On 02/15/2024 01:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 3:58:47 PM UTC-5, Velislav
Bárdos Urbán wrote:
>>> gharnagel wrote:
>>>
>>>> LaD has nothing to do with the brain. This has been refuted by at
least
>>>> two cases with scientific weight to support that.
>>>> First, Dr. Duncan MacDougall, about a century ago. See
>>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/evidence-for-the-existence-of-god/c/
>>> pvZbotWXeMg
>>>> Conclusion: "the probability that the body suddenly loses something
>>>> that cannot be accounted for and which weighs at least 1/4 ounce is
>>>> 99.9%."
>>>> The second is the experience of Dr. Eben Alexander, a
neurosurgeon. His
>>>
>>> until you realize he is a lying
𠗸𠗵𠗮𠘇𠗮𠗿_𠗴𠗼𠘆 visiting
"𠗶𠘀𠗿𠗮𠗲𠗹", supporting the
>>> genocide in
𠗧𠗵𠗲_𠗛𠗼𠗹𠗹𠘆_𠗟𠗮𠗻𠗱_𠗼𠗳_ð —£ð —®ð —¹ð —²ð ˜€ð ˜ ð —¶ð —»ð —²
(see a map), 𠗔𠗡𠗗 the genocide on humans
>>> in the territory misnamed "ukrein", working hard for selling his crappy
>>> books of completely nonsense. Ie
>>>
>>> "I was there, but there was no Eben Alexander" (!!) What a fucking
idiot.
>> 1000
>> 1000 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
>> 1000 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
>> 1000 –[February 15, 2024]
>> .
>> [Velislav Bárdos Urbán] wrote: –
>> " LaD has nothing to do with the brain."
>> .
>> [George Hammond] replied: –
>> Don't be stupid Urban – LAD (Life after Death)
>> is ENTIRELY caused by the MICROTUBULES
>> inside the NEURONS of the BRAIN !
>> .
>> FURTHERMORE these water-filled nanotube
>> microtubules carry ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT at
>> 10^15 Hertz which is 10-TRILLION times as
>> fast as Neuronal firing frequency (100 Hz) !
>> THEREFORE it can compress a three-year
>> afterlife dream down to 3 µs – enabling it to
>> ESCAPE ANY FORM OF DEATH by sheer speed !
>> .... But amazingly – the dream is viewed in
>> REAL TIME by the dearly departed – since the
>> same superfast microtubule system is the
>> "bodily observer" of this superfast dream!
>> .
>> This is the FIRST and ONLY SCIENTIFIC
>> EXPLANATION of LIFE AFTER DEATH!
>> In the entire history of the world !
>> .
>> George
>> .
>
> I already gave you the "bodily observer"/soul
> EXPLANATION of LIFE AFTER DEATH...
>
> it simply leaves through the pores of the skin!
>
> Let me know if my 'arithmetic' is correct...
How the brain works is relatively well known.
It is called 'fuzzy logic'.
Computers generally have 'bits'. They are
on-off, and 'flip-flops' generally drive
the 'bit' into either an 'on' or 'off' state.
Then there is also a 'select' line that chooses
which specific 'bit' or 'byte' or 'gate' is
selected at any point in time for a 'read' or
'write'. Since each 'gate' is selected only
one at a time, this is called 'sequential
processing'.
In 'fuzzy logic', there is more than one output
from each 'gate' and more than one 'input' that
determines whether each logic unit will 'fire'
like a coding 'neuron'. There are also non-coding
'nerve cells' in a 'nervous system'. Some of them
are called 'astrocytes' and among the glial cells,
they look very similar to coding neurons. The
'weights' of each input and output called 'synapses'
can change throughout time. There is the myth that
one never grows new (what is that word), I read a
few years ago, however that some glial cells can
reproduce and gradually differentiate into coding
neurons. Thus the myth that you can not grow new
(something) is actually incorrect. Remember, coding
neurons are different from astrocytes, which are a
type of glial cell.
It would take very, very, very advanced microscopy
and computing to scan each neuron determine if each
synapse is excitory and increases the propensity for
an adjacent neuron to fire, or inhibitory and decreases
the propensity for an adjacent neuron to fire. (This
might possibly be simulated by noting the shape of the
neuron and not needing to get something to detect what type
of 'receptor' it is chemically, but that is far from
obvious). Then take the entire set of scans and
simulate an entire nervous system. Does anyone even
care enough to bother trying? Well this is very
difficult. Has anyone taught a very simple worm
or jellyfish - something very simple. Killed the
worm or jellyfish - and then done microscopy -
this worm or jellyfish DID learn this when it was
alive? This worm or jellyfish DID NOT learn this
when it was alive? Sadly, even I am not sure if
this has been done or not. A lot of web searches
come up with 'content farm' garbage. Remember,
many animals including humans - undergo 'decomposition'
when they die. I do not know what percentage of
humans are eaten by maggots, versus, mold, yeast,
or some other types of fungus. Remember - most
types of embalming do not even suppress maggots,
they simply allow for a delayed funeral. Remember -
there is 'cremation' and 'cremulation'. Cremulation
involves crushing the bones. There are some places
that prohibit you from spreading the 'ashes' of
the deceased, Why? Because some funeral parlors
are cheap. They actually leave noticeable bone
fragments, because crushing entirely to a fine
powder takes more time, and more money.
There is also the concept of 'memory' and
'reading and writing'. If what is originally
written is true information, you may be able
to infer events prior to when you were very
young. Then there is something called 'memes'.
Are 'angels' or 'spirits' memes? Can someone
be 'possessed' by a 'meme'? Then there is the
concept of 'time travel'. In some distant future
age - someone could 'copy' nerve patterns from
the past, by reading some brain pattern from
the past, and then 'upload' it into a future
computer? Basic question - is that even remotely
possible? Basic question - is human civilization
itself inherently unstable - it is not possible
for a 'future' to exist in order to make that possible?
If it is possible, do some 'futures' have a civilization
more advanced than ours? Do other futures have no
future civilization to develop the technology even if
it were theoretically feasible? Did future time
travelers, from another parallel universe besides our
own - travel back in time and meet Jesus? Yet in
this universe, we have already gone past the point
of no return - our parallel universe has no heaven
and no hell because we have no 'future' do develop
the capability - our future is destroyed and in
our parallel time line we are doomed? Well, who
knows.