info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Kibo (CIA operative) says William J. Burns is goonclod failure of logic and David S. Cohen a barking fuckdog// Kibo needs a 5 year prison sentence for fraud waste abuse corruption of govt harrassing private citizens
90 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Claudius Denk
Dec 23, 2021, 12:06:07 PM12/23/21
to
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 5:16:08 PM UTC-8, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
Roboposting moron.
Roboposting moron.
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 23, 2021, 12:47:21 PM12/23/21
to
On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-6, claudi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 5:16:08 PM UTC-8, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Roboposting moron.
I have more respect for the CIA than that, although their Kibo does downgrade the CIA by a large degree. I mean, the fool still thinks 938 is 12% short of 945.
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 5:16:08 PM UTC-8, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Roboposting moron.
Kibo (CIA operative) says William J. Burns is goonclod failure of logic and David S. Cohen a barking fuckdog// Kibo needs a 5 year prison sentence for fraud waste abuse corruption of govt harrassing private citizens
10 views
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 16, 2021, 7:16:08 PM (6 days ago)
to
William J. Burns "barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
The 29 years that the CIA believes it can pester and harrass USA citizens as Kibo Parry Moroney attacked once again:
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 7:05:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Physics Archimedes "goonclod failure of logic"
> fails at math and science:
> > Arresting Kibo Parry M. & perhaps William J. Burns, David S. Cohen on
William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
David S. Cohen "shitwit" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
> tarded:
AP no longer tolerates bully stalkers like Kibo Parry M. for 29 years nonstop attack posts with no math or physics content just sheer insane hatred and redacts them and spits back at the Kibo stalker. And AP asks why does the CIA employ such insane misfits for I had always thought the CIA and FBI were looking out after the general welfare of the American people, not sit there in Washington and for 29 years attack American citizens.
AP is looking for a law firm to take on the CIA with its miscreant employees attacking American citizens for 29 years.
AP who once was a US Navy legal officer says charge Kibo with corruption of govt and put him in jail for 5 years.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
11:01 AM (1 hour ago)
to
David S. Cohen "physics hater" Melissa Nobles
> tarded: William J. Burns
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns
On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 2:21:46 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "physics hater" Melissa Nobles
> tarded: William J. Burns
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns
William J. Burns psychoceramic David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
> > Does the science of psychology have a word for this "insane behavior by insane persons" ?
> How about the phrase "acting like William J. Burns" ?
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 23, 2021, 5:26:35 PM12/23/21
to
CSUN,Scott J. Horowitz, Erika D. Beck, William Karush, Lorraine Foster, Olympia LePoint, Adriana Ocampo
Question CSUN-- did McGinn cheat when in school? For he posts under several fake names like Claudius just to fill up with spam.
> > > John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross, Hugh David Politzer, Frank Wilczek, Sheldon Glashow with their mindless Standard Model, these two imps of physics could never multiply muon mass 105MeV by 9 and see it is within Sigma Error of the neutron and proton (alleged proton rest mass) of 940MeV. Meaning what? Meaning that the proton is a composite of 8 muon rings and the neutron is 9 muon rings. And the muon is the real true electron of atoms, stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating new electrical energy-- the reason stars and Sun shine. But no, the imps of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs put physics knowledge and understanding backwards in time, to caveman mentality physics with their impish Standard Model.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do imps of physics like Glashow or Higgs never understand that a do nothing electron and do nothing proton are imp reasoning in physics. Whereas AP's particles are always doing some law of Electrodynamics. And why does Nobel award imps of science, do they like imp physics instead of true physics?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross -- please, please can they ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > 1> > > ..
> > > > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > > > . ' ` `. |
> > > > > . '. '
> > > > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > > > ' `
> > > > > ; `
> > > > > .' `
> > > > > ; U `
> > > > > ; '; `
> > > > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > 2> > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am McGinn shithead of science with my fake names who pollutes sci.physics everyday with antiscience b.s., and the only thing I have going for me is a enormous loud mouth.
> > > > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > > > ` . ' '
> > > > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > > > `...'
> > 3> > >
> > > > >
> > 4> > > Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Univ Washington,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran,Gerald Miller is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is offtopic Relf? Is Relf taking away your attention?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 5> > > Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 5> > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray: Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > 4> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > 1> > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > 2> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 1033 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > 3> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
Question CSUN-- did McGinn cheat when in school? For he posts under several fake names like Claudius just to fill up with spam.
> > > John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross, Hugh David Politzer, Frank Wilczek, Sheldon Glashow with their mindless Standard Model, these two imps of physics could never multiply muon mass 105MeV by 9 and see it is within Sigma Error of the neutron and proton (alleged proton rest mass) of 940MeV. Meaning what? Meaning that the proton is a composite of 8 muon rings and the neutron is 9 muon rings. And the muon is the real true electron of atoms, stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating new electrical energy-- the reason stars and Sun shine. But no, the imps of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs put physics knowledge and understanding backwards in time, to caveman mentality physics with their impish Standard Model.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do imps of physics like Glashow or Higgs never understand that a do nothing electron and do nothing proton are imp reasoning in physics. Whereas AP's particles are always doing some law of Electrodynamics. And why does Nobel award imps of science, do they like imp physics instead of true physics?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross -- please, please can they ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > 1> > > ..
> > > > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > > > . ' ` `. |
> > > > > . '. '
> > > > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > > > ' `
> > > > > ; `
> > > > > .' `
> > > > > ; U `
> > > > > ; '; `
> > > > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > 2> > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am McGinn shithead of science with my fake names who pollutes sci.physics everyday with antiscience b.s., and the only thing I have going for me is a enormous loud mouth.
> > > > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > > > ` . ' '
> > > > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > > > `...'
> > 3> > >
> > > > >
> > 4> > > Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Univ Washington,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran,Gerald Miller is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is offtopic Relf? Is Relf taking away your attention?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 5> > > Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 5> > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray: Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > 4> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > 1> > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > 2> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 1033 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > 3> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 23, 2021, 7:53:21 PM12/23/21
to
CSUN,Erika D. Beck, William Karush, Lorraine Foster, Olympia LePoint, Adriana Ocampo, Scott J. Horowitz
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 24, 2021, 12:58:10 AM12/24/21
to
Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears
Bill Burns, can you please send Kibo afterwards to the Ukraine front, with his emoji making.
Kibo Parry M. oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.
\\ ("`****/").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==1(li)===========
\\
\\
two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted
\\ ("`****//'").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==1(li)===========
\\
\\
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 25, 2021, 1:22:49 AM12/25/21
to
AP, King of Science has vacated sci.math, sci.physics and Usenet because the CIA has destroyed all Usenet. Too much time, and henceforth, AP only posts information, no response.
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
Archimedes Plutonium
Taking up way too much of my time, and the CIA has put a final lid on the coffin that was once the best science journalism of all time, because of its freedom of speech. Usenet from 1993-2021 is no longer containing any science discussion worth reading and totally dead of science activity. No-one expects govt agencies like CIA or FBI to respect and honor a forum to stay on-topic, not do off-topic, of sci.math with only math being discussed or sci.physics to be about physics content and not about drag net spam. No-one expects CIA or FBI to honor the rules of physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math. Usenet now is like trying to drive through the interior of a garbage dump that sci.math and sci.physics have become before 2022.
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
#1-1, 148th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#1-2, 48th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages
Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-3, 74th published book
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
Archimedes Plutonium
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Taking up way too much of my time, and the CIA has put a final lid on the coffin that was once the best science journalism of all time, because of its freedom of speech. Usenet from 1993-2021 is no longer containing any science discussion worth reading and totally dead of science activity. No-one expects govt agencies like CIA or FBI to respect and honor a forum to stay on-topic, not do off-topic, of sci.math with only math being discussed or sci.physics to be about physics content and not about drag net spam. No-one expects CIA or FBI to honor the rules of physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math. Usenet now is like trying to drive through the interior of a garbage dump that sci.math and sci.physics have become before 2022.
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
#1-1, 148th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 329 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-2, 48th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages
Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-3, 74th published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
Preface:
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 25, 2021, 2:08:05 AM12/25/21
to
Bill Burns, is MATHOPEDIA, the standard reference taught at CIA University that George Tenet built?
MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
by Archimedes Plutonium
Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
----------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------
1) Introduction
2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
3) Appendix
---------
Text
---------
1) Introduction
Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.
Now I do need to discuss the errors of Math in general and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in partial form in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.
MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
by Archimedes Plutonium
Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
----------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------
1) Introduction
2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
3) Appendix
---------
Text
---------
1) Introduction
Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.
Now I do need to discuss the errors of Math in general and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in partial form in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 25, 2021, 3:56:13 AM12/25/21
to
Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs
>
>
>
> ////////
> |:---[.]
> |( _J
> | ^ ( _|
> / \_____)
> / _____ \
> | / \ .
> | | |
> \ /\ /\__
> | | \/---
> \ \ )________________\\ \\\
> | >_____/_____)============
> \__________/ ==============
> / \ -----------------------------// ///
> | | ~~
> \ \\
> \ |\
> \ | \
> \ | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | / |
> |________/____|
> (_________)____)
>
Olcott can David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or is that totally foreign to them? Mind you, not a limit analysis hornswaggle for that is not geometry, limit analysis is not even a math proof for anyone can analysis things, analysis this post and only math hypocrites would think it is a proof.
Olcott can Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, ever ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or does that thought fly way too above their heads?
Olcott, why cannot Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Is it because they cannot even do logic correctly with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction?
>
> Olcott why does Cambridge Univ Stephen J. Toope, David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain keep teaching Boole error filled logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and these crazies still think the slant cut in cone is a ellipse when in fact it is a Oval. Why brainwash and pollute more students like Pete Olcott who is crazy enough as it is.
>
> Olcott why is noone in Cambridge physics able to ask the question which is the atom's true real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith?? Do they not have a brain to ask a simple question????
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> #8-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
>
> Length: 72 pages
>
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
>
> Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.
>
> Preface:
> These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic
>
> Equal+Not
> T = T = T
> T = ~F = T
> F = ~T = T
> F = F = T
>
> If--> then
> T --> T = T
> T --> F = F
> F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
> F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)
>
> And
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F
>
>
> Or
> T or T = F
> T or F = T
> F or T = T
> F or F = F
>
> Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.
>
> Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:
>
> | | ~p
> | |---
> | | .
> | | .
> | | q
> | | .
> | | .
> | | ~q
> | p
>
> Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
> Length: 86 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
> • Publication date : March 23, 2019
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1178 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
> •
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages
Product details
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
>
>
>
> ////////
> |:---[.]
> |( _J
> | ^ ( _|
> / \_____)
> / _____ \
> | / \ .
> | | |
> \ /\ /\__
> | | \/---
> \ \ )________________\\ \\\
> | >_____/_____)============
> \__________/ ==============
> / \ -----------------------------// ///
> | | ~~
> \ \\
> \ |\
> \ | \
> \ | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | / |
> |________/____|
> (_________)____)
>
Olcott can David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or is that totally foreign to them? Mind you, not a limit analysis hornswaggle for that is not geometry, limit analysis is not even a math proof for anyone can analysis things, analysis this post and only math hypocrites would think it is a proof.
Olcott can Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, ever ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or does that thought fly way too above their heads?
Olcott, why cannot Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Is it because they cannot even do logic correctly with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction?
>
> Olcott why does Cambridge Univ Stephen J. Toope, David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain keep teaching Boole error filled logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and these crazies still think the slant cut in cone is a ellipse when in fact it is a Oval. Why brainwash and pollute more students like Pete Olcott who is crazy enough as it is.
>
> Olcott why is noone in Cambridge physics able to ask the question which is the atom's true real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith?? Do they not have a brain to ask a simple question????
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> #8-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Print length : 137 pages
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
>
> Length: 72 pages
>
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Language: English
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
>
> #6-2, 27th published book
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
>
>
> Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.
>
> Preface:
> These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic
>
> Equal+Not
> T = T = T
> T = ~F = T
> F = ~T = T
> F = F = T
>
> If--> then
> T --> T = T
> T --> F = F
> F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
> F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)
>
> And
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F
>
>
> Or
> T or T = F
> T or F = T
> F or T = T
> F or F = F
>
> Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.
>
> Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:
>
> | | ~p
> | |---
> | | .
> | | .
> | | q
> | | .
> | | .
> | | ~q
> | p
>
> Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
> Length: 86 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
> • Publication date : March 23, 2019
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1178 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 86 pages
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
> •
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 25, 2021, 3:59:01 PM12/25/21
to
2-Bill Burns, is MATHOPEDIA, the standard reference taught at CIA University that George Tenet built?
>
3> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
#1-1, 148th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages
Product details
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Lending : Enabled
>
3> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 329 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-2, 48th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
• Lending : Enabled
#1-2, 48th published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
X-Ray: Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-3, 74th published book
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-3, 74th published book
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 25, 2021, 6:05:50 PM12/25/21
to
AP, King of Science has vacated sci.math, sci.physics and Usenet because the CIA has destroyed all Usenet. Too much time, and henceforth, AP only posts information, no response.
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Taking up way too much of my time, and the CIA has put a final lid on the coffin that was once the best science journalism of all time, because of its freedom of speech. Usenet from 1993-2021 is no longer containing any science discussion worth reading and totally dead of science activity. No-one expects govt agencies like CIA or FBI to respect and honor a forum to stay on-topic, not do off-topic, of sci.math with only math being discussed or sci.physics to be about physics content and not about drag net spam. No-one expects CIA or FBI to honor the rules of physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math. Usenet now is like trying to drive through the interior of a garbage dump that sci.math and sci.physics have become before 2022.
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 26, 2021, 1:10:18 AM12/26/21
to
2-AP, King of Science has vacated sci.math, sci.physics and Usenet because the CIA has destroyed all Usenet. Too much time, and henceforth, AP only posts information, no response.
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Taking up way too much of my time, and the CIA has put a final lid on the coffin that was once the best science journalism of all time, because of its freedom of speech. Usenet from 1993-2021 is no longer containing any science discussion worth reading and totally dead of science activity. No-one expects govt agencies like CIA or FBI to respect and honor a forum to stay on-topic, not do off-topic, of sci.math with only math being discussed or sci.physics to be about physics content and not about drag net spam. No-one expects CIA or FBI to honor the rules of physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math. Usenet now is like trying to drive through the interior of a garbage dump that sci.math and sci.physics have become before 2022.
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages
Product details
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
AP alone cannot fight the entire USA govt armed to spam sci.math & sci.physics, armed to spam just because they want to rid Usenet of AP. Me with my 20 posts per day with CIA unlimited posting spam.
To see what AP is doing henceforth-- please go to his own newsgroup--
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Taking up way too much of my time, and the CIA has put a final lid on the coffin that was once the best science journalism of all time, because of its freedom of speech. Usenet from 1993-2021 is no longer containing any science discussion worth reading and totally dead of science activity. No-one expects govt agencies like CIA or FBI to respect and honor a forum to stay on-topic, not do off-topic, of sci.math with only math being discussed or sci.physics to be about physics content and not about drag net spam. No-one expects CIA or FBI to honor the rules of physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math. Usenet now is like trying to drive through the interior of a garbage dump that sci.math and sci.physics have become before 2022.
The USA govt in its attempt to use Usenet as a drag net forum has utterly destroyed science on Usenet. Sci.chem is filled to the gills with drag net spam.
And what finally kicked the bucket on sci.physics is to see 4 shitheads with one sentence poke and jab so that the entire day long 7AM to 10PM, entire day long first 15 threads is totally covered by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius. Probably all working out of the same office to make sci.physics a Spam Mill, all because AP posts there and the game is to kick out AP.
It is taking too much of my time. Henceforth, AP never interacts in the dead Usenet, and does his science only in his own newsgroup.
Sci.physics and sci.math are now just garbage dumps, no discussion, just attack dogs all over the place.
AP's posts will now be just Bulletin Board Notices starting 24Dec 2021. I have far too much science writing to do than to be bothered by insane creeps spam milling sci.math and sci.physics, endorsed by USA govt CIA especially.
I have too many books to write to be bothered with the Trash Pile that is _now_ sci.math and sci.physics.
Bulletins such as this:
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 26, 2021, 6:09:07 PM12/26/21
to
Kibo Parry M can WilliamJ.Burns,David Cohen,Peter Higgs,Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew.
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:38:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Lending : Enabled
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-8, 1st published book
Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages
Product details
Screen Reader: Supported 
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 6:12:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:
> fails at math and science:
On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 2:21:46 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "physics hater" William J. Burns
> tarded: William J. Burns
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns
William J. Burns psychoceramic David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
> > Does the science of psychology have a word for this "insane behavior by insane persons" ?
> How about the phrase "acting like William J. Burns" ?
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns
William J. Burns psychoceramic David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
> > Does the science of psychology have a word for this "insane behavior by insane persons" ?
> How about the phrase "acting like William J. Burns" ?
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
David S. Cohen "shitwit" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.
David S. Cohen "shitwit" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:38:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"
> fails at math and science:
Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry
#1-7, 138th published book
The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry
#1-7, 138th published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-8, 1st published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Product details
File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
Print Length: 632 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
X-Ray:
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
Dec 30, 2021, 7:43:06 PM12/30/21
to
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
Michael Moroney
Dec 31, 2021, 10:53:24 AM12/31/21
to
👽 of Math and 👾 of Physics Archimedes "science hater" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, the ellipse isn't a conic section, that
there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave
isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on
his mood), plus many, many other instances of bad math and physics.
Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium few modern students even know of, much
less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing
his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly increased the
danger to our students!
One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!
Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!
Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like this.
Perhaps he is envious of their potential success, which he never had
because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone to
fail as well. Some claim he is an agent of China, in order for China to
dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of Kim Jong Un of North
Korea. Most likely he is an agent of Putin and Russia, because he has
previously attempted to summon Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new,
true mathematics" in an attempt to destroy mathematics. But the point
is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous books.
Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise
legitimate Amazon.
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, the ellipse isn't a conic section, that
there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave
isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on
his mood), plus many, many other instances of bad math and physics.
Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium few modern students even know of, much
less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing
his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly increased the
danger to our students!
One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!
Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!
Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like this.
Perhaps he is envious of their potential success, which he never had
because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone to
fail as well. Some claim he is an agent of China, in order for China to
dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of Kim Jong Un of North
Korea. Most likely he is an agent of Putin and Russia, because he has
previously attempted to summon Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new,
true mathematics" in an attempt to destroy mathematics. But the point
is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous books.
Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise
legitimate Amazon.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 10, 2022, 2:03:30 AM1/10/22
to
Is-Peter Higgs,Roger Penrose,Reinhard Genzel,Andrea Ghez,Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish,David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
>
> I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
>
> The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
>
> So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
>
> Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
>
Kibo Parry Moroney stalking attacks on
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
>
> I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
>
> The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
>
> So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
>
> Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
>
Kibo Parry Moroney stalking attacks on
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
• Lending : Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 10, 2022, 11:34:41 PM1/10/22
to
2-Is Roger Penrose,Reinhard Genzel,Andrea Ghez,Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish,David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz,Peter Higgs capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jan 11, 2022, 9:17:40 PM1/11/22
to
💩 for 🧠 Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> Claudius, why does Kibo Parry M. CIA agent keep spamming sci.physics with sordid vulgar hate speak????
>
StupidPlutonium, I am not the CIA. And even if I was, I'm not the CIA.
>> Sue the FBI and CIA and Mi5and6 for causing crime and terrorism with their unrelenting and mindless drag net spam.
>>
> Why do you always play make-believe and then pretend that it's all true?
No answer?
<plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> Claudius, why does Kibo Parry M. CIA agent keep spamming sci.physics with sordid vulgar hate speak????
>
StupidPlutonium, I am not the CIA. And even if I was, I'm not the CIA.
>> Sue the FBI and CIA and Mi5and6 for causing crime and terrorism with their unrelenting and mindless drag net spam.
>>
> Why do you always play make-believe and then pretend that it's all true?
No answer?
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 12, 2022, 12:57:02 PM1/12/22
to
When Kibo Parry M. blew his cover in 1997 just minutes after being sworn in-- he is now on a campaign to stop the boiling of lobsters and crabs. Hooray-- and let us hope he succeeds.
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
Stop and HALT the boiling of live lobsters and live crabs
>
>
>
> ////////
> |:---[.]
> |( _J Hi I am Kibo and my spam posts to sci.physics and sci.math mean free the Moon bears
>
>
>
> ////////
> |:---[.]
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 12, 2022, 4:48:44 PM1/12/22
to
CIA agent Kibo Parry M. asks why Dartmouth Dr.Hanlon and Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne make up things that are not true about the slant cut of single cone being a ellipse when AP proved it is a oval, for a single cone has only 1 axis of Symmetry impossible to produce a 2 axes symmetry of ellipse.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
• ASIN : B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date : March 11, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
•
•
• Lending : Enabled
•
Archimedes Plutonium
12:04 PM
to
Priti Patel, Christopher Wray, William J. Burns enjoy destroying and ruining sci.math and sci.physics with their Drag Net Spam. Spam that only fosters more crime than it ever captures criminals or terrorists. There probably is never a single apprehension of a terrorist or criminal for these train load of spam that the FBI, CIA, Mi5or6 dump onto sci.math and sci.physics every day. Not a single capture, but a total ruination of this newsgroup. And the spam does just the opposite-- by inciting criminality and terrorism.
Witness the death of Sir David Amess, and tell me, how much did the assinine rhetoric of Ayaz Mi5or6 contribute to his death.
Witness the storming of the Capitol Building and tell me-- is the idiot Christopher Wray, William J. Burns and posts like this thread,--- how much of destruction and lives lost because of idiots like Wray and Burns posting hatred every day of the year in sci.math and sci.physics.
What destroyed sci.math and sci.physics is idiots in intelligence services that love their sit down lazy job of flamethrowing rhetoric that only incites violence, and more violence.
Think of the absolute absurdity of a FBI and CIA that causes the terrorism causes the criminality causes the storming of the Capitol Building in January of 2021. Does anyone in the FBI or CIA have a marble brain in their head? Anyone?
AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:18 PM (11 hours ago)
to
In fact I would advise the family of Sir Amess and the family of the dead officers who helped protect the Capitol Building to name the FBI and CIA in a lawsuit because of the above spam of hatred that the FBI and CIA and Mi5&6 unload every day into Usenet.
Sue the FBI and CIA and Mi5and6 for causing crime and terrorism with their unrelenting and mindless drag net spam.
Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Jan 11, 2022, 5:27 PM
to sci.math
>of Physics "Court Jester of Math"
Michael Moroney
Jan 12, 2022, 5:22:59 PM1/12/22
to
👽 of Math and 👾 of Physics Archimedes "science hater" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "*n*lB*ttf*ckM*n*r* Attacks" Dartmouth's Phili
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
Why does the evil Plutonium keep trying to trap me into using that word
which ArchiePoo copyrighted, patented and trademarked back in 2017, by
quoting him? Is he looking for a reason to file a lawsuit against me for
using his patented, copyrighted and trademarked word without permission?
Is it true that word is the password to get into the back door <heh heh>
of the Gayville SD gay bar? Just up the road from ArchiePoo?
>> Why do you always play make-believe and then pretend that it's all true?
when they are about 10 or so, not in their 70s.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 13, 2022, 1:09:04 AM1/13/22
to
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM
Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
Hewitt Buettner
Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
by
Richard Cranium
Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM
Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by
Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM
Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM
Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner
Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
by Hewitt Buettner
Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears
by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
by Fred Glover
Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
by Herp Derpington
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..
by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
by Professor Wordsmith
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
by Herp Derpington
Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
1/23/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney
Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney
Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney
Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
by Roger Davis
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter
Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva
Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM
by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
1:37 AM
by Michael Moroney
Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
1:30 AM
by Michael Moroney
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Threatening AP's life:
Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP. Dartmouth College Kibo Parry Moroney, threatening the life of AP with this nonstop 28 year long hate spew stalking.
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"
Dartmouth College: Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner
Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths, and now, the constant hate spew of Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.
AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.
Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.
On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 7:21:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> tarded:
(snipped to save space, for the meaty sections)
> That's why you are a shit for brains
>You can't tell the
> difference between an electron and Dirac's monopole, or an electron from
> a muon. It should be easy, since the magnetic monopole
>
> You need to learn the difference between reality and your flashback
> hallucinations. Also during your hippie days, didn't anyone ever tell
> you not to lick the LSD tabs with "Goofy" on them? Bad trips, man!
Apparently Harvard's Lawrence Bacow, Lene Hau, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Sheldon Glashow,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe
would rather pay Kibo Parry Moroney another $1 million dollars for stalking 7-24-365 for 28 years, rather than teach the truth about mathematics-- it needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a Cauchy limit whitewash.
And that Logic needs to recognize Boole mixed up in error the AND with the OR. Because Boole Logic reduces to 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction.
And that Thomson in 1897 mixed up the 0.5MeV particle as the electron of atoms when it is only the Dirac Magnetic Monopole.
It is apparent the Lawrence Bacow of Harvard wishes to keep teaching falsehoods of science and is pleased to hire a unending stalker of lies, kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short of 945, and his stupid understanding of something as simple as geothermal is underground radioactivity.
Kibo Parry Moroney the 24-7-365 stalker for 28 years says--
On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 9:34:34 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:
AP writes: well I guess Harvard under Lawrence Bacow wants to never change to the truth of science, where they teach logic of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction. And teach that a ellipse is a slant cut in a single cone when really that is a oval. And no-one at Harvard even able to fathom that the real electron is the muon of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, nor able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Oh, sure, everyone in the math dept of Harvard knows calculus is geometry, but the fools of Harvard never wanting to wean themselves off of a con artist scam that is "limit analysis". You see, "limits" were invented by the Frenchman Cauchy back in 1800s, and Cauchy was sick and tired of hearing from his smartest students, that Cauchy was summing up zero width rectangles. So instead of Cauchy being a "real mathematician" and looking for a geometry proof, no, Cauchy invented a con artist trick called "limits" and ever since Cauchy, the professors of mathematics such as Harvard math professors have been con artists of math, and not teachers of math.
> fails at math and science:
Under Lawrence Bacow of Harvard, he holds back the truth of science, and brainwashes our young with his mind-rot of math, physics and science. Lawrence would rather increase the salary of stalker Kibo and brainwash his students with mind-rot.
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, postings only to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom.
Mike Moroney, science failure-- on geothermal
(1)
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling
> but even these are solar power in disguise. They pump water from wells
> from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat
> from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the
> water back into the ground. The water is about 55F out of the ground.
(2)
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >Just as a point of order, what you described is not geothermal. What
> >you've just described is thermal balancing with water, using water
> >cooler than air from the water table to cool a building in the summer,
> >and using water warmer than air from the water table to warm a building
> >in the winter.
>
> In other words, glorified solar energy. Solar energy stored and averaged
> out over many, many years.
>
(3)
On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they
> use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any
> better.
>
> Just answer one question, if you can. If it's really geothermal, why
> is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real
> geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?
(4)
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
> > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
> > on how deep they go.
> >
> > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
> > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.
>
(5)
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 12:30:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> It's amusing how he can't handle that at all. Just like he can't
> handle the concept of permafrost when he goes off on geothermal
> energy. All he can do is attack.
(6)
On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 12:21:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> geothermal heat energy is 99% from the sun where he was (unsure where,
> Mass. I think)
>
> Now tell us where Permafrost comes from.
>
> p.p.s. I was searching because I am actually looking into getting
> geothermal heat. Fossil solar energy is a great resource!
(7)
On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 11:25:58 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >And my geothermal house works on sunshine collected in the day,
>
> Not quite. Sunshine (more specifically ambient heat) collected over
> hundreds or thousands of years. Constant 50 degrees F/10 C down the hole.
> No significant geological activity here since the Jurassic and not deep
> enough to get to the actual heat of the earth.
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics. And Barry Shein loves to whisper in my ear how 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
Kibo Parry Moroney stalking attacks on
Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
Arthur B. McDonald
Francois Englert
Saul Perlmutter
Brian P. Schmidt
Adam G. Riess
Makoto Kobayashi
Toshihide Maskawa
Yoichiro Nambu
John C. Mather
George F. Smoot
Roy J. Glauber
David J. Gross
Hugh David Politzer
Frank Wilczek
Raymond Davis Jr.
Masatoshi Koshiba
Riccardo Giacconi
Gerardus 't Hooft
Martinus J.G. Veltman
Jerome I. Friedman
Henry W. Kendall
Richard E. Taylor
Carlo Rubbia
Simon van der Meer
William Alfred Fowler
Kenneth G. Wilson
James Watson Cronin
Val Logsdon Fitch
Sheldon Lee Glashow
Steven Weinberg
.
.
little fishes
.
.
Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
more and more layers of error thinking physics
.
.
John Baez
Brian Greene
Lisa Randall
Alan H. Guth
Michael E. Brown
Konstantin Batygin
Ben Bullock
Larry Harson
Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
Edward Witten
Quoting Wikipedia—
In the early 1990s, as public awareness grew of the Internet and Usenet, Parry received publicity, including a cover story in Wired magazine..
--- end quote ---
Wired (magazine) editor in chief, Nicholas Thompson
Michael Moroney

10:14 PM (2 minutes ago)
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Still posts attacking me, and no apologies to your superiors such as Dan C. and
just about everyone else here. The punishment shall continue.
Physics Phailure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium...@gmail.com> tarded:
>7—-Say you have covid-19 in the lungs and put through a CT scan with
>resonant frequency that kills a cluster of covid-19, say 10%, is that enough
>for the Immune System to wipe out the remaining 90%
Still pretending to be a scientist?
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 4:09:52 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Stupid Plutonium, I am still seeing many posts such as this one still attacking
> me. So you still haven't learned your lesson yet. So you need to be taught some
> more.
Kibo Parry Moroney stalker of 28 years of scientists, or, paid for stalker? The 28 year long stalking of AP by kibo Parry Moroney makes one think that the NSF, National Science Foundation is paying for kibo Parry to stalk, paying him and World std perhaps $100 of taxpayer dollars for every stalking post that Kibo emits. So yes, if you are paid such easy money just to post ad hominem spam, then you too would probably want some of that almost free money.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
The games that insane Kibo Parry Moroney plays:
Michael Moroney
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 16, 2022, 6:31:22 PM1/16/22
to
Whut on Kibo Parry M. an idiot because he cannot do a percentage correctly, or is Dr.Panchanathan of NSF an idiot for using Kibo Parry M. to spam sci.math and sci.physics.
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 4:52:29 PM UTC-6, whut wrote:
> Shut up idiot.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 4:52:29 PM UTC-6, whut wrote:
> Shut up idiot.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 16, 2022, 9:01:42 PM1/16/22
to
William J. Burns and David S. Cohen of CIA, Kibo Parry Moroney the CIA fuckdog stalker going on 30 years
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 6:41:18 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "math hater"
> tarded:
> "barking fuckdog"
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 6:41:18 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "math hater"
> tarded:
> "barking fuckdog"
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 17, 2022, 2:15:55 AM1/17/22
to
Kibo Parry M. graduation speech at Rensselaer Polytech. Kibo is the headers a broad outline of what you will discuss and how you destroyed sci.math and sci.physics????
3-Sheldon Glashow,CIA Kibo Parry-William J.Burns, Peter Higgs,Adam G. Riess,John C. Mather, George F. Smoot,Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, Sheldon Glashow capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
> > 🪲 of Math and 🪳 of Physics "Village Idiot of
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. __30 year stalker__, that is not nice to call your bosses William J. Burns and David S. Cohen as psychoceramics. For I bet you that both can do a percentage correctly, for which you kibo failed with your 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo does not even belong in sci.math or sci.physics.
>
> Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 1> > > Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
> > > > > > > > > 15k views
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Skip to first unread message
> > > > > > > > > Subscribe
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> > > > > > > > > 12:59 PM (now)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1033 KB
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 4> > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 5> 3> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
>
3-Sheldon Glashow,CIA Kibo Parry-William J.Burns, Peter Higgs,Adam G. Riess,John C. Mather, George F. Smoot,Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, Sheldon Glashow capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
>
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:17:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> > 🪲 of Math and 🪳 of Physics "Village Idiot of
> > fails at math and science:
> > "psychoceramic"
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. __30 year stalker__, that is not nice to call your bosses William J. Burns and David S. Cohen as psychoceramics. For I bet you that both can do a percentage correctly, for which you kibo failed with your 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo does not even belong in sci.math or sci.physics.
>
> Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
> > > > > >
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 1> > > Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 2> > > Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> > > > > > > > On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> > > > > > > > > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 15k views
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Skip to first unread message
> > > > > > > > > Subscribe
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > unread,
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > 12:59 PM (now)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
> > > > > 3> > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 3> > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > 4> > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > > X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 999 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 999 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 60 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 60 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > 5> 4> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1033 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 6> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 386 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book
> > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 4> > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 5> 3> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
May 10, 2022, 8:33:04 PM5/10/22
to
#1-1, 148th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Language : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 329 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #203,710 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #289 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,716 in Physics (Books)
•
Archimedes Plutonium
May 11, 2022, 12:52:41 AM5/11/22
to
#1-2, 48th published book
Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------
1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Language: English
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray:
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Word Wise: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
0 new messages