1-AP is happy to announce his 84th book// Special Relativity, proven and fixed of its errors // Physics series for High School Book 11 By Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

1-AP is happy to announce his 84th book// Special Relativity, proven and fixed of its errors // Physics series for High School Book 11 By Archimedes Plutonium


Special Relativity, proven and fixed of its errors // Physics series for High School Book 11
By Archimedes Plutonium

This is for High School students of science. I took both physics and chemistry in High School, last two years. So anyone taking physics in High School is likely to run into this error of Special Relativity concerning mass. Many people who read physics in books or magazines, will likely, also run into this error, this fake physics.

I wrote this book so as to teach people to avoid the error. And also, the world still has plenty of fools who want to argue that speeds faster than light can exist. So we need a book that definitely sets the logic-record straight, on why no speed can go faster than light-- and the quick and short answer is-- the laws of electricity and magnetism demand no faster speed.

While going over the proof of speed of light has to be a maximum speed and also a constant maximum speed, meaning, no speed less or greater than the speed of light in a vacuum (important that we say vacuum for light can slow down in a different medium), whilst going over that proof, I found errors in the interpretation of Special Relativity (SR), errors that need to be fixed. Mind you, not errors in SR itself, but the interpretation of SR.

Cover Picture: Is the PSSC Physics textbook for High School. I studied PSSC, only a earlier edition than this one shown in a photograph. That is pages 524 and 525 of PSSC Physics, by Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter 1971, 3rd edition. The one I learned from was 2nd edition. And this picture shown of pages 524-525 is a picture of Faraday Law with either moving bar magnet and stationary coil loop, or, stationary bar-magnet and moving coil loop.
Length: 15 pages

Product details
File Size: 822 KB
Print Length: 15 pages
Publication Date: January 26, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0847M53PD
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



[Archimedes Plutonium]

My reference sources are going to be 4th ed PHYSICS OF THE ATOM, Wehr, Richards, Adair, 1985.

On page 421, I quote:

Protons are not ejected by radioactive atoms, but they are easily formed by ionizing hydrogen. They have half the charge of alpha particles and should be good bullet particles if given enough energy. Because of their charge, they can be accelerated by causing them to fall through a potential difference.
--- end quote ---

I do not know, if only polar particles can be accelerated, not the proton+muon?

The world of science needs to get rid of "charge".

I replace it with "wire-direction" or pole. Since I have to, and must use monopole, then, pole is a good replacement.

Of course, the concept of proton as 938MeV is in the trash can. The hydrogen atom is actually 840MeV proton with a 105MeV muon stuck inside to add up to 945.

Now I have to reconcile what the positron is. What the antihydrogen atom is.

And I have to consider if Polarity (what we called charge in Old Physics) is a relativity concept, and instead of just this category of Special Relativity:


x' = delta(x - vt)
y' = y
z' = z
t' = delta (t - ((vx)/c^2))
m = delta m_0

Whether polarity needs to be included in that linear set above.

For polarity really is just direction, while the above is distance-length, time, mass

If polarity needs inclusion, then I found a second mistake in Relativity, and this recent book needs a long way to go to correct Special Relativity.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Update: 27JAN2020, upon finishing the above book, I realized that there is probably and likely to be another mistake in Special Relativity, a mistake of omission, in that what was once called "charge" in Old Physics, needs to be also in the Lorentz transformation equations. It is very easy to see in the mind that in one frame of reference a particle looks like a "+charge", but in another opposite frame of reference it is a "-charge". I like the word "pole" or "wire-direction" rather than the word "charge".

I am going to investigate whether Lorentz transformation equations needs that extra correction, a line of "polarity" along with length, time, mass.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I am almost certain that Special Relativity needs the inclusion of "Old Physics' charge"

Alright, there are plenty of subtraction signs in the AP equations of EM, electrodynamics All those subtraction signs can serve as Polarity (Old Physics called charge)

Alright, there are plenty of subtraction signs in the AP equations of EM, electrodynamics

All those subtraction signs can serve as Polarity (Old Physics called charge)



PHYSICS LAWS

1) all the facts of chemistry and physics
2) Voltage V = kg*m^2/A*s^3
3) Current i = A = magnetic monopoles
4) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2
5) angular momentum L = m^2/(i)s
6) V = i*B*L New Ohm's law, law of electricity
7) V' = (i*B*L)' Capacitor Law of Physics
8) (V/i*L)' = B' Ampere-Maxwell law
9) (V/(B*L))' = i' Faraday law
10) (V/(i*B))' = L' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force



V' = (i*B*L)'

Using the Product Rule of Calculus. Which is (fgh)' = f'gh + fg'h +fgh'
V' = (i*B*L)'

Using the Product Rule of Calculus. Which is (fgh)' = f'gh + fg'h +fgh'

(i*B*L)' = i'*B*L + i*B'L + i*B*L'

V' = (iBL)' = i'*B*L + i*B'*L + i*B*L'



(f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2 Quotient Rule of differentiation

Thrusting bar magnet through coil = current + magnetic field (Lenz).

All we need is just the plain and simple Quotient Rule of Differential Calculus applied to New Ohm's law.

(V/i*L)' = B' (Ampere-Maxwell Law)

Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2

(V/i*L)' = (V'*i*L - V*i' *L - V*i*L') / (i*L)^2



(V/B*L)' = i' (Faraday Law)

Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/g*h^2

(V/B*L)' = (V'*B*L - V*B' *L - V*B*L') / (B*L)^2