“I can save String Theory” World's Greatest Crank, makes World’s Greatest Discovery – Who’s Laughing Now?
cjcountess
World Greatest Crank, makes World’s Greatest Discovery – Who’s
Laughing Now?
When I first started posting on these sites, and even recently, people
called me a crank. because of my theory that "c^2" geometrically,
means "c in the linear direction x c in the 90 degree angular
direction = c in circular and / or spherical motion, as a balance of
centrifugal/centripetal forces, giving rise to "Rest Mass"..
They stated that electron has no geometry and is just “point
particle”, “probability wave”, amongst other things.
Recent threads below indicate that evidence is mounting against,
“Point Particles”, “Probability waves”, “String Theory" and more in
favor of my point of view.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/f2c4f4c11bc74065?hl=en&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/954839c397c4a2f8?hl=en&scoring=d&
My theory is
1) c in linear direction
2) x c in 90 degree angular direction
3) = 90 degree arc trajectory, which if constant, creates a circle
=
“c^2” = “c x 2pi” as energy in circular and or spherical rotation, as
a result of a
balance of centrifugal / centripetal forces, and has angular momentum
of “h/2pi”, for circle, and “h/2pi/2”, for circle making two rotations
to complete one wave cycle, and is “spin1/2”. The speed of light
squared, or “c^2”, also = “G” as highest possible “L/T^2” or “v^2”,
and is “UV” cut off point on EM spectrum, where energy attains "Rest
Mass", and the "EM spectrum", is clearly revealed to be not only the
“electromagnetic”, but the “Energy/Matter”, spectrum.
This makes (c^2 = h/2pi/2 = G) on this quantum level, as attributes of
the same particle, the "electron" uniting Special and General
Relativity,
and Quantum Theory around its geometry.
Again I ask;
how many points of similarity or coincidence must a fingerprint have
before it is considered a match? How many coincidences such as pieces
of a puzzle must fit together to form a picture? All.
Energy = mc^2, h/2pi/2, spin ½, -1charge, all empirically verified,
experimental, mathematical facts, measured points of coincidence, that
fit logically seamlessly together, to form this picture, and cannot
statically be considered just coincidence in negative sense of word,
but a complete match.
(The Geometrical Interpretation of E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and/or
sphered), is fairly easy to explain and visualize.
How “String Theory’s” version of “Quantum Gravity”, can be saved if it
is put in
simplest form, which is 4 D space-time in this
manner.
1)As with Newton’s first law of motion, anything moving at constant
speed in straight line, is equivalent to being still, the constant
speed of light in straight line with momentum of “h”, can be
considered the foundation upon which all waves and rest mass is built.
It and would also be Cosmological Constant centrifugal force. This can
be represented by straight line string.
2)As with Newton’s second law that: Any deviation from constant speed
in straight line, or being at rest, is acceleration, and requires
force of “F=mv^2”.Wavy line or strings produced from this displacement
has energy “E=hf/c^2”, which we can show = “E=mc^2”, just as
“deBroglie”, with his “E=hf=mc^2”, at high end of EM spectrum, as well
as “F=mv^2”. When highest frequency is attained “E=hf=mc^2” , energy
attains “Rest Mass”, and these energy “strings” moves in circular, and
or
spherical motion.
3)As Newton’s third law states that: Every action causes an equal and
opposite reaction, for every quantum of “E=mc^2” which condenses from
pushing against the speed of light barrier, space pushes back on this
“Standing Spherical Wave”, with an equal and opposite or right angular
F=mv^2.
And “Loop Quantum Gravity theory” as well as “String Theory” can still
claim that gravity rest mass comes about because of closed loops, and
all in simple 3D or 4D counting time.
Presenting my case to Discovery Blog:
Presenting my case to Sylvester James Gates:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dsn5q6f_105cmq85bgt&hl=en
See: http://gsjournal.net/science/countess.pdf
Conrad J Countess
Sam Wormley
> “I can save String Theory”
>
But you can't test it!
> +------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
> | PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
> | DO NOT | | LIKE C J COUNTESS -- THEY DRY UP AND BLOW |
> | FEED | | AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
> | DA | | |
> | TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
> +------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | |
> `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /
cjcountess
> On 6/8/11 6:17 PM,cjcountesswrote:
Everyone, just look at what I opened the reply box to find.
Sam Wormley wrote this childish crap.
Just what are you Sam, a jealous child or what?
If you do not agree with my post just say so. You don't have to try
and sabotage or defame me.
I want everyone in the Physics community and on the internet itself to
see how you jealous infantile personality's act.
I've got all of you so called physics experts scared don't I, because
I discovered Quantum Gravity, Origin of Rest Mass, The Solution to the
Mass Gap problem, and that's worth a lot isn't it Sam?
The Noble Prize, The Millennium Prize, which I will never see but the
satisfaction of knowing that I did it is awesome.
I can save string theory.
But you can't test it!
you replied and with an exclamation mark
You are routing for me to fail Sam Wormley, but I've already
succeeded.
I am really disappointed in this Physics group, and especially you
Sam.
I thought I was in the midst of at least a fare-minded group, studying
such a noble subject.
I do not think I was wrong, I just ran into the wrong people first.
Wow! what a big disappointment you are Sam.
You need to grow up.
Oh, and about proving it, there is so much evidence and its growing
exponentially, including the recent evidence concerning electron
shape, failure of string theory, and uncertainty principle losing its
ground, all things that also proved you wrong, and I am sure it hurt
your pride.
It is just a matter of time until I am fully vindicated, and you know
it, and can't stand it because it proved you and your group wrong.
Everyone listen up!!
Sam Wormley and his crew deal in sabotage and discrediting by lies,
deception, and defaming.
Watch him very closely, he's a very sore and sour loser.
Conrad J Countess
Sam Wormley
> Oh, and about proving it, there is so much evidence and its growing
> exponentially, including the recent evidence concerning electron
> shape, failure of string theory, and uncertainty principle losing its
> ground, all things that also proved you wrong, and I am sure it hurt
> your pride.
Concerning electron shape, to be precise, the
electron differs from being perfectly round by
less than 0.000000000000000000000000001 cm. To
put that in context; if an electron was the size
of the solar system, it would be out from being
perfectly round by less than the width of a human
hair.
A 10-year study has revealed that the electron is
very spherical indeed.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/05/electrons-are-near-perfect-spheres/
Raymond Yohros
And that an egg shaped electron is a very stupid
Idea
r.y
cjcountess
Sam, remember the above post, you denied “electron structure” in the
past, and I did not, and now you change your tune.
I was right and you were wrong.
It is all on “International Internet Record”, which are in danger of
being tampered with, by people like you, who don’t want the world to
know the truth.
You were all wrong about a lot of things.
Everyone, watch these internet records, “post”, because they “ARE”
being tampered with.
There is a conspiracy to hide the truth about the emerging physics ,
and Sam may just be apart of it.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
Sam, remember this message also.
You bet on losing horses man.
Maybe I'll lend you an idea.
Don't call people trolls man, it's childish and who can take you
seriously?
But I forgive you man, I forgive everybody. When you have such a
greate idea/discovery the joy overflows, and you gotta share it.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
http://science.niuz.biz/can-t426615.html
See above link which also links to this one below
http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/
"Sam", states in no uncertain terms that, he does not like me.
This is very interesting because I have done nothing to him and do not
even know
him.
One could probably learn alot delving into the personality traits of
someone
like this, who dislikes people for no apparent reason, other than that
he is jealous
of my "theory/discovery", and the fact that it reveals the limitations
of his theorys and posibly his own mind, if he choses to lock himself
in that exposed and closed world of physics, that he and his buddies
adhear so firmly and blindly to.
Ignor it, and it becomes your own parral; Embrace it, and it becomes
your own pearl.
How can anyone ignor this most "simplest", yet most "profound"
discovery, in hundreds of years of physics?
It is the "simplest" because it unifies the most diverse, previously,
seemingly, ununifiable, theorys, which are "General Relativity" and
"Quantum Theorys", among other things. It does this by showing that
the 'inverse square law", which converges around "c^2", does not lead
to "infinity", which results in unreal "Black Holes", "Big Bangs",
"infinitely small and massive point particles ", "probability waves",
that introduce "infinite uncertainty", and instead, reveals the
(Geometrical structure of c^2), which clarifys all these and
revolutionizes mathematics as well.
How can anyone in their right physical, mathematical, logical,
artistic, commonsensical, mind, ignor this revolutionary idea?
Burry your head in the sand, walk around with your fingers stuck in
your ears shouting, "I don't care, I don't care, I don't care!!"
Not only does this discovery show that "energy and matter" are equal
and interconvertable through conversion factor, "c^2", as does the
equation "E=mc^2', the geometrical interpretation gives the equation
physical form and shows exactly how "E" or energy = "m" or matter/rest
mass, through conversion factor "c^2", by enabling energy to aquire
circular and or spherical rotation, which is exactly what gives it
"gravitational rest mass', at this highest posible "v^2" or velocity
squared = "L/T^2" = "G" the gravity constant, revealing equality of
(c^2, h/2pi/2 and G) around the geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2
which is geometrical structure of "Electron".
I am definitely going to make sure that the attention of the physics
world gets trained on this, and I am more than willing and able to
handle the critisism, and debate. And the truth of this discovery will
be revealed for all to see, including whose revealing it, such as
myself, and those who are attempting to hide and distort it, and you
will have to answer to the people for it.
Are you ready for that, because I am.
This discovery is just too important to be ignored or to be stopped by
anyone .
Conrad J Countess
herbert glazier
String theory is more alive than ever. Read books by Brian Greene.You
have to see Planck stuff. You have to see the brane worlds to grasp
the whole cosmos and its trillions and trillions of universes. O Ya
branes also go with a higher dimension. Branes go well with my convex
space as it fits with the M-Theory of QM. Tricky but reality TreBert
cjcountess
I’d like to see your theory.
I personally think that string theory only needs the 3 or 4 dimensions
in which we are known to exist in order to be in simplest and sensible
form, least it diverges from making any truly logical sense at all.
Again, my (Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and/or
sphered), can be considered analogous to a simple string theory in 3
or 4 D as such
1)The constant speed of light in straight line, which is equal to
being still, and also a centrifugal force, according to Newton’s first
law of motion can be considered analogous to a straight line string as
foundation upon which waves and rest mass is built and equal to “c” =
“h” as constant equilibrium state of a spring equal to “K” in
equation “PE = ½ Kx^2”, or constant mass equal to “M” in equation
“F=mv^2” = “Mm/r^2”, the “½ “, is optional and these universal inverse
square laws are interchangeable with change of symbols.
2)The angular speed of light, which come as result of “acceleration =
inertia = gravity”, is due to displacement of string, analogous to
displacement of spring, which creates waves and varies according to
“E=hf/c^2”, and follows Newton’s second law of motion, stating that
any deviation from this constant speed in straight line or being at
rest requires force of “F=mv^2”, which also results when E=hf=mc^2
because we can show that “E=mc^2 = F=mv^2”. This results in wavy line
strings that get shorter and more particle like the higher the
frequency shorter the wavelength and moves from “E=hf/c^2” to
“E=hf=mc^2”, resulting in rest mass.
3)At “E=hf=mc^2”, waves (strings), attain “rest mass” by circular and
or spherical rotation. “E=mc^2/r = F=mv^2/r”,
and space pushes back on these rotating strings or waves with a
quantum of “F=mv^2” for every “E=mc^2”, also in line with “Newton’s
third law of motion”, for every action there is equal and opposite
reaction.
So there you have your string theory in its simplest form of 3 or 4D
cjcountess
internet users, is designed to harass, discredit, deter, and do
serious harm to others in a very subtle, underhanded, vial, and
vicious way.
This should probably be investigated.
While they are putting all their effort into harming others, because
they have no constructive ideas to contribute, I’ll be presenting
evidence so clear that it speaks for itself, hopefully louder than any
false claims, whose credibility is disguised by degrees and titles.
Did you see “Sam Wormley’s” website?
He presents himself as a well rounded, tolerant, and fair man, as well
as an educator.
His diverse interest makes him interesting and as such I would have
liked to communicated with him on various topics of shared interest if
we had not gotten off on a bad start.
Oh well, religion, politics, physics, can’t we just agree to disagree?
Quantum gravity in 3 Steps:
Using the simplest, clearest, explanation, possible
1) “c” in the linear direction
2) x “c” in the 90 degree angular direction,
3) = c^2 as a balance of centrifugal/centripetal forces of rotating
energy, enabling “rest mass"
where (E=mc^2 = F=mv^2), ( c^2 = G = h/2pi/2)
And you can take that to the bank.
Conrad J Countess