Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features

[Sam Wormley]

> Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/92

>
> Published August 20, 2012 | Physics 5, 92 (2012) | DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92

> A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab.
>

[oriel36]

On Aug 20, 7:07 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Published August 20, 2012  |  Physics 5, 92 (2012)  |  DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92
> > A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab.

Empiricists are always puzzled and perplexed yet haven't enough sense
to apply order and cohesion to observations - the surface crust of the
Earth almost dictates the internal fluid dynamics acting on the crust
in terms of differential rotation and from there into such things as
the Earth's magnetic field if analogies to toroidal flow care applied
loosely.There just doesn't seem to be people who can actually talk
about the component parts by taking the widest view possible and
taking account of details as the subject matter becomes more focused.

You have the geology community with their thermal 'convection cells'
which interferes with the discussion on the Earth's 26 mile spherical
deviation and its magnetic field.There is a possibility of
differential rotation between different internal compositions which
would supply toroidal flow to the low viscosity viscous composition in
contact with the crust notwithstanding it demarcates the multitude of
zonal bands that create the spherical deviation while acting to create
and destroy the oceanic crust.

Because paid researchers have such a poor understanding of the
dimensions attached to the rotational characteristics of the
planet,everyone has to suffer the childish and nonsensical thermal
driven 'convection cells' in order to heap praise on the late 17th
century powdered wigs who got it wrong -

https://www.google.com/search?num=10&hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=675&q=convection+cells+in+the+mantle&oq=convection+cells&gs_l=img.1.2.0j0i24l9.1301.5298.0.7168.16.12.0.4.4.0.256.1543.4j6j2.12.0...0.0...1ac.9tHViCy76mk

For goodness sake,apart from the hopelessly indoctrinated,adults are
needed to consider the genuine link between plate tectonics,the
Earth's magnetic field,the shape of the planet and all other topics
which come under the umbrella of a rotating planet and it would make a
nice change in this forum which a river of mediocrity and headache
inducing noise is flowing presently..

[oriel36]

> https://www.google.com/search?num=10&hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source...

>
> For goodness sake,apart from the hopelessly indoctrinated,adults are
> needed to consider the genuine link between plate tectonics,the
> Earth's magnetic field,the shape of the planet and all other topics
> which come under the umbrella of a rotating planet and it would make a
> nice change in this forum which a river of mediocrity and headache
> inducing noise is flowing presently..

Great !,wonderful ! - 5000 years of Western science and not a single
individual can manage to affirm that the Earth turns once in 24 hours
as a point of departure for discussing every conceivable topic
relating to terrestrial sciences and its connection to the celestial
arena.

How can this not be a tragedy ?,this is not human rights issue that
children are not taught the basic dimensions of the planet which
interlinks 15 degrees/1 hour/1037.5 miles at the equator,this is
common sense.

If there is a great ignominy I do not know it,I could understand it if
such things as linking planetary shape,crustal dynamics and the
planet magnetic field using the internal fluid dynamics was in anyway
dull and dreary and I partly understand the limits people choose to
place on themselves so as not to see the wider picture but it is the
willful avoidance of responsibility that can be shocking sometimes and
especially people who call it their job.

This is no a low point in human endeavor - in a no point.

[oriel36]

I guess I express my exasperation without proofreading or rereading
what I wrote and hands up,no excuses.

I meant that the inability to teach students that the Earth turns once
in 24 hours is not a low point in human endeavor - it is that there is
no point to human endeavor once a stance like that is taken.

Venus does not have a magnetic shield in a way the Earth does for much
the same reason the Earth has a 26 mile spherical deviation and Venus
hasn't or why the Earth has a very active surface crust whereas Venus
displays volcanic activity.Even the recent data based on CME's as they
strike Venus contributes to the understanding of the rotational
mechanism behind a planet's magnetic field therefore this area of
study can be added into the mix in using planetary comparisons to
extract a common mechanism-

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/627070main_HFA-orig_full.jpg

They are now talking of a geological study of Mars and sending another
vehicle up there yet the current explanation they have for the clues
left on the surface crust of the Earth is childish where none of the
parts fit together for proposing thermal 'convection cells' as a
mechanism for plate tectonics gets in the way of an explanation for
the spherical deviation of the planet and a magnetic field.

This was never about contending with the spectacular errors inherited
from the late 17th century even though it does demonstrate how
catastrophic the entrenched errors are to the study of terrestrial
effects which connect plate tectonics to the spherical shape of the
planet and the magnetic shield and from there into more complex issue
which graft in orbital elements including climate.Rather than try to
steal my work,and mangle it like they are now doing with rotation and
plate tectonics,they should discuss these matters openly as though the
old errors never mattered and just get on with moving astronomy and
the terrestrial sciences forward.

[Chris.B]

Without wishing to undermine the importance of this work... Shouldn't
we be going to the moon ASAP to find the buried, alien obelisks? ;-)

More seriously (?) there must be some metallic asteroids or remnants
close to the surface. So why isn't this an obvious clue to the source
of the local magnetism? Why is it considered another "mystery?" (to be
pored over by theoreticians)

Perhaps they are the remnants of an ancient, permanent magnet shield
from a crashed, alien ship? Or ships.

If nothing else, finding the source of the magnetism may offer clues
to improved magnetic materials. Presumably the magnetic anomalies must
be extremely long lived? Otherwise there would (or could) be no
surface bleaching.

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

-- "Chris.B" <chr...@nypost.dk>
wrote in message news:c2e22b97-80a0-4b7e...@googlegroups.com
> Dib,dib,dib. Dob,dob,dob.

Naturally he is the leader of the total fuckwits.
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway