Logic is overthrown, not by me
Ka-In Yen
them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
is right, then logic is wrong. This is the greatest achievement
in human history. All logicians should be sent to jail for
cheating our money.
By the way, I move my site to: http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com
You are welcome to visit my site, and leave your comment.
Androcles
"Ka-In Yen" <yen...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:a3c0c841-5fa8-448b...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Aetherialists should announce that logic is overthrown by
them, if they have guts. If the crackpot theory of aether
is right, then logic is wrong. All aetherialists should be sent
to jail for fraud.
By the way, my site is still at
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
You are welcome to visit my site, and stick your stupid comments
up your arse.
zzbu...@netscape.net
> Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> is right, then logic is wrong. This is the greatest achievement
> in human history. All logicians should be sent to jail for
> cheating our money.
Since the only thing 99,99999% of logicians even know about
logic is category theory, they're all almost sent to Hal Reform
School,
rather than anything that requires thinking beyond 2001 anyway.
And since the most only most Physicist even know about Special
Relativity
is General Relativity, they mostlly all sent to a GE Review for the
photonically
amazed, rather than anything that requires thinking beyond Green's
Functions
for the Recursively-Challenged,
PD
> Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> is right, then logic is wrong.
There is not a thing illogical in relativity.
Illogic would require:
- that there are conclusions in the theory that do not follow from the
premises
- that there are statements in the theory that are in direct
contradiction
There is nothing of this sort in relativity.
Terrance Hodgins
news:a3c0c841-5fa8-448b...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
OK, let's visit this horrible site, and read the first sentence
"Abstract: In 1828, Cauch first gave the idea of elastic ether."
Already wrong, you blithering google-posting fuckwit.
Uncle Al
>
> Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> is right, then logic is wrong.
Occam's razor: yer stooopid. Quantum field theory is the end of
logic, Copenhagen or Bohm. Logic as heuristic remains a giant
industrial vat of whoop-ass compared to religion.
Go butter your ass-crack and call yourself a biscuit.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Ka-In Yen
wrote:
> OK, let's visit this horrible site, and read the first sentence
>
> "Abstract: In 1828, Cauch first gave the idea of elastic ether."
>
> Already wrong, you blithering google-posting fuckwit.
Dear Terrance,
If you find any flaw of the mathematic derivation of my theory,
please kindly advise me, it's grateful.
Ka-In Yen
Ka-In Yen
> Ka-In Yen wrote:
>
> > Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> > them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> > is right, then logic is wrong.
>
> logic, Copenhagen or Bohm. Logic as heuristic remains a giant
> industrial vat of whoop-ass compared to religion.
>
My outstanding work is the discovery of the idiocy of physicists.
Stupid
physicists have being doing vector division for a hundred years, but
they
are not aware of it. Read my page:
http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com/2009/04/vector-by-vector-division.html
then you will realize that stupid physicists are totally incapable of
physics.
Androcles
http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com/2009/04/vector-by-vector-division.html
=============================================
*plonk*
Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George
Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.
Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.
There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.
This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.
You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose
of this message is to encourage others to kill-file fuckwits like you.
I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and fuck off.
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
> Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> is right, then logic is wrong. This is the greatest achievement
> in human history. All logicians should be sent to jail for
> cheating our money.
>
That sounds logical to me.
>
> By the way, I move my site to: http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com
> You are welcome to visit my site, and leave your comment.
>
Thanks. Some other time.
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
What do you mean by a "flaw"? Illogical reasoning? I thought you are
in favour of illogical proofs and derivations.
Ka-In Yen
Dear Ostap,
Since you said: "Thanks. Some other time."
How can you said: "I thought you are in favour of
illogical proofs and derivations."
Anyway, you are welcome to visit my site, and leave
your comment(after reading my theory).
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
Because I am **not** in favour of illogical proofs and derivations.
>
> Anyway, you are welcome to visit my site, and leave
> your comment(after reading my theory).
>
You are welcome to take my comments here and post them at your site.
PD
> On Dec 14, 6:19 am, Ka-In Yen <yenk...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
>
> > Physicists should announce that logic is overthrown by
> > them, if they have guts. If the Special theory of Relativity
> > is right, then logic is wrong.
>
> There is not a thing illogical in relativity.
> Illogic would require:
> - that there are conclusions in the theory that do not follow from the
> premises
> - that there are statements in the theory that are in direct
> contradiction
>
> There is nothing of this sort in relativity.
What do you think is illogical about relativity?
Ka-In Yen
<ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 5:32 pm, Ka-In Yen <yenk...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
>
> > Dear Ostap,
>
> > Since you said: "Thanks. Some other time."
> > How can you said: "I thought you are in favour of
> > illogical proofs and derivations."
>
> Because I am **not** in favour of illogical proofs and derivations.
So you never read my theory, but you insist that my theory is
illogical derivations.
Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
Where did I say that?
Ka-In Yen
<ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I thought you are in favour of illogical proofs and derivations.
Which part? Could you more specific? It's grateful.
Dirk Van de moortel
Trust me, nobody is going to wade through the content
of your intestines to see what it was that poisoned you.
Dirk Vdm
Ka-In Yen
<dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ka-In Yen <yenk...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
>
> 6b3f9f72-03b8-461d-b9d3-ecf1f4b7f...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com
>
> > On Dec 21, 9:17 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr."
> > <ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I thought you are in favour of illogical proofs and derivations.
>
> > Which part? Could you more specific? It's grateful.
>
> >http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com
>
> Trust me, nobody is going to wade through the content
> of your intestines to see what it was that poisoned you.
Dear Dirk Vdm,
I got two visitors yesterday and no poison was found.
Dirk Van de moortel
No poison was searched for.
And you had three (3) visitors today.
Dirk Vdm
john
>
> - Show quoted text -
So, Dirk, was the math correct?
john
Ka-In Yen
PD
There's just a small problem here. It is quite possible for a theory
to be flawless in logic and nevertheless wrong as a screen door on a
submarine.
The validity of theories is determined by whether they make better
predictions of experimental results than other theories. Some cranks
believe that if their theory is wrong, then there must be something
wrong with the logic they used and are therefore owed an explanation
of where the flaw in the logic is. But this isn't how science works.
Ka-In Yen
>
> There's just a small problem here. It is quite possible for a theory
> to be flawless in logic and nevertheless wrong as a screen door on a
> submarine.
Flawless, PD can not find a tiny flaw. Ha Ha Ha!
http://aetherdynamics.blogspot.com
If there is a flaw, PD will kick me swiftly. His
entertainment is to kick anti-SRian in this group.
This is kind of interactive video game for him.