Einstein's Sins

[Pentcho Valev]

It all started with the false constancy of the speed of light. Einstein "borrowed" it from the Lorentz equations, called it "postulate", and finally derived, for the gullible world, the Lorentz equations from the "postulate" (reverse engineering):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory
Albert Einstein: "...I introduced the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light, which I borrowed from H. A. Lorentz's theory of the stationary luminiferous ether..."

John Stachel explains that the constancy of the speed of light seemed nonsense to Einstein but he introduced it nevertheless:

http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/einstein/essay-einstein-relativity.htm
John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair."

Indeed, the idea that the speed of light is independent of the speed of the observer is nonsense. Consider the following setup:

A light source emits a series of pulses equally distanced from one another. A stationary observer (receiver) measures the frequency:

http://www.einstein-online.info/images/spotlights/doppler/doppler_static.gif

The observer starts moving with constant speed towards the light source and measures the frequency again:

http://www.einstein-online.info/images/spotlights/doppler/doppler_detector_blue.gif

Premise 1 (Doppler effect; experimentally confirmed): The moving observer measures the frequency to be higher.

Premise 2 (obviously true): The formula

(frequency measured by the moving observer) = (speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer)/(distance between the pulses)

is correct.

Conclusion: The speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer is higher than relative to the stationary observer. In other words, the speed of light varies with the speed of the observer, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

The introduction of the false postulate was Einstein's original sin. The malignancy was there but it was sterile - all VALIDLY deducible consequences of the false postulate were obviously absurd and repugnant. Formally, this is still not fraud - postulates that may prove false are allowed by the deductive approach.

Einstein's second sin, however, was FRAUD - an invalid deduction produced a miraculous result that turned out to be irresistibly attractive. In 1905 Einstein derived, from his two postulates, the conclusion "the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B":

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B."

The conclusion

"the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B"

does not follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates - the argument is INVALID. The following two conclusions, in contrast, VALIDLY follow from the postulates:

Conclusion 1: The clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B, as judged from the stationary system.

Conclusion 2: The clock which has remained at B lags behind the clock moved from A to B, as judged from the moving system.

Conclusions 1 and 2 (symmetrical time dilation) in their combination give no prediction for the readings of the two clocks as they meet at B - in this sense the false postulate is sterile. In contrast, the INVALIDLY deduced conclusion provides a straightforward prediction - the moving clock is slow, the stationary one is FAST (asymmetrical time dilation). The famous "travel into the future" is a direct implication - the slowness of the moving clock means that its (moving) owner can remain virtually unchanged while sixty million years are passing for the stationary system:

http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf
Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")."

The year 1905 can be regarded as the year of the death of physics. Science died and idiotic ideology was born.

Peter Woit: "I think the worst thing that has happened to theoretical physics over the past 25 years is this descent into ideology, something that has accelerated with the multiverse mania of the last 10-15 years."
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=9375

Correct, except for the number 25 - it should be replaced by 112:

"This paper investigates an alternative possibility: that the critics were right and that the success of Einstein's theory in overcoming them was due to its strengths as an ideology rather than as a science. The clock paradox illustrates how relativity theory does indeed contain inconsistencies that make it scientifically problematic. These same inconsistencies, however, make the theory ideologically powerful. [...] The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier. Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting their opponents out of professional discourse. [...] The triumph of relativity theory represents the triumph of ideology not only in the profession of physics bur also in the philosophy of science." Peter Hayes, The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a909857880

And when ideology replaces science, bureaucrats replace scientists of course:

Mike Alder: "It is easy to see the consequences of the takeover by the bureaucrats. Bureaucrats favour uniformity, it simplifies their lives. They want rules to follow. They prefer the dead to the living. They have taken over religions, the universities and now they are taking over Science. And they are killing it in the process. The forms and rituals remain, but the spirit is dead. The cold frozen corpse is so much more appealing to the bureaucratic mind-set than the living spirit of the quest for insight. Bureaucracies put a premium on the old being in charge, which puts a stop to innovation. Something perhaps will remain, but it will no longer attract the best minds. This, essentially, is the Smolin position. He gives details and examples of the death of Physics, although he, being American, is optimistic that it can be reversed. I am not. [...] Developing ideas and applying them is done by a certain kind of temperament in a certain kind of setting, one where there is a good deal of personal freedom and a willingness to take risks. No doubt we still have the people. But the setting is gone and will not come back. Science is a product of the renaissance and an entrepreneurial spirit. It will not survive the triumph of bureacracy. Despite having the infrastructure, China never developed Science. And soon the West won't have it either." https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-172684821.html

Pentcho Valev

[Pentcho Valev]

So Einstein's second sin was a fraudulent and invalid deduction. In 1905 he asserted that

moving clocks run slower (which also means that travelers age slower)

even though the assertion was not a valid consequence of the postulates. The lie is fundamental - without it special relativity is just dull nonsense (the lie converts it into exciting nonsense) - so Einsteinians fiercely teach it even nowadays:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE
Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down."

http://www.jimal-khalili.com/blogs/
Jim Al-Khalili: "And, the faster you move and the longer you move at that speed, the slower your clock ticks, including your own internal biological clock, and so the slower you age - by tiny, tiny fractions of a second of course."

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/back-future-30th-anniversary-neil-degrasse-tyson-talks/story?id=32191481
Neil deGrasse Tyson: "We have ways of moving into the future. That is to have time tick more slowly for you than others, who you return to later on. We've known that since 1905, Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O8lBIcHre0
Brian Cox (2:25) : "Moving clocks run slowly"

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117878.000-a-special-theory-of-relativity.html
John Gribbin: "Einstein's special theory of relativity tells us how the Universe looks to an observer moving at a steady speed. Because the speed of light is the same for all such observers, moving clocks run slow..."

At the beginning of the 20th century the scientific community was still not brainwashed and many saw clearly that

moving clocks run slower

was not a valid consequence of the postulates - actually special relativity predicts that, as judged by the traveler (the owner of the moving clocks),

moving clocks run FASTER.

Einstein was in danger - the time for the third sin, doublethink, had come.

Einstein was a powerful doublethinker. He was able to defend both thesis and antithesis with the same conviction, without any hesitation. So in 1911 he repeated the 1905 lie and additionally explained that the "sudden change of direction" is immaterial with respect to the clock (twin) paradox:

http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol3-trans/368
Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion, but if it undergoes a change of direction as a result of a jolt, then the theory of relativity does not tell us what happens. The sudden change of direction might produce a sudden change in the position of the hands of the clock. However, the longer the clock is moving rectilinearly and uniformly with a given speed in a forward motion, i.e., the larger the dimensions of the polygon, the smaller must be the effect of such a hypothetical sudden change."

In 1918 the "sudden change of direction" involving acceleration, which had been immaterial a couple of years before, became crucial and produced a miraculous HOMOGENEOUS gravitational field:

http://sciliterature.50webs.com/Dialog.htm
Albert Einstein 1918: "A homogeneous gravitational field appears, that is directed towards the positive x-axis. Clock U1 is accelerated in the direction of the positive x-axis until it has reached the velocity v, then the gravitational field disappears again. An external force, acting upon U2 in the negative direction of the x-axis prevents U2 from being set in motion by the gravitational field. [...] According to the general theory of relativity, a clock will go faster the higher the gravitational potential of the location where it is located, and during partial process 3 U2 happens to be located at a higher gravitational potential than U1. The calculation shows that this speeding ahead constitutes exactly twice as much as the lagging behind during the partial processes 2 and 4."

Today's Einsteinians agree that the "sudden change of direction" involving acceleration is both immaterial and crucial, but most of them teach Einstein's 1911 argument (it is easier to teach). Yet an important minority sticks to Einstein's 1918 idiocy and teaches that the "sudden change of direction" is crucial:

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive/archive_2014/today14-05-02_NutshellReadMore.html
Don Lincoln: "Some readers, probably including some of my doctoral-holding colleagues at Fermilab, will claim that the difference between the two twins is that one of the two has experienced an acceleration. (After all, that's how he slowed down and reversed direction.) However, the relativistic equations don't include that acceleration phase; they include just the coasting time at high velocity."

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/members/gibbons/gwgPartI_SpecialRelativity2010.pdf
Gary W. Gibbons FRS: "In other words, by simply staying at home Jack has aged relative to Jill. There is no paradox because the lives of the twins are not strictly symmetrical. This might lead one to suspect that the accelerations suffered by Jill might be responsible for the effect. However this is simply not plausible because using identical accelerating phases of her trip, she could have travelled twice as far. This would give twice the amount of time gained."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/04/physics-needs-philosophy/

Tim Maudlin: "...so many physicists strongly discourage questions about the nature of reality. The reigning attitude in physics has been "shut up and calculate": solve the equations, and do not ask questions about what they mean. But putting computation ahead of conceptual clarity can lead to confusion. Take, for example, relativity's iconic "twin paradox." Identical twins separate from each other and later reunite. When they meet again, one twin is biologically older than the other. (Astronaut twins Scott and Mark Kelly are about to realize this experiment: when Scott returns from a year in orbit in 2016 he will be about 28 microseconds younger than Mark, who is staying on Earth.) No competent physicist would make an error in computing the magnitude of this effect. But even the great Richard Feynman did not always get the explanation right. In "The Feynman Lectures on Physics," he attributes the difference in ages to the acceleration one twin experiences: the twin who accelerates ends up younger. But it is easy to describe cases where the opposite is true, and even cases where neither twin accelerates but they end up different ages. The calculation can be right and the accompanying explanation wrong."

http://sciencechatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=26847
Don Lincoln: "A common explanation of this paradox is that the travelling twin experienced acceleration to slow down and reverse velocity. While it is clearly true that a single person must experience this acceleration, you can show that the acceleration is not crucial. What is crucial is that the travelling twin experienced time in two reference frames, while the homebody experienced time in one. We can demonstrate this by a modification of the problem. In the modification, there is still a homebody and a person travelling to a distant star. The modification is that there is a third person even farther away than the distant star. This person travels at the same speed as the original traveler, but in the opposite direction. The third person's trajectory is timed so that both of them pass the distant star at the same time. As the two travelers pass, the Earthbound person reads the clock of the outbound traveler. He then adds the time he experiences travelling from the distant star to Earth to the duration experienced by the outbound person. The sum of these times is the transit time. Note that no acceleration occurs in this problem...just three people experiencing relative inertial motion."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/spacetime_tachyon/index.html
John Norton: "We read from these hypersurfaces that the traveling twin judges the stay-at-home twin's clock to be running at half the speed of the travelers. When the traveler's clock reads 1 day, the stay-at-home twin's reads 1/2 day; just before the turn around, when the traveler's clock is almost at 2 days, the stay-at-home twin's clock is almost at 1 day. Then, at the end of the outward leg, the traveler abruptly changes motion, accelerating sharply to adopt a new inertial motion directed back to earth. What comes now is the key part of the analysis. The effect of the change of motion is to alter completely the traveler's judgment of simultaneity. The traveler's hypersurfaces of simultaneity now flip up dramatically. Moments after the turn-around, when the travelers clock reads just after 2 days, the traveler will judge the stay-at-home twin's clock to read just after 7 days. That is, the traveler will judge the stay-at-home twin's clock to have jumped suddenly from reading 1 day to reading 7 days. This huge jump puts the stay-at-home twin's clock so far ahead of the traveler's that it is now possible for the stay-at-home twin's clock to be ahead of the travelers when they reunite. Careful attention to the differing judgments of simultaneity of the two twins shows that there is nothing paradoxical in the twin effect. The brief moment of acceleration of the traveling twin completely alters the traveler's judgments of simultaneity and this alteration is key to seeing how relativity provides a consistent account of the effect."

http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Paradox
"The Twin Paradox is a scenario that, at first glance, seems to make nonsense out of Einstein's theory of special relativity. The situation is that a man sets off in a rocket travelling at high speed away from Earth, whilst his twin brother stays on Earth. [...] What happens is that the twin on Earth, viewing himself as stationary and his brother as moving at high speed, sees his brother experiencing time dilation and thus ageing more slowly. At the same time, the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself. Each sees the other as moving, and therefore as experiencing time dilation. But which brother is "correct" in the way he perceives the situation? Both are. Each sees the other as being younger than himself. How they were perceived by any onlooker would depend on which frame of reference the onlooker was in. It doesn't make sense to ask which brother is "really" older, because the answer depends on where you stand to ask the question! But what about when the brother in the spaceship returns to Earth? Surely the contradiction will be apparent then? Ah, but in order to return to Earth, the spaceship must slow down, stop moving, turn around and go back the other way. During those periods of deceleration and deceleration, it is not an inertial frame and therefore the normal rules of special relativity don't apply. When the twin in the spaceship turns around to make his journey home, the shift in his frame of reference causes his perception of his brother's age to change rapidly: he sees his brother getting suddenly older. This means that when the twins are finally reunited, the stay-at-home twin is the older of the two."

The sudden ageing of the stationary twin, described in the last two quotations and in Einstein's 1918 paper, deserves special attention - this is perhaps the greatest idiocy in the history of science:

"When the twin in the spaceship turns around to make his journey home, the shift in his frame of reference causes his perception of his brother's age to change rapidly: he sees his brother getting suddenly older. This means that when the twins are finally reunited, the stay-at-home twin is the older of the two."

Pentcho Valev

[reber G=emc^2]

I wonder if Einstein's biggest sin would be not coming up with adding G for God or Gravity? I have lived much longer than Einstein,and also 13% more clever.My 15 theories are proof of this.I sail better.I build the boats I sail.I paint and sculpture and stop light in flight.Mush more,but I hate to brag.I'm blushing now. TreBert Ooops Treb just jump in.OK he in reality carved out the elephant.It did come out great.

[hanson]

"reber G=emc^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> repeated
Glazier's Gutter-physics and his Idiotic Glazierola which
gives rise for the issues in
<http://tinyurl.com/Tears-for-Einsteins-Misery>, but
>
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent> and sole
purpose to post is for SwineBert to find well meaning fools,
whom he can goad into responding & educate him, the 4th
grade drop out Cretin Glazier, so that Glazier can do this
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>,
to them and proof that Glazier is a Face Shitter &
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
whose MO is exampled in the above links ."Go figure"
2.4)-------------------------------------------------------------

[reber G=emc^2]

On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:36:55 PM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Better than Noah my boats can be in back yards in every home.To be used for fun or saving lives.Its cheap and Gov.should pay for materials.Trebert

[Double-A]

Great idea! First get a patent on them. Then get the government to require everyone to have one in their back yard. Then get the government to pay for them! Sounds like the formula for success! You should make your first sales pitch to Houston!

Double-A

[hanson]

"reber G=emc^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote"

"Better than Noah my boats can be in back yards in every

home, but never in floods, swift water of the high seas.
My imaginary barrel boat is cheap and Gov.should, but
will never pay for materials nor for it, nor for any of Bert's
Gutter physics or his idiotic Glazierola because they are
just <http://tinyurl.com/SwineBert-s-WRONG-Predictions>
"It's a pity" SwineBert says. "Go figure"...... LOL

[benj]

Not how it works Reber. IF there is a boat in every back yard, it's
clear that each year, Democrats would demand that a license be purchased
(from THEM, natch) for you to leave it there just in case it rains and
the boat starts to float. In such case the boat must have been inspected
and licensed to insure that it had all proper safety equipment on board.

Government pay you?
Bwahahahaha! That's what DEMOCRATS tell Blacks and Hispanics. <snort>!

[reber G=emc^2]

Sounds like a plan.Not Houston but to GOPer Mafia.TreBert

[reber G=emc^2]

[hanson]

"Herbert Glazier" <herbert...@gmail.com> it will be
VERY easy for you to avoid and stop the daily reminders
which you grievously hate and desperately try to cover up,
by accepting <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>
and do what is says. So, ....

<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> listen for
a second. Why do you have such an overwhelming inner need
to be reminded every day that you are a Face-Shitter, a Criminal
and <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>, who
not only defends but promotes Jewish criminality, ... but....
>
you being an ashkeNAZI, a hate monger, racist & a bigot,
all of which is the foundation of your Glazier-Jew character,
that can be seen in any of the following links about you,
Bert being ___ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim _____
>
with <http://tinyurl.com/SwineBert-s-WRONG-Predictions>
& being <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>,
who is <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
doing this <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>,
while waiting for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>
and then <http://tinyurl.com/Jew-Swine-Glazier-cries> as seen
in his <http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017> which
"it's tricky", he says, but "it fits" & "it's on the money". "Go Figure"

[hanson]

[Pentcho Valev]

Einstein informs the gullible world that the Lorentz transformation entails the ASYMMETRICAL time dilation on the rotating disk:

Albert Einstein: "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction... [...] The observer performs experiments on his circular disc with clocks and measuring-rods. In doing so, it is his intention to arrive at exact definitions for the signification of time- and space-data with reference to the circular disc K', these definitions being based on his observations. What will be his experience in this enterprise? To start with, he places one of two identically constructed clocks at the centre of the circular disc, and the other on the edge of the disc, so that they are at rest relative to it. We now ask ourselves whether both clocks go at the same rate from the standpoint of the non-rotating Galileian reference-body K. As judged from this body, the clock at the centre of the disc has no velocity, whereas the clock at the edge of the disc is in motion relative to K in consequence of the rotation. According to a result obtained in Section XII, it follows that the latter clock goes at a rate permanently slower than that of the clock at the centre of the circular disc, i.e. as observed from K." http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Einstein refers to Section XII but this Section does not contain any results explaining why the (inertial) clock at the center of the rotating disc should run faster than the (non-inertial) clock placed on the edge of the disc. Rather, the results in Section XII are all based on the Lorentz transformation which predicts SYMMETRICAL time dilation for two INERTIAL clocks: either inertial clock (more precisely, the observer in this clock's system) sees the other inertial clock running SLOW by a factor of 1/gamma = sqrt(1-(v/c)^2).

http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/863506einsteinformuletableau.jpg

Pentcho Valev

[reber G=emc^2]

Calling the elephant "Big Mac" McDonalds love it.Did most of my carving on a corner table there.(No Mess) Made over a 100 prints .Maybe the CEO will give me a free franchise so he can keep it on his desk?? I like that. Trebert

[hanson]

"reber G=emc^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote:
"I like that, I am Trebert _ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim __

[Augǝl]

You !

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Xi ready to take back lovely Qing's Manchurian Homeland from the nazi stealing Russians Vladivostok

Pentcho Valev on Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See Angel's reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.

And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.


1 Rock of Ages██۞██


Kibo ParryM singing Rock of Ages██۞██Moscow rolling blackouts

Xi on Vladivostok border with 1,000 divisions ready to take back stolen Outer Manchuria!!!!
Putin singing Moscow Rolling Blackouts██۞██ sung by CIA, Mi6, Russian Federation choir spammers "_" from Portugal Spam Auditorium --Rock of Ages, cleft for me

And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.

Kibo Parry M still spamming sci.physics undercover with his "im sick i cry" spam
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Special guest singer Kibo Parry M, science failure turned tap dancer and singer
Kibo ParryM singing Rock of Ages██۞██Moscow rolling blackouts
Vladimir Putin, stealing Outer Manchuria....

> Rock of Ages, Vladimir Putin
> Stealing Ukraine once again


Earle Jones, Kibo Parry M. and others pointing out why Oval versus ellipse is important for Xi in seeing Outer Manchuria was stolen from China.

I bet Earle Jones of Stanford Univ. loves Valoid proofs as he does gummy bears in ellipsoid or ovoid.

Singing from Rolling Black Out St.Petersburg

Chorus: Chairman Xi, Taiwan is only 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, yet you let the Russian Nazi Putin steal your 1 million square kilometers of land. Send in 1,000 divisions and get your land back while Russia has an insane dictator.
Xi invades Russia to take back Outer Manchuria with 1,000 divisions to Putin's 1 platoon.
> > > Not waiting for Putin to gift wrap Outer Manchuria and hand the stolen land back to China
> > >
> > > And where the baby Xi Jinping was nestled cuddled and tightly caressed and fed by Chairman Mao concubines in the stillness of the waters of the Amur River in the Rice Reeds and Paddies, where panda bears were playfully playing in yonder oak and beech and Siberian elm trees. The musical of Rock of Ages was played and sung by Chairman Mao's concubines as the rich nutritious protein syrup of fresh rice cultivated by the Ussuri and Amur Rivers flowed their bountiful water over the lush fields of rice and cinnamon and sugar cane. The baby Xi was given dessert of fresh mulberry and peaches and cream from the 3 Farmers visiting.
> > >
> > > Everytime Russia bombs Ukraine, China fells another GLONASS satellite. This makes it easier for China to regain its stolen lands of OUTER MANCHURIA which is 28 times larger than Taiwan. Taiwan can wait, it is not going anywhere, but while Russia has an insane dictator, China may as well recover its beautiful lands of Outer Manchuria.
> > >
> > > Xi masses troops on Russian border to take back Outer Manchuria. If you do not know the history, Russia stole Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok from China.
> > >
> > > While Putin is too busy with his personal war, Xi thinks time is ripe to get back what belongs to China in the first place. OUTER MANCHURIA and especially Vladivostok.
> > >
> > > Xi gives the Chinese people a Christmas gift--- Outer Manchuria-- the beloved Old China
> > > I am not positive we can take out GLONASS and BeiDou from ground based radio and microwaves and laser waves, even jamming.
> > >
> > > But I am certain that we can put a satellite in orbit that is a wrecking ramming satellite that does take out GLONASS and BeiDou. I am certain of this because several countries have robotic satellites that maintenance their fleet of satellites. And to this end, we need such a wrecking ball satellite immediately up there.
> > >


> > > > > in a javelin throw to knock out Moscow high voltage lines
> > > > >> ........///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////|
> > > > >> ......///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////..|
> > > > >> ....///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////....|
> > > > >> ..///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////......|
> > > > >> ///// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////........|
> > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|......../
> > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|....../
> > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|..../
> > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|../
> > > > >> |__| |__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__| |__|__|__|__|__|/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> ||
> > > > >> ||
> > > > >> //////// ||
> > > > >> |:---[.] ||
> > > > >> |( _J ||
> > > > >> | ^ ( _| ||
> > > > >> / \_____) ||
> > > > >> / _____ \ || Long Aluminum javelin to throw to short circuit
> > > > >> | / \ | || .
> > > > >> | | | | ||
> > > > >> \ /\ /\__ | ||
> > > > >> | | \/---
> > > > >> \ \ )
> > > > >> | >_____/_____)
> > > > >> \__________/ ||
> > > > >> / \ ||
> > > > >> | | ~~
> > > > >> \ \\
> > > > >> \ |\
> > > > >> \ | \
> > > > >> \ | |
> > > > >> | | |
> > > > >> | | |
> > > > >> | / |
> > > > >> |________/____|
> > > > >> (_________)____)
> > > > >> ==============================
> > > > >> freedom fighter from the tiresome dictator
> > > > >
> > > > > Yea, the dictator has no power and no hot water, no heat, no electricity for his house, offices.

[V V V V V]

Everyone sins time to time!

[Johni Luzzatto]

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow,
> St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

but "uKraine" doesn't exists, idiot. It's just a Russian Territory since 1991, run by the nazis under special conditions, now retracted in the manifold. Ran by capitalists since 1991, the people poor, ran by the western nazis since the coup detat 2014, the people still poor.

read these papers as proofs.

KHAZARS PIGS WHO CONTROL UKRAINE relodede with links
https://zb10-7gsop1v78.%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/HzFVUijW84Jk/hzXcn0N2zqQE.mp4

Zelensky behind Macron’s calls to Putin – Paris
https://%72%74.com/news/570961-macron-calls-putin-zelensky/

the khazar gypsy gay actor zelenske is a war criminal, killing own people for
personal benefit. His family, parents, wife, domiciled in Israel and other
countries, not helping the wounded soldiers dying on hospitals.

your time is coming, bitch.

[Connie Scutese]

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> Old Chi

you stupid polak. You changed your name and you moved to america, then
now, you are a big american. You repulsive sack of shit.

not only that you are a polak with changed name, but also catholic, the
priest of which, according to their own data, over 50% of them are gays.

[Volney]

🌪️ of Math and 🌀 of Physics Archimedes "Meckling Village Idiot"
Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>
> Knock out electricity in
[snip rest of crap]


Haha! Thanks for proving my point! I wrote:

>> One can easily define insanity as "doing the same foolish thing over and over again".
>
> Incomplete quote as you left off the "expecting a different result" part, but AP's version really applies to StupidPlutonium. Look at what's going on in just one thread, "Re: Einstein's Sins", where AP posts the same foolish thing over and over again:
>
> <snip everything before 2/1>
>
> 2/1, AP tards:
>> Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>
> 2/2, AP tards:
>> Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>
> 2/3, AP tards:
>> Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
>> Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
[...]


You have been spamming that once a day, and that meets YOUR definition
of "doing the same foolish thing over and over again". Even when I point
it out as insanity, YOU KEEP ON DOING "the same foolish thing over and
over again". So you are insane, BY YOUR OWN DEFINITION!


>> One can easily define insanity as "doing the same foolish thing over and over again".
>
> So does AP's spamming of this nonsense qualify as StupidPlutonium's insanity? I say yes.Poor, poor insane AP...

[Volney]

🌪️ of Math and 🌀 of Physics Archimedes "Meckling Village Idiot"
Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:

> Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>
> Knock out electricity in

Oh. My. God.

I point out how StupidPlutonium is insane by his own definition by
"doing the same foolish thing over and over again" and he does it AGAIN,
then I comment on it, so what does InsanePlutonium do? He does the same
foolish thing YET AGAIN!!!

>> Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
>> _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>>
>> Knock out electricity in
> [snip rest of crap]
>
>
> Haha! Thanks for proving my point!
>

> [...]
>
>
> You have been spamming that once a day, and that meets YOUR definition of "doing the same foolish thing over and over again". Even when I point it out as insanity, YOU KEEP ON DOING "the same foolish thing over and over again". So you are insane, BY YOUR OWN DEFINITION!

Hey Ghost of Uncle Al! What do you think of InsanePlutonium "doing the
same foolish thing over and over again" ?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid
that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different
sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.
Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild
radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no
intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more
stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.
Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid.
Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment from the
original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated
by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that define
maximally extrapolated hypergeometric n-dimensional backgroundless
stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is Planck stupid, a quantum
foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand unified theory of
stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."