of Thermodynamics, James. It's sad that you've been driven so
>> insane that rather than admit you're wrong, you're going to sue
>> *science*. But it sure is entertaining watching you spiral down into
>> psychosis.
>>
>> <snicker>
> Apparently you don't either.
Not true, James. Whereas you've relied upon fairy tale hypotheticals
and suppositions pulled straight from your ass to concoct your wholly
impossible "theory", I'm drawing my knowledge from more than 250 years
of careful and rigorous scientific research, from thousands upon
thousands of peer-reviewed papers, from actual scientists and
physicists, thousands upon thousands of them, each and every one of
them far smarter and saner than you, James.
Whereas I have provided links to corroboration of what I wrote, and
explained in detail the underlying mechanisms of what I wrote, you
have provided no details, explained nothing, hand-waved away the fact
that your kooky "theory" has giant gaping inconsistencies, and run
away from performing an experiment which would either prove you 100%
right, thereby overturning nearly all of established science and
physics... or prove you 100% wrong.
And anyone with even a high school education knows you'll prove
yourself 100% wrong, Jim. That you don't know that, but that you know
the entire rest of the world *does* know that, is the fear that grips
you, James, the fear which prevents you from performing that
experiment and thereby disproving the outrageous claims you've made,
which fly in the face of 250+ years of established science.
Instead, you've waffled, hemmed, hawed, backpedaled, hand-waved,
denied large swaths of reality, dismissed proof that you're a
delusional kooktard and are working furiously on a kooksoot.
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is going to sue *science*.
All of it. He's *that* fucking delusional. LOL
Now, before you run away again, James, do try to at least take a peek
at those questions which highlight the logical inconsistencies in your
kooky claims... it is painful for you, I'm sure, but do try...
============================================================
Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it
spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens
from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the
way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James.
Poutnik
Mar 16, 2016, 2:15:12 PM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Dne neděle 13. března 2016 4:51:17 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a):
>
> James McGinn:
> I'm not different because I think outside the box.
> I'm different because I think.
You are different because
you think out of the box of evidences as set of initial and feedback points,
and your hypothesis are air castles without basements.
And you do not care about it.
If anybody points it out, you switch to calling names,
instead of verifying foundations of your hypothesis.
You, not the others, should be the worst enemy of your hypotheses.
>
> James McGinn:
> I'm not different because I think outside the box.
> I'm different because I think.
you think out of the box of evidences as set of initial and feedback points,
and your hypothesis are air castles without basements.
And you do not care about it.
If anybody points it out, you switch to calling names,
instead of verifying foundations of your hypothesis.
You, not the others, should be the worst enemy of your hypotheses.
James McGinn
Mar 16, 2016, 2:36:50 PM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
formation?
Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
absorbed and released by atoms.
I'll take that as a "no."
No, James, you have no fucking clue...
James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
formation?
Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
absorbed and released by atoms.
I'll take that as a "no."
No, James, you have no fucking clue...
Apparently you don't either.
Not true, James.
Is it a secret?
Not true, James.
noTthaTguY
Mar 16, 2016, 9:04:09 PM3/16/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
the elementary box is a tetrahedron;
find an inequality on the edges of a tetrahedron e.g
find an inequality on the edges of a tetrahedron e.g
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 16, 2016, 11:45:53 PM3/16/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:6aa853db-6314-470f...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> formation?
>
> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is *so* retarded he not only
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> formation?
>
> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
doesn't know that when water condenses it gives off a specific band of
wavelength photons, but he apparently cannot Google for it... that's
likely a combination of his being retarded and so afflicted with
Dunning-Kruger that he doesn't dare use Google to search for any
information for fear he'll find proof of his delusional state, thereby
inducing his head to implode.. Lord knows, that black hole Jim calls a
brain is already stressing his cranium to its structural limits.
<snicker>
>>>>>> It is quite apparent, James, that you have no clue how energy is
>>>>>> absorbed and released by atoms.
>>>>> I'll take that as a "no."
>>>> No, James, you have no fucking clue... I'd told you to study on
>>>> photons, as that is the key... or did you not realize that latent heat
>>>> of condensation in water has a specific band of photon wavelengths
>>>> emitted?
>>>>
>>>> Which not only proves that latent heat of condensation exists (and
>>>> thus latent heat of evaporation *must* exist), it also proves gaseous
>>>> phase monomer water is being evaporated, and it proves you're an
>>>> insane moron who is so uneducated you can't even fathom how the world
>>>> works.
>>>>
>>>> Hence your kooky theory, which has been proven wrong via more than a
>>>> half-dozen different avenues.
>>>>
>>>> It's sad that you've been driven so insane that you're now denying the
>>>> Laws of Thermodynamics, James. It's sad that you've been driven so
>>>> insane that rather than admit you're wrong, you're going to sue
>>>> *science*. But it sure is entertaining watching you spiral down into
>>>> psychosis.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>> photons, as that is the key... or did you not realize that latent heat
>>>> of condensation in water has a specific band of photon wavelengths
>>>> emitted?
>>>>
>>>> Which not only proves that latent heat of condensation exists (and
>>>> thus latent heat of evaporation *must* exist), it also proves gaseous
>>>> phase monomer water is being evaporated, and it proves you're an
>>>> insane moron who is so uneducated you can't even fathom how the world
>>>> works.
>>>>
>>>> Hence your kooky theory, which has been proven wrong via more than a
>>>> half-dozen different avenues.
>>>>
>>>> It's sad that you've been driven so insane that you're now denying the
>>>> Laws of Thermodynamics, James. It's sad that you've been driven so
>>>> insane that rather than admit you're wrong, you're going to sue
>>>> *science*. But it sure is entertaining watching you spiral down into
>>>> psychosis.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>> Apparently you don't either.
No, James. It is, in fact, an underlying fundamental of quantum
physics. You know, that large swath of reality that you deny because
you're an uneducated oaf.
It's called phase transition radiation, formally known as Infrared
Characteristic Radiation During First Order Phase Transition, James.
Satellites measure it to determine cloud formation and the associated
energy transfer, and it can be used to determine where hailstones are
forming and hence where tornadic activity is likely.
<http://www.ipme.ru/e-journals/RAMS/no_12009/tatartchenko.pdf#page=6>
<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273987462_Phase-Change_Radiation_Enhanced_Infrared_Absorption_in_Vapor-Liquid_Water_Mixtures>
<http://heattransfer.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/Mobile/article.aspx?articleid=1819226>
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610212001695>
<https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/31033/Wu_Wei-Hsuan.pdf>
<https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/29706/Wang_Kuo-Ting.pdf>
============================================================
Nichols and Lamar in 1968 compared the infrared view of forming /
dissipating cumulus clouds to the photograph of the same clouds and
found that strong infrared radiation in the spectral range of 8-14
microns was emitted from unknown sources at the bottom sides of the
clouds.
============================================================
Now before you start bleating, James, the source was unknown in
1968... today it is fully explained and understood.
Now, before you run away again, James, do try to at least take a peek
at those questions which highlight the logical inconsistencies in your
know you can't address them, that'd make your poor head implode, but
do try to at least look at and consider them...
============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet, James?
Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.
Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?
How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away from
the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and
know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather
than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is
your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?
Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your k'laming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further k'laming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?
How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?
Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?
How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
James McGinn
Mar 17, 2016, 12:11:38 AM3/17/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:6aa853db-6314-470f...@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7,
> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
> > James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> > NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> > heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> > formation?
> >
> > Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is *so* retarded he not only
> doesn't know that when water condenses it gives off a specific band of
> wavelength photons,
Do you concede you were unable to confirm the 2,500,000 J/kg?
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:6aa853db-6314-470f...@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7,
> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
> > James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
> > NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
> > heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
> > formation?
> >
> > Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>
> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is *so* retarded he not only
> doesn't know that when water condenses it gives off a specific band of
> wavelength photons,
A simple yes or no will suffice.
Sergio
Mar 17, 2016, 12:28:16 AM3/17/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
babe lost in the woods ?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 17, 2016, 1:48:35 AM3/17/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:e38453cf-c113-47cb...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>> wavelength photons, but he apparently cannot Google for it... that's
>> likely a combination of his being retarded and so afflicted with
>> Dunning-Kruger that he doesn't dare use Google to search for any
>> information for fear he'll find proof of his delusional state, thereby
>> inducing his head to implode.. Lord knows, that black hole Jim calls a
>> brain is already stressing his cranium to its structural limits.
>>
>> <snicker>
>> likely a combination of his being retarded and so afflicted with
>> Dunning-Kruger that he doesn't dare use Google to search for any
>> information for fear he'll find proof of his delusional state, thereby
>> inducing his head to implode.. Lord knows, that black hole Jim calls a
>> brain is already stressing his cranium to its structural limits.
>>
>> <snicker>
> Do you concede you were unable to confirm the 2,500,000 J/kg?
>
> A simple yes or no will suffice.
*You* made the claim that latent heat of evaporation doesn't exist,
>
> A simple yes or no will suffice.
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA... the onus is upon you and
you alone to prove your claim.
Do you concede that you were unable to disprove the 2,500,000 J/kg
value, James?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
inconsistencies in your kooky 'theory' which is really nothing more
than the mad ramblings of a moron, James:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
James McGinn
Mar 17, 2016, 1:54:57 AM3/17/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Mar 17, 2016, 12:33:42 PM3/17/16
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
<news:dfcca7c9-892f-42f3...@googlegroups.com> did
James McGinn, in
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>> *You* made the claim that latent heat of evaporation doesn't exist,
>> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA... the onus is upon you and
>> you alone to prove your claim.
>>
>> Do you concede that you were unable to disprove the 2,500,000 J/kg
>> value, James?
>>
>> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA... the onus is upon you and
>> you alone to prove your claim.
>>
>> Do you concede that you were unable to disprove the 2,500,000 J/kg
>> value, James?
>>
>> A simple yes or no will suffice.
> I'll take that as a yes.
Good of you to concede that you were unable to disprove that latent
heat exists, James. Your admission means the destruction of your
entire kooky 'theory'.
Now, on to those questions you keep ducking, which highlight the
logical inconsistencies in your kooky 'theory' which is really nothing
more than the mad ramblings of a moron, James:
============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?
more than the mad ramblings of a moron, James:
============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
James McGinn
Apr 22, 2016, 1:15:45 PM4/22/16
to
James McGinn
Apr 29, 2016, 12:24:14 PM4/29/16
to
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 7:51:17 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
Jun 27, 2016, 2:23:38 AM6/27/16
to
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 7:51:17 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
Feb 21, 2017, 11:31:10 AM2/21/17
to
Trump Team
Feb 21, 2017, 9:35:37 PM2/21/17
to
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James Bernard 'Slobbering Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, in
<news:d4336d3b-9e21-41de...@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:28:16 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 3/16/2016 11:11 PM, James Bernard 'Slobbering Tardnado'
>> McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-7, Friendly
>>> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>>>> James Bernard 'Slobbering Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA,
>>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-7, Friendly
>>> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>>>> in <news:6aa853db-6314-470f...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>>>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7,
>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>>>>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
>>>>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
>>>>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
>>>>> formation?
>>>>> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>>>> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is *so* retarded he not only
>>>> doesn't know that when water condenses it gives off a specific band of
>>>> wavelength photons,
>>> Do you concede you were unable to confirm the 2,500,000 J/kg?
>>>
>>> A simple yes or no will suffice.
>> why cant YOU confirm it, James ? or calculate a number ?
>>
>> babe lost in the woods ?
> Answer my question, you evasive jackass.
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is retarded... so retarded
>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>>>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7,
>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>>>>> James, do you deny that NASA has satellites in orbit? Do you deny that
>>>>> NASA is performing real-time atmospheric profiling, to include latent
>>>>> heat release in the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window from cloud
>>>>> formation?
>>>>> Can you provide details as to how they detect, "latent heat?"
>>>> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA is *so* retarded he not only
>>>> doesn't know that when water condenses it gives off a specific band of
>>>> wavelength photons,
>>> Do you concede you were unable to confirm the 2,500,000 J/kg?
>>>
>>> A simple yes or no will suffice.
>> why cant YOU confirm it, James ? or calculate a number ?
>>
>> babe lost in the woods ?
> Answer my question, you evasive jackass.
that he can't admit he's wrong, or he'd be forced to admit he's
retarded.
But as he blathers on denying well-known science, he's *so* retarded
that he doesn't realize that he's only demonstrating to the world that
he's profoundly retarded.
Did I mention that he's retarded? Yeah.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat>
Water - 2264.76 kJ/kg
Now let's watch Tardnado screech "Buuh! That's not the exact number!
Duuurh!", and demonstrate that he doesn't realize that latent heat of
vaporization varies with temperature.
0 C - 2501 kJ/kg
25 C - 2441 kJ/kg
100 C - 2264.76 kJ/kg
And with that, James will now be *forced* to deny sublimation... he
has no choice. Either he admits sublimation takes place, and therefore
latent heat exists for water just as it exists for any compound, or he
denies latent heat and denies sublimation.
Go on, James, prove yourself an even bigger retard.
<snicker>
Oh, while you're here, how about you get right on answering all those
questions you've been running away from, in my .sig... or aren't you
smart enough to do that, Tardnado?
--
Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":
============================================================
Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant
uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James?
Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a
lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating
that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself
if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia?
Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and
help you to not piss all over yourself?
And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a
pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser.
Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.
You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.
You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's
Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction
increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and
electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually
cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James?
According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with
distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an
electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher
energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic
attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the
electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow,
that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic
attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just
violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level.
How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even
you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli
Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard,
and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is
that not dissociating the water?
If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling
point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded
hydrides, KookTard?
If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's
cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard?
If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not*
splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard?
If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have
such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same
H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron
that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of
vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that
your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and
that's just retarded.
If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not
become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard?
How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than
tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other
types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the
sky" sentient, James?
Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the
troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer,
Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant
tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that
way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim?
How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient
tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't
you explain that, James?
Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is
*below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory
not-a-theory" can't answer.
Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your
claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James?
Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your
delusions, James?
Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process,
James?
Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James?
Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions,
James?
Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James?
Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being
*deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James?
Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as
"delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James?
Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in
which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of
education about now, James?
Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out
of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been
deemed mentally incompetent, James?
Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class
as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist",
James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated,
whereas you're ignorant and uneducated?
What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was
the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then
you're not a physicist, James. LOL
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its
back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to
shreds, Jim?
Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
which would make air travel deadly.
Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?
Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?
Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?
How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?
Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James?
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?
How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?
How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their
surface area as you claim?
Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?
How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?
Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?
How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
Why are you not taking your meds, James?
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?
Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?
How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?
Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================
Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
James McGinn
May 3, 2017, 11:37:50 PM5/3/17
to
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 7:51:17 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
0 new messages