You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

[James McGinn]

On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Water
> vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry

You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.

Find another hobby, moron.

James McGinn / Genius

[Paul Alsing]

There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor". As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!

Who let you out of the Funny Farm today, Jimbo? Are they crazy, too?

"Facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away while scientists debate rival theories for explaining them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air pending the outcome."
- Stephen Jay Gould

[Claudius Denk]

LOL. So, is it my fault that you are too dumb to make the distinction?

You got nothing!!!

James McGinn / Genius

[Paul Alsing]

There is no distinction, Jimbo, water vapor is the gaseous form of water, period.
>
> You got nothing!!!
>
> James McGinn / Dumbfuck

You are mixing up your socks again, Jimbo...

[Claudius Denk]

Obviously there is. You are just a moron.

James McGinn / Genius

[Paul Alsing]

> James McGinn / Dumbfuck

No, Jimbo, it is not at all obvious... since you just make it up as you go along.

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Water_vapour

Perhaps you have evidence to the contrary? No, that is not possible... you are clueless now and shall remain clueless forever...

[Jim Pennino]

Let's ask ChatGPT.

Q: What is water vapor?

A: Water vapor is the gaseous form of water, made up of molecules of
water in the air. It is invisible to the naked eye and is often
present in the Earth's atmosphere in the form of fog, clouds, and
humidity.

Q: Is the phrase "water vapor" ambiguous?

A: The phrase "water vapor" is not inherently ambiguous. It refers
specifically to the gaseous state of water, which can exist at various
temperatures and pressures depending on the ambient conditions.

>
> James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot

[James McGinn]

On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
> >
> > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
> >
> > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
> >
> > Find another hobby, moron.
> There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".

I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.

> As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!

And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.

Consensus isn't science.

[James McGinn]

The phase of H2O in the atmosphere is determined by the physical properties of water. It isn't determined by consensus or by a computer program.

You simpletons have no business in scientific discussion.

James McGinn / Genius

[Jim Pennino]

Nope, that is your delusions talking, crackpot.

>
> Consensus isn't science.

Science is performing experiments that give the same results no matter
who performs them, cackpot.

It is your delusions that dismiss such actions as "consensus" crackpot.

It is interesting to note that it took you 14 months to come up with
this delusional nonsense, crackpot.

[Jim Pennino]

Almost. It is determined by many experiments by many different people
which all yield the same results.

It is those actions that your delusions dismiss as "consensus",
crackpot.

>
> You simpletons have no business in scientific discussion.

Delusionally insane crackpots that can not discern between general
agreement and agreement of experimental results have no business in
scientific discussions, especially when they have NO experiments of
their own.

[Solving Tornadoes]

What are you talking about, you babbling moron.?

[Jimbo]

James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> posted:

> On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 8:16:08=E2=80=AFAM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wro=
> te:
> > Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote:=20
> > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 10:11:56 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com=
> wrote:=20
> > >> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 9:25:15 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.c=
> om wrote:=20
> > >> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.c=
> om wrote:=20
> > >> > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn =
> wrote:=20
> > >> > > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino=
> wrote:=20
> > >> > > >=20
> > >> > > > > Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry=
> =20
> > >> > > >=20
> > >> > > > You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, =
> you convoluted nitwit.=20
> > >> > > >=20
> > >> > > > Find another hobby, moron.=20
> > >> > > There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "wat=
> er vapor". As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vap=
> or is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!=20
> > >> > >=20
> > >> > > Who let you out of the Funny Farm today, Jimbo? Are they crazy, to=
> o?=20
> > >> > >=20
> > >> > > "Facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy=
> of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structur=
> es of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away while sc=
> ientists debate rival theories for explaining them. Einstein's theory of gr=
> avitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-a=
> ir pending the outcome."=20
> > >> > > - Stephen Jay Gould=20
> > >>=20
> > >> > LOL. So, is it my fault that you are too dumb to make the distinctio=
> n?=20
> > >> There is no distinction, Jimbo, water vapor is the gaseous form of wat=
> er, period.=20
> > >=20

> > > Obviously there is. You are just a moron.

> > Let's ask ChatGPT.=20
> >=20
> > Q: What is water vapor?=20
> >=20
> > A: Water vapor is the gaseous form of water, made up of molecules of=20
> > water in the air. It is invisible to the naked eye and is often=20
> > present in the Earth's atmosphere in the form of fog, clouds, and=20
> > humidity.=20
> >=20
> > Q: Is the phrase "water vapor" ambiguous?=20
> >=20
> > A: The phrase "water vapor" is not inherently ambiguous. It refers=20
> > specifically to the gaseous state of water, which can exist at various=20
> > temperatures and pressures depending on the ambient conditions.=20
> >=20
> > >=20

> > > James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
>

> The phase of H2O in the atmosphere is determined by the physical properties=

> of water. It isn't determined by consensus or by a computer program.
>
> You simpletons have no business in scientific discussion.
>
> James McGinn / Genius

Jimbo, never in your life have you had a scientific discussion... not ever!

You are *still* a waste of good air. Who left the insane asylum door unlocked?

[Jim Pennino]

The simple fact that you are replying to a 14 month old post, delusional
crackpot.