Quantum Mechanics Gets Weirdly Less Weird
Sam Wormley
New take on old experiment sidesteps limit on quantum uncertainty
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/06/quantum-mechanics-gets-weirdly-l.html
"In the famous two-slit experiment, scientists shine light through two
parallel vertical slits in a thin plate and onto a distant screen (see
diagram). The waves merging from the two slits overlap and interfere
with each other to create a barcodelike pattern of bright stripes where
the waves reinforce each other and dark stripes where they cancel each
other. That "interference pattern" is a hallmark of wavelike behavior.
However, light is a particle as well as a wave. So experimenters can
detect the individual particles of light, or photons, as they hit the
screen.
"Here's the bizarre part. If the light beam is dim enough, the photons
will pass through the apparatus one by one. In that case, a reasonable
person might expect the interference pattern to disappear, as it would
seem that each photon would have to go through one slit or the other,
eliminating the possibility of interference. But no, after enough
photons pass through, the interference pattern once again emerges. So
each photon must literally go through both slits at once and interfere
with itself. Moreover, if the experimenter tries to determine which slit
each photon goes through—say, by alternately closing one slit and then
the other—the interference pattern really does disappear".
Now on to the Weirdly Less Weird part:
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/06/quantum-mechanics-gets-weirdly-l.html
Raymond Yohros
> Quantum Mechanics Gets Weirdly Less Weird
> New take on old experiment sidesteps limit on quantum uncertainty
>
>
> "In the famous two-slit experiment, scientists shine light through two
> parallel vertical slits in a thin plate and onto a distant screen (see
> diagram). The waves merging from the two slits overlap and interfere
> with each other to create a barcodelike pattern of bright stripes where
> the waves reinforce each other and dark stripes where they cancel each
> other. That "interference pattern" is a hallmark of wavelike behavior.
> However, light is a particle as well as a wave. So experimenters can
> detect the individual particles of light, or photons, as they hit the
> screen.
>
> "Here's the bizarre part. If the light beam is dim enough, the photons
> will pass through the apparatus one by one. In that case, a reasonable
> person might expect the interference pattern to disappear, as it would
> seem that each photon would have to go through one slit or the other,
> eliminating the possibility of interference. But no, after enough
> photons pass through, the interference pattern once again emerges. So
> each photon must literally go through both slits at once and interfere
> with itself. Moreover, if the experimenter tries to determine which slit
> each photon goes through—say, by alternately closing one slit and then
> the other—the interference pattern really does disappear".
>
"G-d does not play dice with the universe"
nobody believe herr einstein when he said that.
i post hear many times before that uncertainly is an illusion.
a pattern may emerge when observable conditions are optimize.
using very low amplitude beams have shown to be one of them.
this is strike 3 for the SUPER hero DIMental theories
time for another batter to step on the plate!
r.y
Sam Wormley
I call your attention to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem
"The phenomenon of quantum entanglement behind violation of Bell's
inequality is just one element of quantum physics that cannot be
represented by any classical picture of physics. Other non-classical
elements are complementarity and wavefunction collapse. The problem of
interpretation of quantum mechanics is intended to provide a
satisfactory picture of these non-classical elements of quantum physics.
"The EPR paper "pinpointed" the unusual properties of the entangled
states, e.g. the above-mentioned singlet state, which is the foundation
for present-day applications of quantum physics, such as quantum
cryptography; one application involves the measurement of quantum
entanglement as a physical source of bits for Rabin's oblivious transfer
protocol. This strange non-locality was originally supposed to be a
Reductio ad absurdum, because the standard interpretation could easily
do away with action-at-a-distance by simply assigning to each particle
definite spin-states. Bell's theorem showed that the "entangledness"
prediction of quantum mechanics have a degree of non-locality that
cannot be explained away by any local theory.
"In well-defined Bell experiments (see the paragraph on "test
experiments") one can now falsify either quantum mechanics or Einstein's
quasi-classical assumptions: currently many experiments of this kind
have been performed, and the experimental results support quantum
mechanics, though some believe that detectors give a biased sample of
photons, so that until nearly every photon pair generated is observed
there will be loopholes.
"What is powerful about Bell's theorem is that it doesn't come from any
particular physical theory. What makes Bell's theorem unique and
powerful is that it relies only on the general properties of quantum
mechanics. Physical theories that assume a deterministic variable inside
the particle can account for the experimental results only by assuming
that this variable cannot causally change other variables far away".
tj Frazir
smooth and saved a lot on gas.
I conected to the hub hydrolic a controle to slow the engine RPM without
slowing down untill the engine speed cant be cept then maintained the
speed. a gas saver knob.
No shifting nice grab and top end is any gear you want.
grab that knob and set the hub gap to any rpm you want at that moment.
You can run down the road at a speed at any rpm you want at that time.
and fewer parts !!
oil filled berrings.
tj Frazir
This centrifical 10 pad cluch V 5 on each side on a disk and a V two
pice hub . each V pad has a angle rod conected to a counter wieght you
set to lwest rpm .
Its a snomobile belt as it rides out the split hub is forced apart and
the cluch pads wide farther out inside the hub sandwich.
The gap in the hub sandwich is controled by hydrolic break cylinder
instead of CF like a snowmobile .
The angle never changes and the same amount of flat pad to hub is in
contact at any speed.
Its better then any trany in any car or bike or truck.
like two gears when both gears can change size as it runs.
The Vcluch plate goes from 4 inch to 10 inch as it spins faster aganst
the V hub that widends up as the plate gets bigger.
pads are cheep and change in 15 minuts evry year.
tj Frazir
tj Frazir
time.
You can change the V gap and have the same exceleration pull against the
motor eevry time .
never shift a gear and dont nead a tourk converter and trany.
Dont nead any gear box .
10 v pad per rotor .
split hydrolic hub .
Not one inside the other ,,one against the other.
This centrifical cluch dont have the shoes inside the hub ,,they ride
against the hub like a gear and the hub splits wider as you go faster
and the cluch shoe rotor gets bigger as it goes faster and rides in the
V gap of the hub.
NICE FUCKING JOB TOO
invention 159
tj Frazir
its 400 feet tall 50 foot wide.
Yousuf Khan
> "G-d does not play dice with the universe"
> nobody believe herr einstein when he said that.
> i post hear many times before that uncertainly is an illusion.
> a pattern may emerge when observable conditions are optimize.
> using very low amplitude beams have shown to be one of them.
>
> this is strike 3 for the SUPER hero DIMental theories
> time for another batter to step on the plate!
What's happening here is that we're starting to discover the basic
assembly language programming of the computer we call the Universe. The
reason quantum mechanics works so differently from classical mechanics
is because classical mechanics is the end result of billions of
microscopic computations at the quantum level. So far we've left the
quantum level alone to work away in its default state, and that results
in the classical Universe that we see right now. But quantum mechanics
isn't limited to working only within its default state: it gives us a
clue that it can produce different results by showing us that it can't
be predicted except in a gross probabilistic sense; so there's other
states of reality it can create. Once we start taking control over the
quantum state, we can start affecting the classical reality too. Nothing
will be impossible after that, like for example taking control over
entropy and reversing it. These are our baby steps towards being able to
program that computer ourselves.
Yousuf Khan
Raymond Yohros
> "What is powerful about Bell's theorem is that it doesn't come from any
> particular physical theory. What makes Bell's theorem unique and
> powerful is that it relies only on the general properties of quantum
> mechanics. Physical theories that assume a deterministic variable inside
> the particle can account for the experimental results only by assuming
> that this variable cannot causally change other variables far away".
>
wow, i was not aware unlit now that this theorem existed!
it is "right on"
general quantum observations favor the uncertainly principle
because of many missing variables that are not necessarily local.
kind of like a puzzle with many missing pieces that are too far
away or hidden to complete the picture but they exist and are not
being
accounted for. also, we are trapped with the decimal format
in everything we do. from finances to quantum physics and in the
case of QP, it truly adds to the "loose cents" of uncertainty
why do we use decimals? i don't know? maybe because we have ten
fingers?
Hexadecimal code itself can draw a path or framework to this
hard to predict particle entanglements,probable positions,etc.
and because it is cymetric, it's efficient and it helps us understand
binary sequences.
r.y