Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Truth needs to be written just once

56 views
Skip to first unread message

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 12:59:42 AM9/24/21
to
Truth needs to be written just once. I did that last year, when I wrote about the cause of gravity, the way the infinite universe works, its cyclic nature, creation from supernovas, unity of forces, deuterium fission, etc. (Some of these articles such as that on deuterium fission I may have repeated this year, for public interest.)
Those with brains have understood it, I am glad to say, although for the moment that understanding is confined to my learned Indian friends. It will spread.

The stupid western or westernized racists+bigots, who do not even have the brains to be effective hypocrites, acting out of their petty biases and perceived interests, attack me as must the attack dogs of the vile, corrupt physics establishments.

Unfortunately, such vileness and stupidity as they show are awesome global phenomena, given the repetition of the e=mcc=hv bullshit mantra with its derivatives literally many quintillion times! Through daily attacks upon the public mind of awed billions, via media and academia, professors, politicians and prostitutes - all bolstered by grabby financing and computer artwork.

And yet, even though e=mcc has been forced down heads many quintillion times, it still has not made it to the level of truth. It needs to be repeated, by the attack dogs.

That e=mcc has reduced those should be regarded as eminent physicists to the level of whooping chimpanzees, is what Clutterfreak has shown by his excellent research.
How can I not appreciate his insight and endeavour?
That is what I did.

But the fool whodumbo, my sedulous stalker, the Mad March Hare of Einsteinian DisgustLand, has to butt in with its foul stink, its normal routine.
In the interest of public health, what else to do but flush this impudent excrescence?
That is what I did.

Now this fool pnal, another attack dog, joins in the barking.
Not a dog really a mad squeaking dormouse pretending to be a mad dog. And supporting the Mad March Hare whodumbo, naturally, for they are both rabid due to inhalation of the e=mcc virus. They consider their rabid state to be the normal human state. Sad.

Out of kindness to the world I do not flush it; instead, here I explain my genius understanding of such despicable deplorables.

Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa devils.


whodat

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 10:41:34 AM9/24/21
to

Here piggy piggy.....

whodat

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 11:16:16 AM9/24/21
to
On 9/23/2021 11:59 PM, piggy Arindam Banerjee wrote:

[...]

> Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa devils.

Is that fresh lipstick you put on? Why yes, don't you look lovely,
our pretty little sci.physics piggy!

Keep putting on that lipstick. You'll fool other pigs, but not anyone
who knows anything in the sci newsgroups. Now you are accepted in
sci.physics, as the pig that you are.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 9:34:28 PM9/24/21
to
- flush -
Pigturd whodumbo flushed.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 9:35:02 PM9/24/21
to
- flush -

whodat

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 9:48:56 PM9/24/21
to
On 9/24/2021 8:34 PM, Pig with lipstick Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> - flush -

Here piggy piggy!

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 24, 2021, 11:53:23 PM9/24/21
to
- flush -

whodat

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 3:51:44 AM9/25/21
to
On 9/24/2021 10:53 PM, sci.physsics piggy Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> - flush -
>


Pig squeals don't attract attention here any longer.

Here piggy piggy, have some nice slop!

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 5:48:57 AM9/25/21
to
- flush -
pigturd whodumbo flushed

whodat

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 1:53:20 PM9/25/21
to
On 9/25/2021 4:48 AM, the pig wearing lipstich Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> - flush -
> pigturd whodumbo flushed

Keep telling yourself you are making an impact. In the realm of human
interactions is a feature known as renome. One of the things that seems
to elude you is that you are taking on a "non-person" in these petty
insult laden "discussions." You are using your own name and location and
you have established your renome, that of a mentally ill narcissist who
claims to be the discoverer of a "new physics."

Of course you've only offered nonsense as a basis for your claims.

Opposing you here is an identity that only exists so long as I am logged
into the sci.physics newsgroup in Usenet. When I click on the little x
at the upper right hand corner of my display, "whodat" completely
disappears in the real sense leaving behind a virtual entity that you
keep battling, much as Don Quixote tilted at windmills that he imagined
could be beaten in battle.

Both of you, Arindam Banerjee and Don Quixote, can believe whatever you
want, while in reality there is no achievement by either of you. Your
denials have destroyed any positive nature your renome may have held at
some time in the past, but it is difficult to tell what is true and what
lies you promote because there's clearly no sane base of information
available, so readers for the most part assume that the insanity they
see now has always been part and parcel of Arindam Banerjee. You have
addressed the fact that your father wrote letters on your behalf. Even
that sounds as though the man was desperate to find some middle ground
for a son who consistently disappointed everyone, including him.

Of course Don Quixote was never real, the product of imagination, but
then the same is true about most of your scribblings. You really truly
need to stop posting your gibberish. This is not a narcissist's support
group. You keep taking me on and I only exist here and now, I'm not real
when you make your postings. But in your mind you've made me real,
showing just how pathetic you are.

Wherever he is, Uncle Al is enjoying this show and your dead father is
crying, wherever he is. He always knew. Yet you continue to dishonor
him.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 6:24:19 PM9/25/21
to

whodat

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 8:25:05 PM9/25/21
to
On 9/25/2021 5:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> - flush -
> Pigturd whodumbo flushed


Wherever he is, Uncle Al is enjoying this show and your dead father is
crying, wherever he is. He always knew. Yet you continue to dishonor
him.

You're so demented even your father's memory is sacrificed to your
insanity.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 9:43:33 PM9/25/21
to
- flush -

Pigturd whodumbo flushed.

whodat

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 10:19:26 PM9/25/21
to
On 9/25/2021 8:43 PM, out pig wearing lipstick Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> - flush -

> Pigturd flushed.

So you flushed yourself!

<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/ca/Good-bye-cruel-world-movie-poster-1982.jpg>

Congratulations.

Here's some lovely slop for you to eat so you can do it again. Eat up,
piggy. Don't forget the lipstick when you're finished eating. You want
to look pretty for sci.physics.

Can someone who engages in such stupid games actually discover anything
new in physics? It's obvious they cannot.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 10:23:19 PM9/25/21
to
On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 12:19:26 UTC+10, whodat wrote:
some crap. So
- flush -

whodat

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 11:11:26 PM9/25/21
to
On 9/25/2021 9:23 PM, The evil pig wearing lipstick Arindam Banerjee
wrote:

> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 12:19:26 UTC+10, whodat wrote:

> some crap. So
> - flush -

I have been referring to the works of Leibniz and have come to the
conclusion that while it is possible you are insane it is much more
likely that you are simply evil, and prior to this I never accepted
the Christian views on pure evil. Thank you for providing an example
that has straightened out this intellectual challenge I had experienced
for most of my life. I'm not going to keep promoting this idea in
general, only in the specific instance before this august body.

It answers any questions I had about Arindam placing his battles, not
the ones about his so called new science but rather his clear need to
elevate himself without any legitimacy. I'm somewhat ashamed that I
didn't think of this solution much earlier, but I was of the school
that holds that "hope springs eternal." It was a waste of time and
effort. I am hopeful that this is a "one off" case but with the newly
open mind just acheived I am going to consider this option in more
cases.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 26, 2021, 1:22:11 AM9/26/21
to
- flush -
Crazy pigturd whodumbo flushed

mitchr...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 26, 2021, 2:43:31 PM9/26/21
to
Common truth should be used forever...

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 26, 2021, 7:24:46 PM9/26/21
to
On Monday, 27 September 2021 at 04:43:31 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Common truth should be used forever...
Finding what is truthful takes intellect and honesty. Finding new truth needs Divine help.

Paul Alsing

unread,
Sep 26, 2021, 11:19:37 PM9/26/21
to
On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 4:24:46 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:

> Finding what is truthful takes intellect and honesty. Finding new truth needs Divine help.

If you actually need Divine Help then you are no scientist! That has never been the way science works, and it will never will be!

James McGinn

unread,
Sep 27, 2021, 12:43:10 AM9/27/21
to
On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 4:24:46 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
Stop being an ass and explain your discovery.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 28, 2021, 3:07:30 AM9/28/21
to
The greatest scientists were all theists.
The pseudo scientists are all atheists.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 28, 2021, 3:18:44 AM9/28/21
to
The rail gun fact is that when you put a mass on two parallel rails and put millions of amperes of current through it, it will move very fast.

If you stop its movement, by making it hit the end of the blocked "barrel", then the whole system will move forward with its momentum.

This will happen as the force that makes it move fast does not have a backwards reaction. The reaction is sideways, laterally upon the rails. Unlike any chemical gun, or a coilgun, where there is equal and opposite reaction.

(This is the new discovery. My experiments (making such a model and suspending it as a pendulum bob) show that there is no backwards reaction.
Extending it to arrest the mass/bullet/armature makes the whole equipment move forward, violating inertia)

The consequence is:

You can make a round trip to the nearest star in say 5 years.

Design for this engine has to be such that:

The momentum creating mass returns to the starting position.

This action is made cyclic, as for any engine.

The above discovery with the implications and details are present in the youtube videos that I have made.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


James McGinn

unread,
Sep 28, 2021, 3:30:23 PM9/28/21
to
On Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 12:18:44 AM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> The rail gun fact is that when you put a mass on two parallel rails and put millions of amperes of current through it, it will move very fast.

Yeah, so . . ?

> If you stop its movement, by making it hit the end of the blocked "barrel", then the whole system will move forward with its momentum.

Uh, . . . okay, I guess.

> This will happen as the force that makes it move fast does not have a backwards reaction.

You need to demonstrate this explicitly. Where in your videos have you demonstrated this. Give me a time stamp.

> (This is the new discovery. My experiments (making such a model and suspending it as a pendulum bob) show that there is no backwards reaction.

How so?

> You can make a round trip to the nearest star in say 5 years.

Don't make these kind of claims. You sound like a complete imbecile. Focus on your discovery in your explanation. Do this first.

Be aware that, as Feynman stated, the person easiest to fool is yourself.

James McGinn / Genius

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Sep 28, 2021, 5:23:12 PM9/28/21
to
On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 at 05:30:23 UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 12:18:44 AM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The rail gun fact is that when you put a mass on two parallel rails and put millions of amperes of current through it, it will move very fast.
> Yeah, so . . ?
> > If you stop its movement, by making it hit the end of the blocked "barrel", then the whole system will move forward with its momentum.
> Uh, . . . okay, I guess.
> > This will happen as the force that makes it move fast does not have a backwards reaction.
> You need to demonstrate this explicitly. Where in your videos have you demonstrated this. Give me a time stamp.
Check out the pendulum experiments. Do your own work if you are interested.
> > (This is the new discovery. My experiments (making such a model and suspending it as a pendulum bob) show that there is no backwards reaction.
> How so?
The swingback is the same even when the armature leaves the system with greater velocity due to the current.
> > You can make a round trip to the nearest star in say 5 years.
> Don't make these kind of claims. You sound like a complete imbecile. Focus on your discovery in your explanation. Do this first.
I have done that. In great detail. Over the last 21 years.

>
> Be aware that, as Feynman stated, the person easiest to fool is yourself.
Among bad people, who are out to steal your work and abuse you instead of helping you, one has to be careful.
Unfortunately in this wicked world I am the sole god among lotsa devils. Good people, if any left, are scared as bad people rule.
>
> James McGinn / Genius
Do not fool yourself. You are no genius. But you are an arsehole. Useless, too.

Paul Alsing

unread,
Sep 28, 2021, 9:23:22 PM9/28/21
to
On Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 2:23:12 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 at 05:30:23 UTC+10, James McGinn wrote:

> > Be aware that, as Feynman stated, the person easiest to fool is yourself.

> Do not fool yourself. You are no genius. But you are an arsehole. Useless, too.

Finally, Arindam finds a truth...
0 new messages