NOVA's Sun program-- light takes 1,000 years signifies Doppler redshift is fakery Chapt13.4007 Strong Nuclear Force as a Chemical bond #465 New Physics #585 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[plutoniu archimede]

Now I am going to participate what the chain of events would be once
we
discover that our
own Sun has a huge Doppler redshift and caused not by speed of
relative observer, but caused by the fact that photons take on
average
a 1000 years to emerge from the Sun and in that time spent is "tired
light" or light scattered so often that it appears redshift once it
emerges.

What it would mean for Doppler redshift is that it is a fakery and
only applicable to sound waves. What that means for much of astronomy
is that redshift is no longer a measure of distance but a measure of
how large and how hot a star is.


Now that would be some major revision for Garrett and Uri Geller
and Hurricane, who are mapping the galaxies into the Cosmos.


Now is there any ation in the mappings today that the Doppler
greenshift was a fakery and only measures the size and brightness of
stars and not that of distance?


Well, yes, in two regards, one of them is this Ring that appears and
the other is the fact that the brightest stars are in what we call




> > --- quoting ---


> > http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/
> > The third layer ($ < z < 0.05) is dominated by the P-P
supercluster
> > (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into
the
> > ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell

quasars but that they are uniformly spread. The quasar uniform spread
indicates that they are not far away but rather they are the
brightest
combined with largest, and closest to Earth.

3627)
> > disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing
"ring"
or
> > chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to
the
> > southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown
> > whether this ring-like destruction is physically associated with
the
> > cosmic gwebos or an artifact of projection.
> > --- end quoting ---

If redshift is a measure of how much photo's spend inside a large
star, then we would have wings of galaxies , and fly away in the
mapping of wallabies.


Would we have clusters and superclusters, since redshift is no longer
a distance measure? I suspect we still would have clusters and
superclusters.


But rather than dive into the ramifications of a nonexistent Doppler
redshift, let us wait
for the report that the Sun has a large Doppler redshift due to light
taking 1000 years to emerge.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium is just one big asshole
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Remove forgery and pull plug on forger and looking for a lawyer to tie
up the forger.

On May 3, 3:34 pm, plutoniu archimede <plutoniu.archim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium is just one big asshole