info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
forgib me im sick i cry
331 views
Skip to first unread message
_
Jan 28, 2020, 4:08:23 PM1/28/20
to
forgib me im sick i cry
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 9, 2022, 11:02:09 PM1/9/22
to
Is-Henry W. Kendall,Sheldon Glashow,Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia,Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler
,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Jerome I. Friedman capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
>
> I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
>
> The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
>
> So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
>
> Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
>
>
> THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> 15k views
>
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
>
>
>
> to
> *
> Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
>
> At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
>
> He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
>
> Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
>
> Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> *
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
>
> Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
>
> I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> unread,
> 12:59 PM (now)
>
>
>
> to
> The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
>
> Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
>
> Time is of the essence.
>
> No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
>
> Time is of the essence.
>
> The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
>
> As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
>
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Lending : Enabled
,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Jerome I. Friedman capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
>
> I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
>
> The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
>
> So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
>
> Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
>
>
> THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> 15k views
>
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
>
>
>
> to
> *
> Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
>
> At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
>
> He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
>
> Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
>
> Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> *
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
>
> Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
>
> I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> unread,
> 12:59 PM (now)
>
>
>
> to
> The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
>
> Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
>
> Time is of the essence.
>
> No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
>
> Time is of the essence.
>
> The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
>
> As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
>
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
Product details
• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F
• Publication date : December 15, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 60 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#1-10, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Lending : Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 15, 2022, 3:25:16 PM1/15/22
to
Is-James Watson Cronin,Henry W. Kendall,Sheldon Glashow,Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia,Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Jerome I. Friedman capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
23> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
>
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 18, 2022, 6:03:35 PM1/18/22
to
Henry W. Kendall, Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia,Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Sheldon Glashow,Steven Weinberg are not capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
> > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer
> > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > James Watson Cronin
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Edward Witten
>
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 794 KB
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1033 KB
> • Lending : Enabled
> #2-9, 161st published book
> Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
>
> On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
>
> Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> >
> > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> >
> > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> >
> > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> >
> > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
>
> On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
>
> Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> >
> > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> >
> > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> >
> > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> >
> > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > >
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > >
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer
> > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > James Watson Cronin
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Edward Witten
> >
> > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
>
> Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
>
> #1-5, 112th published book
> > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
>
> Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
>
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray:
Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 794 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 123 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
>
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date : October 19, 2021
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1033 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 386 pages
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> #2-9, 161st published book
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 19, 2022, 2:34:30 PM1/19/22
to
Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia,Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Sheldon Glashow,Steven Weinberg, Henry W. Kendall, are not capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
22> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
23> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 20, 2022, 1:09:12 AM1/20/22
to
Simon van der Meer,William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin,Val Logsdon Fitch,Sheldon Glashow,Steven Weinberg, Henry W. Kendall,Richard E. Taylor,Carlo Rubbia, are not capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jan 22, 2022, 2:37:26 AM1/22/22
to
🦎 of Math and 🐍 of Physics Archimedes "imp of physics" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to their respective University student newspaper
"AP requires"? "AP requires"?
AP is a nobody of science, in the middle of nowhere in an unheated
single wide surrounded by diseased cats. AP has no authority over
anyone, especially any of the greats of science.
> and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom.
Why would anyone, they especially, apologize for anything that's not
wrong? That's pretty dumb and stoopid, isn't it.
> When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.
Nobody is going to apologize for not teaching something so insanely
wrong. You can't even get the masses right! 950.9253795 is much larger
than 938.27208816! You have to use two fudge factors, one using 945 and
the second fudge factor is the fudge factor you call "sigma error"!
[snip crap]
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to their respective University student newspaper
"AP requires"? "AP requires"?
AP is a nobody of science, in the middle of nowhere in an unheated
single wide surrounded by diseased cats. AP has no authority over
anyone, especially any of the greats of science.
> and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom.
Why would anyone, they especially, apologize for anything that's not
wrong? That's pretty dumb and stoopid, isn't it.
> When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.
Nobody is going to apologize for not teaching something so insanely
wrong. You can't even get the masses right! 950.9253795 is much larger
than 938.27208816! You have to use two fudge factors, one using 945 and
the second fudge factor is the fudge factor you call "sigma error"!
[snip crap]
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 22, 2022, 4:11:11 PM1/22/22
to
AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to their respective University student newspaper and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom. When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.
>44 > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
44> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
44> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> 44> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
44> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 23, 2022, 4:52:11 PM1/23/22
to
Math failure Gilbert Strang of MIT as eulogized by his friend Kibo Parry Moron who is a failed engineer from Rensselaer with his 938 is 12% short of 945. My, oh my, is Rensselaer graduating engineers who cannot even do a proper percentage??
Kibo Parry Moron waxing on why MIT Gilbert Strang is a failure of mathematics and should stop writing calculus textbooks
0 views
Subscribe
to
On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 3:10:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"failed goonclod of math" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>of Math andof Physics "Bozo of Math"
Kibo Parry Moron does not mince words in his disgust of the failed Gilbert Strang in mathematics. But Kibo is short on details. Here are the details.
1) Strang has been in math education all his life, yet the imp could never recognize that a single cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, meaning that the slant cut could never be an ellipse but had to be a oval.
2) A real mathematician that writes calculus textbooks is expected to define what the hell are the numbers he is going to use throughout the text to teach Calculus. But no Gilbert Strang is such a scatterbrain, that he never defines-- what the hell are your numbers Gilbert? And has the audacity to define Complex numbers on page 360 but never what the hell are his original numbers.
3) Taking a look at the very first page of Strang's Calculus, 1991, and I hope any new editions were denied so as to save our young students the agony of using a scatterbrained calculus book. But looking at the very first page is revealing as to whether any math textbook is worthy of using in education.
And here, Strang on the very first page reveals not his scatterbrain mind in math, but reveals he never understood Calculus in the first place. For he ends the first page with the stark mistake of saying "The central question of calculus is the relation between v and f."
No, Strang, you math moron. The central question of calculus involves the two new operators of integral and derivative, (other than add, subtract, multiply and divide) for integral and derivative are new operators and the question about integral and derivative is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Of course we can count on scatterbrain Strang to call Calculus just a tiny part of the derivative, and totally amiss of the integral.
So, yes, Kibo Parry Moron is correct in saying that Gilbert Strang is a failure of math, not just because Strang cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, nor can he ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but that Gilbert Strang was never a mathematician in the first place.
Kibo Parry Moron waxing on why MIT Gilbert Strang is a failure of mathematics and should stop writing calculus textbooks
0 views
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:44 PM (1 minute ago)
Archimedes Plutonium
to
On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 3:10:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"failed goonclod of math" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>of Math andof Physics "Bozo of Math"
> fails at math and science:
> > AP requires the entire MIT math dept especially Gilbert Strang to publish in the student newspaper en-masse
Kibo Parry Moron does not mince words in his disgust of the failed Gilbert Strang in mathematics. But Kibo is short on details. Here are the details.
1) Strang has been in math education all his life, yet the imp could never recognize that a single cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, meaning that the slant cut could never be an ellipse but had to be a oval.
2) A real mathematician that writes calculus textbooks is expected to define what the hell are the numbers he is going to use throughout the text to teach Calculus. But no Gilbert Strang is such a scatterbrain, that he never defines-- what the hell are your numbers Gilbert? And has the audacity to define Complex numbers on page 360 but never what the hell are his original numbers.
3) Taking a look at the very first page of Strang's Calculus, 1991, and I hope any new editions were denied so as to save our young students the agony of using a scatterbrained calculus book. But looking at the very first page is revealing as to whether any math textbook is worthy of using in education.
And here, Strang on the very first page reveals not his scatterbrain mind in math, but reveals he never understood Calculus in the first place. For he ends the first page with the stark mistake of saying "The central question of calculus is the relation between v and f."
No, Strang, you math moron. The central question of calculus involves the two new operators of integral and derivative, (other than add, subtract, multiply and divide) for integral and derivative are new operators and the question about integral and derivative is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Of course we can count on scatterbrain Strang to call Calculus just a tiny part of the derivative, and totally amiss of the integral.
So, yes, Kibo Parry Moron is correct in saying that Gilbert Strang is a failure of math, not just because Strang cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, nor can he ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but that Gilbert Strang was never a mathematician in the first place.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 25, 2022, 4:27:16 PM1/25/22
to
Peter Higgs needs to publish in the Univ Edinburgh student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around OUTSIDE of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding together as a hydrogen atom. For Peter Higgs was a physics idiot all his life never understanding what Angular Momentum means. For you can never have a electron flying around outside a proton at 99% speed of light and hold together.
The true electron of atoms is the Muon and is stuck INSIDE a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton and producing electricity-- some of which is a 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Peter Higgs is a physics failure and should apologize to all his students.
>
> Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
>
> Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
>
> AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
>
> So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> #3-1, 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
y
The true electron of atoms is the Muon and is stuck INSIDE a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton and producing electricity-- some of which is a 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Peter Higgs is a physics failure and should apologize to all his students.
>
> Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
>
> Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
>
> AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
>
> So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> #3-1, 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> • Lending : Enabled
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
y
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 26, 2022, 10:27:57 PM1/26/22
to
George Smoot,Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to their respective University student newspaper and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom. When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 28, 2022, 8:09:48 PM1/28/22
to
Kibo on NSF Panchanathan,Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow
Kibo on physics failures Peter Higgs,NSF Panchanathan, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita, Arthur B. McDonald -- too stupid to ever ask which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
Kibo Parry Moron nonstop govt paid stalker of 30 years---
On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic" NSF Panchanathan flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>of Physics "Kim Jong Un's minion"
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo Parry Moron, why cannot any of these Nobel physicists ask the simple question of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac Magnetic Monopole? Is it raw stupidity or is it that they never learned Logic-- how to think straight, think clear?
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
#2-1, 137th published book
#3-1, 2nd published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
Kibo on physics failures Peter Higgs,NSF Panchanathan, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita, Arthur B. McDonald -- too stupid to ever ask which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
Kibo Parry Moron nonstop govt paid stalker of 30 years---
On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic" NSF Panchanathan flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>of Physics "Kim Jong Un's minion"
> fails at math and science:
How much does NSF Dr. Panchanathan pay Kibo Parry Moron to stalk sci.math and sci.physics-- is it $100 per post, for I hope it is 0 per post otherwise that would make the NSF look like-- in Kibo's own words-- goonclod analbuttfuckmanure organization.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo Parry Moron, why cannot any of these Nobel physicists ask the simple question of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac Magnetic Monopole? Is it raw stupidity or is it that they never learned Logic-- how to think straight, think clear?
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 7, 2022, 1:23:45 AM2/7/22
to
Is McGinn spam funded by CERN, US dept of Educ, and NSF, to spam 24-7-365?
SheldonGlashowPeterHiggs, Erika D. Beck, McGinn CSUN still teaching 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction, ellipse a conic when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for so stupid is Harvard and CSUN as seen by McGinn spam 24 hours a day nonstop, so stupid are these universities that they still teach a hydrogen atom electron flys at 99.9% speed of light OUTSIDE a 938MeV proton. AP says these schools are losers of science for the truth of science is the muon is the real electron of atoms and a muon is stuck INSIDE a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, which makes sense because flying at 99.4% speed of light inside a proton, the hydrogen atom can exist.
Is CSUN paying McGinn, Pennino, Pnal to spam sci.physics nonstop 24-7-365? Spam with their fake science just to front page hog sci.physics.
So ask yourself, do you want to go to a school that cannot even fix its mindless mistakes-- 2 OR 1 = 3, slant cut in cone is ellipse when truthfully it is Oval, and they cannot even see that a electron outside a proton would fly away.
Is Harvard, Univ of Edinburgh, Cambridge, CalTech, Stanford, proud of their teaching Boole logic that has a mistake in every connector-- resulting in 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and where no-one in their math department can distinguish a ellipse from a oval-- far too stupid, to even contemplate a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Is there any professor brains worth more than 10cents at these universities? Or all they all like a McGinn.
Harry Cliff LHCb physicist needs to publish in the Cambridge Univ student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around outside of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding up and holding together as a hydrogen atom. Such stupid physics.
> >
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Product details
• ASIN : B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date : March 11, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
•
•
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.
Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.
Product details
• ASIN : B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date : November 21, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
• Lending : Enabled
#11-2, 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> >
> > y
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium
SheldonGlashowPeterHiggs, Erika D. Beck, McGinn CSUN still teaching 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction, ellipse a conic when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for so stupid is Harvard and CSUN as seen by McGinn spam 24 hours a day nonstop, so stupid are these universities that they still teach a hydrogen atom electron flys at 99.9% speed of light OUTSIDE a 938MeV proton. AP says these schools are losers of science for the truth of science is the muon is the real electron of atoms and a muon is stuck INSIDE a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, which makes sense because flying at 99.4% speed of light inside a proton, the hydrogen atom can exist.
Is CSUN paying McGinn, Pennino, Pnal to spam sci.physics nonstop 24-7-365? Spam with their fake science just to front page hog sci.physics.
So ask yourself, do you want to go to a school that cannot even fix its mindless mistakes-- 2 OR 1 = 3, slant cut in cone is ellipse when truthfully it is Oval, and they cannot even see that a electron outside a proton would fly away.
Is Harvard, Univ of Edinburgh, Cambridge, CalTech, Stanford, proud of their teaching Boole logic that has a mistake in every connector-- resulting in 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and where no-one in their math department can distinguish a ellipse from a oval-- far too stupid, to even contemplate a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Is there any professor brains worth more than 10cents at these universities? Or all they all like a McGinn.
Harry Cliff LHCb physicist needs to publish in the Cambridge Univ student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around outside of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding up and holding together as a hydrogen atom. Such stupid physics.
> >
> > Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
> >
> > Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
> >
> > AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
> >
> > So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> >
> > Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
> >
> > Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
> >
> > AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
> >
> > So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> >
> > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book
> >
> >
> >
> > #3-1, 2nd published book
> >
> > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> >
> > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> >
> > Length: 1150 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
3rd published book
> >
> > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> >
> > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> >
> > Length: 1150 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Product details
• ASIN : B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date : March 11, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
•
•
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.
Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.
Product details
• ASIN : B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date : November 21, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 50 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#11-2, 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 154 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> >
> > y
> >
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> 99> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2022, 4:29:28 PM2/17/22
to
3-Is McGinn spam funded by CERN, US dept of Educ, and NSF, to spam 24-7-365?
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 18, 2022, 5:41:58 PM2/18/22
to
Univ Oxford's Andrew Wiles a mega-moron in math for he has yet to come to grips with the question of slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, yet Wiles runs and hides, hides and runs from math truth. Come on out Andrew and do real math for a change instead of your con-art.
Kibo Parry Moron starting to soften his stance on slant cut in cone, realizing there is ambiguity and error. But, does that make Univ Oxford's Andrew Wiles a mega-moron in math for he has yet to come to grips with the question of slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse due to number of axes of symmetry. Why, even a smart form school student in the Oxford area can prove to the math imbecile Andrew Wiles with a paper cone and Mason or Kerr lid that the figure has a "crescent shape add on to the circle" and thus a Oval. This is surprising news because Kibo Parry Moron cannot even do percentages correctly with his 938 is 12% short of 945, but Kibo Parry Moron sniffs out a mistake in conic sections.
On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 11:51:42 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He was looking for a proof of that, just in case it was a tricky problem
> like the ellipse being a conic section. Just going on with intuition
> can quickly mislead someone in math. Look at the ellipse problem. If
> you simply look at a diagram of a cone intersecting a plane, it
> certainly looks like the curve formed is lopsided. This fools many
> people who are poor at geometry and don't realize the center of that
> curve is off-center from the cone's axis.
On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
y
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 26, 2022, 3:55:03 PM2/26/22
to
CSUN,ErikaD.Beck,-Sickfuck McGinn, Pennino spamming sci.physics. AP requires that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose to go to their respective University student newspaper and apologize for teaching them b.s. physics of the electron as 0.5MeV outside a Proton of 938MeV flying around at over 99% the speed of light and still remaining a hydrogen atom. When the real hydrogen atom is a 840MeV proton torus with the Muon stuck inside going near the speed of light but which being inside the proton torus does not fly away but rather instead is doing the Faraday Law of the 8 proton torus rings. So apologize to all your students and the world of physics for being a foolish idiot of physics in your physics career.
CSUN,Adriana Ocampo, Scott J. Horowitz, Erika D. Beck, William Karush, Lorraine Foster, Olympia LePoint, William Alfred Fowler, Kenneth G. Wilson, James Watson Cronin, Val Logsdon Fitch, Sheldon Lee Glashow with their mindless Standard Model, these imps of physics could never multiply muon mass 105MeV by 9 and see it is within Sigma Error of the neutron and proton (alleged proton rest mass) of 940MeV. Meaning what? Meaning that the proton is a composite of 8 muon rings and the neutron is 9 muon rings. And the muon is the real true electron of atoms, stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating new electrical energy-- the reason stars and Sun shine. But no, the imps of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs put physics knowledge and understanding backwards in time, to caveman mentality physics with their impish Standard Model.
Why do imps of physics like Glashow or Higgs never understand that a do nothing electron and do nothing proton are imp reasoning in physics. Whereas AP's particles are always doing some law of Electrodynamics. And why does Nobel award imps of science, do they like imp physics instead of true physics?
Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross -- please, please can they ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > ..
> > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > . ' ` `. |
> > > . '. '
> > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > ' `
> > > ; `
> > > .' `
> > > ; U `
> > > ; '; `
> > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am McGinn antiscience with together my friends Claudius, Pennino, Pnal flood sci.physics everyday so as to hog front page, and thus no other post survives the front page more than 5 seconds.
> > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > ` . ' '
> > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > `...'
Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Univ Washington,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran,Gerald Miller is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is offtopic Relf? Is Relf taking away your attention?
Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages
Product details
CSUN,Adriana Ocampo, Scott J. Horowitz, Erika D. Beck, William Karush, Lorraine Foster, Olympia LePoint, William Alfred Fowler, Kenneth G. Wilson, James Watson Cronin, Val Logsdon Fitch, Sheldon Lee Glashow with their mindless Standard Model, these imps of physics could never multiply muon mass 105MeV by 9 and see it is within Sigma Error of the neutron and proton (alleged proton rest mass) of 940MeV. Meaning what? Meaning that the proton is a composite of 8 muon rings and the neutron is 9 muon rings. And the muon is the real true electron of atoms, stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating new electrical energy-- the reason stars and Sun shine. But no, the imps of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs put physics knowledge and understanding backwards in time, to caveman mentality physics with their impish Standard Model.
Why do imps of physics like Glashow or Higgs never understand that a do nothing electron and do nothing proton are imp reasoning in physics. Whereas AP's particles are always doing some law of Electrodynamics. And why does Nobel award imps of science, do they like imp physics instead of true physics?
Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, John C. Mather, George F. Smoot, Roy J. Glauber, David J. Gross -- please, please can they ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > ..
> > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > . ' ` `. |
> > > . '. '
> > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > ' `
> > > ; `
> > > .' `
> > > ; U `
> > > ; '; `
> > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am McGinn antiscience with together my friends Claudius, Pennino, Pnal flood sci.physics everyday so as to hog front page, and thus no other post survives the front page more than 5 seconds.
> > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > ` . ' '
> > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > `...'
Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Univ Washington,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran,Gerald Miller is the reason you have not yet confirmed real proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, and .5MeV= Dirac magnetic monopole is offtopic Relf? Is Relf taking away your attention?
Stupid Nobel Physics prizes to those who cannot even ask the question of which is the atom's real true electron, the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#1-4, 105th published book
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-5, 112th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages
Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#1-6, 135th published book
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 5, 2022, 4:51:13 PM3/5/22
to
Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Thomas F. Rosenbaum, Gene D. Block, Marc Tessier-Lavigne ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or are they wasting too much time on your McGinn Monty Python Physics. Or is Gene D. Block too much of a modern day failed fool of science to ever ask a question on true real electron?
Stanford's_Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff,, is McGinn correct that Stanford is failed & incompetent to confirm real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and 0.5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
Re: James McGinn, the blubbery cesspool mind of a moron packed inside a single cell atop a foghorn mouth// why California schools have not yet confirmed real proton = 840MeV, electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
Oct 14, 2019, 10:08:30 AM
by Pete Smith
> I fart you.
On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:44:13 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> James McGinn / Genius
only if you count a barking fuckdog as genius
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 10:55:04 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> >
> > And you too proved yourself incompetent and desperate in that you failed to discuss any of the substance of the argument (the subject of which is way, way over your head).
AP writes: Is the reason Stanford Univ has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists like McGinn says is blithering nattering nutter fools-- drinking coffee and eating Danish rolls rather than uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing a Faraday Law dance inside the atom making electricity and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
o-:^>___?
`~~c--^c'
Navy dog says: yes, I enjoy my Danish rolls with blended coffee, steaks and eggs in the California sun instead of real physics of the atom
Stanford University, math dept.
Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
Henry D. I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin, Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabeth Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman,
Thomas M. O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl
Math dept Univ Calif, San Diego
Edward Bender, James Bunch, Thomas Enright, Ronald Evans, Jay Fillmore, Carl FitzGerald,
Michael Freedman, Adriano Garsia, Fan Graham, Leonard Haff, Hubert Halkin, Richard Hamilton, Bill Helton, Jim Lin, Alfred Manaster, John O'Quigley, Yose Rinott, Burt Rodin, Murray Rosenblatt, Linda Rothschild, Michael Sharpe, Lance Small, Don Smith, Harold Stark, Audrey Terras, Adrian Wadsworth, Nolan Wallach, John Wavrik, Daniel Wulbert
On Friday, January 4, 2019 at 5:29:50 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> Weather prediction is not the topic,,,,
John Schwarz,Barry Simon,Kip Thorne,Petr Vogel,Rochus Vogt, of Caltech are you as stupid as McGinn to never understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips, of Caltech are you as stupid as McGinn to never understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry
Stanford's Drs Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding
About McGinn, we all know he is an idiot when it comes to science or even thinking straight, and although he deserves 1 or 2 posts per day (some would say that is too much) but he does not deserve 75 posts per day under various names like Denke or Solvingtornado. So either he post 1 or 2, or I recommend he be kicked out permanently as a front page hog spamming jackarse. I hate his practice of just churning his posts, where the creep adds two words, sometimes not even a new word, to his prior post just to get it on the front page again. To think that sci.physics by year 2019 is mostly a airhead spammer on the front page is enough to make any cry and sob into the new year.
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 10:19:09 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> Aw shucks.
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi I am McGinn under various fake names Denk, Claudius, tornado Pennino, Pnal are my buddies keeping my posts on 1st page 24-7 etc. My game is to fill sci.physics with nothing but my airhead posts because I love to annoy everybody, and on fast days, I just churn all my old posts by adding a word or sentence, and often pretend I am Jim Pennino or Pnal, to make believe someone is actually talking with me. You see, my foot is where my head is and my head where my foot is.
Too stupid to understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry. The .5MeV particle that Thomson discovered was actually Dirac's magnetic monopole
Why does McGinn simply not ask professors of physics at UCLA why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
Why does any physicist not believe proton is 840MeV, electron is 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding, because a ratio of 840 to 105 allows for Angular Momentum
-----------------------------------
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers
Elihu Abrahams
Katsushi Arisaka
Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin
Zvi Bern
Rubin Braunstein
Stuart Brown
Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan
Wesley Campbell
Troy Carter
Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark
John Cornwall
Robert Cousins
Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein
Christian Fronsdal
Walter Gekelman
Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner
Michael Gutperle
Brad Hansen
Jay Hauser
Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang
Eric Hudson
George Igo
Per Kraus
Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason
George Morales
Warren Mori
Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann
Kumar Patel
Roberto Peccei
Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman
B. Regan
James Rosenzweig
Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg
William Slater
Reiner Stenzel
Terry Tomboulis
Jean Turner
Stanford University, math dept.
Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
/\-------/\
\::O:::O::/
(::_ ^ _::)
\_`-----'_/
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in sunny California?
And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being 0.5MeV, your students deserve better.
And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.
Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.
But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.
What answer did they give?
#1-3, 74th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages
Product details
• Print Length : 64 pages
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
Stanford's_Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff,, is McGinn correct that Stanford is failed & incompetent to confirm real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and 0.5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
Re: James McGinn, the blubbery cesspool mind of a moron packed inside a single cell atop a foghorn mouth// why California schools have not yet confirmed real proton = 840MeV, electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
Oct 14, 2019, 10:08:30 AM
by Pete Smith
> I fart you.
On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:44:13 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> James McGinn / Genius
only if you count a barking fuckdog as genius
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 10:55:04 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> >
> > And you too proved yourself incompetent and desperate in that you failed to discuss any of the substance of the argument (the subject of which is way, way over your head).
AP writes: Is the reason Stanford Univ has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists like McGinn says is blithering nattering nutter fools-- drinking coffee and eating Danish rolls rather than uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing a Faraday Law dance inside the atom making electricity and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
o-:^>___?
`~~c--^c'
Navy dog says: yes, I enjoy my Danish rolls with blended coffee, steaks and eggs in the California sun instead of real physics of the atom
Stanford University, math dept.
Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
Henry D. I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin, Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabeth Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman,
Thomas M. O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl
Math dept Univ Calif, San Diego
Edward Bender, James Bunch, Thomas Enright, Ronald Evans, Jay Fillmore, Carl FitzGerald,
Michael Freedman, Adriano Garsia, Fan Graham, Leonard Haff, Hubert Halkin, Richard Hamilton, Bill Helton, Jim Lin, Alfred Manaster, John O'Quigley, Yose Rinott, Burt Rodin, Murray Rosenblatt, Linda Rothschild, Michael Sharpe, Lance Small, Don Smith, Harold Stark, Audrey Terras, Adrian Wadsworth, Nolan Wallach, John Wavrik, Daniel Wulbert
On Friday, January 4, 2019 at 5:29:50 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> Weather prediction is not the topic,,,,
John Schwarz,Barry Simon,Kip Thorne,Petr Vogel,Rochus Vogt, of Caltech are you as stupid as McGinn to never understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips, of Caltech are you as stupid as McGinn to never understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry
Stanford's Drs Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson is McGinn the example of how physicists react when told the proton is 840MeV, electron 105MeV to have chemistry bonding
About McGinn, we all know he is an idiot when it comes to science or even thinking straight, and although he deserves 1 or 2 posts per day (some would say that is too much) but he does not deserve 75 posts per day under various names like Denke or Solvingtornado. So either he post 1 or 2, or I recommend he be kicked out permanently as a front page hog spamming jackarse. I hate his practice of just churning his posts, where the creep adds two words, sometimes not even a new word, to his prior post just to get it on the front page again. To think that sci.physics by year 2019 is mostly a airhead spammer on the front page is enough to make any cry and sob into the new year.
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 10:19:09 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
> Aw shucks.
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
CalTech's Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,Konstantin Batygin are you like McGinn/pnal too stupid to understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
Too stupid to understand Angular Momentum for the chemical bond cannot exist with electron=.5MeV, proton=938MeV. You need 105 to 840 to have chemistry. The .5MeV particle that Thomson discovered was actually Dirac's magnetic monopole
Why does McGinn simply not ask professors of physics at UCLA why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
Why does any physicist not believe proton is 840MeV, electron is 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding, because a ratio of 840 to 105 allows for Angular Momentum
-----------------------------------
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers
Elihu Abrahams
Katsushi Arisaka
Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin
Zvi Bern
Rubin Braunstein
Stuart Brown
Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan
Wesley Campbell
Troy Carter
Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark
John Cornwall
Robert Cousins
Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein
Christian Fronsdal
Walter Gekelman
Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner
Michael Gutperle
Brad Hansen
Jay Hauser
Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang
Eric Hudson
George Igo
Per Kraus
Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason
George Morales
Warren Mori
Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann
Kumar Patel
Roberto Peccei
Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman
B. Regan
James Rosenzweig
Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg
William Slater
Reiner Stenzel
Terry Tomboulis
Jean Turner
Stanford University, math dept.
Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
CalTech math dept
Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
/\-------/\
\::O:::O::/
(::_ ^ _::)
\_`-----'_/
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in sunny California?
And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being 0.5MeV, your students deserve better.
And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.
Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.
But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.
What answer did they give?
#1-3, 74th published book
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
#2-1, 137th published book
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Language : English
• File size : 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
#3-1, 2nd published book
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 8, 2022, 4:14:44 PM3/8/22
to
Putin, Xi, --Biden, call up Xi telling him to call up Putin to withdraw from Ukraine-- for if Putin pushes the button, all major Chinese cities are leveled as is Russian cities// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH
When the invasion started two or more weeks ago of Russia invading Ukraine, I knew there was Chernobyl in Ukraine, but totally unaware that there were 4 other nuclear stations in Ukraine and one of them the largest in Europe.
So the horrible spectacle a few days ago of Russian artillery firing on one of those nuclear power stations, luckily it was not breeched and turned into a 2nd Chernobyl disaster.
So, Biden, this is Tuesday 8 March, please call up Xi and tell him to call up Putin that same day requesting Putin to withdraw all military out of Ukraine.
Tell Xi, that if Putin pushes the nuclear button that all major Chinese cities will be hit and vaporized as well as all major Russian cities. As well as Pyongyang North Korea.
Tell Xi, to call Putin on 8 March.
On 9 March, move the NATO forces into Ukraine to secure Ukraine to all its borders, even the Donbas and the Crimea stolen by Putin in previous years.
Secure the nuclear power stations.
If Putin pushes the nuclear button, every Russian city and Chinese city will become vaporized.
If things continue the way they are continuing now, then Putin will use those 5 nuclear plants as a dump waste site for all Russian radioactive materials to cower and suppress the Ukraine people. But also, Putin will cause Europe to be a radioactive sewer from the winds that blow the radioactive waste into Europe.
Putin will likely dump radioactive waste all along the western border of Ukraine and Belarus, so that the radioactivity in Europe will be almost unliveable.
Biden, call up Israel if this nuclear war ignites, to take care of Iran and Syria.
India and Pakistan in nuclear war 3. I do not know what to instruct there.
Biden, call up Germany and Japan and have them start building nuclear missiles as a wall on Russia and a wall on China.
The trouble with the world right now, is the economic sanctions on Russia should have been installed over 10 years ago when Putin was sending out assassins to kill people in England and Germany and elsewhere, where if the sanctions had been imposed over 10 years ago, we would not have this Ukraine nightmare we have today.
The science of psychology has done a poor job starting 1950, for this community of scientists should have a yearly evaluation report on leaders of countries that could affect Earth deletoriously, and reported that to goverments to start economic sanctions, such as Putin and such as Trump on the report making it impossible for him to be elected.
Going forward, if we escape a nuclear war 3, we need this yearly report of psychologists and make Earth safer in the future.
I had a report list of how many nuclear missiles each country had, and the West has as many as Russia, and China has few. What we have to count on here, is that the missiles of USA are superior to Russia and China, we have to pray they are superior in order for the crazy insane Putin to not push the buttons. But we have to meet his brutal invasion of Ukraine by sending in NATO forces, for if not, then Putin's Russia will make Europe a radioactive waste dump site.
Putin's Russia has already displaced millions of Ukraines and likely will end up being 20 million Ukraines outside of their homeland. That is reason enough to send the NATO army into Ukraine and repel the Russians.
As Putin already threatened to push the button, we have to be on the utmost alert and use our superiority of weapons.
Reinforcing again and again to Xi and Putin that all their major cities will be leveled.
I am using the past history of the Cuban Missile Crisis, that force needs a challenge of force. And that JFK used a naval blockade. And that Khrushchev was not insane but reasonable. In our plight of 2022, it looks like Putin is insane, and the hope and prayer to get us through a nuclear war 3, is the better precision of our missiles.
Putin is old, and so if we do not challenge him here and now, he will push the buttons regardless.
If we do not challenge Putin tomorrow, means Europe has 20 million refuges and likely 4 more Chernobyls and a radioactive wasteland of Europe.
Please, President Biden, call up Xi today and instruct him to call Putin.
AP
to
Biden, please tell Xi also, that if he is unsuccessful in getting Putin to withdraw his forces out of Ukraine that China will be economically sanctioned the day after. Which is actually good for the West as we bring all manufacturing jobs back to the West.
to
When a week ago Putin broadcast to the world, keep out, or he pushs the nuclear button.
The reply to Putin in that instant of time was to say to Putin-- we are on the ready and that every major city in Russia and China will be vaporized and leveled.
That was the only acceptable reply to Putin's threat. For only in that reply, is there a chance to reach some sanity in Putin.
When the invasion started two or more weeks ago of Russia invading Ukraine, I knew there was Chernobyl in Ukraine, but totally unaware that there were 4 other nuclear stations in Ukraine and one of them the largest in Europe.
So the horrible spectacle a few days ago of Russian artillery firing on one of those nuclear power stations, luckily it was not breeched and turned into a 2nd Chernobyl disaster.
So, Biden, this is Tuesday 8 March, please call up Xi and tell him to call up Putin that same day requesting Putin to withdraw all military out of Ukraine.
Tell Xi, that if Putin pushes the nuclear button that all major Chinese cities will be hit and vaporized as well as all major Russian cities. As well as Pyongyang North Korea.
Tell Xi, to call Putin on 8 March.
On 9 March, move the NATO forces into Ukraine to secure Ukraine to all its borders, even the Donbas and the Crimea stolen by Putin in previous years.
Secure the nuclear power stations.
If Putin pushes the nuclear button, every Russian city and Chinese city will become vaporized.
If things continue the way they are continuing now, then Putin will use those 5 nuclear plants as a dump waste site for all Russian radioactive materials to cower and suppress the Ukraine people. But also, Putin will cause Europe to be a radioactive sewer from the winds that blow the radioactive waste into Europe.
Putin will likely dump radioactive waste all along the western border of Ukraine and Belarus, so that the radioactivity in Europe will be almost unliveable.
Biden, call up Israel if this nuclear war ignites, to take care of Iran and Syria.
India and Pakistan in nuclear war 3. I do not know what to instruct there.
Biden, call up Germany and Japan and have them start building nuclear missiles as a wall on Russia and a wall on China.
The trouble with the world right now, is the economic sanctions on Russia should have been installed over 10 years ago when Putin was sending out assassins to kill people in England and Germany and elsewhere, where if the sanctions had been imposed over 10 years ago, we would not have this Ukraine nightmare we have today.
The science of psychology has done a poor job starting 1950, for this community of scientists should have a yearly evaluation report on leaders of countries that could affect Earth deletoriously, and reported that to goverments to start economic sanctions, such as Putin and such as Trump on the report making it impossible for him to be elected.
Going forward, if we escape a nuclear war 3, we need this yearly report of psychologists and make Earth safer in the future.
I had a report list of how many nuclear missiles each country had, and the West has as many as Russia, and China has few. What we have to count on here, is that the missiles of USA are superior to Russia and China, we have to pray they are superior in order for the crazy insane Putin to not push the buttons. But we have to meet his brutal invasion of Ukraine by sending in NATO forces, for if not, then Putin's Russia will make Europe a radioactive waste dump site.
Putin's Russia has already displaced millions of Ukraines and likely will end up being 20 million Ukraines outside of their homeland. That is reason enough to send the NATO army into Ukraine and repel the Russians.
As Putin already threatened to push the button, we have to be on the utmost alert and use our superiority of weapons.
Reinforcing again and again to Xi and Putin that all their major cities will be leveled.
I am using the past history of the Cuban Missile Crisis, that force needs a challenge of force. And that JFK used a naval blockade. And that Khrushchev was not insane but reasonable. In our plight of 2022, it looks like Putin is insane, and the hope and prayer to get us through a nuclear war 3, is the better precision of our missiles.
Putin is old, and so if we do not challenge him here and now, he will push the buttons regardless.
If we do not challenge Putin tomorrow, means Europe has 20 million refuges and likely 4 more Chernobyls and a radioactive wasteland of Europe.
Please, President Biden, call up Xi today and instruct him to call Putin.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:44 AM (10 hours ago)
Archimedes Plutonium
to
Biden, please tell Xi also, that if he is unsuccessful in getting Putin to withdraw his forces out of Ukraine that China will be economically sanctioned the day after. Which is actually good for the West as we bring all manufacturing jobs back to the West.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:53 AM (9 hours ago)
Archimedes Plutonium
to
When a week ago Putin broadcast to the world, keep out, or he pushs the nuclear button.
The reply to Putin in that instant of time was to say to Putin-- we are on the ready and that every major city in Russia and China will be vaporized and leveled.
That was the only acceptable reply to Putin's threat. For only in that reply, is there a chance to reach some sanity in Putin.
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 21, 2022, 2:30:49 PM3/21/22
to
Reinhard Genzel sugar coated gloss Google Search hits when in truth, Reinhard is a failure of both math and physics, for Reinhard is a failed physicist and mathematician with his ellipse a conic section, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, his never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, his stupid mind never able to ask the even a simple question in physics-- which is the atom's true electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
Google Search has become too much Propaganda, not enough truth based Journalism. As if Google is selling knowledge as a advertisement. Science as advertisement and not about truth. It would be like PBS Newshour with Judy Woodruff only interviewing one side of the issue, not both sides. Like the newshour being a Russian run propaganda TV. And thus, Google Search should have a Counterpoint to every scientist on his/her first page. Something that says-- this person is not perfect and here is a counter view or an opposite insight. AP, the King of Science has several Counterpoints on his first page, and so should a math and physics failure that Reinhard Genzel is, have at least one Counterpoint on his first page.
King of Science, AP, has counterpoints on his first page of Google Search hits: thus, small fingerling frys of science like Reinhard Genzel should have Counterpoints on his first page.
About 308,000 results (0.49 seconds)
Search Results
Usenet personality - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Usenet_personality
A Usenet personality was a particular kind of Internet celebrity, being an individual who ... Archimedes Plutonium (current legal name, born Ludwig Poehlmann in 1950, ...
Eccentric believers · Criminal and eccentric... · Unusual personalities
What effect did Archimedes Plutonium and his ... - Quorahttps://www.quora.com › What-effect-did-Archimedes-...
Plutonium is significant because its isotope, plutonium-239, is a slow nuclear fuel. A slow nuclear fuel will likely undergo nuclear fission if it absorbs a ...
4 answers
·
Top answer:
Everyone was trying to figure out this new medium, the internet, what it was for. It was ...
Archimedes Plutonium - Example Problemshttp://www.exampleproblems.com › wiki › index.php
Jan 7, 2022 — Archimedes Plutonium (born July 5, 1950) is primarily noted for his varied and eccentric contributions to Usenet.
Plutonium's claims · Plutonium's assessment of his... · Biographical notes
Who Is The Mysterious Man Sponsoring This National TV Show?https://www.theodysseyonline.com › Entertainment
Apr 17, 2018 — That's right, Archimedes Plutonium is a man whose only internet presence is a minor mention on an extremely obscure Wikipedia page. The page, ...
Archimedes Plutonium - Amazon.comhttps://www.amazon.com › Archimedes-Plutonium
This book can be considered the world's first astronomy textbook that teaches astronomy as all electricity and magnetism. Following the Primal Axiom of Physics ...
Archimedes Plutonium | The Dartmouthhttps://www.thedartmouth.com › staff › archimedes-plu...
To the Editor: In the Oct. 1 issue of The Dartmouth, it was stated that "A group of Dartmouth mathematics professors is spending its federal grant money in a ...
Archimedes Plutonium - EverybodyWiki Bios & Wikihttps://en.everybodywiki.com › Archimedes_Plutonium
Mar 26, 2021 — Archimedes Plutonium (born July 5, 1950), also known as Ludwig Plutonium, wrote extensively about science and mathematics on Usenet.
Archimedes Plutonium - Uncyclopediahttps://mirror.uncyc.org › wiki › Archimedes_Plutonium
Mar 2, 2017 — On November 7th 1990, he discovered the Plutonium Atom Totality Theory, which unified chemistry, physics, biology, and mathematics, paved the ...
Videos
4:24
Ramona Falls - Archimedes Plutonium
YouTube · axioth
May 9, 2012
4:23
Archimedes Plutonium
YouTube · Ramona Falls - Topic
Nov 27, 2014
7:52
Ramona Falls "Archimedes Plutonium" and "Bodies of Water ...
YouTube · Out Of Town Films
Apr 2, 2012
Feedback
View all
Archimedes Plutonium - song by Ramona Falls | Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com › track
Listen to Archimedes Plutonium on Spotify. Ramona Falls · Song · 2013.
So why is a stupid idiot of math and physics like Reinhard Genzel, Roger Penrose given millions of Google Search hits all in wow and awe, with no COUNTERPOINT in all those millions of search hits of Google. This is unfair journalism that Google practices, where they sugarcoat propaganda on failures of science and entrench them even more, not allowing the truth of science of physics and math to surface.
Physics failures Sheldon Glashow, Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
Can failed physicists with their mindless 0.5MeV particle traveling at 99% speed of light outside a 938MeV proton ever stay together, where AP says the true electron is the muon stuck INSIDE a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law-- do physicists Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane have to be failures all their life and never ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Reinhard Genzel with a fat-head after reading the sugar coated glop that Google Search gives me nothing but praise propaganda, more propaganda than what Russia dictators feed its common people before invading Ukraine. AP, the King of Science has 3 Counterpoints on his first page of Google Search, but I have millions of hits with not a single Counterpoint, even though I am a moron of logic with my Boole's 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction and a conic section of ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of calculus fundamental theorem. And I am so so stupid in physics, for I never had the brain to question which is the atom's true electron the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP calls Dirac magnetic monopole.
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
About 174,000 results (0.55 seconds)
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
Search Results
Reinhard Genzel
German astrophysicist
Reinhard Genzel - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Reinhard_Genzel
Reinhard Genzel studies infrared- and submillimetre astronomy. He and his group are active in developing ground- and space-based instruments for astronomy.
Known for: Infrared astronomy; Submillimetre ...
Institutions: Max Planck Institute for Extraterres...
Thesis: Beobachtung von H2O-Masern in Gebi...
Doctoral advisor: Peter Georg Mezger
Life and career · Work · Awards · Membership of scientific...
People also ask
What did Reinhard Genzel do?
Who are the Nobel Prize winners in India?
Feedback
Reinhard Genzel – Facts – 2020 - Nobel Prizehttps://www.nobelprize.org › prizes › physics › facts
Since the 1990s, Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez with their respective research teams, have developed and refined techniques for studying the movement of ...
Videos
PREVIEW
29:51
Nobel Lecture: Reinhard Genzel, Nobel Prize in Physics 2020
YouTube · Nobel Prize
Jan 30, 2021
4 key moments in this video
From 12:50
Integral Field Unit
From 16:46
Adaptive Optics
From 22:15
Effects of General Relativity
From 23:16
Equivalence Principle
7:27
Reinhard Genzel: "Completely unexpected and, wow, I'm on ...
YouTube · Nobel Prize
Oct 6, 2020
5 key moments in this video
PREVIEW
1:31:46
MONSTER Black Hole at the Heart of the Milky Way! Reinhard ...
YouTube · Dr Brian Keating
1 month ago
16 key moments in this video
PREVIEW
1:08:54
A Study of Galaxies and Massive Black Holes (with Reinhard ...
YouTube · MPFNeuro
Dec 17, 2021
4 key moments in this video
View all
Reinhard Genzel (E) | UC Berkeley Physicshttps://physics.berkeley.edu › people › faculty › reinhar...
Reinhard Genzel received his Ph.D. from the University of Bonn (FRG) in 1978. He came to Berkeley as a Miller Fellow in 1980 and joined the Physics ...
Prof. Dr. Reinhard Genzel - Max-Planck-Gesellschafthttps://www.mpg.de › ... › Institutes › Scientific Members
Reinhard Genzel is Director and Scientific Member at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (since 1986)
Reinhard Genzel | Biography, Discoveries, & Facts | Britannicahttps://www.britannica.com › ... › International Relations
6 days ago — Reinhard Genzel, (born March 24, 1952, Bad Homburg, West Germany), German astronomer who was awarded the 2020 Nobel Prize for Physics for ...
Born: March 24, 1952, Bad Homburg
Education: University of Bonn
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020: Reinhard Genzel | astrobiteshttps://astrobites.org › 2020/10/14 › the-nobel-prize-in-...
Oct 14, 2020 — Reinhard Genzel was born in Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany. He studied physics at the University of Freiburg and the University of Bonn ...
Reinhard Genzel - National Academy of Scienceshttp://www.nasonline.org › member-directory › members
Biosketch. Reinhard Genzel, born 1952 in Bad Homburg v d H, Germany, is currently the Director of Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, ...
Laureate - Reinhard Genzel - Lindau Mediathequehttps://www.mediatheque.lindau-nobel.org › laureates
Reinhard Genzel. Nationality: Germany; Institution: University of California, Berkeley; Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching; Award: 2020 ...
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 1, 2022, 9:19:53 PM4/1/22
to
Kibo Parry M. song "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills Planet Earth" sung in school and church with a rapp beat.
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 8:51:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Much better to burn worthless Rubles to boil your water!
Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth-- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech claim on a Nick Thompson's Wired magazine fame.
>
> Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"
>
> Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
Famous poem ballad of "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth".
And since this was written, Senator Lindsey Graham has popped up in support of the idea, likening the history to Brutus of Ancient Rome or of Claus von Stauffenberg failed attempt on the insane Hitler. Sorry, Lindsey your several weeks too late with this idea.
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> General Nakasone a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails
> math.
>cannot understand the slant cut in single
> cone is an Oval, always the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic he
> believes of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither
>can do a geometry proof
> Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
1
Kill Putin, before he kills our planet Earth
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a shit
A shit in France's woods run through with a sword bit
Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a piss
A piss on the plains of Turkey dismounting his horse
Does it really matter how the megalomaniac is dissed
Sun shines from Faraday law, not from fusion
That goonclod physicist professors confusion
It shines from Faraday law you mindless shit for brains
Kill Putin with stinger missile on a boat, car, train or plane
Xi has another Winter Olympic competition, fly in Putin on a plane
But before landing blow it to smithereens from the slalom train
The Chinese Communist Party was watching from the curling rink
Saying, good riddance to you Putin you mindless dink
And blame it on a engine failure, not made-in-China, but NK stink
The Sun gone Red Giant, needs humanity to colonize Europa
Not look at the idiot Putin or Xi navel belly button and scrota
2
Kibo kill Putin stink at NSA Winter Olympics toboggan run
Yes, kibo Parry Moron ordered by General Nakasone says Sun
Sun gone Red Giant phase while fool Putin wants Ukraine
Fool Xi with Chinese Communist Party wants Taiwan
Fool Kim of North Korea wants rockets to reach Sea of Japan
While the world needs rockets to reach Io, Europa and Ganymede
Kibo Parry eats a kilometer of Trump shit just to see where it comes from
Trump eats a kilometer of shit of Putin just to see where it comes from
Putin eats a kilometer of shit by Xi just to see where it comes from
Xi eats a kilometer of shit of Kibo, just to see where it comes from
Andrew Wiles proves that Terence Tao in Fermat Last Theorem prom
The ice skating Olympic gold medal is not given to Russian GazProm
Too many falls on the ice with the overdrugged skaters, drunk on vodka
When what is truly needed is a colony on Callisto, Io, Ganymede and Europa
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
3
Sun gone Red Giant Initiation phase, while idiots chase after Ukraine, Taiwan
Kibo Parry cut out Putin's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
Kibo Parry Moroney cut out Xi's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
Kibo Parry Moron eat a kilometer of Trump's shit just to see where it came from
Mama sang bass, Xi sang tenor, Putin joined Communist Party in awe
When humanity needed to colonize Mars, Io, Ganymede, Callisto, Europa
How did you do it Kibo Parry Moron, a James Bond poisoned dagger walking cane
Or was it the stinger missile aimed at Putin brain
Or was it a Livia Caesar, poisoned chocolate bar
Or was it the traditional Texas housewife method of running over in the car
Or was it the Putin textbook method of polonium in the tea
Or the Godfather method of using eyeglass frame to stab in the temple
Or was it the expeditious Xi method of blowing up his plane as example
Pray tell, Kibo, which was it, Mama sang bass, father sang tenor and all joined in awe
Sadly, humanity cannot colonize Europa because of the babies on Earth Putin and Xi
Chasing after mindless idiotic dreams of conquering lands on Earth
Even though the Sun gone Red Giant is making all of Earth worthless as a shit pee
Idiots Putin and Xi cannot see Europa is where we need to go to live, live, life
With Putin's Ukraine and Xi's mindless land grab strife
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 8:51:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Much better to burn worthless Rubles to boil your water!
Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth-- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech claim on a Nick Thompson's Wired magazine fame.
>
> Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"
>
> Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
Famous poem ballad of "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth".
And since this was written, Senator Lindsey Graham has popped up in support of the idea, likening the history to Brutus of Ancient Rome or of Claus von Stauffenberg failed attempt on the insane Hitler. Sorry, Lindsey your several weeks too late with this idea.
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> General Nakasone a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails
> math.
>cannot understand the slant cut in single
> cone is an Oval, always the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic he
> believes of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither
>can do a geometry proof
> Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
1
Kill Putin, before he kills our planet Earth
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a shit
A shit in France's woods run through with a sword bit
Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a piss
A piss on the plains of Turkey dismounting his horse
Does it really matter how the megalomaniac is dissed
Sun shines from Faraday law, not from fusion
That goonclod physicist professors confusion
It shines from Faraday law you mindless shit for brains
Kill Putin with stinger missile on a boat, car, train or plane
Xi has another Winter Olympic competition, fly in Putin on a plane
But before landing blow it to smithereens from the slalom train
The Chinese Communist Party was watching from the curling rink
Saying, good riddance to you Putin you mindless dink
And blame it on a engine failure, not made-in-China, but NK stink
The Sun gone Red Giant, needs humanity to colonize Europa
Not look at the idiot Putin or Xi navel belly button and scrota
2
Kibo kill Putin stink at NSA Winter Olympics toboggan run
Yes, kibo Parry Moron ordered by General Nakasone says Sun
Sun gone Red Giant phase while fool Putin wants Ukraine
Fool Xi with Chinese Communist Party wants Taiwan
Fool Kim of North Korea wants rockets to reach Sea of Japan
While the world needs rockets to reach Io, Europa and Ganymede
Kibo Parry eats a kilometer of Trump shit just to see where it comes from
Trump eats a kilometer of shit of Putin just to see where it comes from
Putin eats a kilometer of shit by Xi just to see where it comes from
Xi eats a kilometer of shit of Kibo, just to see where it comes from
Andrew Wiles proves that Terence Tao in Fermat Last Theorem prom
The ice skating Olympic gold medal is not given to Russian GazProm
Too many falls on the ice with the overdrugged skaters, drunk on vodka
When what is truly needed is a colony on Callisto, Io, Ganymede and Europa
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
3
Sun gone Red Giant Initiation phase, while idiots chase after Ukraine, Taiwan
Kibo Parry cut out Putin's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
Kibo Parry Moroney cut out Xi's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
Kibo Parry Moron eat a kilometer of Trump's shit just to see where it came from
Mama sang bass, Xi sang tenor, Putin joined Communist Party in awe
When humanity needed to colonize Mars, Io, Ganymede, Callisto, Europa
How did you do it Kibo Parry Moron, a James Bond poisoned dagger walking cane
Or was it the stinger missile aimed at Putin brain
Or was it a Livia Caesar, poisoned chocolate bar
Or was it the traditional Texas housewife method of running over in the car
Or was it the Putin textbook method of polonium in the tea
Or the Godfather method of using eyeglass frame to stab in the temple
Or was it the expeditious Xi method of blowing up his plane as example
Pray tell, Kibo, which was it, Mama sang bass, father sang tenor and all joined in awe
Sadly, humanity cannot colonize Europa because of the babies on Earth Putin and Xi
Chasing after mindless idiotic dreams of conquering lands on Earth
Even though the Sun gone Red Giant is making all of Earth worthless as a shit pee
Idiots Putin and Xi cannot see Europa is where we need to go to live, live, life
With Putin's Ukraine and Xi's mindless land grab strife
Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
Message has been deleted
Trolidan7
Apr 4, 2022, 2:59:28 PM4/4/22
to
On 4/4/22 9:07 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Harvard's Lisa Randall failure in physics needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google Search hit list, instead of nothing but sugar coated propaganda, -- one would think Google physics searches are nothing but Russian kiosk stands on the road to Moscow. Kibo Parry has
> 1m view
>
> Kibo Parry M. has two counterpoints on his first page telling the home audience that Kibo failed math and science with his 938 is 12% short of 945. Which Lisa mastered that math, but Lisa is far too stupid in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> We teach in school that sugar glop is awful for the body, but Google Search sugar coated glop is far far worse.
Yes, but if you work in a school for a government that has built
nuclear weapons, you are indirectly employed for the purpose of
promoting to your students the idea that the government that pays
your salary has the legitimacy to exist.
Nuclear weapons were designed to murder the students that you
were teaching.
You will never be able to rationalize that away.
> Harvard's Lisa Randall failure in physics needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google Search hit list, instead of nothing but sugar coated propaganda, -- one would think Google physics searches are nothing but Russian kiosk stands on the road to Moscow. Kibo Parry has
> 1m view
>
> Kibo Parry M. has two counterpoints on his first page telling the home audience that Kibo failed math and science with his 938 is 12% short of 945. Which Lisa mastered that math, but Lisa is far too stupid in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> We teach in school that sugar glop is awful for the body, but Google Search sugar coated glop is far far worse.
Yes, but if you work in a school for a government that has built
nuclear weapons, you are indirectly employed for the purpose of
promoting to your students the idea that the government that pays
your salary has the legitimacy to exist.
Nuclear weapons were designed to murder the students that you
were teaching.
You will never be able to rationalize that away.
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 4, 2022, 4:27:46 PM4/4/22
to
Harvard's Lisa Randall failure in physics needs a Counterpoint on her 1st page Google Search hit list, instead of nothing but sugar coated propaganda, -- one would think Google physics searches are nothing but Russian kiosk stands on the road to Moscow. Kibo Parry has
1m view
Kibo Parry M. has two counterpoints on his first page telling the home audience that Kibo failed math and science with his 938 is 12% short of 945. Which Lisa mastered that math, but Lisa is far too stupid in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
We teach in school that sugar glop is awful for the body, but Google Search sugar coated glop is far far worse.
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:48:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
1m view
Kibo Parry M. has two counterpoints on his first page telling the home audience that Kibo failed math and science with his 938 is 12% short of 945. Which Lisa mastered that math, but Lisa is far too stupid in physics to even ask the question-- which is the atom's real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
We teach in school that sugar glop is awful for the body, but Google Search sugar coated glop is far far worse.
>"Drag Queen of Science"
>"marble free illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Lisa Randall and NSF Dr. Panchanathan, how much do you pay Kibo Parry Moron to stalk AP for 30 years nonstop, is it more than 0 dollars???
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 2:00:15 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "little stinker"
> fails at math and science:
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.
Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>
About 44,900,000 results (0.49 seconds)
>
Search Results
Lisa Randall
American physicist
Overview
Books
Videos
Education
Main Results
Images
Image result for lisa randall
Image result for lisa randall
Image result for lisa randall
Image result for lisa randall
More images
Lisa Randall | DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICShttps://www.physics.harvard.edu › people › facpages
Professor Lisa Randall studies theoretical particle physics and cosmology at Harvard University. Her research connects theoretical insights to puzzles in ...
lisa randall from www.physics.harvard.edu
People also ask
Why is Lisa Randall famous?
Is Lisa Randall a genius?
What did Lisa Randall discover?
Feedback
Web results
Lisa Randall - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Lisa_Randall
Lisa Randall HonFInstP (born June 18, 1962) is an American theoretical physicist working in particle physics and cosmology. She is the Frank B. Baird, Jr.
Awards: Klopsteg Memorial Award (2006); Lili...
Born: June 18, 1962 (age 59); Queens, New Y...
Education: Stuyvesant High School
Alma mater: Harvard University (BA, PhD)
Academia · Writing · Awards and honors · Personal life
lisa randall from en.wikipedia.org
Videos
PREVIEW
58:47
Lisa Randall. How Physics Scales the Universe
YouTube · CCCB
Mar 27, 2019
10 key moments in this video
From 10:19
Large Scales
From 22:03
The Frontier Energy Scale
From 23:07
How Particles Acquire Mass
From 24:19
Higgs Mechanism
From 27:23
Dark Matter
From 38:24
Hyper Music Prologue
From 40:37
Hidden Riches and Beauty in the Universe
From 40:56
The Big Bang Theory
From 42:09
How Important Is It To Find a Theory That Unites both Special Relativity and Quantum Physics
From 53:18
Fermi Paradox
PREVIEW
48:43
Lisa Randall: Knocking on Heaven's Door - Great Teachers
YouTube · Harvard University
Apr 9, 2012
10 key moments in this video
PREVIEW
1:02:56
Michael Dine discusses "This Way to the Universe" with Lisa ...
YouTube · HarvardBookStore
1 month ago
10 key moments in this video
View all
Lisa Randall (@lirarandall) / Twitterhttps://twitter.com › lirarandall
Physicist and author. Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs,Warped Passages,Knocking on Heaven's Door,Higgs Discovery. Opinions expressed are not solely my own.
lisa randall from twitter.com
Not My Job: Physics Professor Lisa Randall Gets Quizzed ...https://www.npr.org › 2015/11/21 › not-my-job-physics-...
Nov 21, 2015 — Lisa Randall is a theoretical physicist and professor at Harvard. In 2007 she was named one of the 100 most influential people by Time.
lisa randall from www.npr.org
Lisa Randall - American Physical Societyhttps://www.aps.org › physicists › profiles › lrandall
Lisa has spent most her career exploring the nature of the universe and becoming a leading expert on particle physics and cosmology. In 2004, Lisa was ...
lisa randall from www.aps.org
Lisa Randall: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindlehttps://www.amazon.com › Lisa-Randall
Lisa Randall studies theoretical particle physics and cosmology at Harvard University, where she is Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science.
Lisa Randall | Edge.orghttps://www.edge.org › memberbio › lisa_randall
LISA RANDALL is the Frank B. Baird, Jr., Professor of Science at Harvard University. Her research connects theoretical insights to puzzles in our current ...
lisa randall from www.edge.org
Randall, Lisa - Niels Bohr Library & Archiveshttps://history.aip.org › phn
Lisa Randall is Professor of Physics at Harvard University (2001-present). Other institutional affiliations include Massachusetts Institute of Technology ...
lisa randall from history.aip.org
Lisa Randall | Closer to Truthhttps://www.closertotruth.com › lisa-randall › profile
Lisa Randall is an American theoretical physicist and a leading expert on particle physics and cosmology. She works on several of the competing models of ...
lisa randall from www.closertotruth.com
Lisa Randall Speaking Engagements, Schedule, & Fee ...https://www.wsb.com › Speakers
Known for her innovative theoretical physics advances and her best-selling books on scientific ideas and ways of thinking, Harvard professor Lisa Randall is ...
Message has been deleted
Trolidan7
Apr 13, 2022, 4:24:57 PM4/13/22
to
On 4/12/22 4:55 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Trolidan7 says Putin & Xi are blind, but moreso Xi who never saw that
Moscow targets Peking when Putin pushes nuclear buttons. Trolidan says 7
nuclear missiles target Peking.
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 6:28:47 PM UTC-5, Trolidan7 wrote:
>> Are two blind people really better than one?
> China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA
and none at Beijing, why James McGinn???
Is the concept of 'aim' really valid for a modern nuke? If both the
command codes and trajectory and destination are programmed in only
shortly before launch, then the concept of 'aiming' one to a long term
preset destination may not necessarily be a viable premise about them.
It may not necessarily be good to say bad things about everything all
the time.
I am thinking that the Soviet Union had about 40,000 of them in the
1980s and the U.S. had about 30,000 of them in the 1960s. That is
less 'overkill' than there used to be.
> Trolidan7 says Putin & Xi are blind, but moreso Xi who never saw that
Moscow targets Peking when Putin pushes nuclear buttons. Trolidan says 7
nuclear missiles target Peking.
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 6:28:47 PM UTC-5, Trolidan7 wrote:
>> Are two blind people really better than one?
> China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA
and none at Beijing, why James McGinn???
Is the concept of 'aim' really valid for a modern nuke? If both the
command codes and trajectory and destination are programmed in only
shortly before launch, then the concept of 'aiming' one to a long term
preset destination may not necessarily be a viable premise about them.
It may not necessarily be good to say bad things about everything all
the time.
I am thinking that the Soviet Union had about 40,000 of them in the
1980s and the U.S. had about 30,000 of them in the 1960s. That is
less 'overkill' than there used to be.
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 13, 2022, 5:21:08 PM4/13/22
to
Trolidan7 says Putin & Xi are blind, but moreso Xi who never saw that Moscow targets Peking when Putin pushes nuclear buttons. Trolidan says 7 nuclear missiles target Peking.
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 6:28:47 PM UTC-5, Trolidan7 wrote:
> Are two blind people really better than one?
China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA and none at Beijing, why James McGinn???
On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:00:44 PM UTC-6, James McGinn wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 6:28:47 PM UTC-5, Trolidan7 wrote:
> Are two blind people really better than one?
China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA and none at Beijing, why James McGinn???
>Pretending to Understand Storms
John Gabriel, when Russia's Putin pushes the nuclear button, how many of the 5977 Russian missiles are aimed at Chinese cities??
Perhaps half of the 5977 will land on Chinese cities.
Suspect the Pakistan-India missiles aimed at China for Uyghur genocide. That would be 165+160= 325 versus China's 350 missiles.
China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
--- quoting BBC ---
Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
How does this compare with other countries?
Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
Russia 5,977
NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
China 350
Pakistan 165
India 160
Israel 90
North Korea 20
Source-- Federation of American Scientists
> > Trolidan7 on 5:05 PM
> >> Putin & Xi need to hear that if chemical or nuclear weapons are used in Ukraine, that Moscow and St.Petersburg will be nuked.
> >>
> >> This Ukraine invasion has gone far beyond a "fight or war" but a human abomination. Apparently Xi is as insane as Putin. And if they use nukes or chemical warfare on Ukraine, then flatten Moscow and St.Petersburg.
> >>
> >> The Old Testament is relevant here-- eye for eye, tooth for tooth
> > .........
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 16, 2022, 4:41:45 PM4/16/22
to
Beijing targeted with 77 of Russia's 5977 nuclear missiles. Kibo, is that not overkill??? Why so many Kibo???
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 12:56:23 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 77)
James Kibo Parry M. what do you think of Xi compared to Putin?
>"one marble illogical brain"
China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
--- quoting BBC ---
Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
How does this compare with other countries?
Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
Russia 5,977
NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
China 350
Pakistan 165
India 160
Israel 90
North Korea 20
Source-- Federation of American Scientists
*** How many of the India and Pakistan nuclear missiles are targeted at Peking for its Uyghur genocide? Perhaps all 165+160 are aimed at Chinese cities.
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 12:56:23 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 77)
James Kibo Parry M. what do you think of Xi compared to Putin?
>"one marble illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
James Kibo Parry weighing in on Beijing targeted with 77 of Russia's 5977 nuclear missiles. Kibo, is that not overkill???
China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
--- quoting BBC ---
Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
How does this compare with other countries?
Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
Russia 5,977
NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
China 350
Pakistan 165
India 160
Israel 90
North Korea 20
Source-- Federation of American Scientists
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 19, 2022, 5:37:51 PM4/19/22
to
General Nakasone is Beijing targeted with 77 of Russia's 5977 nuclear missiles. Kibo, is that not overkill??? Why so many Kibo???
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
May 8, 2022, 10:13:03 PM5/8/22
to
Sue Alito,Gorsuch, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Roberts when forcing 2million pregnant women to live with Zika &Covid19 MicroEnceph, because they outlawed abortion, and hard to find a single youngster without microbrain. This is where ignorance of science leads Supreme Court opinionated b.s. rulings. Roe versus Wade was never wrong, what was wrong is justices of a microbrain on how Biology works. Just like the stupid British before the Revolutionary War wanted to make lightning strikes on buildings a law-- just because Ben Franklin who was a scientist discovered the lightning rod to save buildings.
The Roberts Supreme Court has only a few who are intelligent in science, the rest are dirt ignorant about anything concerning science, especially biology of abortion.
So how does the American people sue the Supreme Court? Can we take them into the Congress for Inquiry as to why they want to have a pandemic of MicroEncephalopathy, a Supreme Court that demands as well as 1/2 of the State governments demanding women with fetuses of microbrains carry them through birth, like the South American Zika babies.
The Roberts Supreme Court looks to be 2,000 years behind the times in courtroom justice.
Jeff Relf's Dick'sDrivein showing millions of Zika microbrain babies and Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh shuffling through hospitals.
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-5, Jeff-Relf.Me (arsewipe off topic spammer) wrote:
> Steve&Owl, to me:
Biology idiot failures of logic Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court-- thalidomide, now Zika, thence Covid-19 Abortions. There was a newsclip of an actress Sherri Chessen, before Roe versus Wade was inacted in 1973, where she
2m views
The Biology idiot failures of logic Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court-- thalidomide, now Zika, thence Covid-19 Abortions.
There was a newsclip of an actress Sherri Chessen, before Roe versus Wade was inacted in 1973, where she climbed aboard a flight to Sweden to get an abortion, because the USA was too primitive in science-biology for Chessen and for all women who had taken thalidomide before 1973. Imagine that, the USA dirt stupid in biology compared to Europe.
Now we have Biology Zika virus with Microencephalitis, microbrains. TV news shows many in South America cases of microbrain babies. Are the ignorant of biology Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh dimwitted Supreme Court justices envision a entire generation of American women having to fly to Sweden-- a sane nation of biology science. Does the mindless Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh, want a entire generation of kids in the USA with Microencephalitis.
We are experiencing a pandemic of Covid-19. No-one knows if long-covid will be anything like thalidomide or like Zika Microbrains, but with science biology idiots of Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court, you can rest assured those idiots will impose Anti-Science when USA so much needs always and only -- Science. We could have a situation where no baby in the USA is born normal and everyone with the money goes to Europe where they have biology science sanity to perform an abortion.
Only halfwits of USA Supreme Court turn a blind eye to what Europe does for abortion and sees they are even more liberal towards abortion than the half witted brains of Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh who want to make the law of abortions be removed altogether. This is why ISSUES OF SCIENCE should be referred to a Science Court, not a court of "laymen in robes" with their mindless ugly opinion and knowledge of science at issue".
I am sure Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh would be fine to rule on matters of "civil law" but on matters of science required expertise, these judges should set up a SCIENCE SUPREME COURT referral.
AP
The Roberts Supreme Court has only a few who are intelligent in science, the rest are dirt ignorant about anything concerning science, especially biology of abortion.
So how does the American people sue the Supreme Court? Can we take them into the Congress for Inquiry as to why they want to have a pandemic of MicroEncephalopathy, a Supreme Court that demands as well as 1/2 of the State governments demanding women with fetuses of microbrains carry them through birth, like the South American Zika babies.
The Roberts Supreme Court looks to be 2,000 years behind the times in courtroom justice.
Jeff Relf's Dick'sDrivein showing millions of Zika microbrain babies and Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh shuffling through hospitals.
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 1:33:05 PM UTC-5, Jeff-Relf.Me (arsewipe off topic spammer) wrote:
> Steve&Owl, to me:
Biology idiot failures of logic Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court-- thalidomide, now Zika, thence Covid-19 Abortions. There was a newsclip of an actress Sherri Chessen, before Roe versus Wade was inacted in 1973, where she
2m views
The Biology idiot failures of logic Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court-- thalidomide, now Zika, thence Covid-19 Abortions.
There was a newsclip of an actress Sherri Chessen, before Roe versus Wade was inacted in 1973, where she climbed aboard a flight to Sweden to get an abortion, because the USA was too primitive in science-biology for Chessen and for all women who had taken thalidomide before 1973. Imagine that, the USA dirt stupid in biology compared to Europe.
Now we have Biology Zika virus with Microencephalitis, microbrains. TV news shows many in South America cases of microbrain babies. Are the ignorant of biology Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh dimwitted Supreme Court justices envision a entire generation of American women having to fly to Sweden-- a sane nation of biology science. Does the mindless Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh, want a entire generation of kids in the USA with Microencephalitis.
We are experiencing a pandemic of Covid-19. No-one knows if long-covid will be anything like thalidomide or like Zika Microbrains, but with science biology idiots of Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh on Supreme Court, you can rest assured those idiots will impose Anti-Science when USA so much needs always and only -- Science. We could have a situation where no baby in the USA is born normal and everyone with the money goes to Europe where they have biology science sanity to perform an abortion.
Only halfwits of USA Supreme Court turn a blind eye to what Europe does for abortion and sees they are even more liberal towards abortion than the half witted brains of Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh who want to make the law of abortions be removed altogether. This is why ISSUES OF SCIENCE should be referred to a Science Court, not a court of "laymen in robes" with their mindless ugly opinion and knowledge of science at issue".
I am sure Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, Kavanaugh would be fine to rule on matters of "civil law" but on matters of science required expertise, these judges should set up a SCIENCE SUPREME COURT referral.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
May 17, 2022, 2:42:19 PM5/17/22
to
Trump illegally packed the USA Supreme Court leaving it with 7 catholics, only 2 protestants and the 300 million American citizens likely to suffer the consequences of a packed court -- 166th published book
Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Last revised on 17May2022. This is AP's 166th book of science.
Preface: This is AP's 166th book of science. A Supreme Court of Science & Technology to augment the existing Supreme Court. And AP is living through a viral pandemic of covid-19 which has now become a omicron variant that is highly transmissive. And to try to fight the virus the President Biden has surrounded himself with the experts in medicine and biology to make sound decisions. But in the mix is the silly hearings of the USA Supreme Court judging those actions. I say silly because none of the 9 justices of USA Supreme Court is knowledgeable on viral pandemics. And also silly because almost every week is news that the USA Supreme Court is going to deliberate on the issue of abortion. Abortion, here again is biology science, and medical science and a whole long host of life sciences, and for the USA Supreme Court to be deciding on such a science intense issue is another example of people out of their depth making decisions. Leading to the formation of a Science and Technology Supreme Court.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search hit on Dr. Feynman testifying before the USA Congress on what caused the explosion of the Space Shuttle in 1986. For Feynman was an expert in physics and well qualified to "judge" what the problem was and the solution. Again, pointing out that we need a Science and Technology Supreme Court.
Product details
• ASIN : B09PJZX6TB
• Publication date : January 1, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 807 KB
• Lending : Enabled
Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Last revised on 17May2022. This is AP's 166th book of science.
Preface: This is AP's 166th book of science. A Supreme Court of Science & Technology to augment the existing Supreme Court. And AP is living through a viral pandemic of covid-19 which has now become a omicron variant that is highly transmissive. And to try to fight the virus the President Biden has surrounded himself with the experts in medicine and biology to make sound decisions. But in the mix is the silly hearings of the USA Supreme Court judging those actions. I say silly because none of the 9 justices of USA Supreme Court is knowledgeable on viral pandemics. And also silly because almost every week is news that the USA Supreme Court is going to deliberate on the issue of abortion. Abortion, here again is biology science, and medical science and a whole long host of life sciences, and for the USA Supreme Court to be deciding on such a science intense issue is another example of people out of their depth making decisions. Leading to the formation of a Science and Technology Supreme Court.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search hit on Dr. Feynman testifying before the USA Congress on what caused the explosion of the Space Shuttle in 1986. For Feynman was an expert in physics and well qualified to "judge" what the problem was and the solution. Again, pointing out that we need a Science and Technology Supreme Court.
Product details
• ASIN : B09PJZX6TB
• Publication date : January 1, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 807 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : about 50 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Archimedes Plutonium
May 23, 2022, 3:25:46 PM5/23/22
to
Alito, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Gorsuch, Pope Francis ever examine the education system in Catholic schools and Universities as to how much they are Anti-science, especially biology, especially physics, and whether McGinn spamming machine of sci.physics by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius and various fake names is a Catholic Church funded spam organization parked in sci.physics for the purpose of preservation of anti-science taught in Catholic schools.
Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like McGinn and his clown act of Pennino and Pnal and Claudis.
Hi, ginni pig McGinn, how much spam can we expect tomorrow? Will Sergio add bass and percussion?
I know the Catholic church needs to clean house of its sex abuse. But they also need to clean house of their Anti-science stance and their extreme hatred of biology Darwin evolution. And their silly ideas of abortion, no abortion, when biology has abortion as a normal everyday natural law of biology.
We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
So, let us question is the McGinn along with backup Pennino spammer organization is a Catholic Church run and paid for organization to show how bad the Catholic church science is in "Weather" along with physics.
AP
Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like McGinn and his clown act of Pennino and Pnal and Claudis.
Hi, ginni pig McGinn, how much spam can we expect tomorrow? Will Sergio add bass and percussion?
I know the Catholic church needs to clean house of its sex abuse. But they also need to clean house of their Anti-science stance and their extreme hatred of biology Darwin evolution. And their silly ideas of abortion, no abortion, when biology has abortion as a normal everyday natural law of biology.
We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
So, let us question is the McGinn along with backup Pennino spammer organization is a Catholic Church run and paid for organization to show how bad the Catholic church science is in "Weather" along with physics.
AP
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
May 26, 2022, 3:17:45 PM5/26/22
to
3 decades of Catholic Church spam in sci.physics. Roberts, Alito, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Gorsuch, Pope Francis ever examine the education system in Catholic schools and Universities as to how much they are Anti-science, especially biology, especially physics, and whether the "i sick i cry" spamming machine of sci.physics and of Biology science by Catholic church and various fake names is a Catholic Church funded spam organization parked in sci.physics for the purpose of preservation of anti-science taught in Catholic schools.
Hi "i sick i cry spammer", time is running short for the Roberts Court is due to overturn Roe v. Wade in June.
Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like "i sick i cry" and his clown act.
Catholic Church, --- why not fix the problems instead of sending in spam machines.
I know the Catholic church needs to clean house of its sex abuse. But they also need to clean house of their Anti-science stance and their extreme hatred of biology-- Darwin evolution. And their silly ideas of abortion, no abortion, when biology has abortion as a normal everyday natural law of biology.
Abortion is a Natural Law of Biology. And woe to any church that thinks they can overturn Laws of Nature.
We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
So, let us question is the "i sick i cry spammer" is a Catholic Church run and paid for organization to show how bad the Catholic church science is in "physics and biology".
AP
Hi "i sick i cry spammer", time is running short for the Roberts Court is due to overturn Roe v. Wade in June.
Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like "i sick i cry" and his clown act.
Catholic Church, --- why not fix the problems instead of sending in spam machines.
I know the Catholic church needs to clean house of its sex abuse. But they also need to clean house of their Anti-science stance and their extreme hatred of biology-- Darwin evolution. And their silly ideas of abortion, no abortion, when biology has abortion as a normal everyday natural law of biology.
Abortion is a Natural Law of Biology. And woe to any church that thinks they can overturn Laws of Nature.
We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
AP
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
May 29, 2022, 3:05:13 PM5/29/22
to
Alito,Andrea Ghez,CSUN Erika D. Beck,Lisa Randall,Gorsuch, Kavanaugh,Barrett,Roberts, Pope Francis ever examine the education system in Catholic schools and Universities as to how much they are Anti-science, especially biology, especially physics, and whether McGinn spamming machine of sci.physics by McGinn, Pennino, Pnal, Claudius and various fake names is a Catholic Church funded spam organization parked in sci.physics for the purpose of preservation of anti-science taught in Catholic schools.
>
> Instead of the Catholic Church fixing its problems-- sex abuse, antiscience, they send in spammers like McGinn & company to spam all day long.
>
> Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like McGinn and his clown act of Pennino and Pnal and Claudis. After a Catholic church packed USA Supreme Court banning abortion, will they ban Darwin Evolution. Will they leaving teaching biology up to the States. Why not ban science classes altogether in Catholic schools and then spam sci.physics and sci.math all day and night long.
>
CSUN Erika D. Beck, Michael E. Brown, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Edward Witten, John Baez, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
Hi, ginni pig McGinn, keep the spam flowing and warm. Why McGinn, they failed on all these 4 issues key to physics, logic, math?
• File size : 682 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
#2-5, 174th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
Product details
• ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
• Publication date : February 27, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 675 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#2-6, 177th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
Product details
• ASIN : B09VFH9QST
• Publication date : March 12, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 823 KB
• Print length : 74 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#2-7, 178th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
Product details
• ASIN : B09W58XGDW
• Publication date : March 21, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 824 KB
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
y
>
> Instead of the Catholic Church fixing its problems-- sex abuse, antiscience, they send in spammers like McGinn & company to spam all day long.
>
> Just look at the Nobel prize record where in Peace 1/2 are catholic while about 1/2 are protestant but in science you need go back to Eccles to 1963 to see a Nobel in science. Clearly, the Catholic Church Education system, along with its "sex abuse" needs huge fixing. And what is there response? They supply spammers of disinformation like McGinn and his clown act of Pennino and Pnal and Claudis. After a Catholic church packed USA Supreme Court banning abortion, will they ban Darwin Evolution. Will they leaving teaching biology up to the States. Why not ban science classes altogether in Catholic schools and then spam sci.physics and sci.math all day and night long.
>
> Hi, ginni pig McGinn, how much spam can we expect tomorrow? Will Sergio add bass and percussion?
>
> I know the Catholic church needs to clean house of its sex abuse. But they also need to clean house of their Anti-science stance and their extreme hatred of biology Darwin evolution. And their silly ideas of abortion, no abortion, when biology has abortion as a normal everyday natural law of biology. Abortion is a Law of Biology, just as the Earth goes around the Sun is a Law of physics.
> Hi, ginni pig McGinn, how much spam can we expect tomorrow? Will Sergio add bass and percussion?
>
>
> We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
>
> So, let us question is the McGinn along with backup Pennino spammer organization is a Catholic Church run and paid for organization to show how bad the Catholic church science is in "Weather" along with physics.
> We see the silly Roberts Supreme Court packed 7 of 9 justices as Catholics, catholics that never learned true science-- truth of the world about to saddle and strap 300 million Americans with "no abortions" regardless that we have a Zika virus epidemic and a Covid virus pandemic. We even see idiots of science of judges meddling into face masks.
>
>
CSUN Erika D. Beck, Michael E. Brown, Brian Greene, Lisa Randall, Edward Witten, John Baez, Alan H. Guth, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
Hi, ginni pig McGinn, keep the spam flowing and warm. Why McGinn, they failed on all these 4 issues key to physics, logic, math?
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1035 KB
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
#2-5, 174th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
Product details
• ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
• Publication date : February 27, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 675 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 41 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#2-6, 177th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
Product details
• ASIN : B09VFH9QST
• Publication date : March 12, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 823 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Print length : 74 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#2-7, 178th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
Product details
• ASIN : B09W58XGDW
• Publication date : March 21, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 824 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 66 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#2-9, 161st published book
PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
Product details
• ASIN : B09N18QPP1
• Publication date : December 3, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
y
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 20, 2022, 1:39:50 PM6/20/22
to
Todd B Smith Univ Dayton,Jennifer Kahn, inside joke on campus Eric Francis Coppolino,George Witte, Toby Howard, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science. far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics.
> >
> > Pennino is one of many clowns, in the McGinn clown act of front page hogging of sci.physics to throw all other posts to hinter pages.
> >
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > Edward Witten
> > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book
> >
> > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> > • Lending : Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > y z
> >
> > Pennino is one of many clowns, in the McGinn clown act of front page hogging of sci.physics to throw all other posts to hinter pages.
> >
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > John Baez
> > Brian Greene
> > Lisa Randall
> > Alan H. Guth
> > Michael E. Brown
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > Ben Bullock
> > Larry Harson
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > Brian Greene
> > Lisa Randall
> > Alan H. Guth
> > Michael E. Brown
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > Ben Bullock
> > Larry Harson
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book
> >
> > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> >
> > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> >
> > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> >
> > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > Length: 64 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 790 KB
> > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Language: : English
> > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > • Lending : Enabled
> >
> > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> >
> > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> >
> > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > Length: 64 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 790 KB
> > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Language: : English
> > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> > #2-2, 145th published book
> >
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> > #2-2, 145th published book
> >
> >
> > Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > y z
edpr...@gmail.com
Jun 20, 2022, 2:38:06 PM6/20/22
to
On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:39:50 PM UTC-4, plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> Todd B Smith Univ Dayton,Jennifer Kahn, inside joke on campus Eric Francis Coppolino,George Witte, Toby Howard, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
Still trying to get attention slandering Physicists that know far more than you AP?
> Todd B Smith Univ Dayton,Jennifer Kahn, inside joke on campus Eric Francis Coppolino,George Witte, Toby Howard, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
Time to get a new message. You are BORING!
Ed
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 27, 2022, 4:54:42 PM6/27/22
to
Roger Penrose, Marcelo de Sousa, Tessaleno Campos Devezas ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> forgib me im sick i cry
Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Length: 1150 pages
Product details
Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> forgib me im sick i cry
Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages
Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
2nd published book
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab
Jul 1, 2022, 4:35:10 PM7/1/22
to
Give me 5000 dollars, then you are saved.
********************************************************
See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab
☏ : 372 5 3 9 0 0 6 6 0
E-mail : he1983912[@]mail.ee
********************************************************
See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab
☏ : 372 5 3 9 0 0 6 6 0
E-mail : he1983912[@]mail.ee
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab
Jul 2, 2022, 2:47:33 AM7/2/22
to
U have a typing error !!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You should actually forgive me for being so ignorant regarding you.
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 2, 2022, 4:40:25 PM7/2/22
to
Eliezer Rabinovici, Marcelo de Sousa,Jorge Crispim Romao ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > forgib me im sick i cry
>
Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
>
CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 4, 2022, 3:48:46 PM7/4/22
to
Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> Clowns McGinn, Pennino, Pnal with their front page hogging act hoping to push others to hinter pages. It is a trick started by Sam Wormley 1.0, but now McGinn & clowns want to try 2.0 front page hogging.
Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, TARUN GROVER, JORGE E. HIRSCH, MICHAEL HOLST, TERENCE T. HWA, KENNETH A. INTRILIGATOR, ELIZABETH JENKINS, SUCKJOON JUN, BRIAN KEATING, DUSAN KERES, DAVID KLEINFELD
, QUINN M. KONOPACKY, ELENA F. KOSLOVER, JULIUS KUTI, TONGYAN LIN, ANEESH V. MANOHAR, M. BRIAN MAPLE, JOHN A. MCGREEVY, THOMAS W. MURPHY, KAIXUAN NI, MICHAEL L. NORMAN, THOMAS M. O'NEIL, HANS P. PAAR, MARK PADDOCK, JEREMIE PALACCI, TENIO POPMINTCHEV, WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL,KARIN M. SANDSTROM, IVAN K. SCHULLER, LU J. SHAM,VIVEK SHARMA, TATYANA O. SHARPEE, BRIAN SHOTWELL, OLEG SHPYRKO, ELIZABETH H SIMMONS,SUNIL K. SINHA, DOUGLAS E. SMITH, HARRY SUHL
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> Yoichiro Nambu_
> Masatoshi Koshiba_
> Riccardo Giacconi_
> Gerardus 't Hooft
> Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> Jerome I. Friedman
> Henry W. Kendall_
> Richard E. Taylor_
> Carlo Rubbia
> Simon van der Meer_
> William Alfred Fowler_
> Kenneth G. Wilson_
> James Watson Cronin_
> Val Logsdon Fitch_
> Sheldon Lee Glashow
> Steven Weinberg_
>
> Clowns McGinn, Pennino, Pnal with their front page hogging act hoping to push others to hinter pages. It is a trick started by Sam Wormley 1.0, but now McGinn & clowns want to try 2.0 front page hogging.
>
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, TARUN GROVER, JORGE E. HIRSCH, MICHAEL HOLST, TERENCE T. HWA, KENNETH A. INTRILIGATOR, ELIZABETH JENKINS, SUCKJOON JUN, BRIAN KEATING, DUSAN KERES, DAVID KLEINFELD
, QUINN M. KONOPACKY, ELENA F. KOSLOVER, JULIUS KUTI, TONGYAN LIN, ANEESH V. MANOHAR, M. BRIAN MAPLE, JOHN A. MCGREEVY, THOMAS W. MURPHY, KAIXUAN NI, MICHAEL L. NORMAN, THOMAS M. O'NEIL, HANS P. PAAR, MARK PADDOCK, JEREMIE PALACCI, TENIO POPMINTCHEV, WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL,KARIN M. SANDSTROM, IVAN K. SCHULLER, LU J. SHAM,VIVEK SHARMA, TATYANA O. SHARPEE, BRIAN SHOTWELL, OLEG SHPYRKO, ELIZABETH H SIMMONS,SUNIL K. SINHA, DOUGLAS E. SMITH, HARRY SUHL
> Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> Arthur B. McDonald
> Francois Englert
> Saul Perlmutter
> Brian P. Schmidt
> Adam G. Riess
> Makoto Kobayashi
> Toshihide Maskawa_
> Francois Englert
> Saul Perlmutter
> Brian P. Schmidt
> Adam G. Riess
> Makoto Kobayashi
> Yoichiro Nambu_
> John C. Mather
> George F. Smoot
> Roy J. Glauber_
> George F. Smoot
> David J. Gross
> Hugh David Politzer
> Frank Wilczek
> Raymond Davis Jr. _
> Hugh David Politzer
> Frank Wilczek
> Masatoshi Koshiba_
> Riccardo Giacconi_
> Gerardus 't Hooft
> Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> Jerome I. Friedman
> Henry W. Kendall_
> Richard E. Taylor_
> Carlo Rubbia
> Simon van der Meer_
> William Alfred Fowler_
> Kenneth G. Wilson_
> James Watson Cronin_
> Val Logsdon Fitch_
> Sheldon Lee Glashow
> Steven Weinberg_
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 5, 2022, 5:40:39 PM7/5/22
to
Eliezer Rabinovici,Marcelo de Sousa,Jorge Crispim Romao ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > Riccardo Giacconi
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > forgib me im sick i cry
> >
> Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
>
> CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> >
> > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> >
> > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> >
> > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> >
> > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> >
> > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> >
> > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> >
> > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> >
> > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> >
> > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > forgib me im sick i cry
> >
> Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
>
> CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> >
> > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> >
> > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> >
> > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> >
> > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> >
> > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> >
> > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> >
> > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> >
> > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> >
> > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > Length: 17 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> >
> > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > Length: 17 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > • File Size : 698 KB
> > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > 2nd published book
> >
> > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > • File Size : 698 KB
> > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > 2nd published book
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> >
> > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > Length: 1150 pages
> >
> > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa
> > Yoichiro Nambu
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > Riccardo Giacconi
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall
> > Richard E. Taylor
> > Henry W. Kendall
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer
> > William Alfred Fowler
> > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > James Watson Cronin
> > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg
> > William Alfred Fowler
> > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > James Watson Cronin
> > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 18, 2022, 5:43:33 PM7/18/22
to
Kibo Parry M why is Eliezer Rabinovici a imp of physics? Is it because he thinks a ellipse is the slant cut in single cone when in reality it is the oval?
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:37:26 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic"
>"imp of physics"
> fails at math and science:
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Product details
• ASIN : B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date : March 11, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
•
•
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
Product details
• ASIN : B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date : November 21, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
• Lending : Enabled
#12-2, 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
Kibo why?
> Chi-Chung Kao,Jose F.F. Mendes,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa, ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
>
> Fermi Lab: Lia Merminga
>
On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:37:26 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic"
>"imp of physics"
> fails at math and science:
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Product details
• ASIN : B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date : March 11, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
•
•
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
Product details
• ASIN : B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date : November 21, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 51 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
#12-2, 11th published book
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 154 pages
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
Kibo why?
> Chi-Chung Kao,Jose F.F. Mendes,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa, ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > >
> > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > >
> > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
>
> Fermi Lab: Lia Merminga
>
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 20, 2022, 1:21:22 PM7/20/22
to
Why Chi-Chung Kao,Jose F.F. Mendes,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa, cannot ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 27, 2022, 2:34:46 PM7/27/22
to
Xi, for stealing Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok. Can I sell you gas for Inner Manchuria and those rice fields? Or do I have to bomb Beijing with a Sarmat ICBM. Peter the Great made me do it.
Tell Putin, we are ready to push nuclear buttons to where every Russian city and Chinese is a pile of ash// And for every missile launched on Ukraine, one is sent to Moscow// Science Council Rules Earth
In the news _yesterday_ was that Russia and Ukraine sign a deal to transport grain to hungry nations. Today is the news that Russia bombs those shipments.
So, well the only way to talk to a bully like Putin is to tell him whatever he button pushes, the West responds in kind. The 6,000 rust bucket missiles of ICBMs that Russia has is no match for the 6,000 ready and able ICBMs the West has.
And for every missile strike on Ukraine, a like kind is sent to bomb Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd.
Every bully in the world is treated this way, for it is the only effective treatment that stops the ignorant bully.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:06 AM (3 hours ago)
to
Key is to tell Xi, that if a nuclear exchange takes place, all major Chinese cities are ash piles. For Putin is past crazy, but there is immense hope that Xi has still a rational mind, enough to pull Putin from the brink.
Putin is going to push nuclear buttons, no matter what.
And the West needs to target every large Russian city and Chinese city, including North Korea. Pakistan and India need to target China.
I am betting on the fact that the superiority of electronics of the West weapons, ICBM, is so vastly superior over Russia's ICBM. That in an exchange, 1/2 or over 1/2 are duds of Russia.
The West needs to revamp all targets to be large cities, just as Russia is doing in Ukraine-- destroying cities. It is foolish for a ICBM to target a military base, a silo or military installation. For it is people who build ICBMs and not ICBMs build more ICBMs.
The West needs to make it clear to Xi, as Putin escalates, China will be destroyed completely if Putin pushes buttons.
Sanctions are meant to make a country not powerful to become a threat and sanctions are meant to depose a dictator by his own people. But economic sanctions on Russia should have been applied in 1950 and never withdrawn, and so Russia would never have become this ominious in power and threats. Same applies to China and move all manufacturing back to the West.
Putin will push buttons, regardless, and so it is fitting for the West to state quite clearly to Russia, we are ready for your button pushing, and that every missile strike into Ukraine, you will receive a like missile strike on Moscow, St Petersburg or Volgograd.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was solved by Kennedy making the threat of a maritime blockade. Kennedy talked to Eisenhower before he decided to install the blockade. But here we have the opposite situation in 2022, where Putin is making threats and the West being cowards. Kennedy, the good guy made threats and the world is better off. Putin the bad guy is making threats and the West is cowards.
For Putin will push the nuclear buttons before he is gone from Earth. When you meet a bully, you push back equally as what the bully inflicts. The Bible comes in loud and clear on bullies-- an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Putin will push nuclear buttons, anyway. For you can see it in a treaty on Friday to ship food grain, and broken on Saturday with a missile attack.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:20 AM (1 hour ago)
to
The West is in sad state of mind ever since 1950. They knew Russia had ICBM building program. They knew Russia was constantly a enemy of the West, yet they never sanctioned Russia until 2022, far too late. If the West had sanctioned Russia in 1950 as they did in 2022, Russia would not be a bully saber rattling threatening the entire planet.
As for China, the idiot Nixon open door trade, where they sell us cheap hammers and screwdrivers, all the more and better to drop bombs on the USA in the future. Nixon the president with no logical brains, not a single marble of logic, much the sames as 90% of the posters in sci.physics. Much like Trump, and what Nixon and Trump have in common, is that the USA is such a great nation, that even fools with no logical brains can aspire to and become president of the USA, even though they have no logical marbles upstairs. It is not that we should thank Nixon or Trump for being president, to the contrary, they should thank the American people for tolerating such idiocy for 4 years in office. You have to be a "great nation" to let trash like Nixon and Trump in the oval office, and for the USA to survive such 4 years of waste and abuse of power.
So, if the USA had bright logical leadership, every thing would have been done to
1) recognize our enemies
2) economically sanction our enemies and watch them grow weaker and weaker ( we cannot buy their goods, but they can buy ours)
3) form defense alliances such as NATO and make that organization larger and larger.
If that had been done instead of the loudmouth fools wanting Chinese goods to make money, but forgetting, they will drop bombs with their riches.
Then we would not be in this ugly precarious situation of a crazy madman in Russia who could start a nuclear war that would set back humanity over a 1,000 years in the dark trying to recover, and no chance of a permanent colony on Europa for our Sun has gone Red Giant Initiation Phase, and threatens to extinct and throw into oblivion all the life on Earth.
So we let a crazy madman control some 6,000 ICBM missiles.
And we face the ugly situation of his threats on pushing the buttons if he does not get Ukraine.
Well, he is so crazy, that he will push the buttons regardless. Can Xi talk him out of it? I doubt it.
And so the West must do what Kennedy did. Threaten Russia. Kennedy threatened Russia in the Cuban Missile Crisis with a shipping blockade into Cuba.
This is what the West needs now-- threaten Russia, with pushing the nuclear buttons. Tell Russia, every missile strike into Ukraine is met with a missile strike on Moscow, or St.Petersburg, or Volgograd or other cities.
If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, sadly, there goes world war 3. But Putin will push regardless of Ukraine, for he is that old and that crazy and insane of a man, that the only thing he knows and likes is "bombing". Bombing is how he got into office, and bombing is what he will do the last day he is on Earth.
Xi maybe able to stop Putin, and we all can hope Xi comes to some common sense, but as up to now, Xi is acting just as crazy and insane as Putin. It needs to be well explained to Xi that if Putin goes nuclear, that every big Chinese city is wiped off the map. I do not think Xi understands that. I suspect Xi is living in a foggy bubble where he thinks Russia and the West are destroyed and Xi and the Chinese Communist party is there for the clean up and the domination of the world-- what is left of it. Xi is rather dumb to much extent for he loves Russia for stealing Outer Manchuria, yet he hates the USA for making China rich. So, well, can we get Xi to remove Putin? I suspect not. For he lives in that fantasy of China untouched and China cleans up after the rest of the world is a ash wasteland.
So, the West, after it is seen on 22July of a treaty to let food grains out of Ukraine and the very next day 23July, Russia bombs the shipping, is time for the West to take a new role a new strategy. Call up Putin and tell him we are ready willing and able to push nuclear buttons for which every Russian and Chinese city because a ash pile. And every missile strike in Ukraine is met by a missile strike upon Moscow, St. Petersburg and Volgograd and Vladivostok.
The bully has gone too far....
AP

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 25, 2022, 4:23:20 PM (23 hours ago)
to
The West has to realize that the World should have never come into this position where Russia, nuclear armed threatens to push buttons. Should have realized this in 1950, that to avoid this ugly circumstance, Russia was sanctioned and China was sanctioned starting 1950, just so they "never grow to be strong and dumb and reckless". For now we are in that ugly situation of a reckless dictator threatening with nuclear button pushing.
We have two options-- cower under the threat, much like Europe did with Hitler.
Or, the other option-- call it Voice of Strength-- is tell Russia-- go ahead push buttons but every Russian and Chinese city turned to nuclear ash pile. In other words, we face reality, that we were too dumb in 1950 onwards to prevent this ugly Russia and China, and now we have to pay the price. Tell the dictators of Russia and China, tell them, push the button for we pulverize you. This is the better of the 2 options, because we plainly can see what "cowering" did with Hitler. When these dictators become insane as Hitler, as Putin, as Xi. Cowering only makes them more worse.
Chosing option of Voice of Strength-- and I hope, sincerely hope NATO and Joe Biden select Strength, not Cower. There is a best action plan, one of many.
I think the very best action plan, so that Putin can have a "off ramp". Is to declare to Russia and the world, that NATO expedites membership of Ukraine into NATO. Expedites Ukraine as starting 25July, that Ukraine is a member of NATO, and thus the NATO ground army is sent into Ukraine as of 26July2022.
If Putin is insane enough to push nuclear, well, that is the price the entire world pays for letting Russia and China from 1950 onwards grow in power. Economic sanctions on "our enemies" should have started in 1950, not 2022. Only crazy idiots want to have their enemies grow in power, buying their cheap hammers so that they can drop bombs on us in the future. This is the price we have to pay for our stupidity of 1950. Joe Biden is wrong in appeasing Putin. We have to tell Putin,-- push buttons but your Russia is a ash pile afterwards. This is the price of our 1950 onwards ignorance.
Of course, well some smart and brave Russians may depose of Putin, and the world can relax and breathe a sigh of relief, but in the meantime, we chose option of **Voice of Strength** to get us out of this ugly situation.
Send in the full NATO army into Ukraine, with highest alert on a missile launch by Russia.
Of course we all know that NATO will push out all of Russians in Ukraine.
This is the only way of stopping the madman Putin of his open ended indiscriminant bombing and missiling Ukraine cities and buildings. No country deserves the right to indiscriminately and forever bomb another country. And NATO and the West should enter Ukraine on just this principle alone.
Tell Putin, we are ready to push nuclear buttons to where every Russian city and Chinese is a pile of ash// And for every missile launched on Ukraine, one is sent to Moscow// Science Council Rules Earth
In the news _yesterday_ was that Russia and Ukraine sign a deal to transport grain to hungry nations. Today is the news that Russia bombs those shipments.
So, well the only way to talk to a bully like Putin is to tell him whatever he button pushes, the West responds in kind. The 6,000 rust bucket missiles of ICBMs that Russia has is no match for the 6,000 ready and able ICBMs the West has.
And for every missile strike on Ukraine, a like kind is sent to bomb Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd.
Every bully in the world is treated this way, for it is the only effective treatment that stops the ignorant bully.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:06 AM (3 hours ago)
to
Key is to tell Xi, that if a nuclear exchange takes place, all major Chinese cities are ash piles. For Putin is past crazy, but there is immense hope that Xi has still a rational mind, enough to pull Putin from the brink.
Putin is going to push nuclear buttons, no matter what.
And the West needs to target every large Russian city and Chinese city, including North Korea. Pakistan and India need to target China.
I am betting on the fact that the superiority of electronics of the West weapons, ICBM, is so vastly superior over Russia's ICBM. That in an exchange, 1/2 or over 1/2 are duds of Russia.
The West needs to revamp all targets to be large cities, just as Russia is doing in Ukraine-- destroying cities. It is foolish for a ICBM to target a military base, a silo or military installation. For it is people who build ICBMs and not ICBMs build more ICBMs.
The West needs to make it clear to Xi, as Putin escalates, China will be destroyed completely if Putin pushes buttons.
Sanctions are meant to make a country not powerful to become a threat and sanctions are meant to depose a dictator by his own people. But economic sanctions on Russia should have been applied in 1950 and never withdrawn, and so Russia would never have become this ominious in power and threats. Same applies to China and move all manufacturing back to the West.
Putin will push buttons, regardless, and so it is fitting for the West to state quite clearly to Russia, we are ready for your button pushing, and that every missile strike into Ukraine, you will receive a like missile strike on Moscow, St Petersburg or Volgograd.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was solved by Kennedy making the threat of a maritime blockade. Kennedy talked to Eisenhower before he decided to install the blockade. But here we have the opposite situation in 2022, where Putin is making threats and the West being cowards. Kennedy, the good guy made threats and the world is better off. Putin the bad guy is making threats and the West is cowards.
For Putin will push the nuclear buttons before he is gone from Earth. When you meet a bully, you push back equally as what the bully inflicts. The Bible comes in loud and clear on bullies-- an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Putin will push nuclear buttons, anyway. For you can see it in a treaty on Friday to ship food grain, and broken on Saturday with a missile attack.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:20 AM (1 hour ago)
to
The West is in sad state of mind ever since 1950. They knew Russia had ICBM building program. They knew Russia was constantly a enemy of the West, yet they never sanctioned Russia until 2022, far too late. If the West had sanctioned Russia in 1950 as they did in 2022, Russia would not be a bully saber rattling threatening the entire planet.
As for China, the idiot Nixon open door trade, where they sell us cheap hammers and screwdrivers, all the more and better to drop bombs on the USA in the future. Nixon the president with no logical brains, not a single marble of logic, much the sames as 90% of the posters in sci.physics. Much like Trump, and what Nixon and Trump have in common, is that the USA is such a great nation, that even fools with no logical brains can aspire to and become president of the USA, even though they have no logical marbles upstairs. It is not that we should thank Nixon or Trump for being president, to the contrary, they should thank the American people for tolerating such idiocy for 4 years in office. You have to be a "great nation" to let trash like Nixon and Trump in the oval office, and for the USA to survive such 4 years of waste and abuse of power.
So, if the USA had bright logical leadership, every thing would have been done to
1) recognize our enemies
2) economically sanction our enemies and watch them grow weaker and weaker ( we cannot buy their goods, but they can buy ours)
3) form defense alliances such as NATO and make that organization larger and larger.
If that had been done instead of the loudmouth fools wanting Chinese goods to make money, but forgetting, they will drop bombs with their riches.
Then we would not be in this ugly precarious situation of a crazy madman in Russia who could start a nuclear war that would set back humanity over a 1,000 years in the dark trying to recover, and no chance of a permanent colony on Europa for our Sun has gone Red Giant Initiation Phase, and threatens to extinct and throw into oblivion all the life on Earth.
So we let a crazy madman control some 6,000 ICBM missiles.
And we face the ugly situation of his threats on pushing the buttons if he does not get Ukraine.
Well, he is so crazy, that he will push the buttons regardless. Can Xi talk him out of it? I doubt it.
And so the West must do what Kennedy did. Threaten Russia. Kennedy threatened Russia in the Cuban Missile Crisis with a shipping blockade into Cuba.
This is what the West needs now-- threaten Russia, with pushing the nuclear buttons. Tell Russia, every missile strike into Ukraine is met with a missile strike on Moscow, or St.Petersburg, or Volgograd or other cities.
If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, sadly, there goes world war 3. But Putin will push regardless of Ukraine, for he is that old and that crazy and insane of a man, that the only thing he knows and likes is "bombing". Bombing is how he got into office, and bombing is what he will do the last day he is on Earth.
Xi maybe able to stop Putin, and we all can hope Xi comes to some common sense, but as up to now, Xi is acting just as crazy and insane as Putin. It needs to be well explained to Xi that if Putin goes nuclear, that every big Chinese city is wiped off the map. I do not think Xi understands that. I suspect Xi is living in a foggy bubble where he thinks Russia and the West are destroyed and Xi and the Chinese Communist party is there for the clean up and the domination of the world-- what is left of it. Xi is rather dumb to much extent for he loves Russia for stealing Outer Manchuria, yet he hates the USA for making China rich. So, well, can we get Xi to remove Putin? I suspect not. For he lives in that fantasy of China untouched and China cleans up after the rest of the world is a ash wasteland.
So, the West, after it is seen on 22July of a treaty to let food grains out of Ukraine and the very next day 23July, Russia bombs the shipping, is time for the West to take a new role a new strategy. Call up Putin and tell him we are ready willing and able to push nuclear buttons for which every Russian and Chinese city because a ash pile. And every missile strike in Ukraine is met by a missile strike upon Moscow, St. Petersburg and Volgograd and Vladivostok.
The bully has gone too far....
AP

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 25, 2022, 4:23:20 PM (23 hours ago)
to
The West has to realize that the World should have never come into this position where Russia, nuclear armed threatens to push buttons. Should have realized this in 1950, that to avoid this ugly circumstance, Russia was sanctioned and China was sanctioned starting 1950, just so they "never grow to be strong and dumb and reckless". For now we are in that ugly situation of a reckless dictator threatening with nuclear button pushing.
We have two options-- cower under the threat, much like Europe did with Hitler.
Or, the other option-- call it Voice of Strength-- is tell Russia-- go ahead push buttons but every Russian and Chinese city turned to nuclear ash pile. In other words, we face reality, that we were too dumb in 1950 onwards to prevent this ugly Russia and China, and now we have to pay the price. Tell the dictators of Russia and China, tell them, push the button for we pulverize you. This is the better of the 2 options, because we plainly can see what "cowering" did with Hitler. When these dictators become insane as Hitler, as Putin, as Xi. Cowering only makes them more worse.
Chosing option of Voice of Strength-- and I hope, sincerely hope NATO and Joe Biden select Strength, not Cower. There is a best action plan, one of many.
I think the very best action plan, so that Putin can have a "off ramp". Is to declare to Russia and the world, that NATO expedites membership of Ukraine into NATO. Expedites Ukraine as starting 25July, that Ukraine is a member of NATO, and thus the NATO ground army is sent into Ukraine as of 26July2022.
If Putin is insane enough to push nuclear, well, that is the price the entire world pays for letting Russia and China from 1950 onwards grow in power. Economic sanctions on "our enemies" should have started in 1950, not 2022. Only crazy idiots want to have their enemies grow in power, buying their cheap hammers so that they can drop bombs on us in the future. This is the price we have to pay for our stupidity of 1950. Joe Biden is wrong in appeasing Putin. We have to tell Putin,-- push buttons but your Russia is a ash pile afterwards. This is the price of our 1950 onwards ignorance.
Of course, well some smart and brave Russians may depose of Putin, and the world can relax and breathe a sigh of relief, but in the meantime, we chose option of **Voice of Strength** to get us out of this ugly situation.
Send in the full NATO army into Ukraine, with highest alert on a missile launch by Russia.
Of course we all know that NATO will push out all of Russians in Ukraine.
This is the only way of stopping the madman Putin of his open ended indiscriminant bombing and missiling Ukraine cities and buildings. No country deserves the right to indiscriminately and forever bomb another country. And NATO and the West should enter Ukraine on just this principle alone.
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 29, 2022, 1:40:39 PM7/29/22
to
Spam-mill NSF S.Panchanathan,F.Fleming Crim,Brian Stone,James S. Olvestad,Dorothy E. Aronson., far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
National Science Foundation NSF, spam mill, S. Panchanathan, F.Fleming Crim, Brian Stone, James S. Olvestad, Dorothy E. Aronson.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabent Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn M. Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman, Thomas M O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young
Cornell Univ physics:
Jim Alexander, Tomas Arias, Ivan Bazarov, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Debanjan Chowdhury, Itai Cohen, Csaba Csaki, Veit Elser, Eanna Flanagan, Carl Franck, Lawrence Gibbons, Paul Ginsparg, Yuval Grossman, Thomas Hartman, Georg Hoffstaetter, Natasha Holmes, Chao-Ming Jian, Eun-Ah Kim, Michael Lawler, Andre Leclair, Peter Lepage, Stephen Levy, Matthias Liepe, Kin Fai Mak, Jared Maxson, Liam McAllister, Paul McEuen, Erich Mueller, Christopher Myers, Michael Niemack, Matthias Neubert, Katja Nowack, Jeevak Parpia, Ritchie Patterson, Maxim Perelstein, Daniel Ralph, Brad Ramshaw, David Rubin, Anders Ryd, James Sethna, Jie Shan, Kyle Shen, Eric Siggia, Saul Teukolsky, Julia Thom-Levy, Robert Thorne, Cyrus Umrigar, Jane Wang, Michelle Wang, Ira Wasserman, Peter Wittich
Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang
> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young
Cornell Univ physics:
Jim Alexander, Tomas Arias, Ivan Bazarov, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Debanjan Chowdhury, Itai Cohen, Csaba Csaki, Veit Elser, Eanna Flanagan, Carl Franck, Lawrence Gibbons, Paul Ginsparg, Yuval Grossman, Thomas Hartman, Georg Hoffstaetter, Natasha Holmes, Chao-Ming Jian, Eun-Ah Kim, Michael Lawler, Andre Leclair, Peter Lepage, Stephen Levy, Matthias Liepe, Kin Fai Mak, Jared Maxson, Liam McAllister, Paul McEuen, Erich Mueller, Christopher Myers, Michael Niemack, Matthias Neubert, Katja Nowack, Jeevak Parpia, Ritchie Patterson, Maxim Perelstein, Daniel Ralph, Brad Ramshaw, David Rubin, Anders Ryd, James Sethna, Jie Shan, Kyle Shen, Eric Siggia, Saul Teukolsky, Julia Thom-Levy, Robert Thorne, Cyrus Umrigar, Jane Wang, Michelle Wang, Ira Wasserman, Peter Wittich
Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang
> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber_
> > George F. Smoot
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jul 30, 2022, 9:50:11 PM7/30/22
to
☠️ of Math and ☣ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> Cambridge Physics Dept
> Stanford physics dept.
> Caltech Physics Dept
> UCLA Physics dept
> UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
[snip TONS of stalking victims]
Why is Plutonium stalking just about every professor he can find? Is it
because he *still* cannot understand a simple math proof of why the
ellipse is a conic section? Is Plutonium mentally circling the drain? He
has been losing it lately. Is Plutonium a dangerous stalker or still a
harmless blitherer? I hope he's harmless but I'd hate to turn on the
news one day to hear... But Plutonium's list of his stalking victims
keeps getting longer and longer...
<plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
> Cambridge Physics Dept
> Stanford physics dept.
> Caltech Physics Dept
> UCLA Physics dept
> UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Harvard Physics dept
[snip TONS of stalking victims]
Why is Plutonium stalking just about every professor he can find? Is it
because he *still* cannot understand a simple math proof of why the
ellipse is a conic section? Is Plutonium mentally circling the drain? He
has been losing it lately. Is Plutonium a dangerous stalker or still a
harmless blitherer? I hope he's harmless but I'd hate to turn on the
news one day to hear... But Plutonium's list of his stalking victims
keeps getting longer and longer...
Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 31, 2022, 12:50:44 AM7/31/22
to
Kibo ParryM on Lijian Zhao,Xi ready to push buttons to take back stolen Vladivostok, Outer Manchuria, and clear the Nazis out of Heilongjiang, Amur River, Harbin
On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 8:50:11 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "antiscience"
>"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
In fact, Putin intends to wipe out China and take it over, as Xi is unfocused.
Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along Amur & Ussuri river. While Putin is engaged in Ukraine, China may as well stop being a pansy patsy-- so says Trolidan.
3m views
1:34 PM (3 hours ago)
Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along
Trolidan7's profile photo
Trolidan7
2:04 PM (3 hours ago)
to
On 4/29/22 11:34 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along Amur & Ussuri river. While Putin is engaged in Ukraine, China may as well stop being a pansy patsy-- so says Trolidan.
>
I am thinking that this land is part of Portugal under the
Treaty of Zaragoza and not part of Spain.
Trolidan is correct, as Putin causes nuclear war, 7 nukes from Vladivostok will hit Beijin, as well as 2,000 missiles from Russian subs stationed near Vladivostok. Putin takes Xi as a pansy patsy, and wants all of Manchuria, not just Outer Manchuria.
China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 8:50:11 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "antiscience"
>"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
>stalking just about every professor he can find? Is it
> because he *still* cannot understand a simple math proof of why the
> ellipse is a conic section?
Xi tired of playing the patsy pansy to Putin, stealing Outer Manchuria, and targeting Beijing with 7 nuclear missiles.
> because he *still* cannot understand a simple math proof of why the
> ellipse is a conic section?
In fact, Putin intends to wipe out China and take it over, as Xi is unfocused.
Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along Amur & Ussuri river. While Putin is engaged in Ukraine, China may as well stop being a pansy patsy-- so says Trolidan.
3m views
1:34 PM (3 hours ago)
Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along
Trolidan7's profile photo
Trolidan7
2:04 PM (3 hours ago)
to
On 4/29/22 11:34 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Trolidan7 says for Xi to invade Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok to regain stolen Russia land along Amur & Ussuri river. While Putin is engaged in Ukraine, China may as well stop being a pansy patsy-- so says Trolidan.
>
I am thinking that this land is part of Portugal under the
Treaty of Zaragoza and not part of Spain.
Trolidan is correct, as Putin causes nuclear war, 7 nukes from Vladivostok will hit Beijin, as well as 2,000 missiles from Russian subs stationed near Vladivostok. Putin takes Xi as a pansy patsy, and wants all of Manchuria, not just Outer Manchuria.
> mentally circling the drain? He
> has been losing it lately. Is Plutonium a dangerous stalker or still a
> harmless blitherer? I hope he's harmless but I'd hate to turn on the
> news one day to hear... But Plutonium's list of his stalking victims
> keeps getting longer and longer...
Chairman Lijian Zhao: does China have any defense against a Russian Sarmat ICBM for Kibo Parry M. says Sarmats are circling Inner Manchuria ???
> has been losing it lately. Is Plutonium a dangerous stalker or still a
> harmless blitherer? I hope he's harmless but I'd hate to turn on the
> news one day to hear... But Plutonium's list of his stalking victims
> keeps getting longer and longer...
China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 2, 2022, 1:46:01 PM8/2/22
to
Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Cambridge Univ, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Cambridge Physics Dept
Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta,Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta,Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
Stanford physics dept.
Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
Caltech Physics Dept
Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin
UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)
UCLA Physics dept
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner
UCSD, Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept
Henry D.I. Abarbanel, Kam S. Arnold, Daniel P. Arovas, Richard D. Averitt, Julio T. Barreiro, Dimitri N. Basov, Steven Boggs, James G. Branson, Adam J. Burgasser, Leonid V. Butov, Alison Coil, Eva-Maria S. Collins, Max Di Ventra, Patrick H. Diamond, Fred C. Driscoll, Daniel H. Dubin,
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabent Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn M. Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman, Thomas M O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl
Olga K. Dudko, Raphael M. Flauger, Michael M. Fogler, Alex Frano, George M. Fuller, Daniel R Green, Kim Griest, Benjamin Grinstein, Alexander Groisman, Tarun Grover, Jorge E. Hirsch, Michael Holst, Terence T. Hwa, Kenneth A. Intriligator, Elizabent Jenkins, Suckjoon Jun, Brian Keating, Dusan Keres, David Kleinfeld, Quinn M. Konopacky, Elena F. Koslover, Julius Kuti, Tongyan Lin, Aneesh V. Manohar, M. Brian Maple, John A. McGreevy, Thomas W. Murphy, Kaixuan Ni, Michael L. Norman, Thomas M O'Neil, Hans P. Paar, Mark Paddock, Jeremie Palacci, Tenio Popmintchev, Wouter-Jan Rappel, Karin M. Sandstrom, Ivan K. Schuller, Lu J. Sham, Vivek Sharma, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Brian Shotwell, Oleg Shpyrko, Elizabeth H Simmons, Sunil K. Sinha, Douglas E. Smith, Harry Suhl
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 5, 2022, 3:44:15 PM8/5/22
to
Close CERN and close Nobel prizes in physics until CERN can admit the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole while the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton.
1> Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Cambridge Univ, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
3> Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta,Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
>
4> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
>
>
6> Caltech Physics Dept
>
7> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
8> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
9> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
10> > > Archimedes Plutonium
1> Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Cambridge Univ, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
2> Cambridge Physics Dept
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
3> Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta,Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
>
4> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
5> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
>
>
6> Caltech Physics Dept
>
7> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
9> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
10> > > Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 8, 2022, 5:16:14 PM8/8/22
to
Pope Francis, Portugal spam,Close CERN and close Nobel prizes in physics until CERN can admit the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole while the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton.
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 9, 2022, 2:58:07 PM8/9/22
to
Richard Moore,Pope Francis, Portugal spam,Close CERN and close Nobel prizes in physics until CERN can admit the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole while the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton.
Antonio Costa,Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa,Jose F.F. Mendes ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
Antonio Costa,Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa,Jose F.F. Mendes ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> >
> > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > >
> > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> >
> > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > >
> > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> >
> > >
> > > CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> > > >
> > > > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> > > >
> > > > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> > > >
> > > > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> > > >
> > > > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> > > >
> > > > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> > > >
> > > > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> > > >
> > > > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> > > >
> > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> > > >
> > > > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> > > >
> > > > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> > > >
> > > > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> > > >
> > > > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> > > >
> > > > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> > > >
> > > > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> > > >
> > > > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> > > >
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > 2nd published book
> > > >
> > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > 2nd published book
> > > >
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 14, 2022, 4:13:26 PM8/14/22
to
Mi6Richard Moore,Pope Francis, Portugal spam,Close CERN and close Nobel prizes in physics until CERN can admit the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole while the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton.
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 19, 2022, 4:24:58 PM8/19/22
to
James S. Olvestad, NSF Dorothy E. Aronson,Dr.Panchanathan,F.Fleming Crim, Brian Stone, . Time for new leadership at NSF. One that knows physics, not pinball computer games, and especially one with common sense that you do not fund spamming stalkers like kibo Parry M, I sick I cry, rick_s, and numerous other paid for by government dollars to spam and stalk. Time we had a leader at NSF, not some fool who destroys the newsgroups sci.math and sci.physics.
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
Kibo says of Rensselaer as mindless fuckdog of Kim Jong Un's Kibo Parry Moroney, CIA William Burns 30 year nonstop stalker On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 1:07:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Kim Jong Un's stooge" Rensselaer Polytechnic
> 3 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
> to
> Kibo says of Rensselaer as mindless fuckdog of Kim Jong Un's
> Kibo Parry Moroney, CIA William Burns 30 year nonstop stalker
> On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 1:07:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
> > >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> > What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> > Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> > Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> > --scott
> > --
> > "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
> >
> >
> > Some preliminaries:
> >
> > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > in the proof:
> >
> > ^ x
> > |
> > -+- <= x=h
> > .' | `.
> > . | .
> > | | |
> > ' | '
> > `. | .'
> > y <----------+ <= x=0
> >
> > Cone (side view):
> > .
> > /|\
> > / | \
> > /b | \
> > /---+---' <= x = h
> > / |' \
> > / ' | \
> > / ' | \
> > x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> > / a | \
> >
> > Proof:
> >
> > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> >
> > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> >
> > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> >
> > qed
> >
>
> Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
> by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
> Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM
>
> Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
> by Hewitt Buettner
>
> Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
>
> Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
> by
> Richard Cranium
>
> Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
>
>
>
> Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
> by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
> by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
>
>
> Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 3/4/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
> Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> by
> Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
>
> Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
> by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM
>
>
> Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
>
> Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
> by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
>
> Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
> by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
>
>
> Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
>
>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
>
> Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
> by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
>
>
>
> Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
> By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
>
>
>
> Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
> I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
> By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
> by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM
>
>
> Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
> by Hewitt Buettner
> Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
> by Hewitt Buettner
>
>
>
> Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Fred Glover
>
> Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
> by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
>
> Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
> by Herp Derpington
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..
> by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
> by Professor Wordsmith
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
> by Herp Derpington
>
>
>
> Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
> By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
>
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 1/23/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
> Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
> 10/28/17
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
> Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> 8 posts by 2 authors
> 12/4/17
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
> Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 20 posts by 3 authors
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> 20 posts by 2 authors
> 4/9/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
>
> Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
> by Budd Hakken
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
> by Roger Davis
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
> by Irwin Houser
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
> Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
> 2:15 AM
> by Buck Futter
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> 2:07 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
> Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
> 2:02 AM
> by Bret Alva
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
> 1:55 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> 1:52 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
> 1:47 AM
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
> By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> 1:37 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> 1:30 AM
> by Michael Moroney
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
Kibo says of Rensselaer as mindless fuckdog of Kim Jong Un's Kibo Parry Moroney, CIA William Burns 30 year nonstop stalker On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 1:07:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Kim Jong Un's stooge" Rensselaer Polytechnic
> 3 views
> Subscribe
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 1:59 PM (2 hours ago)
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
>
> to
> Kibo says of Rensselaer as mindless fuckdog of Kim Jong Un's
> Kibo Parry Moroney, CIA William Burns 30 year nonstop stalker
> On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 1:07:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
> > >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> > What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> > Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> > Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> > --scott
> > --
> > "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
> >
> >
> > Some preliminaries:
> >
> > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > in the proof:
> >
> > ^ x
> > |
> > -+- <= x=h
> > .' | `.
> > . | .
> > | | |
> > ' | '
> > `. | .'
> > y <----------+ <= x=0
> >
> > Cone (side view):
> > .
> > /|\
> > / | \
> > /b | \
> > /---+---' <= x = h
> > / |' \
> > / ' | \
> > / ' | \
> > x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> > / a | \
> >
> > Proof:
> >
> > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> >
> > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> >
> > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> >
> > qed
> >
>
> Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
> by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
> Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM
>
> Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
> by Hewitt Buettner
>
> Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
>
> Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
> by
> Richard Cranium
>
> Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
>
>
>
> Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
> by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
> by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
>
>
> Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 3/4/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
> Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> by
> Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
>
> Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
> by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM
>
>
> Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
>
> Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
> by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
>
> Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
> by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
>
>
> Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
>
>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
>
> Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
> by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
>
>
>
> Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
> By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
>
>
>
> Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
> I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
> By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
> by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM
>
>
> Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
> by Hewitt Buettner
> Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
> by Hewitt Buettner
>
>
>
> Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Fred Glover
>
> Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
> by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
>
> Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
> by Herp Derpington
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..
> by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
> by Professor Wordsmith
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
> by Herp Derpington
>
>
>
> Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
> By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
>
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 1/23/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
> Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
> 10/28/17
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
> Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> 8 posts by 2 authors
> 12/4/17
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
> Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> 20 posts by 3 authors
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> 20 posts by 2 authors
> 4/9/18
> By Michael Moroney
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
>
> Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
> by Budd Hakken
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
> by Roger Davis
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
> by Irwin Houser
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
> Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
> 2:15 AM
> by Buck Futter
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> 2:07 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
> Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
> 2:02 AM
> by Bret Alva
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
> 1:55 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> 1:52 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
> 1:47 AM
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
> By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> 1:37 AM
> by Michael Moroney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> 1:30 AM
> by Michael Moroney
Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 24, 2022, 5:14:50 PM8/24/22
to
Chi-Chung Kao,Jose F.F. Mendes,Fabiola Gianotti,Antonio Costa, ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > >
> > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > >
> > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
Fermi Lab: Lia Merminga
Fermi Lab: Lia Merminga
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > >
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > >
> > >
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > >
> > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > >
> > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V
> > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 794 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 123 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 4, 2022, 5:37:16 PM9/4/22
to
Kibo on CERN, Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London,CERN & Cambridge Harry Cliff ever going to grow up about particle physics? By confirming real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law? CERN's Paula Alvarez Cartelle,Ben Allanach,Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel, Gino Isidori, Gudrun Hiller, Frank Kruger, physicists with no logical brain to be in physics. Too stupid to ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron? The muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is Dirac's magnetic monopole? When you have Harry Cliff absent of logical intelligence you just have more of the same b.s. of henpecking a monterously dumb theory of Standard Model that only quacks like Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London follow and chip away around the edges with their mindless "new force" and their mindless Standard Model with mindless quarks.
The I sick I cry is either Mi6 in UK or CIA in USA, a spam block to push everyone off front page-- and kibo is likely the one that is the spammer.
It will take a long time to rid Old Physics of their mindless electron of 0.5MeV orbiting at 99.9% speed of light OUTSIDE a 938MeV proton, mindless mindless Old Physics as if they cooked up physics in a saloon bar.
People in science with no logical brains have a hard time of reasoning that a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton makes more commonsense than a 938MeV proton with electron of 0.5MeV outside the proton yet flying around at 99.9% speed of light.
Most every physicist today believes in the A grade of memorization learning is more valuable than commonsense
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Cambridge Physics Dept
Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
Cambridge Math Dept
Alan Baker
Bela Bollobas
Darwin Smith
John Coates
Timothy Gowers
Peter Johnstone
Imre Leader
Gabriel Paternain
> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
The I sick I cry is either Mi6 in UK or CIA in USA, a spam block to push everyone off front page-- and kibo is likely the one that is the spammer.
It will take a long time to rid Old Physics of their mindless electron of 0.5MeV orbiting at 99.9% speed of light OUTSIDE a 938MeV proton, mindless mindless Old Physics as if they cooked up physics in a saloon bar.
People in science with no logical brains have a hard time of reasoning that a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton makes more commonsense than a 938MeV proton with electron of 0.5MeV outside the proton yet flying around at 99.9% speed of light.
Most every physicist today believes in the A grade of memorization learning is more valuable than commonsense
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper,Cambridge far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
Cambridge Math Dept
Alan Baker
Bela Bollobas
Darwin Smith
John Coates
Timothy Gowers
Peter Johnstone
Imre Leader
Gabriel Paternain
> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber_
> > George F. Smoot
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 5, 2022, 4:26:38 PM9/5/22
to
MitchR on CERN, Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London,CERN & Cambridge Harry Cliff ever going to grow up about particle physics? By confirming real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law? CERN's Paula Alvarez Cartelle,Ben Allanach,Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel, Gino Isidori, Gudrun Hiller, Frank Kruger, physicists with no logical brain to be in physics. Too stupid to ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron? The muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is Dirac's magnetic monopole? When you have Harry Cliff absent of logical intelligence you just have more of the same b.s. of henpecking a monterously dumb theory of Standard Model that only quacks like Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London follow and chip away around the edges with their mindless "new force" and their mindless Standard Model with mindless quarks.
>
Re: Dan Christensen shits in face James Peebles, Donna Strickland, Michel Mayor with their mindless electron of 0.5MeV, proton 938MeV when in truth muon is the electron inside a 840MeV proton doing the Faraday law
mitchr...@gmail.com
test
Xi loves Russia for stealing Outer Manchuria Xi hates USA for making China rich Xi will love Russia
by Clutterfreak Jul 1, 2022, 1:09 PM
Clutterfreak was that a CERN test run by Texas A&M physics dept who have not yet unplugged you from sci.physics for reasons of spam spam spam???
Texas A&M physics dept
> Artem Abanov, Tom Adair, Girish Agarwal, Glenn Agnolet, Alexey Akimov, Roland Allen, Meigan Aronson, Bill Bassichis, Katrin Becker, Melanie Becker, Alexey Belyanin, Siu Ah Chin, Gregory Christian, Darren DePoy, Steven Dierker, Nelson Duller, Bhaskar Dutta, Ricardo Eusebi, Alexander Finkelstein, Lewis Ford, Rainer Fries, Ed Fry, Carl Gagliardi, John Hardy, Philip Hemmer, Dudley Herschbach, Jeremy Holt, Teruki Kamon, Helmut G. Katzgraber, Robert Kennicutt, Che-Ming Ko, Olga Kocharovskaya, Vitaly Kocharovsky, Jaan Laane, David Lee, Igor Lyuksyutov, Lucas Macri, Rupak Mahapatra, Jennifer Marshall, John Mason, Peter McIntyre, Dan Melconian, Saskia Miodszewski, Nader Mirabolfathi, Dimitri Nanopoulos, Donald Naugle, Casey Papovich, Valery Pokrovsky, Christopher Pope, Ralf Rapp, Grigory Rogachev, Joe Ross, Alexei Safonov, Wayne Saslow, Hans Schuessler, Marlan Scully, Egin Sezgin, Alexei Sokolov, Louis Strigari, Nicholas Suntzeff, Winfried Teizer, David Toback, Kim-Vy Tran, Bob Tribble, Jonelle Walsh, Lifan Wang, Robert Webb, Michael Weimer, George Welch, Wenhao Wu, Vladislav Yakovlev, Ping Yang, Dave Youngblood, Aleksei Zheltikov, M. Suhail Zubairy,
>
Re: Dan Christensen shits in face James Peebles, Donna Strickland, Michel Mayor with their mindless electron of 0.5MeV, proton 938MeV when in truth muon is the electron inside a 840MeV proton doing the Faraday law
mitchr...@gmail.com
test
Xi loves Russia for stealing Outer Manchuria Xi hates USA for making China rich Xi will love Russia
by Clutterfreak Jul 1, 2022, 1:09 PM
Clutterfreak was that a CERN test run by Texas A&M physics dept who have not yet unplugged you from sci.physics for reasons of spam spam spam???
Texas A&M physics dept
> Artem Abanov, Tom Adair, Girish Agarwal, Glenn Agnolet, Alexey Akimov, Roland Allen, Meigan Aronson, Bill Bassichis, Katrin Becker, Melanie Becker, Alexey Belyanin, Siu Ah Chin, Gregory Christian, Darren DePoy, Steven Dierker, Nelson Duller, Bhaskar Dutta, Ricardo Eusebi, Alexander Finkelstein, Lewis Ford, Rainer Fries, Ed Fry, Carl Gagliardi, John Hardy, Philip Hemmer, Dudley Herschbach, Jeremy Holt, Teruki Kamon, Helmut G. Katzgraber, Robert Kennicutt, Che-Ming Ko, Olga Kocharovskaya, Vitaly Kocharovsky, Jaan Laane, David Lee, Igor Lyuksyutov, Lucas Macri, Rupak Mahapatra, Jennifer Marshall, John Mason, Peter McIntyre, Dan Melconian, Saskia Miodszewski, Nader Mirabolfathi, Dimitri Nanopoulos, Donald Naugle, Casey Papovich, Valery Pokrovsky, Christopher Pope, Ralf Rapp, Grigory Rogachev, Joe Ross, Alexei Safonov, Wayne Saslow, Hans Schuessler, Marlan Scully, Egin Sezgin, Alexei Sokolov, Louis Strigari, Nicholas Suntzeff, Winfried Teizer, David Toback, Kim-Vy Tran, Bob Tribble, Jonelle Walsh, Lifan Wang, Robert Webb, Michael Weimer, George Welch, Wenhao Wu, Vladislav Yakovlev, Ping Yang, Dave Youngblood, Aleksei Zheltikov, M. Suhail Zubairy,
Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 15, 2022, 3:08:10 PM9/15/22
to
Juan Rojo, Ramona Vogt, Wally Melnitchouk, C.-P. Yuan, Tim Hobbs,CERN, Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London,CERN & Cambridge Harry Cliff ever going to grow up about particle physics? By confirming real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law? CERN's Paula Alvarez Cartelle,Ben Allanach,Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel, Gino Isidori, Gudrun Hiller, Frank Kruger, physicists with no logical brain to be in physics. Too stupid to ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron? The muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is Dirac's magnetic monopole? When you have Harry Cliff absent of logical intelligence you just have more of the same b.s. of henpecking a monterously dumb theory of Standard Model that only quacks like Harry Cliff, Mitesh Patel Imperial College London follow and chip away around the edges with their mindless "new force" and their mindless Standard Model with mindless quarks.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages