On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:21:30 PM UTC,
ju...@diegidio.name wrote:
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 10:53:29 PM UTC,
ju...@diegidio.name wrote:
> >
> > If gravitational effects (and only gravitational effects) are inter-universal, universes have not evolved independently relative to gravity, or, indeed, spacetime.
> >
> > Along that line, and to all physical effects, universes must be "co-located" relative to any "out-of-spacetime": i.e. given that "out-of-spacetime transformations" do not affect gravity, nor the physics in general! But the point really would be that we, so to speak, get rid of the constants, within a single *shared* spacetime.
> >
> > On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 9:41:16 PM UTC, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> >
> > > There are more universes in the cosmos than flakes of snow in an endless storm.
> >
> > Should I take it that there are as many universes (in string theory) as there are quantum bifurcations?
> >
> > > Only their spacetime is different.
> > > Half are positive.
> > > Our universe is negative.
> > > All universes are tied with a gravity grid. Its call coupling.
> > > Treb is made of positrons.
> >
> > I may be made of negatrons.
>
> More speculation:
>
> The proto-universe is of pure logic (I do have a rationale for this), its fundamental particle and interaction is the negatron. The negatron is its own anti-particle (there is no anti-negatron), and the origin of all particles. When a negatron decohers