Part 2, AP's 159th book of science// Meteorology-- Weather -- described and explained totally as electricity and magnetism Archimedes Plutonium Alright, I finished my 158th book of Solving Darwin's Mystery of the explosion in Flowering plants in..

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Part 2, AP's 159th book of science// Meteorology-- Weather -- described and explained totally as electricity and magnetism Archimedes Plutonium

Alright, I finished my 158th book of Solving Darwin's Mystery of the explosion in Flowering plants in Cretaceous. Now I can focus full attention on Weather, Meteorology.

I find it funny and somewhat annoying that the name Weather is attached with Meteor in Meteorology. I can see the ancient connection of meteors in the sky and the science of atmosphere study, but rather, I would think a science conference should get together in the future and rename their science to be Weatherology instead of Meteorology. And save the word meteorology for the science that studies meteors.

I am spurred on to writing this book for Weatherology needs to be converted all into the laws of electricity and magnetism. Not a simple feat to be sure, for weather is a complex phenomenon.

For AP believes in the primal axiom of all of physics-- All is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism.

And perhaps I am fated to write this book just about now, at the end of 2021, for I have to write the Sophomore College year TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS which is half about thermodynamics. And writing this weather book well prepares me for writing the thermodynamics in TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS.

And I write this at a moment in time in my life when I battle 3 years of drought in summers of 2012, 2020, and 2021. And just yesterday in the news was of British Columbia, BC, Canada receiving enormous rainfall that caused floods and where farmers were trying to save their cattle from drowning. Which is a topic dear to me in weather-- a zero sum game --- because BC, had a horrible heat dome of 2021 while I had in South Dakota a horrible drought. That I had experienced in 2012 drought a enormous rainfall after the horrible drought summer, so much rain but way too late in the season to help the plants for they had already gone dormant. So this idea and concept of rainfall being somewhat a Zero Sum Game. That if one place gets overly too much while you get far too little rain elsewhere, that the total rainfall on Earth is a zero sum game. The misery of the 2021 drought for me was to here other places in the world get flash flooding of too much rain, while I in Plutonium Atom National Park receives next to zero rain.

But the purpose of this book is not to make just observations and hypotheses but to translate all of weather science into electricity and magnetism. To get away from expressions of cold front and heat dome and other thermodynamics. To explain weather purely in electric and magnetic field concepts. To make weather talk be like talking about a electric circuit.

And I shall use the 6 laws of AP- EM Equations. I start with Wind, then move on to Rain. I may have to write the Rain chapter years later for this is difficult science.

And I shall use Modelling to find the answers.

Now Maxwell in the 1860s used modelling to derive his-- what is now known as the Maxwell Equations. Trouble was, that Maxwell made a mistake in modelling, for he should not have used modelling at all. Maxwell should have used a concept that I discovered of "Most Perfect Entity".

AP discovered the Unification of the 4 Forces of Physics by using Most-Perfect-Entity. For to unify the forces we look for the most perfect of the 4 forces then unify the other 3 less perfect around the most perfect. Of course EM force is the most perfect force for it has the most perfect particle or wave-- light wave.

And AP discovered the true laws of EM theory, for the Maxwell Equations are all flawed or missing terms and asymmetrical, and by using again the "Most Perfect Entity" which in case of the EM theory is the Ohm's law. So if Maxwell had been a bit smarter, although he certainly was a magnamous genius, a towering figure in physics even today with his flawed equations. If Maxwell had used the principle of "Most Perfect Entity" rather than his "Modelling" that the Maxwell Equations would have been true and correct, provided that Maxwell had picked Ohm's law above that of Coulomb or Faraday or Ampere laws or any other law in EM theory.

So what AP did in the past decade was use this principle of "Most Perfect Entity" in order to rescue the real true EM laws. And that the New Ohm's Law was not V= iR, voltage equals current times resistance, but rather that V = CBE, voltage equals quantity of current times magnetic field times electric field.

So when AP places New Ohm's law as the foundation of all of EM theory and takes the derivative of each of V, C, B, E in turn, we end up with all the 4 differential laws of EM theory, then add on the two other laws for a complete set of 6 EM laws that comprise all of EM theory. The true laws of EM theory, for Maxwell Equations of 1860s misses many laws and terms of the true EM equations.

However, now, AP wants to translate all of Weatherology into the EM theory of physics, and the best way I can proceed is to make Modelling of concepts. To model the Wind. To model Rain. Can I take guidance and instruction from Maxwell in his modelling of 1860? I think I can, and I should review Maxwell modelling. For I bet that Maxwell modelling is more apt in unlocking Weather, than Maxwell's modelling was in unlocking the laws of EM theory.

So I am doing for Weather in using modelling what Maxwell tried to do for deriving the laws of EM theory in 1860 and was really not successful, although Maxwell pointed the way forward.

And AP has to admit here, this science and physics endeavor is one of AP's most hard and difficult task. But AP can never shrug or back away from any science challenge. It is just not in the cards of fate.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, let us get started on this odyssey, terribly difficult one.

We have to start with a victory from the beginning. And that victory is the Jet Stream. So we look at the Lines of Force of Earth's magnetic field that emanate out of the North Pole and then recede back into Earth at the South Pole.

In several of my books I claimed the 2nd law of thermodynamics was none other than the Right-Hand-Rule in Faraday or in Ampere law.

So, use your right-hand and curl your four fingers as emitting out of the North Pole and look to see where your thumb points in what direction? Your thumb points West to East, and that is exactly the direction of the Jet Stream.

Now, go to the South Pole and those magnetic lines of force are receding back into Earth, and curl your fingers to recede back into Earth and notice where your thumb direction points to. It points from West to East, and so, here again we have the Jet Stream at the South Pole.

So we have the 2nd law of thermodynamics as merely the Right Hand Rule of Faraday and Ampere law.

Now we go to the challenging difficult part of sorting out:
a) cold air mass compared to warm air mass
b) high pressure air mass versus low pressure air mass

Old Meteorology treated these two as if they are different entities for whatever situation would give a answer to their query.

In true Weather we need to be able to use these concepts.

A) Voltage, current, magnetic field, electric field
B) O2 gas, N2 gas, H2O gas

Now can we have Weather if no atmosphere exists? Yes we can actually have weather without molecules or atoms making up air. For the entire Solar System has a solar wind of radiation. So there is no need to have air molecules to have weather.

Errors of Old Meteorology

1) They never really distinguished between cold front warm front and low pressure and high pressure. They just evoked one or the other as needed to end the conversation.

2) They never utilized the fact that air is 70% nitrogen, 22% oxygen, and a capacity to hold H2O molecules.


What New Weatherology must do is connect the terms of cold front, warm front, low pressure, high pressure with terms of Voltage, current, magnetic field, electric field.

So a huge mistake in Old Meteorology with their cold mass, warm mass, low pressure, high pressure, is that Old Meteorology can have a cold mass that is low pressure or is high pressure and a warm mass that is high pressure or is low pressure whenever they discuss weather.

What true Weather aims to do is define these concepts as being voltage, current, magnetic field, electric field. So that there is no longer this horrible mistaken mix up of a cold front being either low pressure or high pressure, whichever ends the discussion so everyone can go grab a hot chocolate and Danish roll.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now in my last published book 158th, about Darwin's Mystery, the question was raised about the emanation of the Magnetic Lines of Force from the North Pole as being stronger than the magnetic lines of force of the South Pole. Is the magnetic field at North Pole stronger than the magnetic field at South Pole.

The reason this question comes up is because Pangaea for the most part was directly over the South Pole yet the North Pole stayed free and clear of landmasses in continental drift. Suggesting to AP, that the force strength of the North Pole magnetic field is stronger than the South Pole magnetic field.

Now an easy way of measuring the force strength is simply look at the Jet Stream in North hemisphere and compare to South hemisphere.

People reading my thoughts on Weatherology seldom keep in mind that electricity and magnetism is 10^38 stronger of a force than is the force of gravity. People are accustomed to think in terms of gravity force, not EM force as being 10^38 stronger. So we need just a tiny tiny bit of EM force to overpower gravity. And it is gravity that causes continents to conglomerate into Pangaea.

Perhaps throughout the entire history of Earth from Precambrian to present day, there has never been a continent land mass over the North Pole. If true, would be answered by this claim that the force field strength of North Pole is the greatest field strength of magnetism upon Earth.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So let us look at the huge and awful and horrible mistake of Old Meteorology over their confusion of what is cold front, warm front, low pressure, high pressure.

And no better of a website than this gov website from Caltech that highlights the huge error of Old Meteorology.

--- quoting NOAA, dot gov SciJinks

On Earth there are four main jet streams: two polar jet streams and two subtropical jet streams. They form in the atmosphere where warm air masses meet cool air masses. Credit: NOAA/JPL-Caltech
What Causes Jet Streams?
Jet streams form when warm air masses meet cold air masses in the atmosphere.

The Sun doesn’t heat the whole Earth evenly. That’s why areas near the equator are hot and areas near the poles are cold.
So when Earth’s warmer air masses meet cooler air masses, the warmer air rises up higher in the atmosphere while cooler air sinks down to replace the warm air. This movement creates an air current, or wind. A jet stream is a type of air current that forms high in the atmosphere.

The fast-moving air currents in a jet stream can transport weather systems across the United States, affecting temperature and precipitation. However, if a weather system is far away from a jet stream, it might stay in one place, causing heat waves or floods.
Earth’s four primary jet streams only travel from west to east. Jet streams typically move storms and other weather systems from west to east. However, jet streams can move in different ways, creating bulges of winds to the north and south.

How Does the Jet Stream Help Us Predict the Weather?
Weather satellites, such as the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites-R Series (GOES-R), use infrared radiation to detect water vapor in the atmosphere. With this technology, meteorologists can detect the location of the jet streams.
--- end quote ---

[Archimedes Plutonium]

The trouble with Old Meteorology is that their concepts are not electricity and magnetism concepts of how weather works. Old Meteorology based their explanations on thermodynamics of hot and cold and they basically had 4 concepts of cold front, hot front, low pressure and high pressure. And they then mixed and matched those 4 to explain weather when basically they had just 2 concepts for a cold mass is low pressure and a hot mass is high pressure. So Old Meteorology had only 2 concepts. Electromagnetic theory has 4 concepts of voltage, quantity of current, magnetic field and electric field. This is where Meteorology needs and gets 4 concepts to explain weather. So instead of just two concepts in Old Meteorology of cold front and hot front, we have 4 concepts to reckon with in new true Weatherology.

AP insists that after this book is published that there be a conference to change the name of weather science to be Weatherology. And reserve the name meteorology for the science that studies meteors and meteorites. Scientists should never be lazy in changing their names when outdated, and this laziness reflects bad on all science communities, that no-one in science has the brain to change for the better.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

> > On Earth there are four main jet streams: two polar jet streams and two subtropical jet streams. They form in the atmosphere where warm air masses meet cool air masses. Credit: NOAA/JPL-Caltech
> > What Causes Jet Streams?
> > Jet streams form when warm air masses meet cold air masses in the atmosphere.
> >
> > The Sun doesn’t heat the whole Earth evenly. That’s why areas near the equator are hot and areas near the poles are cold.
> > So when Earth’s warmer air masses meet cooler air masses, the warmer air rises up higher in the atmosphere while cooler air sinks down to replace the warm air. This movement creates an air current, or wind. A jet stream is a type of air current that forms high in the atmosphere.
> >

So this explanation is bad to worse. In 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat moves from hot to cold. In the above we have cold air moving to replace warm air.

AP starts out great in explanation in that the Jet Stream follows the right hand rule of Faraday law in the direction of Jet Stream is west to east, both north and south poles as we use the magnetic field lines of force.

Now that raises the question of whether north pole is always a stronger magnetic field than south pole because continental drift never had a land mass over the north pole, only the south pole. Raises the question if on Jupiter the north pole has a stronger magnetic field than south pole. If memory is correct, the Auroras on Jupiter were much stronger on north pole, and Jupiter's south pole aurora was very much weaker.

So I suspect that the emission of magnetic field is stronger in energy than the receding of magnetic field.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I need to do some modeling for what is not mentioned in Old Meteorology is the composition of atmosphere and how it affects weather.

So that we have four major molecules.

N2 comprising 78%
O2 comprising 21%
And all other gases in the 1% including H2O and CO2.

O2 or dioxygen is a covalent bond.

N2 is dinitrogen and is also covalent bond.

But H2O is a polar bond molecule with much electrical reaction. By polar, I mean it has free magnetic monopoles.

Now O and N atoms like to bond with other atoms when given a chance such as N with hydrogen or O with nitrogen.

So the gases are a complex mixture of the atmosphere.

And we can say the heaviest of the gases listed are CO2 next being O2 and then N2 and finally water is the lightest H2O.

This is nice for plants need CO2 near the ground and animals need O2 near the ground but when we get high up in altitude we run low on O2 and have to wear a oxygen tank.

So in the upper atmosphere we have high concentration of H2O and we see them as clouds. And H2O is the most electrical of these gas molecules.

Now we ask the question of how mixed up are these gases to make the atmosphere? Is it a good mixture or is it somewhat layered as per mass of molecules? For this is important in wind creation and of course rainfall.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Modeling:

Web site states a typical lightning bolt is 1*10^9 Volts and 30,000 amps while household current is 120 Volts, 15 amps.

Now the question is, in modeling, can we translate 30,000 amps into being a gigantic fan running on that current to be the wind of a region giving a wind of speed 50 km per hour. Last week we had a day of 50 km per hour.

So here I am wondering if all the lightning electricity of planet Earth were to go into formation of Wind. Are the two comparable in energy?

What I am getting at here is fundamentally all of Weather boils down to being just electricity and magnetism, and when we see forms of weather as lightning bolts or see weather as gusts of wind, that basically those are one and the same electricity.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

The other day I made huge progress in realizing the Earth Magnetic field causes the Jet Stream to go from West to East, and thus the 2nd law of thermodynamics is none other than the Right Hand Rule is in Faraday Law of EM theory.

I am on the verge of making another huge stride in progress, helped on by this book I recently bought. Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond by Andreas Keiling, Octav Marghitu, and Michael Wheatland, editors, 2018. It is a book only for professionals of this topic-field and do not recommend it otherwise.

On page 157 starts a chapter on Electrical Current Sheets.
--- quoting Electric Currents in Geospace ---
What is so different from our daily experience is that electric currents in space plasmas are carried by the entire medium rather than through conducting wires. In other words, the entire volume of plasma can act as conducting wires.
...
The solar wind interacts with the Earth's magnetic field and creates a magnetic cavity around the Earth known as the magnetosphere. This interaction creates several plasma domains around and within the magnetosphere. Some of these domains contain intense electric currents, such as the bow shock, magnetopause, and magnetotail. In particular, the magnetotail has a reservoir of energetic charged particles called the plasma sheet estimated to be 4-6 R_E thick normally. Embedded within the plasma sheet is a thinner central region called the current sheet that has a significant electric current directed mostly in the dawn-to-dusk direction. Its midplane is often referred to as the neutral sheet where the magnetic field is directed mostly sunward above it and mostly antisunward below it.
...
The neutral sheet captures a lot of attention from space researchers because it harbors very dynamic processes with occasional explosive energy releases.
--- end quoting ---

Now a major trouble with the above book is that those authors and researchers never had the true electron of atom's is the muon and the particle they thought was the electron as the 0.5MeV particle is actually Dirac's magnetic monopole. So what that does with the entire book of above, is make plasmas irrelevant. It makes the Electric Sheets exist without having plasma physics. And that of course, begs the question of the book above should start out with talking about the weather on Earth and its current sheets.

It is my hope and expectation that once AP finishes this book on Weather, having transformed, or translated all of weather into being just electricity and magnetism, it is my expectation that this book will be the frontis book of the above book I just quoted. In other words, in the future, that book Electric Currents in Geospace, is incomplete and needs this book of Weather as the first chapters.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now this is an idea I have known for some considerable time now, but have never needed to use it, nor thus, bother to state it. But now in doing Wind in Weather, I need this idea of EM theory.

If you look at the at the Faraday law as inverse to the Ampere law, the Faraday law of thrusting a magnetic field through a coil yields a electric current in that coil. And the Ampere law of a electric current in a wire yields a magnetic field around that wire.

So, well, the two laws are inverses of one another. And that provides me with a restatement.

Faraday law inverse-- given a coil and thrusting a current through the coil, not part of the coil itself, turns the coil into a magnetic field of turns.

Ampere law inverse-- given a line of force of magnetic field, creates closed loop rings of electric field around that line of force.

In other words, I am simply replacing electricity for magnetism and vice versa in those laws.

And where this helps me the most is I can then translate any situation by switching electricity for magnetism, or switching magnetism for electricity while still keeping the same geometry.

For example, a warm front air mass thrusts into a cold front air mass, producing either closed loop rings of magnetism or if I wanted closed loop rings of electric current, whichever suits me the best at the moment of explanation.

Another example, the Earth magnetic field at north pole with right hand rule gives the direction of Jet Stream. And here I can use the Jet Stream as a current flow, or if I wanted to , see it as a magnetic Line of Force, even though the Earth Magnetic Field set up that magnetic line of force.

Another example, the Earth magnetic field is seen in many pictures, but we can replace it with electric lines of force, same geometry but instead of being magnetism is now electric current flow for lines of force.

[Mostowski Collapse]

Do you always water your plants when it rains?
Why do you do that AP brain farto, why?

[Michael Moroney]

🤮 of Math and 💩 of Physics Archimedes "Village Idiot of Meckling SD"
Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:

> Kibo Parry M. graduation speech at Rensselaer Polytech. Kibo is the headers a broad outline of what you will discuss and how you destroyed sci.math and sci.physics????

Oh no! StupidPlutonium attacked me again! FAIL!!

> Alright, let us get started on this odyssey, terribly difficult one.

"Us", StupidPlutonium?

>
> We have to start with a victory from the beginning. And that victory is the Jet Stream. So we look

"We", StupidPlutonium? Do you have multiple personalities just like
McGinn? Except perhaps yours are active all at the same time, so when
you (singular) come up with yet another new crackpot idea all by your
lonesome, it's really you (plural)? All those personalities?

Do your personalities talk out loud to each other or is it almost like
telepathy, communicating mentally, since you share one diseased brain?
Do you argue with each other?

That reminds me, I should ask McGinn the same question.

> In several of my books I claimed the 2nd law of thermodynamics was none other than the Right-Hand-Rule in Faraday or in Ampere law.

Why do you still make up garbage and pretend that it's real?

>
> So, use your right-hand and curl your four fingers as emitting out of the North Pole and look to see where your thumb points in what direction? Your thumb points West to East, and that is exactly the direction of the Jet Stream.
>
> Now, go to the South Pole and those magnetic lines of force are receding back into Earth, and curl your fingers to recede back into Earth and notice where your thumb direction points to. It points from West to East, and so, here again we have the Jet Stream at the South Pole.
>
> So we have the 2nd law of thermodynamics as merely the Right Hand Rule of Faraday and Ampere law.

Do you realize that that's exactly ass-backwards? Because Earth's
magnetic pole that was in Canada and is now heading to Siberia is
actually a magnetic south pole? Why? Because the north pole of a magnet
is attracted to it, which is why a compass's north pole points north!
Those old sailors got it backwards!

<snip rest of garbage which Plutonium pretends is true>