Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

[Michael Moroney]

Autistic Archie Plutonium writes:

<snip>

The usual "12 Failures of Plutonium" + personal attack + stalking of
Harvard professors.

You succumbed to your autism again, I see. Better luck next time.

[Michael Moroney]

>>OK, Archie, help us clear this up, once and for all.
>>Since you are the self-proclaimed expert on Logic, can you walk us through
>>this logic? Perhaps we're missing something obvious.

Why not answer the question rather than follow it up with the 12 Failures
of Plutonium again?

[Michael Moroney]

Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> babbles:

<snip yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium">

>Michael Moroney writes



>Feb 13 (2 hours ago)

>Are you on drugs or something? First you snip my post, specifically
>snipping the part where I mention Google not caring about your abuse,
>and then you come up with something about cruelty and MIT?

Why do you humiliate yourself by posting made-up crap like turning a
stadium into a particle accelerator?

[benj]

On 2/14/2018 2:34 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 2:25:24 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all
>>
>> by Archimedes Plutonium
>>
>> 12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
>> by Archimedes Plutonium
>>
>> Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall
>>
>> PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
>>
>> 1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV
>> Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy.
>>
>>
>> 2nd proof with the direct observance some years back in Poland of a 840 Mev particle along with 105 MeV particle of the hydrogen atom.
>>
>> Hello, well i found the below on the internet. I need a 840MeV particle that is the Real Proton. I have asked to look for it in the production of Muons. Is the below a production of muons along with 840 MeV particles?
>>
>> Quoting
>>
>> Indication For A Broad J(pc) = 2++ Meson At 840-mev Produced In The Reaction Pi- P ---> Pi+ Pi- N At High |t|
>> K. Rybicki, I. Sakrejda (Cracow, INP)
>> 1985 - 10 pages
>>
>> Z.Phys. C28 (1985) 65-74
>> DOI: 10.1007/BF01550250
>> Abstract (Springer)
>> The reaction π−p→π+π−n has been studied at 17.2 GeV/c and 63 GeV/c. A partial wave analysis shows a fairly broad (∼250 MeV) resonance at about 840 MeV. This object, already visible in moments of the angular distribution, is produced in theD wave with helicitym=2 via unnatural exchange. The cross section for the reaction π−p→D2U(840)n is only by an order of magnitude lower than that of ϱ(770) and falls likepLAB−2.1±0.3. We have not been able to explain this object by systematic experimental effects like acceptance and/orN* reflections; neither is the nature of the resonance (if real) clear to us.
>> --- end quote ---
>>
>>
>> 3rd proof-- pull plug out of electrical socket and notice light flash. That flash of light was the magnetic monopoles as photons with charge energy of .5MeV, for the monopoles compose all electric currents.
>>
>> 4th proof is that the radius of the hydrogen proton shrinks too much when a muon is injected and that contradicts Standard Model. The reason is obvious-- the proton is 840 MeV electron is muon and then you add a second muon.
>>
>> --- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom, confirm physics is broken ---
>>
>> So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve scattering muons off protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to explain this puzzle.
>>
>> --- end Quote ---
>>
>> 5th proof electrochemical battery is not explainable as Faraday law unless you concede the battery is a thrusting bar magnet, and thus, the battery is explained as a dipole magnet of the anode and cathode and the electrolyte solution is the ferromagnetism of spins all lined up. And thus a current in the circuit is because the battery as a thrusting magnet forces monopoles down the circuit wire.
>>
>> 6th proof, spin is charge, and charge is spin and the only particle for that is a ratio of permittivity to permeability as that of 10^-6/ 10^-12 is a charge energy of 10^6 or 1 MeV for photon charge energy, and that leaves the proton, electron=muon, monopole with .5MeV charge energy.
>>
>>
>> 7th proof the Maxwell Equations are not symmetrical without current being the flow of magnetic monopoles.
>>
>> 8th proof, now, a straightforward proof that the muon is the real-electron can come from ion theory. The trouble is that weeding out a proof of electron = muon, is that we get entangled with the magnetic monopole. So, the proof is simple for ion theory, to prove the muon = real electron. Take for example iron Fe atoms, they are 26 protons, 26 electrons=muons
>> Now iron has ion states of -4, -2, -1, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5 +6, +7
>> So, suppose the electron = .5MeV particle and not the 105 MeV particle
>> That would mean Iron can exist as iron with 26 protons and only 19 electrons at one extreme and 26 protons and 30 electrons at the other extreme.
>> Now in Maxwell theory, there is a law that enforces Conservation of Energy, called the Lenz law in Faraday law. Otherwise, you have unlimited energy and Nature does not have unlimited energy.
>> So that in atoms, the protons become a thrusting bar magnet and the electrons= real-electrons are the closed loop of wire (inert gases are closed loop wires and why bonding exists is to close the loop of real-electron structure).
>> So, the proof that .5MeV are not electrons, is that iron bonds readily with other iron forming a compound of iron, the metal iron and metallic bond is due to iron atoms wanting to close the loop of their 26 Real Electrons. They close that loop by the metallic bond. That means, the existence of ions from -4 to +7 is unrelated altogether from Electron configuration. That ions are some other particle behavior but not the electron nor proton behavior.
>> The reason iron exists as iron from Fe-4 to Fe+7 is that the particle .5MeV is a surface interloper particle of atoms, it is a add-on particle not the integral electron of atoms. If the monopole were the electron we break conservation of energy by all these interlopers. The reason the chemical table is all built around the inert gases, is because Faraday's law must be obeyed and thus atoms with a closed loop of their electrons seek no bonding of electrons= muons. But atoms that have no closed loop of their muons, seek that closed loop structure and thus, they form covalent, ionic, metallic bonds with other muons of other atoms.
>>
>> 9th Proof. In Chemistry, it is rare, that a atom loses or gains any Real-Electron=muon.
>> And that is a 9th proof that Real Electron=muon, that beta decay in Old Physics, was not the electron of atoms but the transfer of Magnetic Monopoles.
>> The only real radioactive decay mode is the helium nucleus-- alpha decay
>> But there is never a Real Electron decay for that would mean muons spewed out of atoms. Nor do we see protons spewed out of atoms, Real Proton = 840 MeV. The so called hydrogen nucleus of a 938 MeV is not radioactive decay, for it is still a 840 proton + 105 muon = hydrogen atom.
>>
>> 10th Proof. Well, I spoke of the internal heart or core of the concept of Chemistry, that the proton/s and electron/s are two parts of the Faraday Law. The protons are the thrusting bar magnet and the electrons= muons forms the closed loop of wire. Essentially that is the heart and core of atomic physics, a replay of Faraday's law with protons and electrons.
>>
>> But, however, the electrons= muons only forms a closed loop wire for Faraday's law in the inert gases, the helium, neon, argon, etc and all other atoms want to have that closed loop configuration. Thus, is borne the Chemistry of bonding. Chemistry is borne. So that one atom without a closed loop configuration bonds with another atom to achieve that goal. So chemistry bonding is that of muons bonded to other muons in different atoms.
>>
>> Now, can these .5 MeV particles fulfill the atoms need to make their muons a closed loop? Obviously not, because ions of atoms such as Fe, iron, swing from -4 to +7 in ions, so that proves ions cannot solve a atom's problem of its electron structure being less than closed loop. Only muons of other atoms can fulfill a atom's need to be closed loop.
>>
>> 11th Proof. Solving the Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly, alongside proton radius shrunk
>>  --- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom, confirm physics is broken ---
>>
>> So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve scattering muons off protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to explain this puzzle.
>>  --- end Quote ---
>>
>> Now in re-reading that Ars article on proton radius shrinking when a hydrogen atom of 840 MeV proton with electron = 105 MeV and then a second muon is tried to be compounded-- will of course, shrink the proton radius for the two muons with 1 proton all three are centered at the center of the proton.
>>
>> But in re-reading was mentioned an anomaly I was not familiar with-- Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly.
>>
>> And reading some results of that, I find surprizing for it was Feynman who claimed Electrodynamics was the supreme physics theory in accuracy of prediction.
>>
>> But the anomaly is off by a mere .1%, which seems very very small to be not even an anomaly. Trouble is, the electron of Old Physics was found to be so accurate as to be described as physic's most precise finding ever, and that makes the .1% discrepancy ever so much larger.
>>
>> Now, I was able to explain away the proton radius anomaly because the proton is not 938 MeV but is 840 MeV and the electron is not the .5MeV particle but rather is 105 MeV.
>>
>> So, can I explain away the Muon Magnetic Moment Anomaly. I believe I can easily. For if you consider that what Old Physics measured as the electron magnetic moment was none other than the monopole as a dressed up photon magnetic moment. And it is easily seen that in EM theory the permeability constant is "exact" no uncertainty at 1.26*10^-6 H/m.
>>
>> So, it is no wonder that Old Physics thought their electron magnetic moment in Quantum Electrodynamics was so ultra ultra precise-- for, they never measured the magnetic moment of the electron, but instead a magnetic monopole of the dressed up .5 MeV particle.
>>
>> Then, when it came time to measure the magnetic moment of the muon, the real-true-electron, there is this .1% discrepancy, but there are discrepancies in the proton and neutron etc.
>>
>> So, once we realized the Real Electron is the muon, afterall, there is no magnetic moment anomaly.
>>
>> 12th proof -- Static Electricity Re: Proofs that the Real Electron=muon
>>
>> Alright, I need a 12th proof, for I do not want to neglect what is probably our first encounter with electricity-- static electricity. As we walk across a carpet and touch something we experience a spark. Trouble with static electricity, is that the concept makes out the atom as a flimsy structure, really really flimsy structure that electrons of atoms can be picked off so easily, and from very many diverse materials. One would think the structure of atoms was built of stronger stuff. And that is what the Electron = Muon concept is about, that it is so very very hard to separate a electron from its atom, just like separating a proton out of a nucleus. So the subject of static electricity is this interloper particle, this surface superficial particle that is easily "whipped up" as the magnetic monopole, just as easy as producing electricity in a Faraday Law demonstration of a thrusting bar magnet in closed loop of wire. For, we can easily imagine that our walk across a carpet is similar to a thrusting bar magnet and then the closed loop wire is when we touch something, having built up some monopoles in our body.
>>
>> Old Physics would say that we picked up electrons on the carpet, and as we touch something, remit that imbalance of electrons.
>>
>> New Physics would say that we picked up magnetic monopoles.
>>
>> Now let us look at other static electric experiments. For when we rub a glass rod (+1) with silk, or rub a plastic rod (-1) with wool. Here again, Old Physics would say we pick off electrons of atoms.
>>
>> New Physics would say, no, the atoms are still composed of all their electrons and protons. The only thing changed with the rubbing is that energy of the rub transfers to the magnetic monopole energy-- packets of .5MeV monopoles of charge energy. And the energy of rubbing becomes monopoles. These are those closed Lines of Force of a magnet, and the moment we touch something these stored up monopoles, flow from our body to that of the touched object.
>>
>> How is that a proof the electron = muon?
>>
>> Simple, in that the carpet, or plastic rod (-1) with wool or glass rod (+1) with silk, are materials that are electrically neutral substances, for the rubbing action was transformed not into free electrons, but was formed into monopoles. These substances remain electrically neutral, and the only change is that the rub created magnetic monopoles-- some + charged monopoles, some - charged monopoles, and these monopoles are superficial to the atoms where they formed.
>>
>> Static Electricity is merely stored monopoles. Monopoles are conservation of energy, for the rubbing had to be transformed into some energy packets and that is-- monopoles of charge energy.
>>
>> In the experiment of where we pick up bits of paper from either the glass rod or the plastic rod due to static electricity. What is happening here, is that the rod is not involved with the Real Electrons of atoms, but is involved with the superficial surface charged particle that is the magnetic monopole.
>>
>> Now the electroscope is explained much much easier with magnetic monopoles rather than the silly electrons on one leaf pushing away the electrons on the second leaf.
>>
>> For consider instead a closed loop line of force between the two leafs
>>
>> /\
>> O
>>
>> Where the leafs start out as ||
>>
>> Then comes the charged rod of monopoles sending down a monopole closed loop O that pushes apart the two leafs.
>>
>> Now i have two gold leafs and if true should leave the push apart looking more like this () rather than this /\. And that is what i have ()
>>
>> by Archimedes Plutonium
>> ------------------
>> -------------------
>>
>>
>> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>
>>> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
>>> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>>
>> Moroney is a Boston poster who says he weighed the electron in High School and went on to get a degree in engineering but how is this possible when he is so dumb and cannot even do a percentage correctly?
>>
>>
>> Michael Moroney is not only a failure of math, --must have have been burnt out at school-- but also an insane crank on sci.math, sci.physics for 24 years now. I have often asked Google to please engineer a delete key so original authors of a thread can develop their own thread without these insane stalking poopers pooping up (Moroney a 24 year stalker). Let original authors delete any post in their thread which is unfit. Let insane stalkers make their own threads so they can crap all they wish without interrupting those doing serious science.
>>
>> MAKE sci.math a Level Playing field, and stop tilting sci.math in favor of moron stalkers.
>>
>> Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
>>
>> President Larry Summers
>>
>> Harvard Physics dept
>> Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
>> Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
>> Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
>> Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
>> David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
>> Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
>> Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
>>
>>
>> Harvard Math dept
>> Noam Elkies (FP)
>> Dennis Gaitsgory (FP)
>> Robin Gottlieb (PP)
>> Benedict Gross (FP)
>> Joseph Harris (FP)
>> Heisuke Hironaka (EM)
>> Michael Hopkins (FP)
>> Arthur Jaffe (FP)
>> David Kazhdan (EM)
>> Mark Kisin (FP)
>> Peter Kronheimer (FP)
>> Jacob Lurie (FP)
>> Eric Maskin (FP)
>> Barry Mazur (FP)
>> Curtis McMullen (FP)
>> David Mumford (EM)
>> Martin Nowak (FP)
>> Gerald Sacks (EM)
>> Wilfried Schmid (FP)
>> Yum-Tong Siu (FP)
>> Shlomo Sternberg (EM)
>> John Tate (EM)
>> Cliff Taubes (FP)
>> Hugh Woodin (FP)
>> Horng-Tzer Yau (FP)
>> Shing-Tung Yau (FP)
>>
>>    /\-------/\
>>    \::O:::O::/
>>   (::_  ^  _::)
>>    \_`-----'_/
>> You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Harvard?
>> And, even though you-- professors of math/physics, want to remain stupid in Real Electron/Calculus, your students deserve better.

>
> Michael Moroney writes
>
>
>
> Feb 13 (2 hours ago)
>
>
> Are you on drugs or something? First you snip my post, specifically
>

Will someone please take this nutjob's keyboard away?

[Michael Moroney]

Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails yet again:

>Eh, Moron Moroney what percentage short is 940 MeV from 945MeV,

Those don't sound like very useful numbers. (what, you are having trouble
looking up the mssses of the proton or muon? FAIL!) You may find the
numbers 951 and 938 slightly more useful. The difference is almost 13
MeV, which is about 12% the mass of a muon too heavy.

>and redeem yourself of the claim you are an engineer.

What? What will my coworkers do without me? My degree comes in so useful
for understanding how absurd your more absurd claims are!

Sine waves are really semicircles? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
No i (sqrt(-1))? That's OK, we EE's use 'j' instead.
No electric field? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
8.88 is "exactly" 9??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Fe+3 more massive than a neutral Fe atom? HAHAHAHHA!!!!
.511 MeV particle a magnetic monopole yet div[B] = 0? HAHAHAHAHA!!!
A test tube full of H+ ????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Oh by the way, you need to redeem yourself of the claim you are some
scientist or mathematician, and embrace what you really are, a net kO0k.
Not as if everyone else doesn't know that...you'll be the last one to
figure that out...

[Michael Moroney]

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:

>On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 4:14:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> p.s. See if you can learn from dumb Mr. Boole. Don't try to walk to town during
>> one of those Dakota blizzards wearing only a T-shirt and sandals...

Subject: Re: Are MIT students wearing only T-shirts & sandals?

Yesterday they sure were. And the day before. The temperature was unusually
warm, temps in the 70s. (Global Warming?) Not so much today.

<snip the 12 Failures of Plutonium, yet again, twice!>

Oops, looks like I triggered the autism yet again. Must be that Archie realizes
he really isn't smarter than Mr. Boole.

[Michael Moroney]

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael Moroney writes:
>9:01 AM (7 hours ago)

>Physics Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>>Stay out of all my threads, you miserable rotten creep

>Sorry, there is no such thing as "my thread" on Usenet. Porat has just
>as much right to babble his nonsense here as you do to babble your
nonsense here. You post something, expect a response.

>Besides, what's the difference between Porat babbling nonsense about
>'circlons' and 'chains of orbitals' and Archimedes Plutonium babbling
nonsense about 'electron=muon' and 'cosmic plutonium atoms'????
Other than the fact Plutonium is a much better speller?

So tell us, Archie, do you believe you have the right to babble nonsense
here but Porat doesn't have the same right to babble nonsense? If so,
why?

<snip full blown stalking autism attack with the "12 Failures">

Oh dear, poor Archie seems to be cycling back and forth, sometimes restraining
his autism, but sometimes letting loose with hundreds of lines of failures.
I hope he can get it under control some day.

[Michael Moroney]

I missed how Archie mutiple posted his reply, upping his lameness score.

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>Moroney and Shein writing

Shein? Never met the man.

> tests for Boston

I don't even live in Boston.

>Michael Moroney writes the definitive physics and math entrance
>exam for both Harvard and MIT
>1:06 AM (19 minutes ago)

No, I just measure the lameness and predictability of Plutonium posts.

>Nomen Nescio
>4:46 PM (3 hours ago)

>Palmjob Paddle Award:
>[ ] Did You Catch The Hidden Message Behind Lady G Outfit Last Night?'s mushroom-slathered meatpole
>[ ] Jim McGinn weather report
>[ ] Steve Carroll's Darwinian Finch

>=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=DB=9E=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=
=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88 ]=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=
=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=83=20
>=E2=96=82=E2=96=84=E2=96=85=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=
=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=85=E2=96=84=E2=96=83=E2=96=82=20
>I=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=
=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=
=96=88=E2=96=88=E2=96=88].=20
>=E2=97=A5=E2=8A=99=E2=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=
=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=96=B2=E2=8A=99=E2=97=A4...=20

ahh, I see. Archie doesn't like the crude ascii checkboxes.

>AP writes: No questions on the fact the REal Proton is 840MeV, REal
>Electron is 105MeV and .5MeV particle was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?
<snip crap>


So here goes: New Improved Plutonium Lameness Checklist.

=E2=98=90 Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
=E2=98=91 ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
=E2=98=91 ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
=E2=98=91 ...multiple times...
=E2=98=90 ...enough times to be classified as spam...
=E2=98=91 ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie added zero new content...
=E2=98=91 ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
=E2=98=91 ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
=E2=98=91 ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
=E2=98=91 ...who are university math or physics professors...
=E2=98=91 ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
=E2=98=91 ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
=E2=98=91 ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
=E2=98=91 ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
=E2=98=91 ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
=E2=98=91 ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
=E2=98=91 ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
=E2=98=90 ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
=E2=98=91 ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
=E2=98=90 ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
=E2=98=91 ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
=E2=98=90 ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
=E2=98=91 ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
=E2=98=91 ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
=E2=98=91 ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
=E2=98=90 ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
=E2=98=90 ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
=E2=98=91 ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
=E2=98=91 ...Archie asks Google Groups to something they can't do...
=E2=98=91 ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.

Archimedes Plutonium Lameness score: 23!

[Michael Moroney]

I missed how Archie mutiple posted his reply, upping his lameness score.

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>Moroney and Shein writing

Shein? Never met the man.

> tests for Boston

I don't even live in Boston.

>Michael Moroney writes the definitive physics and math entrance
>exam for both Harvard and MIT
>1:06 AM (19 minutes ago)

No, I just measure the lameness and predictability of Plutonium posts.

>Nomen Nescio
>4:46 PM (3 hours ago)

>Palmjob Paddle Award:
>[ ] Did You Catch The Hidden Message Behind Lady G Outfit Last Night?'s mushroom-slathered meatpole
>[ ] Jim McGinn weather report
>[ ] Steve Carroll's Darwinian Finch

>███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
>▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
>I███████████████████].
>◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

ahh, I see. Archie doesn't like the crude ascii checkboxes.

>AP writes: No questions on the fact the REal Proton is 840MeV, REal
>Electron is 105MeV and .5MeV particle was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?
<snip crap>


So here goes: New Improved Plutonium Lameness Checklist.

☐ Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
☑ ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
☑ ...multiple times...
☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
☐ ...and Archie added zero new content...
☑ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
☑ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
☑ ...who are university math or physics professors...
☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
☑ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
☑ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
☐ ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
☑ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
☑ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☑ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
☑ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
☐ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☑ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☑ ...Archie asks Google Groups to something they can't do...
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.

[Michael Moroney]

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: Moroney & Shein Boston show Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

>Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages

Again?? Plutonium failed all over the place again! Who has been feeding
Plutonium Taco Bell Extra Beany Burritos laced with Ex-Lax?? Stop it!

>12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
>by Archimedes Plutonium

It's back!! The 12 Failures of Plutonium!! 12 claims the electron is the
short-lived muon, and every single one of them is wrong! How could
Plutonium fail so much?

[Michael Moroney]

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>Subject: Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard,
> teach percentages correctly??--

AlzheimerPlutonium, you are still mad at me for catching your math mistake?

FAIL!



x-no-archive: yes

[Michael Moroney]

AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>AP writes: 26 years of posts of Moroney and all they amount to is the above,

Hey, you're the one who after 26 years is posting ascii art buttholes!

>no wonder Harvard kicked out Moroney as a moron tramp

You're projecting again, Dartmouth College fired your ass for posting
stupid crap like your Plutonium Atom Stupidity under their name!


x-no-archive: yes

[Michael Moroney]

AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:27:27 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 10:45:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium fails at math:

>AP writes: Moroney-kibo-shein spammers for decades, never any math never any physics-- just insane stalking

Archimedes Plutonium, spammer for decades, never any math never any physics-- just
insane stalking.

x-no-archive: yes
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:

[Michael Moroney]

[Michael Moroney]

AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:27:27 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 12:06:30 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>AP writes: the worthless stalker Moroney of 27 years, just repeats and repeats, the
>insane nutter.

I can't help it if your autism makes you so repetive.
Why are you autistic people so repetive?


x-no-archive: yes

[SergIo]

On 4/2/2019 2:18 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:27:27 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 12:06:30 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> AP writes: the worthless stalker Moroney of 27 years, just repeats and repeats, the
>> insane nutter.
>
> I can't help it if your autism makes you so repetive.
> Why are you autistic people so repetive?
>
>
> x-no-archive: yes
>

south dakota is know for high levels of cosmic rays

[Michael Moroney]

AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>Subject: Re: try it out-- all the light vanishes Re: slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light

>I do not think anyone has made any "use" of Dr. Hau's slowed light, until now.
>For it has been just a curiousity at Harvard, not of any use, until now.
...
>Dr. Hau, when you read this, please do the experiment and tell the world about
>it. I am pretty sure all the light vanishes the instant you turn the laser off.

>Try it.


poor archie. Perhaps his diseased cats cause him to have delusions such as
his evil atom god or his belief that anyone actual agrees with him enough so
he uses "we" to describe his delusions, or that all the professors he stalks
actually see and read his posts.

I actually heard of a disease carried by cats that causes rodents not to be
afraid of cats. It's actually a survival technique of the disease, rodents with
it aren't afraid of cats, they are more likely to be caught and eaten by cats,
cats get or at least carry the disease, they spread it to other rodents, who
become unafraid of cats, etc. They say it affects humans (with cats) as well,
some mental illness, but I forget exactly what.


x-no-archive: yes

[Chris M. Thomasson]

Toxoplasma Gondii. Time to take a shower.

[Michael Moroney]

AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>AP writes: Is Harvard physics like Moroney-- only doing ad hominem, never any physics

Is South Dakota like AutisticPlutonium-- only doing ad hominem, never any physics.



x-no-archive: yes

[Michael Moroney]

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: Announcement:: AP's Calculus book most recent best seller--World's
>First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition by
>Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

>Announcement:: AP's Calculus book most recent best seller--World's First
>Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition by Archimedes
>Plutonium (Author)

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your
children! He teaches bizarre false physics, that there are no negative
numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many,
many other instances of bad math and physics.

He has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books on Usenet.
Fortunately, this has failed so far, perhaps in part due to the fact Usenet
is an old, dying medium few students even know of, much less use. However, Mr.
Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing his dangerous books for free
on Kindle. This has greatly increased the risk to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is to teach false Boolean logic such as
3 AND 2 = 5. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll
post a false statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that
it is false, but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false
statement such as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer
scientists. It is important for future computer scientists to remember that
in the bitwise Boolean logic used by computers, 3 OR 2 = 3 and 3 AND 2 = 2.
Don't let Plutonium's bad logic confuse you!

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math and physics, just like he
is. Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. Maybe he is a
minion of Kim Jong Un of North Korea. But the point is, stay away, if he
offers to give or sell you his dangerous book. Especially now since they are
available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.

[Michael Moroney]

Babbling KO0k Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> ko0kbabbles:

>Yes, so, like the ellipse is never a conic cut, always a cylinder cut. What is
>wrong with just being honest and truthful.

>Subject: kicking out the sci.physics scumbag shithead kibo Parry Moroney-- no science only hate spiel stalker

How many times do I have to tell you, kooktard, if you attack me I attack back. You
keep attacking me, so I guess you must like it when I attack back.

Either that, or you really are too dumb and stoopid to understand "if you attack me
I attack back".

And now you even attack me when I point out that Sefton is babbling nonsense.

How dumb and stoopid is that, Uncle Al?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.
Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."



x-no-archive: yes

[Michael Moroney]

Minnow of Math and Runt of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> begs me to strike back for attacking me:

>kibo-- boar hog with tits Re: kibo Parry Moroney, booted out of sci.physics-- kibo is useless

Archimedes Plutonium made a wonderful discovery when he discovered the existence
of the prehistoric California Desert Walrus. This rare creature is unknown to
science, as only the tusks have been discovered. However Plutonium discovered
that since there were no fish for the California Desert Walrus to feed on, it
depended on other prey. It was the local apex predator, preying on the local
tigers. The California Desert Walrus would deliver a lethal blow to the tiger by
biting it in the mouth. The California Desert Walrus's tusks would break off and
jam the tiger's mouth open. The California Desert Walrus followed its prey around
until it died of exhaustion from its mouth being pried open, then the California
Desert Walrus would feast on the body of the tiger. The tusks grew back the next
day.

Stupid scientists thought the tiger skeletons with California Desert Walrus tusks
jamming its mouth open were actually the mythical Saber Tooth Tiger. How silly that
they didn't discover the hunting techniques of the California Desert Walrus, jamming
the mouths of its prey open with its tusks!



x-no-archive: yes

[Flaming Psychotic Embolism]

Shut up idiette.

[john]

MM
‘

And now you even attack me when I point out that Sefton is babbling nonsense.

’
For you, Mikey, EVERYTHING is nonsense.

[Michael Moroney]

Minnow of Math and Runt of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>What we throw out of Old Math-- excerpt from my textbook-- TEACHING TRUE
>MATHEMATICS: journal-textbook for ages 5 to 18, Volume 1; Kindle

No, Archie, don't use "we" just because your diseased cats are meowing!! They
are not telling you to throw stuff out of math, they are telling you that they are
hungry! Feed them!!! (and take them to the vet!!)


x-no-archive: yes