Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Earth inner and outer core defy Newtonian gravity and GR implies the Sun core does the same Chapt13.2 rigid-body-rotation #289 Atom Totality 5th ed
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 7, 2012, 3:26:51 PM2/7/12
to
Since the 1990s, evidence is accumulating that the inner and outer
core are both solid body rotation, even though the outer core is
liquid and that the outer core is rotating faster than the entire rest
of the planet is rotating. Only the EM force is strong enough to
exhibit a iron liquid inner core to rotate in rigid body rotation and
be faster than the rest of the planet.
This characteristic of Earth implies the Sun has no mass-gravity, nor
does it have General Relativity. The Sun has only EM force.
The core and out to the tachocline of the Sun is EM in action and the
remainder of the Sun to the surface where we see sunspots is almost
rigid body rotation. I say almost because there is a slight
differential rotation. But neither mass gravity of Newton nor General
Relativity can have a rigid body rotation of the entire Sun from
center out to sunspots. Only EM force is strong enough to keep the Sun
together. If the universe had only gravity to hold astro bodies
together, the Sun and all stars would dissipate out into space very
quickly.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
core are both solid body rotation, even though the outer core is
liquid and that the outer core is rotating faster than the entire rest
of the planet is rotating. Only the EM force is strong enough to
exhibit a iron liquid inner core to rotate in rigid body rotation and
be faster than the rest of the planet.
This characteristic of Earth implies the Sun has no mass-gravity, nor
does it have General Relativity. The Sun has only EM force.
The core and out to the tachocline of the Sun is EM in action and the
remainder of the Sun to the surface where we see sunspots is almost
rigid body rotation. I say almost because there is a slight
differential rotation. But neither mass gravity of Newton nor General
Relativity can have a rigid body rotation of the entire Sun from
center out to sunspots. Only EM force is strong enough to keep the Sun
together. If the universe had only gravity to hold astro bodies
together, the Sun and all stars would dissipate out into space very
quickly.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
G=EMC^2
Feb 7, 2012, 6:46:09 PM2/7/12
to
On Feb 7, 3:26 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
has 4 layers so it begs the question. Are all layers revolving as
one? TreBert
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the 1990s, evidence is accumulating that the inner and outer
> core are both solid body rotation, even though the outer core is
> liquid and that the outer core is rotating faster than the entire rest
> of the planet is rotating. Only the EM force is strong enough to
> exhibit a iron liquid inner core to rotate in rigid body rotation and
> be faster than the rest of the planet.
>
> This characteristic of Earth implies the Sun has no mass-gravity, nor
> does it have General Relativity. The Sun has only EM force.
>
> The core and out to the tachocline of the Sun is EM in action and the
> remainder of the Sun to the surface where we see sunspots is almost
> rigid body rotation. I say almost because there is a slight
> differential rotation. But neither mass gravity of Newton nor General
> Relativity can have a rigid body rotation of the entire Sun from
> center out to sunspots. Only EM force is strong enough to keep the Sun
> together. If the universe had only gravity to hold astro bodies
> together, the Sun and all stars would dissipate out into space very
> quickly.
>
> Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
> Since the 1990s, evidence is accumulating that the inner and outer
> core are both solid body rotation, even though the outer core is
> liquid and that the outer core is rotating faster than the entire rest
> of the planet is rotating. Only the EM force is strong enough to
> exhibit a iron liquid inner core to rotate in rigid body rotation and
> be faster than the rest of the planet.
>
> This characteristic of Earth implies the Sun has no mass-gravity, nor
> does it have General Relativity. The Sun has only EM force.
>
> The core and out to the tachocline of the Sun is EM in action and the
> remainder of the Sun to the surface where we see sunspots is almost
> rigid body rotation. I say almost because there is a slight
> differential rotation. But neither mass gravity of Newton nor General
> Relativity can have a rigid body rotation of the entire Sun from
> center out to sunspots. Only EM force is strong enough to keep the Sun
> together. If the universe had only gravity to hold astro bodies
> together, the Sun and all stars would dissipate out into space very
> quickly.
>
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Reality is Sun's core is 7% of its volume,but half of its mass. Sun
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
has 4 layers so it begs the question. Are all layers revolving as
one? TreBert
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 8, 2012, 1:47:34 AM2/8/12
to
what percentage of the Sun surface is solid body rotation
G=EMC^2
Feb 8, 2012, 9:52:38 AM2/8/12
to
On Feb 8, 1:47 am, Archimedes Plutonium
> what percentage of the Sun surface is solid body rotation- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Suns layers shown by are use of sound waves. First layer is the
"photosphere" its about 250 miles deep. Convection zone How thick??
Next is the "radiation zone" I like this layer best for it goes with
my photon speed theory. This radiation zone does not slow photons
speed,but that each photon takes 200,000 years to reach the Sun's
surface. Thickness again ?? Core diameter is small considering the
huge size of the Sun but has a temperature of almost 28,000,000 F
Very powerfull gravity. I will go with all 4 layers revolving in lock
step due to the great gravitation at the core. Sun's time of rotation
is . At the equator 25 Earth days and near the poles 34 Earth days .
TreBert
>
> - Show quoted text -
Suns layers shown by are use of sound waves. First layer is the
"photosphere" its about 250 miles deep. Convection zone How thick??
Next is the "radiation zone" I like this layer best for it goes with
my photon speed theory. This radiation zone does not slow photons
speed,but that each photon takes 200,000 years to reach the Sun's
surface. Thickness again ?? Core diameter is small considering the
huge size of the Sun but has a temperature of almost 28,000,000 F
Very powerfull gravity. I will go with all 4 layers revolving in lock
step due to the great gravitation at the core. Sun's time of rotation
is . At the equator 25 Earth days and near the poles 34 Earth days .
TreBert
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 8, 2012, 3:48:01 PM2/8/12
to
You speak of the surface layer as 25 days for equator and 34 days at
poles.
Is there a sort of tachocline for this surface layer that the equator
up to latitude 60 degrees north and south have this 25 days and from
60 degrees north to pole have a 34 day rotation. So that the
"differential rotation" is a misnomer, in that it is really solid body
rotation of the surface layer only that it has a tachocline boundary.
I am trying to get the information that the Sun is entirely solid body
rotation with a slight hiccup of the poles on the surface layer, and
that would support EM gravity and defeat Newtonian gravity and General
Relativity.
Archimedes Plutonium
Michael Moroney
Feb 8, 2012, 7:40:44 PM2/8/12
to
"G=EMC^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> writes:
>I will go with all 4 layers revolving in lock
>step due to the great gravitation at the core. Sun's time of rotation
>is . At the equator 25 Earth days and near the poles 34 Earth days .
Can't be in lock step if different parts of the surface rotate at
>I will go with all 4 layers revolving in lock
>step due to the great gravitation at the core. Sun's time of rotation
>is . At the equator 25 Earth days and near the poles 34 Earth days .
different rates. Unless you simply mean each part is in step with the
mass immediately below (or above) it, as if the sun were made of a bunch
of solid rods attached together at the center, but rods at different
latitudes moved differently from each other.
0 new messages