The time dilation factor in direction to the Sun has been canceled.
Only the orthogonal time dilation factor to the planet - Sun vector is
considered. This doesn't change much the perihelion precession of
Mercury (from 2.5e-7 to 8e-7) but does impact light bending.
-Phil
> I have implemented light bending into the FR simulator and we can
> already see different result from standard Newtonian arithmetics and
> Finite Relativism in the second tab:
> http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe
Nobody is stupid enough to run an executable.
>
> The time dilation factor in direction to the Sun has been canceled.
> Only the orthogonal time dilation factor to the planet - Sun vector is
> considered. This doesn't change much the perihelion precession of
> Mercury (from 2.5e-7 to 8e-7) but does impact light bending.
So FR is wrong. Again.
Why even post?
>
>
> -Phil
That makes about as much sense as putting a smaller wheel on the front
of your bicycle so's you can be going down hill all the time.
Hey Phil, See: Physics FAQ: Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html
Welcome back to get your nose bloodied some more, Phil. You must really
like the process (even be addicted to it) to be posting your drivel here
again. Potter does the same thing.
Once again my name is on it, there is no virus. If you don't trust me
run it on Doug's machine.
> So FR is wrong. Again.
>
> Why even post?
I'm currently adjusting it; when I reduce the time tick of the light
bending calculation I get a more important difference.
This is an update.
Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:
http://www.google.com/mobile/navigation/index.html#p=default
Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. Say goodbye to
Eric Gisse's prosperity.
Delusions, delusions.
Light bending is a parabola path in gravity aether.
Mitch Raemsch
From the link above:
"Google Maps Navigation is an internet-connected GPS navigation system with
voice guidance."
Imbecile, Google Navigator is BASED on GPS.
Phil, pardon me, but this assurance of nothing.
>
> Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:http://www.google.com/mobile/navigation/index.html#p=default
Phil, please. Can't you try a little harder not to be such an obvious
idiot? Google Navigator is *based* on GPS, which in turn *relies* on
relativity.
>
> Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:
> http://www.google.com/mobile/navigation/index.html#p=default
>
Phil, Phil, how can you be so utterly stooopid!
Enter Google; Exit Microsoft, Stage Left
http://www.gpsworld.com/lbs/enter-google-exit-microsoft-stage-left-9128?print=1
November 11, 2009
By: Kevin Dennehy
LBS Insider Newsletter, November 2009
Google Maps Navigation will change the way the location-based services industry does
business. How it will change the industry remains to be seen, but a major player offering
the same services for free that companies are now enjoying much profit from is very
disconcerting.
In other company news, MSN Direct’s use of unused FM radio spectrum was a great idea in
2004. It effectively used unused portions of the FM radio spectrum to deliver such
location-based services as real-time traffic, weather, and other content. It was a victim
of low-cost and evolving technology for LBS delivery. Having Microsoft involved in LBS was
a big shot in the arm for the industry. However, it remains to be seen what the company’s
plans are to continue in the LBS space in the near future.
Despite industry observers and competitors who say otherwise, Google’s launch of its
Google Maps Navigation product will clearly change the players, services offered, and
financial stability of the location-based services market. The service, while being touted
as free, still requires initial users on the Verizon system to have requisite voice and
data plans.
With such capability as turn-by-turn navigation, voice guidance, and automatic re-routing,
Google Maps Navigation is no entry-level app that competitors should ignore. Google Maps
Navigation initially is being offered on the Android 2.0 series devices.
Companies have seen this type of service coming from Google for a long time and predicted
some dire times for both personal navigation device (PND) companies and handset navigation
vendors who offer services in a very lucrative market.
Some say that Google, which dropped Tele Atlas as its mapping company for North America in
early October (though kept the company’s mapping data for international markets), will
make money off of location-based ads that are sold in conjunction with the navigation
solution. The company purchased mobile advertising company, AdMob, for $750 million,
though it is not known whether it AdMob will be joining the location-based advertising
fray in conjunction with Google Maps Navigation — but the speculation is there.
Stay tuned, the fireworks and fallout from this announcement are yet to be determined.
MSN Direct to Be Shut Down in 2012
Microsoft’s recent decision to shut down MSN Direct in early 2012 not only means that a
major company’s location-based services offering is going away, but also signals that the
way LBS is delivered is rapidly evolving. MSN Direct, launched in early 2004, was offered
on several navigation devices, such as Garmin’s Nuvi line.
MSN Direct works with unused FM radio spectrum to broadcast such data as real-time
traffic, weather, stock quotes, and local gas prices. Microsoft said that the demand for
the service had decreased significantly with the rise of Wi-Fi cellular, FM RDS (Radio
Data System), and other digital networks.
The data networks that deliver traffic and other content to mobile and in-car devices are
going through a significant evolution, said Scott Sedlik, Inrix’ vice president of
marketing. “MSN Direct was an innovative service early on and did provide value-added
information, but ultimately is a casualty of getting stuck between other networks that
were able to deliver more scale…less expensively.”
Sedlik said that RDS-TMC (Traffic Message Service) continues to be the dominant broadcast
network for delivering traffic in North America and Europe. “Clear Channel’s Total Traffic
Network has the broadcast adoption with more than 1 million subs from BMW, Mini, TomTom
and other PNDs, OEMs. Navteq’s RDS-TMC network has grown from a few thousand subs to
several hundred thousand based on their ad-supported model that is bundled with Garmin
PNDs at retail,” he said.
Sedlik said that XM/Sirius traffic data services, delivered via satellite, have had some
success in automotive. “However, the high subscription price and Sirius’ financial
stability have created significant concerns at auto OEMs regarding the long-term viability
of the services,” he said. “HD radio broadcast data services, and [Digital Audio
Broadcasting] in Europe, are still in their infancy, but are expected to deliver broadcast
services next year. MSN Direct ultimately got squeezed between the various business
models and content of these one-way broadcast services.”
While one-way broadcast services may be dominant right now, the end-game is two-way
connectivity for delivery of traffic, navigation, and other services, Sedlik said. “The
iPhone and, soon, Android-based devices are creating a revolution in the classical mobile
value chains. They are spurring intense adoption of GPS-enable smartphones,” he said.
“Two-way connectivity and the evolving value chain allow application developers, and OEMs,
to deliver incredibly rich, up-to-date, and personalized traffic, navigation, weather and
other content in ways that were previously not financially viable.”
Microsoft said it will provide pro-rated refunds for existing MSN Direct customers,
including those in a one-time payment program.
So while MSN Direct is shutting down, Sedlik predicts that RDS-TMC continues to grow in
the next few years in terms of overall subscriptions, but will ultimately decline over
time. He said that HD radio will gain some adoption, particularly in automotive to steal a
share of the market from satellite operators. “GPRS and GSM, as well as hyrbird HD/GPRS
solutions, will gain the majority of the market opportunity,” he said.
Echoing Sedlik’s remarks about the rise of the smartphone as the platform of choice to
deliver traffic and other content, Andre Gueziec, Beat the Traffic CEO and founder, said
that wireless data plans are going down in cost for 3G and 4G service. “We see the
smartphone as the key client for traffic information. We are moving aggressively with
consumer and white-label products for Blackberry and the iPhone,” he said.
I haven't spent a year to get flagged as a hacker, how about that?
> eric gisse wrote:
>>
>> Nobody is stupid enough to run an executable.
>
> Once again my name is on it, there is no virus. If you don't trust me
> run it on Doug's machine.
Oh, so I should run an executable from you just because you say there isn't
a virus?
I run linux. How am I supposed to run your windows program that depends on
windows binaries?
>
>> So FR is wrong. Again.
>>
>> Why even post?
>
> I'm currently adjusting it; when I reduce the time tick of the light
> bending calculation I get a more important difference.
>
> This is an update.
Why not post to a blog then?
"11/13, still wrong. Check back tomorrow".
Phil, you really don't get the objection do you?
Post the source code and I'll consider running it.
It's been so long since I saw something so breathtakingly stupid that it
actually took my breath away.
FYI Phil, my professional aspirations lie in information technology. And
amusingly enough, I know more about *two* entire fields than you.
Sorry, Phil, but your avowals of personal integrity just don't cut it.
What hacker doesn't say "Trust me"?
Phil simply isn't aware of the relevant issues.
I wonder if he'd run an executable I'd like to send him.
You said it yourself: "internet-connected GPS navigation system".
That's a GPS replacement using a triangular cell phone tower locater.
Use a Windows emulator.
[...]
What is breathtaking about this is your pathological compulsion to
return to the same place where you continue to bring abuse down on
yourself.
What I suggest is that you review how many times you've spent a span
of effort here, and how at the end of each one of those efforts, you
vowed that you would take your ideas elsewhere and not bother trotting
them out here again. And off you'd go, muttering and fuming. And then
a month or so later, you return, having forgotten your avowals and
your embarrassments and your flustered blustering. It's like the
college student who enrolls, then drops all classes when failure looks
imminent, then returns again the following semester to enroll again,
drops all classes again, enrolls again the following semester, drops
all classes again, and so on. What are you learning from this
exercise?
PD
I did not know that Google Navigator was GPS-driven. But I
_immediately_ suspected it when you said the one would replace the
other, your track record being what it is.
> Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. Say goodbye to
> Eric Gisse's prosperity.
Your track record being what it is, Gisse should run out and buy a
lottery ticket.
Mark L. Fergerson
Given that hacking is a fraud, I don't think I would share my name in
this case.
Phil, tell you what: Put your address and phone number here so we can
verify your identity, and then we'll decide whether putting your
"name" on any statement is worth anything.
Phil, please. I just asked you to try harder not to be so obviously
stupid, and you just seem to be obsessed with digging the hole deeper.
That you are overconfident. I hope you agree on Darwin's natural
selection theory at least.
You can't, but the federal can.
Yes, I do, and I see that you are a classic example of random
variation. Whether or not this variation enhances likelihood of
survival and progeny is yet to be seen. The way things are going, it
appears that you are doing your best to remove yourself from the gene
pool.
PD
Is this what happens when the cog slips while you are typing?
Here we are, back to your "any attention, even negative attention, is
better than no attention" disorder.
Things not going well at home?
PD is speaking for himself.
Uh, no, not really. I don't seem to be drawing the negative attention
the way you are, Phil.
This may tell you something.
The first truth is the negative truth about yourself.
I see this fits you people.
Mitch Raemsch
PD suddenly ran out of scientific arguments. Furthermore I feel I am
jeopardizing PD's virtues, so you will never agree unless natural
selection says so.
Really Phil, you think "GPS" means "cell phone" ?
So you expect me to install a windows emulator just to run an untrusted
binary to see something which doesn't even make correct predictions?
I think my afternoon plans of NCIS and the development of a command/control
suite for a botnet is a better plan.
Phil, there was no science involved to begin with. Your OP explained that
your theory doesn't make the correct prediction.
So how are things going at home?
Slow time effects light. Gravity is the one force with its own time.
Mitch Raemsch
Well I spent 2 short evenings writing it this week, I probably created a
mistake but I still am in the same order and I already get something out
of light bending.
There is nothing scientific in your thread to argue about.
There are a number of factual errors you've made about GPS and Google,
however.
> Furthermore I feel I am
> jeopardizing PD's virtues, so you will never agree unless natural
> selection says so.
Natural selection makes people agree on things?
Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
GPS to making factual errors about evolution.
[...]
> Natural selection makes people agree on things?
> Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
> GPS to making factual errors about evolution.
I just want everybody knowing PD:
- Agrees parallel universes does not make any sense
- Agrees Einstein GR plagiarism likeliness equals 94%
- Agrees Einstein was accused of domestic violence many times
- Wouldn't give GR $5
Do you mean other than the attention you seek?
> PD wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Natural selection makes people agree on things?
>> Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
>> GPS to making factual errors about evolution.
>
> I just want everybody knowing PD:
> - Agrees parallel universes does not make any sense
That's quantum mechanics. Einstein argued against it.
Oh, now, Phil, you'll have to point to where I agreed to any of this
stuff.
Is the problem related to dosage?
You seem to be degrading even more quickly than usual.
It MUST be a medication issue that brought you back here in such a
weakened state.
Well yes, he both agreed and disagreed with it; just like his
cosmological constant. So according to you, in both cases that makes
him right?
xxein: Not a word about the physic and light bending, huh?
>> Enter Google; Exit Microsoft, Stage Left
>> http://www.gpsworld.com/lbs/enter-google-exit-microsoft-stage-left-9128?print=1
http://www.answers.com/topic/physic
Einstein was right about quantum mechanics. Science judeged him for
it.
They needed that.
Science only knows the odds. God knows every outcome.
" I don't believe that God plays dice with the universe." Albert
Einstein
The auld farts who did real hacking. The term hackers has changed
over the decades :-(.
/BAH
/BAH
I missed this one. I do keep getting surprised at the extent of
ignorance.
<snip>
/BAH
Hey, I can't keep track of every new trick Google pulls out of its
ass either!
Mark L. Fergerson
There is another worrisome aspect which has to do with the computtering
biz which I can't describe in English ASCII. My red flag went
straight up in the air when I read the blurb. My red flag gear
is usually wrong about specifics but usually marks a mess potential.
/BAH
The photons created in the sun's core, are not the photons that
are absorbed at the earth's surface. The wavelengths are different.
Never mind, Herb!
You mean like the snappy MiniMap add-on for Firefox that uses (among
other things) various versions of Google mapping services? And...
> There is another worrisome aspect which has to do with the computtering
> biz which I can't describe in English ASCII. My red flag went
> straight up in the air when I read the blurb. My red flag gear
> is usually wrong about specifics but usually marks a mess potential.
...has nasty habits like freezing, not changing resolution
proportional to zoom level, panning back to your "home" coordinates
when you change map type, Not Playing Well with laptop touchpads...
anyway, it's worth far more than what I paid for it (nothing). When it
works.
I think my red flag is b0rken.
Mark L. Fergerson
Two aether rates slow in gravity and motion in GR and SR.
Mitch Raemsch
xxein: You are obviously out of the loop.
There is no loop. There is just an intellectual game of hubris.
Mitch Raemsch
Yep. If it's the only game in town, then planes, ships and trains
won't go.
>
> I think my red flag is b0rken.
>
<grin>
I got paid to have my red flags perk up before we shipped hard/software.
/BAH
I made the mistake of considering a non-Euclidean space last week but I
just figured out something important where time variations will
gradually change the properties of a light ray.
Whenever I have some time I will make the necessary corrections.
The only way to win is not to play the game.
Mitch Raemsch
It takes years to obtain an education in physics. When do you intend to fit
that in?
/BAH
I'll write something tonight, it's obvious.
Shapiro and Einstein's Sobral is a shallow parabola past the Sun.
This is light's geometry path bending it in the sky.
Mitch Raemsch
Dropped the ball, Phil?
I'm sure it's somewhere near. You don't get out much.
You'd say that to Einstein.
~ BG