Re: Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics,so stupid in physics I am too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and thus I attempt to keep Indian Institute of Technology as dumb as Arindam Banerj

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Monday, 6 February 2023 at 02:46:31 UTC+5:30, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> No-one at Indian Institute of Technology ever asking the question of which is the Atom's true electron-- the Muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole and not the electron of Atoms.

No one cares about Archie, whose level of stupidity was described trenchantly by Uncle Al.
>
> Is Arindam Banerjee, the constant flame spamming imbecile holding IIT backwards and behind from doing true physics???
> banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> banerjee...@gmail.com
> , …
> 19
> Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?
> Feb 4

Archie, if that drives out the esteemed scums that would be just great.
The world needs my physics.
Out with entropy, relativity and quantum nonsenses.
> 
> banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> banerjee...@gmail.com
> , …
> 25
> unread,
> Re: Bhattacharya Saswata,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy on
> Feb 4
> 
> > Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
> >
> >
> > Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?
> > 8:32 PM
> > 
> > banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> > Jim Pennino
> > 10
> > unread,
> > Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1, by Arindam Banerjee
> > 8:01 PM Feb 4, 2023
> > 
> >
> > Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > >
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > >
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium

[Volney]

On 2/6/2023 9:36 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, 6 February 2023 at 02:46:31 UTC+5:30, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>> No-one at Indian Institute of Technology ever asking the question of which is the Atom's true electron-- the Muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole and not the electron of Atoms.
>
> No one cares about Archie, whose level of stupidity was described trenchantly by Uncle Al.
>>
>> Is Arindam Banerjee, the constant flame spamming imbecile holding IIT backwards and behind from doing true physics???
>> banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
>> banerjee...@gmail.com
>> , …
>> 19
>> Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?

K👁️👁️kfight!!

[Arindam Banerjee]

Moroney - OUT!

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 08:25:40 UTC+5:30, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> 1>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,
>
> Yes, yes. Fusion is a hoax. Deuterium fission causes H bombs.

Physics gotta be revised from the the original bungler Helmholtz onwards.
Things are simply impossible with superbunglers like Einstein.
The capitalists boosting these fakes want control, keep humanity pinned to Earth.
Sad. Disusting, even more.
>
> and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.
> > 1>
> > 
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?

When ,when?
Liars rule.
Poor silly Archie, such a wannabe esteemed scum but too stupid to make that grade.


> > 9:09 PM
> > 
> > 1>

[Volney]

I'm just here on the sidelines, I'm hoping for an entertaining kꙩꙩkfight
between you and Arky. It's just like WWE rasslin', with the difference
being the rasslin' isn't real.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Moroney imitates McGinn.
Remains as moronic as ever.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Insane Kibo speaking to insane Arindam
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 1:13:39 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> I'm just here on the sidelines, I'm hoping for an entertaining kookfight

> between you and Arky. It's just like WWE rasslin', with the difference
> being the rasslin' isn't real.

Although Kibo likes to think of himself as sane and of good mind, it is Kibo aka Moroney or Volney who along with Arindam Banerjee suffer insanity and need psychiatric treatment. Both Kibo and Arindam are portrayed in AP's upcoming book of why so many Engineers end up insane-- Decobert-- Earle Jones -- Kibo Parry -- Arindam Banerjee.

They follow the Peter-Principle-Observation of psychology. This Peter Principle is not a principle but an observation of how Bureaucracies run. That people in a bureaucracy keep rising in ranks until they are in a job they cannot handle adequately. Same for Kibo and Arindam, they rose in education in engineering and found out that engineering is too much for their small minds and then the seek even higher ranks-- pure physics or pure math, yet they failed engineering.

So here we have some psychological underpinning that all humans want to strive for some high rank and achieve great things, but cannot figure out in their striving that they fail at this desire. They are not content with something less than engineering for they failed engineering and now they want something even beyond engineering-- pure physics or mathematics.

Kibo never belonged in sci.math or sci.physics. Arindam never belonged in sci.physics or sci.math.

And here is the fact that these two men are insane and need help. Kibo is insane for being a nonstop stalker, incurable stalker, he just has no marbles in his head that he is a insane bully stalker. And Arindam is insane in his delusions of grandier of his ideas of physics, when those ideas are worth a shit.

Could psychiatrists help either one?? Of course so, but to start the treatment both need to admit the reality-- they are insane and need outside help.

AP

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 07:44:41 UTC+5:30, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> 2>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes.
At last something may penetrate your fat head, Archie,

> and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> 2>

> > 
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?

> > 9:09 PM
> > 
> 2>

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 08:42:23 UTC+5:30, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> Insane Kibo speaking to insane Arindam
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 1:13:39 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > I'm just here on the sidelines, I'm hoping for an entertaining kookfight
> > between you and Arky. It's just like WWE rasslin', with the difference
> > being the rasslin' isn't real.
> Although Kibo likes to think of himself as sane and of good mind, it is Kibo aka Moroney or Volney who along with Arindam Banerjee suffer insanity and need psychiatric treatment. Both Kibo and Arindam are portrayed in AP's upcoming book of why so many Engineers end up insane-- Decobert-- Earle Jones -- Kibo Parry -- Arindam Banerjee.

Wrong, Archie. I am the very model of supreme sanity, as the greatest genius of all time.
High time the world dumped the bungler Einstein and followed me to great glory and joy.

[Volney]

🪲 of Math and 🪳 of Physics Archimedes "Village Idiot of Meckling SD"
Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> They follow the Peter-Principle-Observation of psychology. This Peter Principle is not a principle but an observation of how Bureaucracies run. That people in a bureaucracy keep rising in ranks until they are in a job they cannot handle adequately.

So the Peter principle, applied to yourself, means the job of potwasher
was the level of job that you could not handle adequately?

> Could psychiatrists help either one?? Of course so, but to start the treatment both need to admit the reality-- they are insane and need outside help.

Yes both you and Banerjee need to admit the reality of your insanity and
that both of you need help. Will you ever admit that you need
significant help? Unfortunately, both of you are too far gone to realize
that, even though it's blazingly obvious to everyone else that both of
you need outside help.

Since there's nothing I can do to help either of you, I'll just sit back
and watch the kӨ0kfight between you two.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Poor Moroney, with his moronic wits he could at his pathetic utmost imitate McGinn.
With such a name as Moroney, it is understandable why that moron Moroney needs a better identifier.
One can sympathize, but that is hampered by the extent of his surly, mean, mendacious and moronic nature worthy of the sort of Eurocentric racism and bigotry he represents.
Poor fool, will hang on tenaciously to the silly laws of conservation of energy, etc.
Not a fool, that is too much praise. Just a robot with biases.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 12:26:39 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 3>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Good, good. Keep on repeating that, Archie.

> and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> 3>

> > 
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > 9:09 PM
> > 

> 3>

[Volney]

On 2/9/2023 6:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 12:26:39 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> 3>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,
>
> Good, good. Keep on repeating that, Archie.
>

Pluto sure spams a lot, doesn't he.

[Arindam Banerjee]

An engineer has to make good with what is available, even dunces like Archie.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 01:44:56 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 4>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes. Keep up the good publicity work, Archie.
Attaboy!

> and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> 4>

> > 
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > 9:09 PM
> > 

> 4>

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Arindam Banerjee and Indian Institute of Technology too stupid to ask the simple question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
5>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.
5>

banerjee...@gmail.com
, …

20
unread,

Banerjee wrote:
When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
9:09 PM


5>

5>Arindam failed elementary geometry and logic with his slant cut of cone a ellipse when it truth that is a oval, and his mindless adherence to Boole - Jevons Logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, too pathetically dumb to realize Boole switched OR for AND truth table for AND is TTTF not TFFF.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Sunday, 12 February 2023 at 11:33:14 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee and Indian Institute of Technology too stupid to ask the simple question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
> 5>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Good, good. Indeed all the cores of stars are as cols as can be. Keep up the publicity, Archie. Good boy!

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 12:14:42 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee insane anal fuckdog of physics-- especially his- USA Moon landing was a staged act in Arizona

Some say Colorado.
Wherever scenes match, Archie.
Silly of them to photo a prop marked C.
>
> 2-Indian Institute of Technology,Bhattacharya Saswata,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.
>
>
> Arindam Banerjee
> Jim Pennino
> 5
> unread,
> de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke
> On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 14:46:12 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjee
> 11:28 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Popular movement in physics education sorely needed
> Students everywhere must ask their teachers why they must learn all the nonsenses, starting from
> 11:26 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Greatest fraud in science - the "proof" of GR
> A simple optical effect (lensing by the Sun's outer material) was passed off as gravitational
> 11:23 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> ,
> Jim Pennino
> 2
> unread,
> The way the eternal and infinite universe works, as per Arindam Banerjee
> 8:01 PM
> 
> ,
> Arindam Banerjee
> 3
> 
>
>
> > unread,
> > Re: Banerjee Varsha,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhattacharya Saswata,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy with imp Arindam??
> > 8:20 PM

> > banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >

> > 37
> > unread,
> > Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore--are you as dumb as Arindam Banerjee never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> > 3:31 AM

> > banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >

> > 53
> > unread,
> > Re: Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as insane nutjob of physics as Arindam Banerjee // not able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole and real electron is
> > 2:37 AM

> > banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > ,

> > unread,
> > Taboos for physicists
> > in the Indian press to get international attention in 2003. While the matter was quickly suppressed, evidently by some global-level covert mutual understanding among all the elites
> > Jan 28

> > banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >

> > 24

> > unread,
> > Re: Bhattacharya Saswata,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy on

> > 8:42 PM
> > mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > mitchr...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 12
> > unread,
> > Re: Anurag Sharma,Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha,Bhattacharya Saswata of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as stupid and pandering fools of Climate Change like Jai Maharaj// thus never able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole?
> > 9/9/22

[Archimedes Plutonium]

7>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.
7>

banerjee...@gmail.com
, …

20
unread,
Banerjee wrote:
When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
9:09 PM


7>

Indications are that Banerjee spam is connected to Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney spam-- probably from same organization, despite the fact they play act antagonistic some sort of Artificial Stupidity Experiment

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:09:36 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 7>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes. So true. Keep up the publicity, Archie, good boy!

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 02:05:38 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 8>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes. So universally trye. Keep up the publicity, Archie.

and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???
>
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
> On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
> 1:16 PM

> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,

> Replying to a physics academic
> Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
> 1:13 PM
> 
>
>
>
> > 8>

> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > Banerjee wrote:
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > 9:09 PM
> > 

> > 8>

[Volney]

On 2/16/2023 8:46 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 02:05:38 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> 8>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,
>
> Yes, yes. So universally trye. Keep up the publicity, Archie.

And the biggest kꚙkfight in sci.physics in years rages on. Fight! Fight!
Fight! We need to see what color kꙭk blood is!

[Archimedes Plutonium]

9>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???

Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
1:16 PM

Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Replying to a physics academic
Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
1:13 PM


> 9>

> banerjee...@gmail.com
> , …
>
> 20
> unread,
> Banerjee wrote:
> When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> 9:09 PM
> 

> 9>

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 07:01:51 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 9>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes. Keep up the publicity, Archie.
We may find some clever and good soul who is also of means, to promote my work.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Moron Moroney being a moron knows not that Archie and I are in cahoots!
No such thing as bad publicity, moron Moroney.
Thanks for joining in.
Bad from the bad is good for the good, no confusion! Not that you will understand this, moron.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

_drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

_Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines

_Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

_No one can win a fight or war without any offence, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia

_End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator

_rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator

_And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.

_Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.

NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and worse.

Either
(1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
Or
(2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.

Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.

What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.

AP

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 17:21:11 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 10>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin

Good, good, keep up the publicity work, Archie, good boy!

, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.
> > Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???
> >
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > unread,
> > Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
> > On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
> > 1:16 PM
> > 
> > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > unread,
> > Replying to a physics academic
> > Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
> > 1:13 PM
> > 

> > > 10>

> > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > , …
> > >
> > > 20
> > > unread,
> > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > 9:09 PM
> > > 

> > > 10>
>
>
> Arindam Banerjee spamming b.s. day after day, year after year
>
> Arindam Banerjee
> Volney
>
> 5

> de Broglie's hypothesis - a most embarrassing joke

> On 2/19/2023 9:11 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 23:59:16 UTC+5:30,
> Feb 19
> 

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha

Indian Institute of Technology

Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.



11>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???
>
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
> On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
> 1:16 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Replying to a physics academic
> Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
> 1:13 PM
> 

> > 11>

> > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > , …
> >
> > 20
> > unread,
> > Banerjee wrote:
> > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > 9:09 PM
> > 

> > 11>

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday, 21 February 2023 at 02:48:12 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha
>
> Indian Institute of Technology
>
> Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
>
>
>
> 11>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes cold cores causing cbr.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

Could the professors of IIT realize-- oh o, we have a fruitcake on our hands??? And was it the case that IIT just kept passing Arindam Banerjee up to higher grades just to get rid of the pest, when they should have failed him????

>
> Indian Institute of Technology
>
> Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
>
>
>

> 12>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> > Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???
> >
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > unread,
> > Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
> > On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
> > 1:16 PM
> > 
> > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > unread,
> > Replying to a physics academic
> > Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
> > 1:13 PM
> > 

> > > 12>

> > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > , …
> > >
> > > 20
> > > unread,
> > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > 9:09 PM
> > > 

> > > 12>

[Arindam Banerjee]

IOn Tuesday, 21 February 2023 at 02:48:12 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha
>
> Indian Institute of Technology
>
> Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
>
>
>
> 11>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

3deg Kelvin, Archie, and that causes the cosmic background radiation.
Keep up the good work, Archie, you lovable toxic toad.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, 22 February 2023 at 12:45:49 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 13>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin

Yes, yes, the cold 3 K cores of the stars is the source of the CBR.
Like the permanent magnetic fields causing permanent superconducting current.
Thanks for the publicity, Archie.
Kisses on both your cheeks, you ugly toxic toad.

, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> 13>

> > > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > > , …
> > > >
> > > > 20
> > > > unread,
> > > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > > 9:09 PM

> 13>

[Volney]

On 2/21/2023 11:57 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 February 2023 at 12:45:49 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> 13>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin
>
> Yes, yes, the cold 3 K cores of the stars is the source of the CBR.

And your evidence of this is where? By evidence, I mean a reproducible
experiment where these core temperatures are measured, and the 3 K CMBR
is measured to be coming from the core. (say by pointing a microwave
horn straight down or at the sun). Not because you say so.

Whoops! It wouldn't be coming evenly from all directions, would it!

> Kisses on both your cheeks, you ugly toxic toad.

Oh so _that's_ why you are insane! You've been kissing those cane toads
that infest Australia, for their hallucinogenic effects!

OK, you two. Back to your kookfight.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 04:09:34 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 14>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,


Yes, yes, 3 deg K, the source of the cosmic background radiation filling the universe.

>and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> 14>

> > > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > > , …
> > > >
> > > > 20
> > > > unread,
> > > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > > 9:09 PM

> 14>

[Archimedes Plutonium]

16>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.
16>

> > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > , …
> > >
> > > 20
> > > unread,
> > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > 9:09 PM

16>

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Saturday, 25 February 2023 at 10:01:05 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 16>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes, that causes the 3 deg J cosmic background radiation from the cold cores of the stars and planets.
Keep up the publicity, Archie, good boy.
Now where is Roachie?

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now one way of monetizing Google Newsgroups would be a advertisement column along the sidelines, much like we see whenever we google search the web, columns and columns of advertising.

So for instance the insane science posts of Arindam Banerjee, such as this post, on the sideboard some company will advertise baby diapers, keying in on the words "Arindam arsewipe". Or advertising skin care products as Arindam scrubs his arse with a steel brush. Or, toilet paper companies will stand alongside this thread of Arindam Banerjee, the arsewipe of science and physics.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 2 March 2023 at 08:04:51 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now one way of monetizing Google Newsgroups would be a advertisement column along the sidelines, much like we see whenever we google search the web, columns and columns of advertising.

Fat chance with near zero views for crap like yours, Archie.
And very few officially for me as well.
I suppose they have the right or whatever to twist numbers.

>
> So for instance the insane science posts of Arindam Banerjee, such as this post, on the sideboard some company will advertise baby diapers, keying in on the words "Arindam arsewipe". Or advertising skin care products as Arindam scrubs his arse with a steel brush.

No Archie, I use a water spray. Clean and saves paper. Indians do this.

> Or, toilet paper companies will stand alongside this thread of Arindam Banerjee, the arsewipe of science and physics.

I would be proud and happy to let my posts make dirty, polluting, anti environment toilet paper extinct.
When the Westerners have clean arses, they will be better people, naturally.
Good boy, Archie. Keep up the publicity work.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Well, on the issue of toilet paper, I stand with Arindam on that issue, for I gave up on toilet paper a few years back, and saving trees is well worth it. In fact, I am going all Kindle on magazines to save more trees.

I encourage everyone to do the same. Cleaning with water is far easier than paper.

I learned this in Malaysia, living in Malaysia, that you need only a pan of water. It is only the wasteful West, that luxury wastes on paper.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Good, good.
Let us start with Moroney.
Pull down his pants.
Bung his head out of his black hole.
Then get Greta.
Give her a hose.
Get her to clean up Moroney's anal orifices, cleanse it thoroughly for the good of the planet, trees, etc.
Repeat, with Alsing, whodat, and other pests.

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/.../c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/.../c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/.../c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Arindam Banerjee photo profile
Arindam Banerjee


2
Light never travels the marked out distance IF THE EARTH MOVES
8:53 PM


Clutterfreak's profile photo
Clutterfreak
, …
Arindam Banerjee
68
unread,
Arindam's Physics :-)
On Sunday, 5 March 2023 at 11:58:04 UTC+11, whodat wrote: > On 3/4/2023 6:33 PM, Physfitfreak
8:41 PM

whodat's profile photo
whodat
,
Arindam Banerjee
2
Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics
On Sunday, 5 March 2023 at 12:43:10 UTC+11, whodat wrote: Greta, Greta, I am stuck! Get your hose.
8:35 PM


Please, do not settle for imitation or copies of AP original posts. Go to the original AP post.

[Volney]

On 3/2/2023 12:47 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 March 2023 at 13:48:19 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 8:42:46 PM UTC-6, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 2 March 2023 at 08:04:51 UTC+5:30, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> Now one way of monetizing Google Newsgroups would be a advertisement column along the sidelines, much like we see whenever we google search the web, columns and columns of advertising.
>>> Fat chance with near zero views for crap like yours, Archie.
>>> And very few officially for me as well.
>>> I suppose they have the right or whatever to twist numbers.
>>>>
>>>> So for instance the insane science posts of Arindam Banerjee, such as this post, on the sideboard some company will advertise baby diapers, keying in on the words "Arindam arsewipe". Or advertising skin care products as Arindam scrubs his arse with a steel brush.
>>> No Archie, I use a water spray. Clean and saves paper. Indians do this.
>>>> Or, toilet paper companies will stand alongside this thread of Arindam Banerjee, the arsewipe of science and physics.
>>> I would be proud and happy to let my posts make dirty, polluting, anti environment toilet paper extinct.
>>> When the Westerners have clean arses, they will be better people, naturally.
>>> Good boy, Archie. Keep up the publicity work.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>> Well, on the issue of toilet paper, I stand with Arindam on that issue, for I gave up on toilet paper a few years back, and saving trees is well worth it. In fact, I am going all Kindle on magazines to save more trees.
>>
>> I encourage everyone to do the same. Cleaning with water is far easier than paper.
>
> Good, good.
> Let us start with Moroney.
> Pull down his pants.

You really are like Plutonium. Seeing you have an interest in men's
buttholes, you must be gay, just like Plutonium is gay.

Or is it because of your job as men's room assistant, and you clean
men's buttholes after they take a dump. With water only, of course.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Sunday, 5 March 2023 at 16:57:56 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

Archie, Moroney is asking for the Greta treatment.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

1-Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

Why does IIT put up with the Arsewipe of Physics-- Arindam Banerjee

Arindam Banerjee profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

Paul Alsing

unread,
Lifelong bullshitting
On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 12:49:42 AM UTC-8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > Lifelong bullshitting is
8:54 PM


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,

All Nobel laureates in physics are mendacious nincompoops
As the believe in the law of conservation of energy. Energy gets created and destroyed in our
8:08 PM


> Could the professors of IIT realize-- oh o, we have a fruitcake on our hands??? And was it the case that IIT just kept passing Arindam Banerjee up to higher grades just to get rid of the pest, when they should have failed him????
> >
> > Indian Institute of Technology
> >
> > Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
> >
> >
> >

> > 19>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin, and his insane multiply of KE = 1/2 mv^2 by a scalar as something different. But his endless string of lies and liaring.

> > > Typical Arindam Banerjee antiphysics bullshit-- does he use it in his hair to keep it oiled???
> > >
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > unread,
> > > Jewish physics and genuine Aryan physics
> > > On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 14:49:43 UTC+5:30, JJ Lodder wrote: > Peter Moylan <pe...@
> > > 1:16 PM
> > > 
> > > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > unread,
> > > Replying to a physics academic
> > > Someone in alt.usage.english who could be a physicist made some comments about my experiments on rail
> > > 1:13 PM
> > > 

> > > > 19>

> > > > banerjee...@gmail.com
> > > > , …
> > > >
> > > > 20
> > > > unread,
> > > > Banerjee wrote:
> > > > When will they admit that 1969 moon landings were done in some US desert?
> > > > 9:09 PM
> > > > 

> > > > 19>

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Monday, 6 March 2023 at 11:04:45 UTC+8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 1-Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)??

Archie, my name is there in letters of gold, as the top student representative in 1977-78, in the TSG. Anyone can see it.
I had a brilliant time in Iit Kharagpur. I was in the debating teams, edited the campus magazine, was elected to the highest post...

> And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

They may not remember that in my term I instituted the Students' Senate, which is going strong.
Yes I did make life difficult for the fatcats of my time, for the good of the students.
All there in black and white print, for the coming generations.

>
> Why does IIT put up with the Arsewipe of Physics-- Arindam Banerjee

No, no, Archie, we are campaigning with Greta for washed arses, remember? Saving the trees and the planet.

>
> Arindam Banerjee profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
>
> Paul Alsing
>
> unread,
> Lifelong bullshitting
> On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 12:49:42 AM UTC-8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > Lifelong bullshitting is

The pseudo-physicist's task, yes.

> 8:54 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> All Nobel laureates in physics are mendacious nincompoops

Aren't they?! Proper bunch of doddering, blithering fools they look like, to all my friends and colleagues, after my successful rail gun experiments showing inertia violation thus necessitating a revolution in science.

> As the believe in the law of conservation of energy.



Energy gets created and destroyed in our

Infinite universe, Archie. At last you have got it!

> 8:08 PM
> 
> > Could the professors of IIT realize-- oh o, we have a fruitcake on our hands???

No, Archie. They gave me a First Class Honours and I was campus-recruited for a great career.

>> And was it the case that IIT just kept passing Arindam Banerjee up to higher grades just to get rid of the pest, when they should have failed him????

Alas no, Archie. Half my class was failed over 5 years but not I.

> > >
> > > Indian Institute of Technology
> > >
> > > Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 19>Time to permanently remove AB Arindam Banerjee out of sci.physics with his liaring and his Anti-science b.s. He does not even accept the methods of science. Not only do we have to put up with his interior of Earth and Sun is a frigid almost 0 degree Kelvin,

Yes, yes, Archie, you got it. Good boy. Keep on with the publicity work. Good, good.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Kanseri Bhaskar, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 06:54:18 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Annapurna Devi Yadav,Kanseri Bhaskar, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

Ah, Archie. No such thing as bad publicity, what. All publicity is for the good of the business. In my case, the HTN and IFE, revising text books, etc.
>
> Sanjay Kumar,Dharmedra Pradhan,Kanseri Bhaskar,Kedar B Khare, Joseph Joby, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????
>
> 2Why Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, cannot check to see if the real proton of Atoms is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law, as explained by Arindam they are "criminal bunglers".
>
>
> > > Making money by teaching and spreading lies about Nature. The fraud comes from ignoring my discoveries about Nature, thus depriving all.
> > Dharmedra Pradhan-Ghosh Santanu,Kedar B Khare,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Ghosh Sankalpa, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????
> >
> > Mr. Pradhan is Arindam Banerjee typical and indicative of scientists at IIT, claiming the moon landing of Apollo 11 in 1969 was a staged hoax in the Arizona desert, along with other Banerjee (ball tingling notions-- the center of Earth and Sun is a cool 1 degree Kelvin for superconductivity??)
> >
> > Why does India encourage whackos who hate science, to spam sci.physics every day with more spam.
> >
> > Subhas Sarkar
> > Annapurna Devi Yadav
> > Rajkumar Ranjan Singh
> > Sanjay Kumar

> > > > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > > > Arindam Banerjee

> > > > , …
> > > > mitchr...@gmail.com
> > > > 5
> > > > Angels guard my rest
> > > > On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 07:27:21 UTC+11, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > You are admitting you
> > > > 4:28 PM

> > > > 
> > > > > > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > > > > > Arindam Banerjee

> > > > > > 4
> > > > > > Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore--are you as dumb as Arindam Banerjee never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> > > > > > Mar 19

> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > > > > > Arindam Banerjee

> > > > > > Why all physicists are criminal bunglers who must blither the most absurd nonsense
> > > > > > Mar 19
> > > > > > 

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Annapurna Devi Yadav,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K.,Kanseri Bhaskar, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

[Arindam Banerjee]

In India, I am loved to distraction, Archie. Covertly, of course, for who wants his/her career to be torpedoed by the Einsteinian rulers?
Elsewhere, in the West, mass sackings must happen to those bad guys.
Then rebuild grandly based on:
Latest experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

Earlier experiments (2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

The way the universe operates:
(2020)
The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

(2006)
Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

[Archimedes Plutonium]

A.Banerjee on Indian Institute of Tech. --"the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth"

AP writes: Bad experience? Bad grades Arindam, take up engineering and cheer up!!!

> On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 7:08:51 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > Very sad to say, my new design rail gun has even less acceptibility to the powers that be than your plutonium universe, Archie.
>
> Is Arindam Banerjee fixing his rail gun to knock out St.Petersburg electric lines????
>
> How does that rail gun work Arindam, you attach your Rail Gun to a electric line in a network and it destroys the entire network, even the source of power, by blowing up all the transformers in the network.
> RAIL GUN that knocks out Moscow & St.Petersburg electricity, and here I thought it was going to be drones.
> Bravo, Arindam finally makes good in physics, give Arindam the best Darjeeling tea to be found!!!! You take it with cream Arindam???

No way, Archie.
You sound like Gulliver before the King of Brobdingnag, proposing all sorts of horrid weaponry for victory in war.
The response from His Majesty was, as per Internet:
****
Based on Gulliver's descriptions of their behaviour, the King describes the English as "the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth".
****
You Americans are, of course, even more debased than the English of Swift's time.
The English since Swift have been improved with contact from the Brahmanical upper castes of India, but that has not happened to the other whites who could not get such contact.
Which is why, as debased English, you think I should be interested in doing evil stuff you lots are so good at.
Grow up, Archie. Don't be one among the most pernicious race of odious little vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee




> Sanjay Kumar,Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., ,Dharmedra Pradhan,Kanseri Bhaskar,Kedar B Khare, Joseph Joby, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????

> >
> > 2Why Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, cannot check to see if the real proton of Atoms is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law, as explained by Arindam they are "criminal bunglers".
> >
> >
> > > > Making money by teaching and spreading lies about Nature. The fraud comes from ignoring my discoveries about Nature, thus depriving all.
> > > Dharmedra Pradhan-Ghosh Santanu,Kedar B Khare,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Ghosh Sankalpa, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????
> > >
> > > Mr. Pradhan is Arindam Banerjee typical and indicative of scientists at IIT, claiming the moon landing of Apollo 11 in 1969 was a staged hoax in the Arizona desert, along with other Banerjee (ball tingling notions-- the center of Earth and Sun is a cool 1 degree Kelvin for superconductivity??)
> > >
> > > Why does India encourage whackos who hate science, to spam sci.physics every day with more spam.
> > >
> > > Subhas Sarkar
> > > Annapurna Devi Yadav
> > > Rajkumar Ranjan Singh
> > > Sanjay Kumar
>

> Saxena Vikrant,,Dharmedra Pradhan-Ghosh Santanu,Kedar B Khare,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Ghosh Sankalpa, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????

> >
> > Mr. Pradhan is Arindam Banerjee typical and indicative of scientists at IIT, claiming the moon landing of Apollo 11 in 1969 was a staged hoax in the Arizona desert, along with other Banerjee (ball tingling notions-- the center of Earth and Sun is a cool 1 degree Kelvin for superconductivity??)
> >
> > Why does India encourage whackos who hate science, to spam sci.physics every day with more spam.
> >
> > Subhas Sarkar
> > Annapurna Devi Yadav
> > Rajkumar Ranjan Singh
> > Sanjay Kumar

> > > Constant daily spamming b.s. nonsense from Arindam Banerjee of his hatred of physics and physicists.

>
>
>
>
> Indian Institute of Technology
>
> Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
>
>
>
>
> > >

> Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant,Annapurna Devi Yadav,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K.,Kanseri Bhaskar, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????

>
> Sanjay Kumar,Dharmedra Pradhan,Kanseri Bhaskar,Kedar B Khare, Joseph Joby, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????
>
> 2Why Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, cannot check to see if the real proton of Atoms is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law, as explained by Arindam they are "criminal bunglers".

> 

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Monday, 10 April 2023 at 13:57:37 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> A.Banerjee on Indian Institute of Tech. --"the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth"
>

Americans now, Archie; that description was for the English of the 18th century.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.,1 out of 5 stars rating, Indian Institute of Technology and Stanford Univ teaching physics is that true of Arindam Banerjee and Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney in your science-hate spam and stalk posts going on 30 years?

How would you rate Banerjee's recent post?? 0 out of 5 stars-- something to shun and avoid??


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,

Revolutionary Isaac Newton-Arindam Banerjee physics

Latest experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun https://www.youtube.com/

7:10 PM




> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 12:21:13 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> >Back to your kookfight.
>
> This is sci.physics, not a fight between kooks Kibo Parry M-V and his mate Arindam Banerjee.
>
> IIT physics a waste of brain cells??
> > > Mason Yearian Stanford Uni physics textbook--Kibo Parry M-V is Jason correct by saying it is a waste of brain cells?? You indicate in your dissertion below this is a fact, can you elaborate?? How about Stanford Uni Robert Wagoner, does he have two marbles of a physics brain to rub together or is he also Bathynomus? Can even Earle Jones understand Mason Yearian and can Earle finally learn Ohm's law??
> > > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 1:18:28 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry--did JDB critic copy his review from Jason Herrmann, Reno Nevada review. Both of those scathing reviews have the same vitriol, did they copy one another's review, Kibo???
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 11:03:10 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > tarded:
> > >
> > > Jason Herrmann the antiscience runt and spamtard cannot tell the difference from science fiction and real science. He is looking for science fiction and unfortunately stumbled into the real science section and picked a AP book of real true science. This only shows that AP books are attractive to not only scientists but runts of science
> > >
> > > Top review from the United States
> > >
> > > Jason Herrmann -- Reno Nevada
> > > 1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of money and brain cells
> > > Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on November 17, 2019
> > > A complete and utter load of BS.
> > > 2 people found this helpful
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 6:00:58 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > of Math and of Physics Archimedes "spamtard" Plutonium
> > > > <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> > > > > Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
> > > > > Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
> > > > > Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
> > > > > Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
> > > > > Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
> > > >
> > > > Oh no! It looks like Plutonium is mad that McTard is out-spamming him,
> > > > so Pluto increases his own spam output. In just this topic Pluto spams
> > > > at least 10 times.
> > > >
> >
> >
> > > Stanford Uni physics a waste of brain cells-Robert Wagoner??
> > > 
> > > JDB on Univ South Florida too scared to DNA test Smilodon as walrus tusks for fear of proving AP correct.
> > >
> > >
> > > JDB never studied logic, hopefully Dr.Carney at least tried to study logic.
> > > >
> > > > Top review from the United States
> > > >
> > > > J.D.B
> > > > 1.0 out of 5 stars Mindless, pointless, and useless
> > > > Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on November 6, 2022
> > > > This 'book' is a rambling series of email exchanges by someone who never even studied the material they are laying claim to. The alternate hypotheses are never supported nor is there any work to show the works opposing the author are incorrect. If hundreds of specimens of various cats are found with fangs literally growing out of the skull, it's not because someone misplaced a piece of a walrus onto a cat. This work is a pretentious joke, and I made the mistake borrowing it to read.
> > > > One person found this helpful
> > > >
> > > > AP writes: So anyone can make up a sentence "If hundreds of specimens..." That is not the point you moron JDB, for there is not one case example of a skull with fangs attached. If the Moon was made of Limburger cheese.... JDB is a moron of science.
> > > > > JDB and Dr.Ryan Carney University of South Florida, Tampa-- Scleromonchlus was a water animal, just like Pterosaurs, but Univ South Florida, Tampa has no logical brains to see this// And does USF have brains to DNA test the sabers of Saber tooth tiger as walrus.
> > > > > 1>
> > > > > Not a single Saber toothed tiger skull intact with sabres ever found in fossils, yet Tampa's University of South Florida with JDB hate spews and Dr. Ryan Carney work on Archaeopteryx is probably all wrong. Not a single saber of the tiber DNA tested-- yes, Potsdam Germany tested DNA of lower mandible but not the saber.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does Univ South Florida Tampa, have the brains to DNA test Smilodon sabers to make sure they are __not__ walrus tusks, or is everything from USF illogical loudmouth criticism coming out of JDB, a science moron.
> > > > > 2>
> > > > > Does University of South Florida, Tampa require Logic abilities before it gives degrees in science to students, or better yet, has professors like Dr. Ryan Carney build a Archaeopteryx to fly when no aerodynamic engineer can make the heavy animal fly. Why is Dr. Carney too dumb to make a commonsense guess-- the Bird used its false-wings as a paddle to oar and row in the shallow seas. No wonder you have hate spew fools like JDB, spewing hate on books of science that correct fools like Dr. Carney.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now we have reports of the Scleromonchlus taylori fossil that was a ancestor of the Pterosaur. The Scleromonchlus fossil has a huge head for body size--- MEANING, that the animal swam in water and lived in water-- and putting a logical brain to work-- Dr. Carney, can you see that your flying Pterosaurs has got to be a most awful joke in all of science history. The animal used its appendages to paddle oar on water.
> > > > > 3>
> > > > > For example JDB understanding of how logic even works-- for when you make a If--> then argument, science is not about hypotheticals but about genuine facts. Yes, AP is working on facts--- facts that never a full intact Sabre tooth tiger skull. Every one in is wired together in museums.
> > > > >
> > > > > University of South Florida's Ryan Carney's work on Archaeopteryx-- could it fly, fails to convince physicists, especially AP since he wrote a book that the Archaeopteryx in fact did not fly but used its bone structure to paddle in water. For Earth from Precambrian to about 90 to 66 mya had 1/2 of Earth constantly facing the Sun and the other 1/2 of Earth in constant darkness and in this landscape the seas were shallow. So life in the seas was met with reptile-birds that could use their so called wings to paddle around in water, much like some water birds. But the Archaeopteryx never flew in the air.
> > > > > 4>
> > > > > My 65th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PTEROSAURS; Paleontology mistake for it never flew, it sailed and oar-rowed with their Sail (not a wing for flying); paleontology series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 22Dec2021. And this is AP's 65th published book, mostly on science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I was reading a Scientific American article of October, 2019 on Pterosaurs, giant animals, some the size of giraffes flying. This upset my logical mind and knew there was a big mistake in this. Thus, I wrote this book to put some logical commonsense into the field of paleontology.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture is my picture of that magazine article.
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Why the increasing number of Paleontology Mistakes, due to the rise of the Internet as worldwide forum to argue with a cloistered science.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) The AP Conjecture on Pterosaurs.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) Sails, or rowing-oars, not wings.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) A logical and physiological difference between a Sail and a Wing.
> > > > >
> > > > > 5) Mechanism to evolve Sails, not wings.
> > > > >
> > > > > 6) Pteroid bone and flexor tendon for rowing oar.
> > > > >
> > > > > 7) What the Pterosaurs ate is revealing.
> > > > >
> > > > > 8) The huge widespread prevalence of Shallow Seas in geological time.
> > > > >
> > > > > 6>Product details
> > > > > 6>ASIN : B07YDL2412
> > > > > 6>Publication date : September 25, 2019
> > > > > 6>Language : English
> > > > > 
> > > > > 101>◦ #61 in Paleontology (Books)

> > >
>
>
> Indian Institute of Technology
>
> Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.

> NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
>
> 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
>
> My 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
>
>
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> ◦ ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> ◦ Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> ◦ Language ‏ : ‎ English
> ◦ File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> ◦ Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> ◦ Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> ◦ Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> ◦ X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> ◦ Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> ◦ Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> ◦ Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> ◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1048 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 404 pages
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)
>
>
> #2-5, 174th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
>
> Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
> #2-6, 177th published book
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
>
> Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
> #2-7, 178th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
>
>
> Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
>
> The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> #2-8, 202nd published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
>
> Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.
>
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BC5T9JBH
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 27, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 801 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 45 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
>
> #2-9, 161st published book
>
> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
>
> Preface:
> A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
>
> It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
>
> Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Saturday, 29 April 2023 at 11:14:16 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.,1 out of 5 stars rating, Indian Institute of Technology and Stanford Univ teaching physics is that true of Arindam Banerjee and Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney in your science-hate spam and stalk posts going on 30 years?

No, but thanks for the publicity, Archie.

> > Physics is the most important hard science

Unfortunately, Archie, thanks to e=mcc nonsense it is as hard as your brain farts.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

3- Is A.Banerjee fixing his rail gun█۞█knock out St.Petersburg electric power lines█۞█ to knock out St.Petersburg electric lines????

Depraved spammer Arindam Banerjee who hates science and his Apollo 11 a staged hoax on Arizona desert.


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

, …
Enes Richard
23
unread,
The law of conservation of energy
czwartek, 25 maja 2023 o 15:37:06 UTC+2 Sylvia Else napisał(a): > On 25-May-23 10:22 pm, Enes
1:03 PM


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

, …
Murel Meisner
10
unread,
About the MMI bungle, leading to the horrendous disaster that is absurd physics
12:28 PM







> No relativity in your railgun, eh Arindam??
> 


> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee

> ,
> Zach
> 2
> unread,
> The depravity of relativity
> On 4/23/2023 5:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 24 April 2023 at 02:37:36 UTC+10, Ross
> 7:33 PM
> 

> > > Indian Institute of Technology
> > >
> > > Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
> > >



> > > Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant,Annapurna Devi Yadav,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K.,Kanseri Bhaskar, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata. Hi professors of Indian Institute of Technology. Can any of you please remember when Arindam Banerjee was a student of IIT (as he claims he was)?? And can you remember if he had his head up his arse in antiscience as he spams each and every day of the year in sci.physics, now????
> > >

> > > Sanjay Kumar,Dharmedra Pradhan,Kanseri Bhaskar,Kedar B Khare, Joseph Joby, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, of Indian Institute of Tech, is Arindam Banerjee correct when he says you cannot understand the hydrogen proton is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law because Arindam says you are "criminal bunglers". Personally I do not see where Arindam gets the criminality out of this????

> > >
> > > 2Why Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, cannot check to see if the real proton of Atoms is 840MeV with a muon stuck inside doing the Faraday law, as explained by Arindam they are "criminal bunglers".
> >

> > > > > 
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > > > unread,

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Saturday, 27 May 2023 at 09:26:27 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 3- Is A.Banerjee fixing his rail gun█۞█knock out St.Petersburg electric power lines█۞█ to knock out St.Petersburg electric lines????

No.

>
> Depraved spammer Arindam Banerjee who hates science and his Apollo 11 a staged hoax on Arizona desert.

With very bad direction, Archie. Could not impress the villagers of Nowshera in 1969. Those devout Muslims were upset because the sanctity of the Moon had been violated. After seeing the A11 film, they must have concluded it was just another hoax from the lying West.
Which was very good, this their realization I mean,for they refrained from rioting, etc.

> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee

Beat all Hollywood stars.

> , …
> Enes Richard
> 23
> unread,
> The law of conservation of energy

Shame, shame. Out with it.

> czwartek, 25 maja 2023 o 15:37:06 UTC+2 Sylvia Else napisał(a): > On 25-May-23 10:22 pm, Enes
> 1:03 PM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee

Beats all rock stars.

> , …
> Murel Meisner
> 10
> unread,
> About the MMI bungle, leading to the horrendous disaster that is absurd physics
> 12:28 PM

Ugh, ugh.
How could these snooty racists be sooooooo incompetent? Their bigotry makes them stupid.

> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> > No relativity in your railgun, eh Arindam??

Not a chance, Archie.

> > 
> 

> > Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> > Arindam Banerjee

Living god, sole poet among lotsa devils, greatest genius of all time, etc.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Arindam Banerjee why are you and Indian Institute of Tech too stupid to understand real electron of Atoms is the muon inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law while the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole?? Why such physics idiocy??

Arindam, do you want to be a physics failure all your life???


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …
Enes Richard

50

unread,
The law of conservation of energy

sobota, 27 maja 2023 o 23:38:22 UTC+2 Paul Alsing napisał(a): > On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 2:10:
5:16 PM


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

Enes Richard
19

unread,
About the MMI bungle, leading to the horrendous disaster that is absurd physics

4:55 PM


◦ Print length ‏ : ‎ 124 pages

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Arindam Banerjee, India's arsewipe of physics opens his mouth again.

On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 6:50:48 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 01:21:58 UTC+10, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > https://phys.org/news/2022-01-mysterious-strands-revealed-milky-center.html?fbclid=IwAR0Iq4yiPBU9fqE9r_AaFqmjYlDmgNu54BY5gb5RVfZH451IyT2z-tbKrMc#:~:text=Using%20observations%20at%20radio%20wavelengths%2C%20Northwestern%20University%27s%20Farhad,field%20at%20close%20to%20the%20speed%20of%20light
> >
> > As technology advances, so do the tools used to make observations.
> >
> > An unsolved mystery that will help to modify the current model. This is how science works.
> >
> > Fascinating stuff, eh?
> Disgusting.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 12:07:54 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee, India's arsewipe of physics opens his mouth again.

Curses from aggrieved devils beats praise from the Gods and Goddesses, in terms of satisfaction. Keep it up, Archie.

Indeed, when so much public money is wasted upon the propaganda for conjectural bullshit.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Thanks for the publicity, Archie.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 01:00:45 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 2-Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.
>
> Arindam Banerjee
> , …
> Sylvia Else
> 13
> unread,
> A single experiment demonstrating the violation of inertia, throws out the theories of Einstein, and much more. Einstein had thought something like this would happen!
> 9:06 AM
> 
>
> 
> This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.

> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee

> unread,
> Is it electricity that is making the armature move, or is it gravity or my pushing hand or unknown physical forces relating to black holes, quarks, neutrinos, dark matter, etc. ?
> 5:48 AM

> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee

> unread,
> Are mini black holes at work pushing the armature?


Thanks for the free publicity work, Archie.

[Volney]

Look, the twins are fighting over who is the bigger fish in the tiny
stagnant mud puddle of sci.physics again!

[Arindam Banerjee]

Poor trolling moron Moroney, posing as Volney, has absolutely lost it. He cannot understand my gratitude to Archie, for all the free publicity he is giving me. Irony is, that Moroney is also doing the same thing. If he had not been such a moron, so witless, I would have thanked him too for the publicity.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

3-Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.

Arindam Banerjee
, …
Sylvia Else
13
unread,
A single experiment demonstrating the violation of inertia, throws out the theories of Einstein, and much more. Einstein had thought something like this would happen!
9:06 AM



This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Is it electricity that is making the armature move, or is it gravity or my pushing hand or unknown physical forces relating to black holes, quarks, neutrinos, dark matter, etc. ?
5:48 AM

Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,
Are mini black holes at work pushing the armature?

> On 08-July-23 8:00 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.
5:39 AM


> > >
> > > Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book

> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English

> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)


> > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >

> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Indian Institute Technology-Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata,- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.
>
> +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

My 250th published book.

TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 784 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 160 pages




> +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
> Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
>
> In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
>
> A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
>
> The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
>
> Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
>
> AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
>
> In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
>
> Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
>
> You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
>
> The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
>
> --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
>
> m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
>
> m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
>
> This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
>
> m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
>
> --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
>
> Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
>
> AP
>
>
> No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
>
> Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
>
> --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> x/v atoms are discharged.
>
> So the mass m discharged is
>
> m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> where
> N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> F is the Faraday constant.
> --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
>
> No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
>
> So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
>
> So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
>
> But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
>
> Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Cosmic Rays from Sun
>
> 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
>
> When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
>
> I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
>
> Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
>
> Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
>
> So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
>
> How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
>
> I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
>
> But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
>
> So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
>
> There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
>
> But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
>
> So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
>
> I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
>
> A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
>
> Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
>
> So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
>
> If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
>
> AP
> to
> So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
>
> In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
>
> For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
>
> The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
>
> AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
>
> When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
>
> AP, King of Science
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
> Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
>
> To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
>
> The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
>
> No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
>
> I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
>
> AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
>
> Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
>
> AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
>
> Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
>
> AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
>
> Chemistry Europe--
> "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
>
> P Vermeeren, 2023
> "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
>
> AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
>
> AP


Indian Institute Technology-Physics dept. Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha, Bhattacharya Saswata, Bhatnagar M.C. , Chatterjee R., Chaudhary Sujeet, Das Pintu, Dhaka Rajendra S., Ghosh Joyee, Ghosh Pradipta, Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu, Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare, Khare Neeraj, Kumar Sunil, Malik H.K., Mani Brajesh Kumar, Marathe Rahul, Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S. , Mishra Amruta, Muduli P.K., Ravishankar V. , Reddy G.B. , Saxena Vikrant, Sengupta Amartya, Senthilkumaran P. ,Shenoy M.R. , Shukla A.K., Singh J.P., Singh Rajendra, Sinha Aloka, Soni Ravi Kant, Srivastava Pankaj, Varshney R.K., Vijaya Prakash G.

>

> 
> This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Is it electricity that is making the armature move, or is it gravity or my pushing hand or unknown physical forces relating to black holes, quarks, neutrinos, dark matter, etc. ?
> 5:48 AM
> 
> Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
> Arindam Banerjee
> unread,
> Are mini black holes at work pushing the armature?
> > On 08-July-23 8:00 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.
> 5:39 AM
> 

Nothing but spam spam spam out of knucklehead Arindam Banerjee, cluttering up sci.physics for a decade now.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Dr.Anurag Sharma, Dr.Babu Sujin B, Dr.Banerjee Varsha, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 6:53:40 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Can_Dr.Babu Sujin B, Dr.Banerjee Varsha,Dr.Anurag Sharma, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Dr.Banerjee Varsha,Dr.Anurag Sharma,Dr.Babu Sujin B, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Dr.Das Pintu, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Dr.Das Pintu, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

[Archimedes Plutonium]

.Can_Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Dr.Das Pintu, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

> > > > > >
> > > > > > Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.

Is Arindam Banerjee the reason ITT fails to have a Nobel winner in chemistry or physics? Like Arindam, his hatred of science is glooming large with his constant hatred of science-- Apollo 11 was a staged hoax, Sun core is a frigid near 0 Kelvin, the man is a lunatic of science, perhaps reflecting why India fails to achieve science honors.

47
Einstein's Sins
Beijing▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃Moscow mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Beijing
6:57 PM


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
unread,

The challenge for the Einsteinian whodumbos
How to steal my intellectual property in Physics while only abusing me, when any notice to me is paid
6:55 PM

mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
, …
Arindam Banerjee
13

> • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB

> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe

> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday, 8 August 2023 at 10:04:48 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> .Can_Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Dr.Das Pintu, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.
> Is Arindam Banerjee the reason ITT fails to have a Nobel winner in chemistry or physics? Like Arindam, his hatred of science is glooming large with his constant hatred of science-- Apollo 11 was a staged hoax, Sun core is a frigid near 0 Kelvin, the man is a lunatic of science, perhaps reflecting why India fails to achieve science honors.

Nobel Prizes are a joke.

Thanks for the publicity, Archie.

Why aren't your laxatives working that well with whodumbo?

[Archimedes Plutonium]

/Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.

Is Arindam Banerjee reflective, a reflection of why India never has a Nobel prize in chemistry or physics, for schizophrenic type of behavior-- one moment doing physics-- rail gun, next moment shouting that Apollo 11 was a staged hoax in Arizona desert and that the Sun and Earth cores are a frigid near 0 Kelvin temperature. Maybe all of Indian physics and chemistry is like this-- one moment doing science-- next moment hating science.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Saturday, 12 August 2023 at 02:39:23 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> /Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.
> Is Arindam Banerjee reflective, a reflection of why India never has a Nobel prize in chemistry or physics,

What is better, Archie? To be a fake like you and them, or expose them as frauds and bunglers?
Indians at their best are moral. Unlike the elite western devils. Nobel was drenched in innocent blood. His prizes are a cover up.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

\Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

Of course a spamming imbecile Arindam is not happy polluting sci.physics and tries his luck with sci.math....


banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
banerjee...@gmail.com
Asimov, Hari Seldon and I
https://groups....
7:54 PM

.....

banerjee...@gmail.com's profile photo
banerjee...@gmail.com
2
From proof to disproof of FLT
On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 09:51:36 UTC+10, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: > https://www.
6:53 PM


[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 11:55:55 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> \Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks
> Of course a spamming imbecile Arindam is not happy polluting sci.physics and tries his luck with sci.math....

Thus that goes down in Encyclopaedia . ArchiePooetica
sample of that trash below.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

^Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

> > Of course a spamming imbecile Arindam is not happy polluting sci.physics and tries his luck with sci.math....

Here is the schizoid---Arindam Banerjee's opinion on world politics:

Cause of US decline - the rule of the whodumbos
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

Aug 13, 2023, 7:22:15 PM (7 days ago)

> > > > So, your analogy of a 'headless chicken' just struck a chord with me.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

*Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

Alan Folmsbee's profile photo
Alan Folmsbee
, …

8
iron is ferromagnetic because...
Folmsbee crackpot?? as bad as Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the
8:28 PM

Alan Folmsbee's profile photo
Alan Folmsbee
, …
Arindam Banerjee
5
unread,
27 minutes until Moon landing, estimated
On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 23:06:03 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: > On Wednesday, August 23,
8:20 PM


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

,
Jeffrey Rubard
5
unread,

Cause of US decline - the rule of the whodumbos

On Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 04:12:34 UTC+10, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023
7:23 PM


[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 06:52:49 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> ^Can_Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet, Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks
>
> > > Of course a spamming imbecile Arindam is not happy polluting sci.physics and tries his luck with sci.math....

Where Arindam provides the disproof of FLT, thus setting a challenge for who can first find nonzero positive a b c for aaa+bbb=ccc for n=3
No mean feat.
And so elegantly done, can be understood by anyone with IQ 50 points above that of Archie - and with high school education in maths.

> Here is the schizoid---Arindam Banerjee's opinion on world politics:
>
> Cause of US decline - the rule of the whodumbos

Sad.
Hope exists with -

Latest experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

Earlier experiments (2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

The way the universe operates:

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ


Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

[Jeffrey Rubard]

Maybe you should give up the "Dick Cheney way of ideas", dude.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Can_Dr.Chaudhary Sujeet,Dr.Das Pintu,Dr.Shenoy M.R.,Dr.Bhatnagar M.C.,Dr.Chatterjee R., Indian Institute of Technology- please-step into the physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. Once weighed the hydrogen test tube should be 1/4 the weight of the oxygen test tube for H4O but if mainstream chemistry is correct then 1/8 atomic mass units. My weighing scales do not go up to 0.00001 gram, and sure that Indian Institute Technology has far better precision. Thanks

India's paid for by ... spamming jackarse Arindam Banerjee...


Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee

, …
mitchr...@gmail.com
15

unread,
Cause of US decline - the rule of the whodumbos

4:54 PM
