IN 2003, ARINDAM BANERJEE BROUGHT SHAME TO OUTLOOK MAGAZINE
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
the article follows the comments:
Comments:
While amateur theorists can, perhaps, be excused for such utter non-
sense, a major publication like Outlook should refrain from
publicising work that has not been presented to and been reviewed in
an appropriate expert forum. Pushing ones idea in Usenet groups does
not constitute such review.
Sunil
New Delhi, India
Jul 29, 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The article is good, but its really very hard to deny newtons first
law of motion just on the basis of the facts given in the article.
Mr. Banerjee is talking about the Pseudo Force that exists.......due
to centrifugal forces. Unfortunately his perpetual motion machine is
just an assumption and not, we cannot use Internal Energy the way Mr.
Arndam mentioned in this article.
I would like outlook to verify the validity of an particular concept
and then publish it.
Vishal
Mumbai, India
Dec 27, 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dynamics
Newt Is Old Hat
An Indian researcher challenges the First Law of Motion and unveils a
blueprint for perpetual motion machines
By Arindam Banerjee
Outlook Magazine
July 14, 2003
"What are you up to this time?" a friend asked me enthusiastically.
He was referring to the recent articles in newspapers announcing that
an Indian had challenged Newton's First Law of Motion. I explained my
ideas to him as best I could, dwelling on the issue that if my
mathematical derivation for unlimited energy -- and the thought
structure underlying it -- had been published two centuries ago, the
history of the world could have been quite different. If my theories
are proved right, with experiment, we could have unlimited energy
without needing to burn fossil fuel or radioactivity, and travel to
the stars, within 10-50 years.
I had first presented them to the world via the Usenet in January
2000, and had published my book To the Stars! on our 'adda' family
website in September 2000. To my great relief, no one ever accused me
of lack of originality! Lively exchanges with those interested -- all
around the world -- led to no conclusion about the correctness of my
ideas, save that further work was required to prove them. I agreed
heartily. I was, however, truly on my own. At that stage (around May
2001), my parents came for a visit and my father was keenly
appreciative of my work, understanding its potential. He undertook to
give my ideas publicity. Personally, I was hesitant to approach the
media before doing the proper experiments but my father pointed out
that as things were, I could never realise the resources to prove my
ideas conclusively one way or the other. I realised his success when
phone calls came from unknown people, congratulating me.
"Whatever led you to start thinking this way?," was the first
question. The heavenly bodies, of course! How could we get there?
Conventional ideas in physics force us upon this planet, forever.
Biochemist-turned-science fiction writer Isaac Asimov deemed it so --
it is impossible to construct a rocket ship to the stars (the fuel
tank would have to be much larger than the earth!). Further,
Einstein's assumptions underlying his Special Theory of Relativity,
which gave the world the famous equation e=mc2, forbade it -- the
mass of any body approaching the speed of light would become near-
infinite, and thus incapable of further acceleration.
That seemed unfair to me. Why should the stars exist only to
tantalise us? There had to be a way to go there. Why couldn't we? Any
number of science fiction movies and novels showed flying saucers.
Our own Ramayana describes the vimaan, so the concept of pollution-
less travel without rockets is certainly there in the public's
imagination. So, why was there never any serious effort made to
actually make or even theorise about the possible technology of
vimaans?
Newton's first law of motion (a body stays at rest or travels at a
constant speed in a straight line with respect to an initial
reference unless affected by an external force) does not support the
existence of vimaans, as vimaans can accelerate without external
force. So its functioning cannot but disprove the First Law -- which
in turn revises many others dear to physicists. Newton's third law of
motion (to every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction)
seems to make any internal activity ultimately futile. For, any force
generated completely within a body (internal force, let us say) has
an equal and opposite counterpart.
Thus, overall, there will be cancellation of forces and the body
simply cannot move, unless an external force is applied. So, no
object can move with internal force -- hence, vimaans or flying
saucers can reside solely within the imagination. Let us assume, for
argument's sake, that Newton's First Law is wrong -- that is, a body
can move using its internal force, generated by expenditure of its
internal energy, and clever engineering processes. Then the
consequences become very interesting. If the body increases its
velocity 'v' as a result of an internally induced acceleration 'a'
over a time period 't', then no matter what its initial velocity
(with respect to any initial reference), its final speed will be that
initial velocity plus 'v'.
Thus, if v=20 km/hr, the same amount of internal energy has to be
spent to raise the speed from say 100 km/hr to 120 km/hr, as to raise
the speed from 1,000 km/hr to 1020 km/hr.
Consider a body on a frictionless surface. You are in a vehicle
beside it, and you want to move the body at the same speed as your
vehicle. You give a push, and the body accelerates till it reaches
say 10 km/hr and then keeps on sliding. You speed your vehicle to 10
km/hr, and then give the body a push using the same force as earlier.
The body then reaches 20 km/hr and you speed up your vehicle
correspondingly for the next push.
So, with the same expenditure of energy every time, you can push the
body to as high a speed as you can reach with your vehicle. The
forces exerted here were external to the body, but they could have
been internal and generated by internal energy, by our assumption of
Newton's first law being wrong.
Let the percentage of internal energy 'E' converted to kinetic energy
be 'k' (k is less than 1), so kE = 0.5mvv, where 'm' is the mass of
the body and 'v' the increase in speed over time 't'. In time, T,
where T = Nt, the internal energy required to speed the mass to the
speed Nv will be EN, while the kinetic energy of the body, with
reference to the initial reference (where v was 0) will be
0.5m(Nv)(Nv). Now EN = 0.5mvvN/k, so the maximum extra free energy,
with reference to the initial reference, that can be obtained will be
0.5mvvN (N - 1/k). Note that N can be as high as design
considerations will permit. Let some engineering device convert as
much of the body's kinetic energy as possible to, say, electrical
energy, and then use a fraction for its effective internal energy.
The balance electrical energy is up for consumption.
We thus have a generator that produces power indefinitely without
needing any external source. This apparently breaks the law of
conservation of energy, but actually reduces it to a special case,
applicable where "velocity addition" effects as described earlier do
not occur. When such a generator is used to drive a vehicle using
internal force, we have a spaceship to the stars. (And an explanation
for the internal energy naturally emitted by the stars, and
artificially from N-bombs?) A constant acceleration of g, or nearly
10 m/sec/sec, would let it reach light speed in a year, twice light
speed in two years.
After that, it would turn around to face the earth, and then keep on
"accelerating" towards the earth, effectively decelerating towards
the star. So it looks like a return trip could take 10 years, using
purely Newtonian mechanics, and ignoring any possible consequences of
Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. In any case, such a vehicle
could go on land, on sea, in water, in air, as well as space. Its
engine could give energy anywhere, and thus, truly open the universe
to mankind.
That's all very well, a physicist would say, but what about Newton's
first law of motion? Let's see how we can shake it up, before we find
ways to break it. Consider a closed box in outer space. An
electrically powered robot starts accelerating from one end till it
reaches around the middle of the box, then it decelerates to a stop
at the other end of it. As it accelerates, it pushes the box in a
direction opposite to its travel, and so the box also accelerates.
When the robot decelerates, the box also decelerates, and comes to a
stop. To an external observer, the box has certainly moved without
any external force, and so Newton's First Law has at least been
shaken. If the robot had continued to accelerate and banged against
the other side, that impact would have brought the box to a sudden
stop. If it had gone straight through, the box would keep on moving,
behaving like a rocket expelling mass.
Suppose through some engineering means, we make the robot just about
to hit the rear side of the box transfer most of its kinetic energy
to another robot stationed at the rear side. The second robot thus
moves with the same velocity along the box and hits the front side,
thereby transferring its kinetic energy to the whole box, making it
attain a higher velocity. This may look impossible, but let us not
forget that unlike force, energy is a scalar quantity with no sense
of direction, and can change its form.
In my book, To the Stars!, I have envisioned the above approaches in
detail, using currents in electromagnets to accelerate a mass, and a
hydraulic system to transfer the energy of the mass, from one to the
other going in the opposite direction. Probably a simpler method,
using two balanced masses connected rigidly, and involving "energy
reversal" with angular momentum, may be found more suitable.
I believe there is a pressing need for experimentation in this vital
area. We should not take things for granted, blindly following the
accepted laws of physics and conclude from such ancient theory alone
that all internal activity in a closed space must necessarily
dissipate into heat, as opposed to overall motion. The fate of
mankind, and the health of this world, depends upon the favourable
outcome of such experiments.
(The author, an IIT alumnus [IIT degree obtained by fraud according
to his own confession. - JM], worked with Bharat Electronics,
Ghaziabad, for 11 years, moved to Telstra Research Labs, Melbourne,
in 1989. He can be contacted on e-mail . This is an abridged version,
full text...)
More at:
http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?220728#comments
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
hari....@indero.com
person of the subject paid him some attention. That person is a real
indian and jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. struggles to find any respect
among them because his indian web image is completely fake.
When the person came looking for help he thought the image was valid and
sought some help for a project in india.
Quickly he learned that jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. was not an indian
but an american pretending to be one and could not provide anything
about india.
Jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. turned on him like a mad dog and has been
stalking him since. He even went so low as to attack his wife.
Jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. continues to show his true character and
the "high" level of enlightenment he has achieved by his school yard
bully antics.
No real indian accepts him for his claims, some allow jay stevens,aka
dr. jai etc. to proceed because he is a useful fool that posts some
radical cut and paste articles they agree with.
Behind his back they laugh at him and wonder how this fool of jay
stevens,aka dr. jai etc. can stand to look at himself in the mirror.
Arindam Banerjee
containing the article when I was in India, but then it has somehow
vanished, the way such things happen! Dear mahabundurr, what joy!
Great, great.
My theoretical work (given below) has been proved beyond a shadow of doubt
by one young Mr Schroeder working in Texas Uni on a US DoD grant, in the
field of reaction of rail guns.
It won't take up anyone much effort to google this subject, and then find
out that the rail gun provides no reaction. This is the sum of his work,
published and carefully vetted by the profs.
For me, this caused great joy, for this is the direct proof of my theory,
and the resulting manufacture of Internal Force Engines. All that is the
first section of my book "The Principles of Motion" which continues in the
vein of Sir Isaac Newton. It explains the nature of explosion, in the
second section - how the lighting of a match, the power of nukes, the energy
from the sun, are all related to the equation I derived, in the article
below. Had Sir Isaac Newton been alive today, he would have written
something like that - certainly, he would have much appreciated my work.
Anyway, looks like since there is renewed interest, I should at least put on
Internet my ebook "To the Stars!".
Hari, if you say so I will do so. As a Catholic, you may be interested
about certain theological issues involved. In 2008, I was in Adelaide after
getting a spiritual boost by visting Uluru, Coober Pedy, and travelling
through the vastness in the Ghan. I had a spiritual experience in Mary
Mackillop Church, from the marvellous artwork showing Christ on the cross.
Suddenly the whole meaning of Christianity became clear to me. I had by
that time, given up on my new physics - the indifference and insults from
the Abominable Garg had weighed me down. But after this experience, I got a
new life. I googled for the topic "reaction form rail-gun" and lo - what a
miracle! The work I wanted to do, would have done if opportunity permitted,
had already been done! Amazing! No wonder they have made Our Mary a saint.
Cheers to all, and by the way, jBm, I have changed the topic of the post
suitably. Two negatives (you and the topic) together have made a positive.
What fun!
Arindam Banerjee
<use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20100209LI2h7MQ1zCCZ9L3I47Mhhmn@F2E7I...
harmony
but that too most often does not work, and then commies must resort to
violence.
so, when is arindam bannerjee starting to throw rocks?
<use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20100209LI2h7MQ1zCCZ9L3I47Mhhmn@F2E7I...
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
heaps of rocks and gravel dotted the sides of the long road between
institute buildings and the hostels. Some miscreants hid behind those
mounds and threw stones at the multitude of students hurrying to
class in the morning or back to the dorms at the end of the day.
Arindam has publicly admitted cutting classes so it indeed likely
that he was one of the rock throwers, envious of those of us who
actually studied and acquired an education.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
In article <4b73051b$0$12440$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net>,
"harmony" <a...@hotmail.com> posted:
>
> incessant propaganda is an old commie routine.
> but that too most often does not work, and then commies must resort to
> violence.
> so, when is arindam bannerjee starting to throw rocks?
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
Arindam Banerjee
Great publicity stunt!
Yay for bundurrs! They can be of some use, after all.
Not that they want to be, of course, but engineers make use of
anything around.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee.